Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Owner Gifting Your French House to Your Children After Brexit: Donation, Tax-Free Allowances, Notaire Fees and How to Challenge the Bill

You bought a house in the Dordogne or a flat in Paris years ago, your children have grown up, and you are starting to think about passing the property on while you are still here to organise it. Since Brexit, British owners ask the same anxious questions in every consultation: can I gift my French house to my children from abroad, will the French tax office treat me worse than a French resident, and what happens if the notaire or the tax office values the house far above its real price? The good news is that French law gives you a clear, well-tested route. The strict news is that every step of that route is formal, and a missed formality can cost your children tens of thousands of euros.

A gift of a French property made during your lifetime is called a donation. When it covers a house or a flat, it must be executed before a notaire, it is taxed in France even if you live in Kent or Edinburgh, and it must respect the forced share of your children, known as the réserve héréditaire. Used properly, the donation lets each parent pass up to 100,000 euros to each child free of French gift tax, renewable every fifteen years. Used carelessly, it triggers a reassessment of the property value, late-payment penalties, or a dispute between siblings that ends in court. This guide explains the lawful route, the exact cost, and the remedies when the administration disagrees with you.

I. How to gift your French house lawfully after Brexit: notarial deed, forced heirship and cross-border validity

Before any discussion of tax, the gift must exist as a matter of civil law. A French donation of land is not a handshake, a letter, or an English deed of gift signed at home. It is a formal French instrument, and the formalities protect both you and your children.

A. Why the gift must pass through a French notaire and what the deed must contain

The rule is blunt. Article 931 of the Civil Code provides that “Tous actes portant donation entre vifs seront passés devant notaires dans la forme ordinaire des contrats ; et il en restera minute, sous peine de nullité.” (C. civ., art. 931) In plain terms, every lifetime gift must be executed before a notaire, who keeps the original in his records, and any gift made without a notaire is void. An English solicitor cannot replace the French notaire for a house situated in France, and a gift signed only before witnesses has no legal effect on the property, however genuine your intention.

The official public service explains the position in the same way, stating that a donation-partage is executed by notarial deed. The service-public.fr guide to the donation-partage adds that the gift and the sharing out can be done in separate instruments, provided you as donor take part in both. In practice the notaire will verify your title deeds, check for mortgages and rights of way, confirm your identity and capacity, and then publish the deed at the land registry, a step called publicité foncière, which makes the transfer enforceable against third parties. The service-public guide confirms that where the gift includes a building you must also pay the land-registry publication charges in addition to gift tax and notaire fees.

For British families the most useful instrument is usually the donation-partage. Article 1075 of the Civil Code states that “Toute personne peut faire, entre ses héritiers présomptifs, la distribution et le partage de ses biens et de ses droits.” (C. civ., art. 1075) A donation-partage lets you divide property between your presumed heirs immediately, with each child receiving a defined lot now rather than an undivided share to argue about later. Its decisive advantage was confirmed by the Cour de cassation in a published ruling: “Attendu que les biens qui ont fait l’objet d’une donation-partage ne sont pas soumis au rapport qui n’est qu’une opération préliminaire au partage en ce qu’il tend à constituer la masse partageable ; que ces dispositions s’appliquent aussi à ceux, qui, donnés en avancement d’hoirie, sont ensuite inclus dans une donation-partage postérieure” (Cass. Civ. 1, 4 July 2018, no. 16-15.915, published in the Bulletin). The rapport is the accounting exercise by which lifetime gifts are notionally brought back into the estate at death to check equality between heirs. Property distributed through a donation-partage escapes that exercise, which freezes values at the date of the gift and protects the child who received the house against a later claim that the market has risen.

A very recent decision shows why the drafting of the deed matters so much. On 9 September 2026 the First Civil Chamber quashed a Versailles appeal ruling that had ordered a son to bring back 127,000 euros, the sale price obtained five years after his father’s death, for a flat given in 2001. The deed had departed from the default rule and provided that the value to be accounted for would be the value at the donor’s death, or the sale value if the flat were sold. The Cour de cassation held that “En statuant ainsi, alors qu’il résultait de la clause de rapport que le respect de la volonté du défunt impliquait que, par dérogation au droit commun, la valeur du bien au jour de son aliénation n’avait lieu d’être prise en compte que si cette aliénation était intervenue avant le décès du donateur, la cour d’appel, qui n’a pas tiré les conséquences légales de ses constatations et énonciations, a violé le texte susvisé” (Cass. Civ. 1, 9 Sept. 2026, no. 24-21.254). The lesson for British donors is direct: the default rule in Article 860 of the Civil Code is that “Le rapport est dû de la valeur du bien donné à l’époque du partage, d’après son état à l’époque de la donation” (C. civ., art. 860), but you may depart from it in the deed, and the courts will enforce your clause literally. A notaire experienced with cross-border families will draft that clause deliberately instead of leaving your children to litigate its meaning a decade later.

Practical points follow from this. First, budget for regulated notaire fees calculated on a sliding scale plus disbursements and the land-registry charges; ask for a written fee estimate before signing. Second, if you keep a right to live in the house, known as usufruit, while giving away the bare ownership, known as nue-propriété, say so expressly, because the retained life interest changes both the valuation and your right to remain. Third, if one child already received money years ago, tell the notaire: earlier gifts can be folded into a later donation-partage, which under the 2018 ruling shelters them from the rapport exercise as well.

B. How forced heirship and English law elections shape what you can give

Many British owners assume that, as English nationals, they can leave or give their French house to whomever they please. French law starts from the opposite principle. Certain heirs, above all your children, are reserved heirs, called héritiers réservataires, and they are guaranteed a minimum share of your estate. Article 913 of the Civil Code provides that “Les libéralités, soit par actes entre vifs, soit par testament, ne pourront excéder la moitié des biens du disposant, s’il ne laisse à son décès qu’un enfant ; le tiers, s’il laisse deux enfants ; le quart, s’il en laisse trois ou un plus grand nombre” (C. civ., art. 913). With one child, half the estate is untouchable; with two children, two-thirds; with three or more, three-quarters. The freely disposable remainder is called the quotité disponible. A gift that eats into the reserve can later be cut back through an action in reduction, known as action en réduction, brought by the disadvantaged child at the opening of the succession. The service-public guide warns expressly that a reserved heir left out of a donation-partage, or given a lot below his reserve share, may challenge the arrangement if the remaining estate cannot make up the difference.

Brexit did not abolish the one tool that lets you choose English law for your succession. The EU Succession Regulation continues to apply in France with universal scope, and it allows you to elect the law of your nationality to govern your succession as a whole, a mechanism lawyers call professio juris (Regulation (EU) No 650/2012, art. 22). Because the connecting factor is nationality rather than EU membership, a British national can still elect English law in a will or equivalent instrument. But the election must be express, it should be drafted to cover lifetime gifts so far as the applicable law permits, and it does not of itself neutralise French tax: tax follows its own territorial rules regardless of the civil law governing the succession. Families who elect English law to escape forced heirship should therefore still size every gift against the French reserve while the donor is alive, or accept the risk that a child sues in France after the death.

Two traps deserve emphasis. The first is the unequal gift. Giving the French house to the child who loves France while giving nothing comparable to the sibling in Manchester invites a reduction claim later. A donation-partage that allots each child a balanced lot, possibly with a compensating payment called a soulte, neutralises that risk at the source. The second trap is the second marriage. A gift of the whole house to children of a first marriage can collide with the surviving spouse’s rights, and the notaire should map the spouse’s position before any deed is signed.

II. What the gift costs and how to fight back when the tax office disagrees

Once the deed is signed, the tax office takes an interest. France taxes gifts of French houses even when both donor and donee live in Britain, and the bill has three layers: the gift tax itself, called droits de donation, the notaire’s regulated fees, and the land-registry charges. Understanding each layer in advance is what separates a planned transfer from an unpleasant surprise.

A. How droits de donation are calculated: allowances, scale and the fifteen-year clock

The starting point is territoriality. Article 750 ter of the General Tax Code provides that “Sont soumis aux droits de mutation à titre gratuit”, covering assets situated in France even “lorsque le donateur ou le défunt n’a pas son domicile fiscal en France”, and assets worldwide “lorsque le donateur ou le défunt a son domicile fiscal en France au sens de l’article 4 B” (CGI, art. 750 ter). Read the two limbs together and the message for British owners is clear. If you are fiscally domiciled in France, your worldwide gifts are within the French net. If you live in Britain and remain fiscally domiciled there, your French house is still within the French net because it is situated in France. There is no Brexit exemption, no non-resident discount, and no way to move a French house out of France for tax purposes. The house is taxed where it stands.

The calculation then runs in three steps. First, each gift benefits from a personal tax-free allowance, called an abattement, which depends on the family link. Article 779 of the General Tax Code states that “il est effectué un abattement de 100 000 € sur la part de chacun des ascendants et sur la part de chacun des enfants vivants ou représentés par suite de prédécès ou de renonciation” (CGI, art. 779). Each parent can therefore give 100,000 euros to each child free of gift tax, so a couple with two children can pass 400,000 euros free of tax in one round. Lower allowances apply to wider family: 15,932 euros per brother or sister, 7,967 euros per nephew or niece. Gifts between spouses and civil partners benefit from a full exemption, while gifts to unrelated persons face a flat 60 percent rate after a small allowance, so a gift to a friend or an unmarried partner outside a civil partnership is punitively taxed.

Second, the taxable balance is charged on a progressive scale. Article 777 of the General Tax Code provides that “Les droits de mutation à titre gratuit sont fixés aux taux indiqués dans les tableaux ci-après, pour la part nette revenant à chaque ayant droit” (CGI, art. 777). In the direct line the rate starts at 5 percent on the slice up to 8,072 euros and climbs through 10, 15 and 20 percent to 30 percent above 552,324 euros, 40 percent above 902,838 euros and 45 percent beyond 1,805,677 euros. A concrete example helps. A mother in Lyon gives her daughter a flat worth 250,000 euros, her first gift. The 100,000 euro allowance leaves 150,000 euros taxable. Applying the scale gives roughly 30,000 euros of gift tax, before notaire fees and registry charges. The same gift split between two parents as two 125,000 euro gifts leaves only 25,000 euros taxable per parent and roughly 4,800 euros of tax each, so about 9,600 euros in total instead of 30,000. Splitting donors is often the single cheapest legitimate planning step a British couple can take, and it requires no exotic structure.

Third, earlier gifts are clawed back into the calculation through the fifteen-year reminder, called the rappel fiscal. Article 784 of the General Tax Code obliges the parties to declare earlier gifts in every new deed, and provides that “La perception est effectuée en ajoutant à la valeur des biens compris dans la donation ou la déclaration de succession celle des biens qui ont fait l’objet de donations antérieures, à l’exception de celles passées depuis plus de quinze ans” (CGI, art. 784). Gifts from the same donor within the previous fifteen years are aggregated to compute the tax, with the earlier tax credited, so that splitting one large gift into yearly slices does not permanently reset the progressive scale. Conversely, allowances themselves renew: once fifteen years have passed, a fresh 100,000 euro allowance per parent per child becomes available. Families with a valuable house sometimes combine a gift of bare ownership now, keeping the usufruit, with a second gift after the fifteen-year window, progressively transferring the asset at modest cost.

Valuation is where British files most often go wrong. The taxable base is the open-market value, called valeur vénale, at the date of the gift, meaning the price a willing buyer would pay for that house, in that village, in that condition, on that day. British owners tend to rely on the purchase price paid a decade ago or on an estate agent’s optimistic email. The tax office relies on comparable sales, and its property database is increasingly precise. Declare 180,000 euros for a house the administration values at 260,000 euros and you will receive a reassessment, called a redressement, for the missing tax plus interest and penalties. Where you retain the usufruit, the gift is valued on the bare ownership only, using the statutory age scale, which substantially lowers the base for younger donors; but the scale is fixed by law, so do not invent your own discount. If the house needs major works, commission an independent valuation report before the deed and have the notaire annex the evidence supporting any discount. A ten-page surveyor’s report is a modest investment against a six-figure reassessment.

One final cross-border warning concerns the British side. If you are domiciled in the United Kingdom for inheritance tax purposes, a gift of your French house may also count as a potentially exempt transfer under British rules. The official gov.uk guidance states that gifts made less than seven years before death may be taxed, the outcome turning on the recipient, the value and the timing (gov.uk, rules on giving gifts). French gift tax paid can generally be credited against any British tax on the same transfer under the double-tax relief rules, but the two systems run on different clocks and different valuations. Take coordinated advice before signing, and keep the French deed, the valuation report and the tax receipts: your British personal representatives will need them if you die within seven years.

B. How to challenge a reassessment, a penalty or a refusal to register

Disputes in this field follow recognisable patterns, and each has a remedy. The most common is the valuation reassessment. The administration sends a rectification proposal, called a proposition de rectification, asserting a higher valeur vénale with its comparables. You have a short deadline, normally thirty days, to reply. Do not let it pass in silence: an unanswered proposal becomes a confirmed assessment. Your reply should attack the comparables one by one, pointing out differences in location, size, condition, tenure and planning constraints, and should attach your surveyor’s report, photographs, quotes for works and any failed sale attempts at the declared price. Where the gap is technical rather than legal, you may request an expert appraisal procedure, which brings in an independent valuer. Many files settle at this stage for a compromise value, and a reasoned, evidenced reply sent within the deadline is the cheapest advocacy you will ever buy.

The second pattern is the penalty for an undisclosed earlier gift. Because Article 784 requires the deed to state whether earlier gifts exist, with the amounts, the notaires involved and the registration dates, an omission looks like concealment even when it was a memory lapse. If the administration discovers a forgotten cash gift from 2019 in a 2026 deed, it will aggregate it and may add penalties for bad faith. The defence is documentary: produce the earlier deed or bank records, show the tax was paid or the allowance covered it, and demonstrate that the omission changed nothing financially. Prevention is simpler still. Before every new gift, ask your notaire to run a family gift history check going back at least fifteen years, and disclose everything, including modest sums, in the new deed.

The third pattern is the challenge between siblings after your death. A child who received less may bring an action en réduction against the gift, or dispute the valuation date under Article 860. The 2026 ruling discussed above shows that courts enforce bespoke valuation clauses strictly, and the 2018 ruling shows that a donation-partage shuts down the rapport exercise altogether. If you anticipate friction, the donation-partage with balanced lots remains the strongest shield: it is far harder for a sibling to attack a division you organised transparently, with every child present before the same notaire, than to attack a simple gift discovered after the funeral.

Where the dispute is with the administration rather than the family, the procedural ladder is standard. Start with a reasoned written reply at the rectification stage. If the assessment is confirmed, file a formal claim, called a réclamation, to the tax office, setting out the facts, the law and the evidence, and keep proof of posting. If the claim is rejected expressly or by silence, the matter goes to the courts, where valuation cases are heard by the civil courts with full powers to substitute their own value. Throughout, respect every deadline, because French tax litigation is unforgiving of delay: a meritorious case filed one day late is a lost case. And where the bill is genuinely due but unaffordable, ask for a payment plan, called délai de paiement, rather than defaulting into enforced recovery against the very house you just gave away.

Conclusion

Gifting a French house to your children after Brexit is neither forbidden nor fiscally ruinous, but it is a technical operation that rewards preparation and punishes improvisation. Put the gift through a French notaire in a properly drafted deed, consider the donation-partage to fix values and keep siblings at peace, measure every gift against the forced reserve even where you have elected English law, and price the tax honestly: 100,000 euros per parent per child free, a progressive scale above that, and a fifteen-year memory for earlier gifts. Above all, value the house on real evidence, because most disputes in this field are not about the law at all but about a number in a deed that the administration refuses to believe. Get the number right, disclose the history, answer every letter within its deadline, and the transfer your family remembers will be your generosity, not your tax bill.

Need a quick opinion on your case

A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm to review your deed, your valuation or your reassessment before you sign or reply. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page. We assist British owners across France, including Paris and the Île-de-France, before their notaire and the tax office.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.