Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your UK ISA in France After Brexit: Why the Tax-Free Wrapper Fails, How Interest, Dividends and Gains Are Taxed, and How to Declare and Challenge the Bill

You opened an ISA in Britain, watched it grow free of UK tax for years, then moved to France — and assumed the tax-free status travelled with you. It does not. The London flats, the Dordogne farmhouses and the Paris studios of thousands of British residents hold the same quiet problem: a Cash ISA paying interest, or a Stocks and Shares ISA paying dividends and sitting on gains, that is invisible to HMRC but fully visible to the French tax administration. France does not recognise the ISA wrapper. From the day you become French tax-resident, the interest, dividends and gains inside it are taxed in France under the ordinary rules for investment income, with a flat-rate income-tax charge, social levies on top, a yearly declaration duty for every foreign account, and a 1,500 euro fine per undeclared account. This guide explains, with the exact statutory texts and recent court rulings, when a British mover becomes French tax-resident, why the ISA loses its shield, how each type of return is taxed and credited under the Franco-British treaty framework, how to declare the accounts properly — and how to challenge a reassessment that goes too far. If your only question is bank-account interest and the yearly 3916 form, our companion guide to UK savings, ISA accounts and the 3916 declaration answers it directly; this guide goes further, covering the whole ISA picture — Cash-ISA interest, share dividends, fund gains, the 12.8 percent charge with 17.2 percent social levies, the treaty credit and the full challenge route.

I. You Live in France Now, So France Taxes Everything: When a British Newcomer Becomes French Tax-Resident and Why the ISA Wrapper Fails

A. Have I Become French Tax-Resident? The Home, Stay and Economic-Centre Tests That Catch British Movers

The starting point is brutal in its simplicity. Article 4 A of the French Tax Code provides: “Les personnes qui ont en France leur domicile fiscal sont passibles de l’impôt sur le revenu en raison de l’ensemble de leurs revenus.” If your tax home — your domicile fiscal, the French concept of tax residence — is in France, you are liable to French income tax on the whole of your income, wherever in the world it arises. Your ISA interest earned in Leeds, your dividends from London-listed shares, the gain on funds held in Manchester: all of it falls inside the French tax net from the moment France counts you as resident. Only taxpayers whose tax home is outside France are taxed merely on their French-source income. There is no halfway house, no grace year in the statute, and no exemption for savings built up before the move.

Whether your tax home is in France is decided by Article 4 B of the Tax Code, which sets three alternative tests: “Sont considérées comme ayant leur domicile fiscal en France au sens de l’article 4 A : a. Les personnes qui ont en France leur foyer ou le lieu de leur séjour principal” — persons who have their household home or their main place of stay in France — alongside those who carry on a professional activity in France and those who have the centre of their economic interests there. Meeting any one of the three is enough. For most British movers, the first test decides everything: if your family home is the house in the Luberon or the flat in the 11th arrondissement, where you habitually live, sleep, receive post and organise your private life, you are French tax-resident even if you still work remotely for a London employer, even if you spend weeks back in Britain, and even if you consider yourself British first. The professional-activity and economic-centre tests then act as safety nets for the administration: a Briton who keeps a pied-à-terre in London but works full-time from Lyon, or whose investments, rental income and business interests are managed from France, can be caught by the second or third test as well.

The courts give the word foyer — household home — a concrete, human meaning that surprises many newcomers. In a 2023 ruling on a taxpayer who claimed his home was in Israel, the Paris administrative court of appeal recalled the definition that governs single taxpayers: Administrative Court of Appeal of Paris, 20 October 2023, No 22PA00816 holds that “le foyer d’un contribuable célibataire, sans charge de famille, s’entend du lieu où il habite normalement et a le centre de sa vie personnelle, sans qu’il soit tenu compte des séjours effectués temporairement ailleurs en raison des nécessités de la profession ou de circonstances exceptionnelles” — the home of a single taxpayer with no family dependants means the place where he normally lives and has the centre of his personal life, disregarding stays made temporarily elsewhere for professional needs or exceptional circumstances. The taxpayer lost: his request was rejected. For a British reader the lesson is direct. If you normally live in France and have centred your personal life there — partner, friends, doctor, gym, French mobile contract, children in a French school — trips back to Britain for work or family do not move your foyer back across the Channel. The administration looks at where you actually live your life, not at your passport, your accent or your nostalgia. Couples are examined through the household as a whole: where the family lives together normally fixes the foyer, and separate analysis applies only in genuinely split situations that the administration tests strictly.

Two practical consequences follow. First, residence can start earlier than you think: the day the family home genuinely moves to France, you enter the worldwide-taxation rule of Article 4 A, including on ISA income received after that date. Keep dated proof of the move — the removal invoice, the French lease or completion deed, school enrolment, French health cover registration — because every later argument about which year France may tax starts from that factual anchor. Second, where both countries claim you — Britain under its statutory residence test, France under Article 4 B — the Franco-British double tax treaty provides tie-breaker rules that allocate a single residence. Those rules turn on permanent home, centre of vital interests, habitual stay and nationality, in that order, and they matter most for the year of the move. Do not try to game them by counting nights with a spreadsheet while your life is plainly in France: the treaty tie-breaker, like Article 4 B, looks for the real centre of your existence, and the administration has seen every version of the night-counting argument.

One common misunderstanding should be cleared up at once. Splitting the couple — leaving a spouse in Britain while you live in France, or vice versa — does not reliably keep anyone outside French tax. Each spouse is assessed on the household facts, and the administration will examine where each person actually lives, works and holds their interests. Artificial splits constructed for tax purposes invite the very reassessments this guide later explains how to challenge, from a position of weakness. If your family situation is genuinely spread across the two countries, take advice before the first French return, not after the first reassessment: the residence analysis done properly at arrival costs a fraction of the dispute done badly three years later.

B. Why Your ISA Has No French Equivalent: the Wrapper Stays Open in Britain but Turns Transparent in France

On the British side, the news is good and dangerously misleading at the same time. The official GOV.UK guidance on moving abroad confirms that you can keep your ISA open after you stop being a UK resident and that you keep UK tax relief on the money and investments held in it — but you cannot put fresh money in once non-resident, unless you are a Crown employee serving overseas or their spouse or civil partner, and you must tell your ISA provider as soon as you stop being a UK resident. Transfers between providers remain possible while non-resident, and you may pay in again only if you return and become UK resident. Read that guidance here: GOV.UK, Individual Savings Accounts, If you move abroad. So the account survives the move, the British tax shelter on the contents continues as far as HMRC is concerned, and nothing forces you to close or cash in the ISA when you settle in France. Many British residents conclude, wrongly, that nothing needs to be done.

France takes the opposite view, and French law is what counts once you live here. No provision of the French Tax Code recognises the British ISA as an exempt envelope. The exemptions France grants to its own savings products — the Livret A, the sustainable-development booklet, the youth booklet — are written product by product into domestic law and extend to no foreign equivalent. Your Cash ISA is, in French eyes, an ordinary interest-bearing deposit account abroad. Your Stocks and Shares ISA is an ordinary securities account holding foreign shares and units. The interest, dividends, distributions and gains they produce are therefore taxed under the standard French rules for investment income examined in part II, at the flat rate plus social levies, with no credit for the British concept of tax-freedom. The British relief is not double taxation — HMRC takes nothing, so there is nothing to credit — it is simply a foreign exemption France does not mirror. Expecting symmetry between the two systems is the single most expensive error British ISA holders make in France.

The transparency works in both directions, and that matters for planning. Because France looks through the wrapper, every distribution is characterised by its nature: interest stays interest, dividends stay dividends, a disposal gain stays a gain on securities. You cannot reclassify ISA growth as something softer, and you cannot shelter a large realised gain inside the ISA on the theory that no British tax arose. Conversely, British withholding that genuinely is levied — for example on certain dividends before treaty relief — is not lost: as shown below, the French flat-rate computation credits foreign tax within the treaty limit. The practical discipline is therefore to stop thinking of the ISA as a thing and start thinking of it as a list of income items, each taxed in France according to its own nature. That mental switch — from envelope to items — is what makes the declaration section that follows straightforward rather than frightening.

What should you actually do with the ISA once resident? There is no single answer, and this guide does not pretend otherwise. Keeping it is lawful and often sensible for the British side: the UK shelter persists, the account can be transferred between providers, and a future return to Britain restores the right to contribute. Cashing it in to fund French projects — a property purchase, French-regulated savings, an assurance-vie contract — crystallises French tax on the gains at that point and ends the yearly declaration burden for that account, which suits some households. Closing it in a panic in the arrival year, without comparing the French flat-rate cost against the British shelter value and your real likelihood of returning, suits almost nobody. The wrong move is not keeping or closing: it is doing nothing while France taxes the contents every year, undeclared, with penalties compounding. Decide deliberately, declare whatever you keep, and read on for exactly how.

A final boundary note for completeness. This guide covers the ISA you hold as a French resident. The pensions universe — State Pension uprating and declaration, teachers’ and NHS pensions taxed in Britain under the treaty, private-pension and QROPS transfers — follows different treaty articles and is examined in our guide for British retirees, UK pensions and QROPS charges in France. Do not mix the two: pension contributions and pension funds are not ISA subscriptions, and the treaty treats them under entirely separate provisions.

II. What France Takes and How to Declare It: the 12.8 Percent Charge, the 17.2 Percent Social Levies, Form 3916 and the Treaty Credit

A. How Your Cash-ISA Interest, Share Dividends and Fund Gains Are Taxed: the Flat-Rate Charge, the Social Levies and the Foreign-Tax Credit

French tax captures your ISA returns through the category of investment income — revenus de capitaux mobiliers. Article 120 of the Tax Code expressly brings foreign securities into scope: “Les dividendes, intérêts, arrérages et tous autres produits des actions de toute nature” — dividends, interest, arrears and all other products of shares of every kind — of companies with registered offices abroad, alongside interest and profits from foreign partnerships and distributions to shareholders of foreign companies. Your Cash-ISA interest is interest within this article; your dividends from London-listed shares inside a Stocks and Shares ISA are dividends within it; fund distributions follow the same route. The article’s deliberate breadth — “de toute nature”, of every kind — is the legislature’s answer to creative relabelling: if it behaves like investment income from a foreign security, it is taxed as such, whatever the British wrapper calls it.

The income-tax charge itself is the flat-rate levy — the prélèvement forfaitaire unique. Article 200 A of the Tax Code states the rate without ambiguity: “Le taux forfaitaire mentionné au premier alinéa du présent 1 est fixé à 12,8 %” — the flat rate is set at 12.8 percent. Foreign-source investment income is taken into the computation gross: “Les revenus mentionnés au premier alinéa du présent 1° de source étrangère sont également retenus pour leur montant brut.” That gross-basis rule matters enormously for ISA holders: the full dividend or interest lands in the French base with no deduction for British fees, no allowance, and no recognition of the ISA shelter. Where genuine foreign tax has been withheld at source — British withholding suffered on a dividend before treaty relief, for example — it is not simply added to your loss: “L’impôt retenu à la source est imputé sur l’imposition à taux forfaitaire dans la limite du crédit d’impôt auquel il ouvre droit” — tax withheld at source is credited against the flat-rate charge within the limit of the tax credit it gives right to. In plain terms, the treaty credit mechanism caps the relief at what the treaty allows, and any surplus foreign tax stays unrelieved. Keep every withholding certificate your provider or broker issues, because the credit is documentary or it is nothing.

Interest deserves a closer look because ISA holders often assume a withholding machine handles it. The French advance levy on interest — the prélèvement forfaitaire non libératoire — applies, under Article 125 A of the Tax Code, to individuals domiciled in France receiving interest and similar products “lorsque la personne qui assure le paiement de ces revenus est établie en France” — where the person paying the income is established in France. Your Cash ISA pays from Britain through a British provider: no French payer, no advance levy at source, no dispensation request to file. That is not a saving, it is a deferral into the yearly return: the gross interest is simply declared and charged at 12.8 percent on assessment, plus the social levies below. Do not confuse the absence of withholding with an absence of tax. Households that spent years with tax handled inside the British system must rebuild the reflex of setting aside, from each interest credit, the French charge that will fall due the following year.

Gains realised inside a Stocks and Shares ISA — selling shares or fund units standing at a profit — follow the securities-gains regime. Article 150-0 A of the Tax Code charges “les gains nets retirés des cessions à titre onéreux, effectuées directement, par personne interposée ou par l’intermédiaire d’une fiducie, de valeurs mobilières, de droits sociaux” — net gains from onerous disposals, made directly, through an intermediary or through a trust, of securities and company rights. Switching funds inside the ISA, rebalancing, bed-and-ISA manoeuvres before departure: each disposal is tested on its own French character once you are resident, regardless of the British view that everything happened inside a shelter. Unrealised growth, by contrast, is not taxed year by year: France taxes the gain on disposal, not the paper profit, so the buy-and-hold investor inside a Stocks and Shares ISA feels the income-tax charge mainly on dividends until a sale crystallises the gain. Track acquisition prices and disposal proceeds in euros from the start of residence — reconstructing five years of sterling contract notes under reassessment pressure is how good cases become expensive ones.

On top of the 12.8 percent come the social levies — and this is where British newcomers routinely under-budget by half. Article L.136-6 of the Social Security Code provides that “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B du code général des impôts sont assujetties à une contribution sur les revenus du patrimoine” — individuals domiciled in France are liable to a contribution on capital income — expressly including “Des revenus de capitaux mobiliers”. Investment income is therefore inside the social-levy base by statute, and Article L.136-7 extends the mechanism to investment products paid to French residents. The rates are set by Article L.136-8, and the official service-public guidance confirms the all-in burden on capital income: CSG, CRDS and solidarity levy totalling 17.2 percent. The arithmetic of an ISA return in France is therefore 12.8 percent income tax plus 17.2 percent social levies — a combined 30 percent flat burden on interest and dividends before any treaty credit. Budget on that basis from the first year, and the French system holds no further surprises on this income; budget on British assumptions, and every assessment will feel like an ambush.

One relief valve exists for households whose overall position makes the flat rate punitive: the global option for the progressive scale. Article 200 A further allows relief by election: the same Article 200 A lets the taxpayer expressly elect for all of that investment income to be brought into the aggregate net-income base instead of suffering the flat rate. The election is global — all of the investment income, not cherry-picked lines — and it must be made with the yearly return, no later than the filing deadline, because the progressive scale with its allowances can beat 12.8 percent plus levies where household income is modest. But note the trap: the social levies apply either way, and opting in drags the whole investment-income basket into the scale. Run both computations before signing, keep the workings, and never elect on a hunch the week the reassessment arrives.

B. Declare Every Account or Pay 1,500 Euros Each, Then Challenge a Wrong Bill Before 31 December of Year Two

Declaration is where ISA cases are won and lost, because the penalties for silence dwarf the tax itself. Article 1649 A of the Tax Code imposes the duty in terms that cover every ISA without exception: “Les personnes physiques, les associations, les sociétés n’ayant pas la forme commerciale, domiciliées ou établies en France, sont tenues de déclarer, en même temps que leur déclaration de revenus ou de résultats, les références des comptes ouverts, détenus, utilisés ou clos à l’étranger.” Individuals domiciled or established in France must declare, with their income return, the details of accounts opened, held, used or closed abroad. Each Cash ISA is an account to declare. Each Stocks and Shares ISA is an account to declare, even where it holds only funds and no cash balance. An account closed during the year is declared as closed. An account you forgot you had — the Help-to-Buy ISA from 2016, the matured fixed-rate ISA sitting in cash — is declared like all the rest. The declaration is made on the foreign-accounts form attached to the yearly income return, the 3916, with the account references, the provider identity and the opening or closing dates; the income itself is returned through the foreign-income schedules feeding the main 2042. File both limbs every year the account exists at any point in the year, and keep a copy of every 3916 filed: in a later dispute, the copy is your proof of good faith. For the declaration mechanics of ordinary savings accounts alongside ISAs, see also our guide to declaring UK savings and ISA accounts on the 3916.

The price of omission is fixed by statute and applied per account. Article 1736 of the Tax Code provides: “Les infractions au premier alinéa de l’article 1649 A sont passibles d’une amende de 1 500 € par ouverture ou clôture de compte non déclarée.” — breaches of the first paragraph of Article 1649 A carry a fine of 1,500 euros per undeclared account opening or closure. With several ISAs across providers and years, the fines stack faster than the underlying tax: three ISAs undeclared over four years can produce a penalty bill that exceeds the income-tax adjustments several times over. Redress where you have slipped: the spontaneous regularisation of an omission before any administration request is always cheaper than the same correction after the reassessment notice lands, and the file that shows voluntary disclosure is the file that negotiates penalties down. If you discover old ISAs undeclared, regularise through the normal corrective-return route with counsel rather than waiting for the administration to find them — because it will.

Finding them is easier than most ISA holders imagine. The administration no longer depends on your 3916 alone: financial institutions report under automatic-exchange frameworks, and the Tax Code punishes late exchange filings — the same Article 1736 sanctions late filing of the automatic-exchange declaration with a 200 euro fine per account. Beyond data feeds, the courts let the administration use what the criminal justice system uncovers: the Court of Cassation has held that “l’autorité judiciaire doit communiquer à l’administration des finances toute indication qu’elle peut recueillir, de nature à faire présumer une fraude commise en matière fiscale” — the judicial authority must pass to the finance administration any information it gathers capable of suggesting tax fraud — rejecting a taxpayer’s attempt to block criminal-file material in a foreign-accounts case: Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 14 April 2021, No 19-23.230, a Bulletin-published ruling arising from nine Swiss accounts reassessed to registration duties. The fact pattern differs from an ISA, but the principle travels: information about foreign holdings reaches the tax office through many doors, and the courts keep those doors open. Assume the administration knows or will know, and organise your position accordingly.

When the reassessment arrives — the proposition de rectification setting out the additional tax, the social levies, the penalties and the interest — treat it as the opening of a procedure with deadlines, not as a final bill. Answer within the stated time, in writing, point by point: concede what is due, contest what is wrong, and attach the documents — provider statements in euros, withholding certificates, 3916 copies, proof of residence dates — that prove each contested point. The most frequent ISA errors in reassessments are classifiable and therefore beatable: taxing pre-residence income received before the move to France, refusing a treaty credit that withholding certificates evidence, applying penalties to accounts that were in fact declared, or taxing the same dividend twice through double counting of broker statements. Each of these is a factual demonstration, not a legal theory, which is why the records discipline urged throughout this guide — euros-basis statements, certificates, filed forms — decides the outcome more than advocacy does. Our walkthrough of the reassessment machinery, reply deadlines and tribunal routes in British residents facing a French tax audit over UK income applies directly to ISA disputes.

If the administration maintains the charge, the formal claim — the réclamation — must be filed within a hard statutory deadline. Article R*196-1 of the Tax Procedures Book requires that “les réclamations relatives aux impôts autres que les impôts directs locaux et les taxes annexes à ces impôts, doivent être présentées à l’administration au plus tard le 31 décembre de la deuxième année suivant celle” — claims for taxes other than local direct taxes must reach the administration by 31 December of the second year following the relevant event, whether that is collection, payment or the event giving rise to the claim. Miss that New Year’s Eve and the substance of your case no longer matters: the claim is inadmissible. File by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, or through the online fiscal messaging with the acknowledgements saved, and diary the administration’s six-month reply period: silence for six months is an implied rejection you may take to the administrative tribunal. Before the tribunal, ISA disputes turn on the same documents — residence-date proof, euro statements, certificates, filed 3916 forms — plus the precise statutory quotes this guide has given you. Present a file where every figure reconciles to a provider document, and the judge can follow the money; present estimates and assertions, and the administration’s computation wins by default.

Conclusion

Your ISA survives Brexit and survives the move: Britain lets you keep it open, keep the British relief on its contents, and transfer it between providers while non-resident. What does not survive is the illusion that British tax-freedom means French tax-freedom. From the day your household home fixes in France, Article 4 A taxes your worldwide income, Article 4 B tests your home, your stay and your economic centre, and the courts define your foyer by where you actually live your life. Inside the transparent wrapper, interest, dividends and gains are taxed at 12.8 percent plus 17.2 percent social levies, gross, with foreign withholding credited only within the treaty limit — and every account must be declared yearly on pain of 1,500 euros per omission. The households that thrive under this regime do three unglamorous things: they fix their residence date with dated proof, they declare every ISA every year with euro-basis records and withholding certificates, and they answer every reassessment in writing, on time, with documents. Do those three things and the ISA remains a useful, lawful part of a cross-Channel financial life; neglect them and the same account becomes a penalty machine. Where the bill is wrong — pre-residence income taxed, credit refused, declared account fined — the claim deadline of 31 December of year two and the administrative tribunal stand ready. Use them.

Need a quick opinion on your case.

If you hold a Cash ISA, a Stocks and Shares ISA or older British savings accounts while living in France, send us the provider names, the yearly statements and any reassessment or 3916 letters you have received. A lawyer of the firm will review your file and call you back with a telephone consultation within 48 hours to tell you what is taxable, what must be declared and whether a reassessment can be challenged. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page, and keep your statements, certificates and filed returns ready for the call.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.