Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, attorney at the Paris Bar
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Signed a Compromis in France? The 10-Day Withdrawal, the Loan Clock and Getting Your Deposit Back

You signed the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) from abroad, the scanned copy sits in your inbox, and two separate ten-day clocks have started ticking whether you noticed them or not. The first protects you: French law gives any non-professional buyer ten days to walk away from a residential purchase for no reason at all. The second constrains you: once a French bank issues your mortgage offer, you cannot accept it for ten days either. Between those two clocks sits your deposit, held by the notaire (public officer who authenticates the sale) or the estate agent, and the question every foreign buyer eventually asks: if I pull out, or if my loan falls through, do I get my money back, and what exactly must I do to keep that right intact?

This guide answers that question step by step, using the statutes as they stand in September 2026 and two published rulings of the Cour de cassation (France’s highest civil court) that punished buyers who miscounted a deadline or sent their withdrawal the wrong way. It covers the withdrawal right itself, the correct way to count and send it from outside France, the mortgage reflection period and the loan suspensive condition, and the refund of sums paid in advance. It does not replace advice on your own file: amounts, dates and the exact wording of your compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) determine everything, and a lawyer should check them before any deadline expires. Our real estate law team in Paris handles these files for international buyers every week.

A preliminary warning for readers coming from common-law systems: in France, the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) is not an “offer” you can casually abandon. Article 1589 of the Civil Code treats a mutual promise to sell and buy, once the property and the price are agreed, as a sale in substance, and only the protections described below let you escape it cleanly. Sign first and verify later is therefore the wrong order. Read this guide before you sign, keep every postal receipt and email timestamp, and calendar every deadline the day the agreement is notified to you.

I. How Do You Exercise the 10-Day Withdrawal Right Without Missing the Deadline?

The withdrawal right, called the délai de rétractation (cooling-off period), is the single most buyer-friendly feature of French residential conveyancing, and the single most botched one by foreign purchasers. The mechanism looks simple: ten days, no reason needed, no penalty. In practice, three things go wrong again and again — buyers misunderstand when the clock starts, miscount the ten days, or send the withdrawal in a form the seller can challenge. Each mistake has cost real buyers their deposit or damages, as the cases below show.

A. Counting the Ten Days: The Day-After-Presentation Trap That Cost a Buyer 3,500 Euros

The statute sets the rule in one dense sentence: Article L. 271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code provides that “l’acquéreur non professionnel peut se rétracter dans un délai de dix jours à compter du lendemain de la première présentation de la lettre lui notifiant l’acte”, which means that a non-professional buyer may withdraw within ten days counted from the day after the first presentation of the letter notifying the deed. Three elements of that sentence deserve unpacking, because each one is a trap for a buyer sitting in London, New York or Dubai.

First, the protection belongs to the acquéreur non professionnel (non-professional buyer), meaning a buyer acting outside any professional real-estate activity. A foreign individual buying a holiday home or a relocation apartment qualifies; a company whose business is property dealing generally does not. If you buy through a family property company, check your status before relying on the withdrawal right, since the seller will certainly check it if you use it.

Second, the clock starts from the première présentation (first presentation) of the notification letter, not from the day you actually open the envelope or return from holiday. If the postman presents the registered letter on 4 September and leaves an advice slip because you are in another country, the starting point is 4 September all the same. For buyers who manage the purchase remotely, this is the most dangerous sentence in French conveyancing: the deadline can run while the letter sits uncollected at a French post office. Give your notaire (public officer who authenticates the sale) or a trusted contact a forwarding arrangement, or arrange electronic notification, before the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) is signed.

Third, the ten days are counted from the lendemain (day after) that first presentation, and the starting day itself is not counted. That sounds generous, but a December 2024 ruling of the Cour de cassation (France’s highest civil court) shows how narrowly courts apply it. In that case, the buyer’s agent had notified the sale promise by registered letter received on 4 September 2018, and the buyer posted his withdrawal on 15 September. The buyer argued that the starting day should be excluded twice — once under Article L. 271-1 and once under the general procedural counting rule — which would have pushed his deadline to Saturday 15 September at midnight and saved his withdrawal. The Court rejected that arithmetic outright: Cass. 3rd civ., 19 December 2024, No. 23-12.652 holds that “leurs effets ne se cumulent pas”, meaning the two counting rules express the same principle and their effects do not stack. The deadline had therefore expired on Friday 14 September at midnight, the withdrawal posted on the 15th was late, and the buyer was ordered to pay the estate agent 3,500 euros in damages for refusing to complete the sale, on the basis of civil liability under Article 1240 of the Civil Code.

Work through the method on a concrete example so you can apply it to your own dates. Notification first presented on Thursday 4 September: day one of the ten-day period is Friday 5 September, day ten is Sunday 14 September. Here a second rule softens the outcome: Article 642 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that “Le délai qui expirerait normalement un samedi, un dimanche ou un jour férié ou chômé est prorogé jusqu’au premier jour ouvrable suivant”, which means a deadline that would fall on a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday is extended to the next working day. Counting is therefore a two-step exercise — count ten days from the day after presentation, then check whether the tenth day is a working day — and the 2024 ruling adds the third step courts will not do for you: do not add an extra day on top. When in doubt, send the withdrawal several days early; an early withdrawal is always valid, a late one is worthless.

One more timing point matters for remote buyers. The withdrawal is effective on dispatch, not on receipt, provided you use a proper method — the postmark on your registered letter is what counts, which is why the buyer in the 2024 case argued so hard about the 15 September posting date. Keep the post office receipt and a copy of the letter. If you use electronic registered mail, keep the proof of sending and the timestamp the provider certifies. These documents are your entire case if the seller claims the withdrawal arrived late.

B. Sending the Withdrawal the Right Way: Registered Mail, Electronic Equivalents and the Email That Failed

The same Article L. 271-1 governs the form of both directions of the exchange: Article L. 271-1 of the Construction and Housing Code requires notification to the buyer “par lettre recommandée avec demande d’avis de réception ou par tout autre moyen présentant des garanties équivalentes”, meaning by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or by any other means offering equivalent guarantees for establishing the date of receipt or delivery, and adds that “La faculté de rétractation est exercée dans ces mêmes formes”, meaning the withdrawal itself must be exercised in those same forms. In plain terms: mirror the formality you received. If the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) reached you by registered letter, answer by registered letter; if it was validly delivered by hand against receipt, a hand-delivered withdrawal against a signed receipt works too.

For a buyer outside France, the practical ranking of methods is straightforward. A paper registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt sent from any post office remains the gold standard and is accepted everywhere without discussion. Electronic registered mail (lettre recommandée électronique, a registered email service with certified delivery) has explicit statutory equivalence with paper registered mail and is the best option when you are abroad and time is short — but use an accredited provider that certifies the sending date, the receipt date and the identities of sender and recipient, not your ordinary email account. Hand delivery against a dated and signed receipt is valid but requires the recipient’s cooperation, which you may not get from a hostile seller. An ordinary email, a text message or a phone call to the agent is not enough, standing alone, to exercise the right safely.

A February 2022 ruling of the Cour de cassation (France’s highest civil court) illustrates both the strictness and a narrow lifeline. Buyers who had signed a sale promise tried to withdraw by a simple email sent to their own notaire (public officer who authenticates the sale), who had also been appointed by the seller to receive any withdrawal notice and who certified in court that he had received the message on 9 May 2017 at 6:25 p.m. The Paris court of appeal held the withdrawal invalid, reasoning in the abstract that an email identifies neither sender nor recipient and proves no receipt date, and that the statutory equivalence between paper and electronic registered mail “ne peut être étendue à un simple courriel”, meaning it cannot be extended to a plain email. The Cour de cassation (France’s highest civil court) quashed that decision — not because plain emails are generally valid, but because the appeal court had failed to examine the concrete circumstances: Cass. 3rd civ., 2 February 2022, No. 20-23.468 required the judges to ask whether sending the message to the seller-mandated notaire (public officer), who attested in legal proceedings that he received it at a precise date and time, had in those specific circumstances offered guarantees equivalent to registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt.

The lesson for foreign buyers is deliberately two-sided. Do not rely on an ordinary email to withdraw: the default rule treats it as insufficient, and the 2022 buyers survived only after years of litigation culminating in cassation and a retrial. But if an email is all you managed to send before the deadline, do not assume all is lost either — preserve everything that proves dispatch, receipt and content (headers, timestamps, the recipient’s replies, any acknowledgment by the notaire (public officer) or agent), because a court must assess equivalence concretely rather than dismissing the message out of hand. The safe procedure remains: send electronic or paper registered mail first, then follow up by every other channel.

A final shield completes this part of the picture. During the ten-day period, the seller and intermediaries are forbidden from taking any money from you: Article L. 271-2 of the Construction and Housing Code states that “nul ne peut recevoir de l’acquéreur non professionnel, directement ou indirectement, aucun versement à quelque titre ou sous quelque forme que ce soit avant l’expiration du délai de rétractation”, meaning no one may receive from the non-professional buyer, directly or indirectly, any payment in any form or on any basis before the withdrawal period expires. If anyone pressures you to wire the deposit “to show good faith” before the ten days run out, refuse: the demand itself is unlawful, and a lawful deposit arrangement only starts once the period has expired. Any payment scheduled after expiry should be written into the agreement with its amount and date, failing which the agreement is treated as made under a suspensive condition of handover of the funds.

II. What Happens When Your French Mortgage Falls Through?

Most foreign buyers finance at least part of a French purchase with a French mortgage, whether for the rate, the currency match or the tax structure. French law surrounds that loan with its own ten-day period and its own suspensive condition, and the two interact with the withdrawal right in ways that surprise newcomers. This second part walks through the loan clock, then explains how to recover the sums you paid in advance when the financing fails — and what happens when the failure is yours rather than the bank’s.

A. The Loan Offer You Cannot Accept for Ten Days and the Suspensive Condition That Protects Your Deposit

Once a French lender issues your formal loan offer, a reflection period begins that mirrors the withdrawal right but runs in the opposite direction: it protects you against yourself. Article L. 313-34 of the Consumer Code provides that “L’emprunteur et les cautions ne peuvent accepter l’offre que dix jours après qu’ils l’ont reçue”, meaning the borrower and any personal guarantors may not accept the offer until ten days after receiving it. Acceptance is given by letter, with the postal timestamp as proof, or by any other means agreed between the parties that makes the acceptance date certain. During the same period, the lender is bound: sending the offer obliges it to keep the stated terms for a minimum of thirty days from receipt. For a buyer negotiating from abroad, the practical consequence is calendar discipline — receipt date plus ten clear days before you can sign, and a thirty-day window in which the bank cannot move the rate.

Alongside that reflection period sits the financing suspensive condition, the condition suspensive d’obtention de prêt (loan approval condition), which makes the entire sale depend on you obtaining the mortgage described in the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement). Where the price is paid even partly with a regulated loan, the protection is automatic: Article L. 313-41 of the Consumer Code provides that the deed “est conclu sous la condition suspensive de l’obtention du ou des prêts qui en assument le financement”, meaning it is concluded subject to the suspensive condition of obtaining the loan or loans financing it, with a validity period that cannot be shorter than one month from signature. The general law of conditional obligations backs this up: Article 1304 of the Civil Code frames how conditional obligations stand and fall with the event. Read your compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) for three figures before anything else — the minimum loan amount, the maximum acceptable rate and the maximum duration — because the condition covers the loan as described there, and a refusal for materially different terms may not trigger it.

Three practical steps keep the condition alive. First, file complete loan applications promptly with at least the number of banks the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) requires — commonly two or three — and keep dated proof of every application, every request for additional documents and every response. Courts examine the buyer’s diligence when the seller contests the failure of the condition, and a buyer who applied late, applied for the wrong amount or ignored the bank’s document requests is exposed. Second, insist that any refusal letter states the amount, duration and rate applied for, so it can be matched against the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) figures; a vague oral “no” proved months later by a witness statement is weak evidence. Third, watch the condition’s expiry date as closely as the withdrawal deadline: if the banks are slow, ask the seller in writing for an extension before the condition lapses, because once it expires unfulfilled without extension, the sale is treated as never having existed — which helps you recover your deposit but kills a purchase you may still want.

Foreign buyers should also note the currency and status specifics that complicate French applications. Non-resident borrowers face enhanced proof-of-income checks, translated and sometimes apostilled documents, and life-insurance (assurance emprunteur, borrower insurance) requirements that can delay or derail approval; start the insurance medical questionnaire in parallel with the loan file, not after. If you finance partly from abroad, confirm in writing with the notaire (public officer who authenticates the sale) how the foreign funds will be transferred, evidenced and converted, since anti-money-laundering verifications on large incoming wires routinely add one to two weeks. None of this changes the legal framework, but all of it affects whether you meet the contractual deadlines — and deadlines, as Part I showed, are where these transactions are won or lost.

B. Getting the Sequestered Deposit Back and Avoiding the Penalty for Walking Away

The deposit you paid after the withdrawal period — the séquestre (escrowed deposit) or acompte (down payment), usually around five percent of the price and held by the notaire (public officer) or the agent — is fully recoverable when the loan condition fails. The same Article L. 313-41 of the Consumer Code that creates the condition orders the consequence: “toute somme versée d’avance par l’acquéreur à l’autre partie ou pour le compte de cette dernière est immédiatement et intégralement remboursable sans retenue ni indemnité à quelque titre que ce soit”, meaning every sum paid in advance by the buyer to the other party or on its behalf is immediately and fully refundable, with no deduction or indemnity on any basis whatsoever. Immediately means immediately: neither the seller nor the escrow holder may retain the funds pending a debate about who is at fault, charge file fees against them, or set them off against an alleged penalty. If the holder resists, a formal demand letter citing the article, followed by summary proceedings before the local court, normally unblocks the situation.

Distinguish that clean exit from the two expensive ways of leaving a compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement). The first is simply letting the withdrawal or condition periods expire and then refusing to complete: the sale then stands as a binding agreement — recall that under Article 1589 of the Civil Code a mutual promise to sell and buy is equivalent to a sale once property and price are agreed — and the seller can sue for forced performance or damages rather than merely keeping a deposit. The buyer in the December 2024 case learned this at a cost of 3,500 euros awarded to the agent under Article 1240 of the Civil Code, and sellers routinely claim more. The second is triggering a forfeit clause: most preliminary agreements contain an indemnité d’immobilisation (lock-in indemnity, typically around ten percent) payable by the defaulting buyer when the sale collapses through his fault outside any protective condition. Check whether your agreement frames the sum as such an indemnity, what fault triggers it, and whether the amount is proportionate, because these clauses are the main battlefield when a sale fails for a reason the parties describe differently.

When the file turns contentious, the dispute almost always centers on one of three questions, so organize your documents around them from day one. Was the withdrawal sent in time and in proper form — registered letter receipts, electronic registered mail certificates, bailiff’s reports of hand delivery? Did the loan applications match the compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) figures and were refusals properly evidenced — application forms, bank correspondence, refusal letters stating terms? And who failed first — the chronology of notifications, extensions requested and answers received? A buyer who can answer all three with dated documents normally recovers the séquestre (escrowed deposit) without litigation; a buyer with only recollections and phone calls faces an uphill case. Keep in mind as well that tax questions often surface at this stage — non-resident buyers sometimes ask whether a failed purchase generates deductible costs or affects wealth-tax filings — and those questions belong to a tax adviser, since conveyancing counsel cannot settle them inside a sale file.

Finally, a Paris-specific note for the many foreign buyers targeting the capital and its region: files handled through Paris notaires (public officers) and Paris agents follow exactly the same statutes and deadlines as everywhere else in France — no Paris exception extends or shortens the ten days. The local specifics are practical rather than legal: Parisian sellers and agents move fast and expect the same pace from you, service of documents through busy offices benefits from electronic registered mail with certified timestamps, and any litigation over the deposit or the penalty will run before the Paris courts with their own waiting times. Readers dealing with these issues in the capital can turn to our Paris real estate lawyers for file-specific review before a deadline expires.

Conclusion

A French compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) gives a foreign buyer two genuine protections — ten days to withdraw for any reason and a financed purchase conditioned on obtaining the loan, with every euro paid in advance refundable when the condition fails — but both protections are fenced with formalities that courts enforce strictly. Count the ten days from the day after first presentation without double-counting the starting day, extend only onto the next working day when the last day is not one, and send the withdrawal by registered mail or certified electronic equivalent. Treat the mortgage offer’s ten-day reflection period and the thirty-day lender commitment as hard diary entries, keep written proof of every loan application and refusal matched to the agreement’s figures, and demand immediate full refund of the séquestre (escrowed deposit) when the financing condition fails. The buyers in the 2024 and 2022 rulings lost years and thousands of euros on points of counting and form that a careful diary and a registered letter would have avoided. Do not let your purchase turn on the same details: have your dates and your documents checked while the clocks are still running.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Signed a compromis in France or facing a loan refusal and want a lawyer to review your deadlines before they expire. Our firm offers a consultation by telephone within 48 hours with an attorney of the firm. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22. Reach us anytime through our contact page.

Source: Cour de cassation – “Judilibre” & “Légifrance” Open Data.

What our clients say

kader ladjouzi
5 hours ago

Best real estate and business law attorney in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
4 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.