Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Resident in France Receiving UK REIT Distributions After Brexit: the Investment-Vehicle Exception, the Treaty Credit and How to Challenge Double Tax

You live in France, you hold shares in a British Real Estate Investment Trust, a REIT, through a London broker, and your vouchers look different from ordinary dividend statements. Next to the familiar dividend lines sits another line, labelled PID, short for property income distribution, and on that line British tax has been deducted before the money reaches you. Ordinary UK dividends arrive gross, with nothing taken in London. Property distributions do not. That deducted British tax changes everything about your French return: it opens a treaty credit that ordinary dividends never trigger, it complicates the choice between the French flat rate and the progressive scale, and it creates a paper trail that most British investors in France never assemble until a reassessment forces them to.

This guide is written for a British reader with no French tax training who receives UK property distributions while resident in France after Brexit. It explains what a PID is, why the France-United Kingdom double tax convention of 19 June 2008 treats it worse than an ordinary dividend, how to declare it in France, how to compute the treaty credit without leaving money behind, and how to challenge a bill that ignores the British tax you already paid. Every French term is explained the first time it appears, and the decisive French texts are quoted word for word from the French Tax Code (Code général des impôts), the Social Security Code and the book of tax procedure (Livre des procédures fiscales).

If your income is ordinary dividends from UK-listed shares rather than property distributions, start with the general guide on British residents receiving UK dividends, which covers residence, worldwide taxation and the standard treaty credit in full. If your problem is interest on UK savings, the companion guide on British residents earning UK savings interest covers the treaty article for interest and the same choice between the flat rate and the progressive scale. This page goes further, into the one distribution that actually suffers British tax at source.

I. Why your UK property distributions are taxed in both countries when ordinary dividends are not

A. What a PID is and why British tax is deducted from it

A Real Estate Investment Trust is a listed property company under a special British regime: it pays little or no British corporation tax on its rental profits, and in exchange it must distribute most of those profits to shareholders. The part of the payout that comes from tax-exempt rental business is not an ordinary dividend. It is a property income distribution, and Britain taxes it at source at its own domestic rate before you ever see it. Your broker voucher therefore shows two different natures of income side by side: ordinary dividends, paid gross, and PIDs, paid net of British tax. The first reflex of a well-organised file is to separate them, payment by payment, because France and the treaty treat them differently from this point on.

On the French side, both lines are taxable. France taxes you on your worldwide income as soon as you have your domicile fiscal, your tax domicile, in France. Article 4 B of the French Tax Code provides: “Sont considérées comme ayant leur domicile fiscal en France au sens de l’article 4 A : a. Les personnes qui ont en France leur foyer ou le lieu de leur séjour principal” (Article 4 B, Code général des impôts). In plain English, if your foyer, your family home, or your main place of stay is in France, you are French tax resident, and the location of the REIT changes nothing. Article 158 states the worldwide rule bluntly: “sans qu’il y ait lieu de distinguer suivant que ces revenus ont leur source en France ou hors de France” (Article 158, Code général des impôts). The definition of taxable investment income is deliberately wide. Article 120 catches “Les dividendes, intérêts, arrérages et tous autres produits des actions de toute nature et des parts de fondateur des sociétés, compagnies ou entreprises financières, industrielles, commerciales, civiles et généralement quelconques dont le siège social est situé à l’étranger quelle que soit l’époque de leur création” (Article 120, Code général des impôts). A distribution from a British REIT, a company with its registered office abroad, falls inside that net whether the voucher calls it a dividend or a PID. Keeping the money in London, reinvesting it automatically, or never transferring it to France changes nothing: France taxes the payment, not the transfer.

The practical consequence is a calendar and a currency discipline. PIDs are taxable for the year the broker pays them, converted into euros at the payment-date rate, and declared the following spring. For each PID, record four figures from the voucher: the gross distribution, the British tax deducted, the net received, and the payment date. If the voucher mixes ordinary dividends and PIDs on one line, ask the broker for a breakdown before filing; reconstructing it two years later during an audit, from archived contract notes, is slow and sometimes impossible. The two tax authorities exchange information systematically under the convention’s cooperation machinery (2008 UK-France Double Taxation Convention, in force, GOV.UK), so organise the file on the assumption that both sides already know the payments.

B. The treaty exception that lets Britain tax your PIDs with no 15 per cent ceiling

For ordinary dividends, the 2008 convention shares the taxing right generously toward France: the state of your residence may tax, and any British tax on the dividend is capped at 15 per cent of the gross amount for the beneficial owner, the person truly entitled to the income (2008 UK-France Double Taxation Convention, Article 11, GOV.UK). Since Britain currently levies no withholding on ordinary dividends, that ceiling sleeps and France collects the whole charge. For property distributions, the convention withdraws the ceiling. Its protections do not apply to dividends paid out of immovable-property income by an investment vehicle above the stated holding threshold, and in that case the state where the dividends arise may apply its own domestic rate (2008 UK-France Double Taxation Convention, Article 11, GOV.UK). That single carve-out is why your PID line shows a British deduction while your ordinary dividend line does not.

This is where the treaty credit comes alive. Article 24 gives the French resident a credit against French tax equal to the tax genuinely paid in Britain under the convention, capped at the amount of French tax attributable to the same income (2008 UK-France Double Taxation Convention, Article 24, GOV.UK). Three lessons follow for PID holders. First, only tax effectively and definitively borne in Britain under the convention counts: keep the voucher, because it is the only proof of the British levy. Second, the credit can never exceed the French tax on the same distributions: if Britain took more than France charges on the PIDs, the excess is lost and France refunds nothing. Third, the credit is computed PID by PID, or at least as a coherent pool of British-taxed distributions, and claimed on the foreign-income return, the déclaration des revenus encaissés à l’étranger (form 2047). The Conseil d’État has described exactly this machinery, foreign withholding on dividends set against the French tax under the conventions, in a case involving dividends from companies in Italy, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands: “s’agissant de titres de sociétés établies en Italie, au Royaume-Uni et aux Pays-Bas, SGAM Banque a perçu des dividendes servis sur ces titres, diminués des retenues à la source acquittées respectivement dans ces trois Etats. La société s’est estimée en droit, en application des stipulations des conventions fiscales conclues par la France avec ces trois Etats, d’imputer sur l’impôt sur les sociétés dont elle était redevable en France les crédits d’impôt correspondant au montant de ces retenues à la source” (Conseil d’État, 5 July 2021, No. 399952). The context there was corporate tax, but the mechanics, withholding abroad then imputation at home under the convention, are precisely your PID credit as an individual. Present every claim in those terms: identify the British levy, tie it to the treaty article that authorises it, and quantify the French ceiling.

One wrong route must be closed immediately. The HMRC claim form for French residents, the France-Individual form, exists to claim relief at source from British income tax and repayment of tax already paid, but HMRC describes it as a form for French residents receiving British pensions, purchased annuities, interest or royalties, a list on which dividends and property distributions do not appear (Double Taxation: UK-France, Form France-Individual, GOV.UK). Do not file it for PIDs: the British deduction on a PID is treaty-authorised, not recoverable in London, and the relief belongs on the French 2047. Files that waste a year waiting for a London repayment that cannot come are among the most expensive mistakes in this area.

II. How to declare your PIDs, compute the credit and challenge the bill

A. Declare both lines, then choose the 12.8 per cent flat rate or the progressive scale with open eyes

Report every distribution on form 2047, ordinary dividends and PIDs separately, with gross amounts in euros, then carry the totals onto the main return (form 2042). The 2047 is also where the foreign tax credit for the British PID levy is computed and claimed, so a PID omitted from the 2047 loses both its declaration and its credit in one stroke. File online from your espace particulier on impots.gouv.fr within the French deadlines, and keep the filed PDF with its acknowledgment together with every voucher. For PIDs that stay in London with a British broker and no French paying agent, no French advance is collected and the whole liability falls on the annual return, which makes this discipline decisive.

The default French charge is the prélèvement forfaitaire unique, the single flat-rate levy of 30 per cent, whose income-tax half is 12.8 per cent. Article 200 A of the Tax Code states: “L’impôt sur le revenu dû par les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B à raison des revenus, gains nets, profits, distributions, plus-values et créances énumérés aux 1° et 2° du A du présent 1 est établi par application du taux forfaitaire prévu au B du présent 1”, and “Le taux forfaitaire mentionné au premier alinéa du présent 1 est fixé à 12,8 %” (Article 200 A, Code général des impôts). The same article confirms the treaty interaction that makes PIDs special: “L’impôt retenu à la source est imputé sur l’imposition à taux forfaitaire dans la limite du crédit d’impôt auquel il ouvre droit, dans les conditions prévues par les conventions internationales” (Article 200 A, Code général des impôts). In other words, even under the flat rate, the British PID levy reduces the French bill within the credit limit. The other half of the 30 per cent is social charges, the prélèvements sociaux of 17.2 per cent. The base rule sits in the Social Security Code: “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B du code général des impôts sont assujetties à une contribution sur les revenus du patrimoine assise sur le montant net retenu pour l’établissement de l’impôt sur le revenu”, expressly including “c) Des revenus de capitaux mobiliers” (Article L. 136-6, Code de la sécurité sociale), collected under the framework of Article 1600-0 C of the Tax Code. Any comparison of routes must add 17.2 per cent on the correct base to both sides.

Before the final return, a 12.8 per cent advance, the prélèvement forfaitaire non libératoire, may already have been taken at payment. Article 117 quater catches French-domiciled individuals receiving distributed income within its listed articles, providing that they “sont assujetties à un prélèvement au taux de 12,8 %” (Article 117 quater, Code général des impôts). Modest households can be exempted from the advance where their reference tax income of two years earlier stays below the thresholds, since households whose income “est inférieur à 50 000 € pour les contribuables célibataires, divorcés ou veufs et à 75 000 € pour les contribuables soumis à une imposition commune peuvent demander à être dispensées de ce prélèvement dans les conditions prévues à l’article 242 quater” (Article 117 quater, Code général des impôts). The request goes to the paying institution “au plus tard le 30 novembre de l’année précédant celle du paiement des revenus”, with a sworn statement, an attestation sur l’honneur: households “formulent, sous leur responsabilité, leur demande de dispense des prélèvements prévus aux mêmes I au plus tard le 30 novembre de l’année précédant celle du paiement des revenus mentionnés auxdits I, en produisant, auprès des personnes qui en assurent le paiement, une attestation sur l’honneur” (Article 242 quater, Code général des impôts). Miss the 30 November deadline and the advance is taken and merely set against the final tax a year later.

The strategic decision is the global election for the progressive scale, the option globale pour le barème progressif, and PIDs make it trickier than for ordinary dividends. The Conseil d’État restated the mechanism in a 2024 case between two individual taxpayers: “Il résulte de ces dispositions que si les revenus de capitaux mobiliers et plus-values de cession de valeurs mobilières qu’elles énumèrent sont en principe imposés au taux forfaitaire de 12,8 %, ces revenus peuvent, sur option du contribuable portant sur la totalité des revenus entrant dans leur champ pour l’année en cause, être imposés par application du barème progressif de l’impôt sur le revenu” (Conseil d’État, 5 April 2024, No. 490411). The election is global, catching every qualifying income and gain of the year, it is exercised when filing, and above all it is irrevocable: “Il ressort de la lettre même de ces dispositions qu’une telle option revêt un caractère irrévocable” (Conseil d’État, 5 April 2024, No. 490411). Two PID-specific cautions follow. First, the 40 per cent allowance, the abattement de 40 %, which can make the scale attractive for ordinary dividends, is reserved for dividends “distribués par les sociétés passibles de l’impôt sur les sociétés ou d’un impôt équivalent” from treaty states, “réduits, pour le calcul de l’impôt sur le revenu, d’un abattement égal à 40 % de leur montant brut perçu” (Article 158, Code général des impôts). A REIT exempt on its rental profits is not self-evidently a company subject to corporation tax or an equivalent levy, so never assume the allowance covers your PIDs: check the vehicle’s status and the distribution resolution, and compute the scale both with and without the allowance before electing. Second, the treaty credit interacts differently with each route, since the French-tax ceiling is computed on the tax actually due under the chosen route. Run both computations in full, keep the losing one as proof of a deliberate choice, and remember that a choice discovered to be expensive during an audit cannot be undone.

B. Recover the credit the return forgot and challenge double taxation before the deadline

Most PID disputes are not about principle but about a credit missing, capped wrongly, or refused. The French-side remedy is the réclamation, the formal claim to the administration. Use it whenever France has taken too much: credit omitted from the 2047, advance of 12.8 per cent never set against the final bill, social charges on the wrong base, PIDs and ordinary dividends mixed into one opaque total, or a reassessment that ignores the British levy shown on the vouchers. The deadline is strict. Claims “doivent être présentées à l’administration au plus tard le 31 décembre de la deuxième année suivant celle, selon le cas : a) De la mise en recouvrement du rôle ou de la notification d’un avis de mise en recouvrement ; b) Du versement de l’impôt contesté lorsque cet impôt n’a pas donné lieu à l’établissement d’un rôle ou à la notification d’un avis de mise en recouvrement” (Article R*196-1, Livre des procédures fiscales). For tax charged by assessment, that means 31 December of the second year after the assessment; for tax taken without assessment, such as the advance, 31 December of the second year after payment. File from your online account, state the exact legal basis for each head of claim, attach the vouchers with the British levy highlighted, show the credit computation against the French ceiling, and ask expressly for discharge or restitution with interest. Silence for six months opens the door to the administrative court, the tribunal administratif, where the paper file decides.

Four PID files recur in practice. First, the broker that reports a single annual total with no PID split: demand the breakdown, and until it arrives declare the split on a reasoned basis disclosed in the return rather than hiding the income. Second, the administration that treats the whole PID as an ordinary dividend and the British levy as irrelevant: answer with the investment-vehicle exception and Article 24, voucher by voucher. Third, the credit claimed in full where the British levy exceeds the French tax on the PIDs: recompute honestly at the ceiling, because an inflated claim discredits the whole file and the excess was never recoverable. Fourth, the sale of the REIT shares themselves, where the broker’s capital-gain figure is carried onto the wrong line or confused with accumulated distributions: gains on disposal follow their own regime and must not be folded into dividend lines. In every case, quantify line by line: a claim that sets out the British levy, the treaty article behind it and the resulting French ceiling is answered, while a vague complaint about being taxed twice is not. And where the administration will not move although the treaty has plainly been misapplied, the convention itself offers the mutual-agreement procedure before the competent authorities, with strict presentation deadlines, alongside the domestic courts.

Conclusion

Your UK property distributions are the exception that proves the dividends rule. Ordinary UK dividends reach you gross and leave France to collect everything; PIDs reach you net of British tax, deducted under the convention’s investment-vehicle exception, and that deduction buys you a French treaty credit capped at the French tax on the same income. Declare both lines separately on form 2047, choose between the 12.8 per cent flat rate and the progressive scale only after computing both routes with the credit and the social charges included, never assume the 40 per cent allowance covers an exempt vehicle, request the advance exemption before 30 November when your income allows, and challenge any missing or capped credit before 31 December of the second year. Hold that discipline and the British levy becomes what the treaty intended: a payment on account of the French bill, not a second tax on the same income.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm. We can review your REIT vouchers and PID lines, your flat-rate or scale election and any double-tax bill with you. Call Maître Reda Kohen at +33 6 46 60 58 22. Contact the firm.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
3 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.