Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, attorney at the Paris Bar
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Buying French Property at Auction: Seizure Sales, Bidding Rules and Title Risks Explained for Foreign Buyers

Every month, court-ordered auctions in Paris, Lyon, Bordeaux and the coastal resorts put French flats, village houses and development plots on the market at starting prices far below estate-agent listings. For a foreign buyer paying in cash, the temptation is obvious: a Paris studio with a mise à prix (reserve price) of 120,000 euros, a Provençal farmhouse opened at half its apparent market value, a building plot with no chain and no seller to negotiate with. Some buyers do secure genuine bargains. Others discover, too late, that a French seizure auction is not a quicker version of an ordinary purchase but an entirely different legal transaction, governed by the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings, with no cooling-off period, no mortgage condition, no hidden-defects warranty, and a ten-day window after the hammer falls during which a stranger can take the property away from the winning bidder. This guide explains, for non-French buyers, how a saisie immobilière (judicial seizure of real estate) leads to an adjudication (auction sale), what title the successful bidder actually receives, and where foreign bidders most often lose money.

The single most important point comes first. At auction you buy the property strictly as it stands, with its occupants, its leases, its easements and its planning position, and you cannot renegotiate after the fall of the hammer. The sale file prepared for the court, the cahier des conditions de vente (conditions of sale), describes the property and the procedure, but it does not replace your own due diligence. A buyer who reads that file line by line, visits the property, checks the registered charges, secures funds in France before bidding and instructs a local lawyer in good time can bid with confidence. A buyer who treats the reserve price as the likely total cost, or who assumes that consumer protections from ordinary sales apply, is heading for an expensive lesson. The sections below follow the chronology of a real case: the seizure, the auction room, the ten days after the sale, the two months to pay, and the moment you finally take possession.

I. How a French Seizure Auction Works and What the Buyer Actually Receives

A. From the Seizure Order to the Auction Room: Procedure, Reserve Price and the Sale File

A judicial auction starts long before any bidding, with a creditor enforcing an enforceable title against a debtor who owns French real estate. Under Article L. 321-1 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings, the creditor seizes the property by a formal act served on the debtor, and the procedure is then driven by a commandement de payer valant saisie (order to pay operating as seizure), which is published at the land registry. Within two months of that publication the creditor summons the debtor before the enforcement judge for the audience d’orientation (orientation hearing), where the judge checks the validity of the proceedings and decides whether the property will be sold by private treaty under supervision or by forced auction. For a foreign buyer monitoring auction listings, this history matters for one practical reason: every step of it can be challenged, and a successful challenge unwinds everything that follows.

The Cour de cassation made that fragility clear in a recent ruling. In Cass. 2nd civ., 6 March 2025, No. 22-12.742, the Court held, “En application de ces textes, la nullité du commandement de payer valant saisie atteint tous les actes de la procédure qu’il engage.” In other words, if the initial seizure order is void, every subsequent act of the procedure falls with it, including the orientation judgment and the auction itself. The buyer cannot cure that defect and cannot claim to be a good-faith purchaser protected from it. The practical lesson is to verify, through your lawyer, that the procedure described in the sale file has not been the subject of pending challenges, and to understand that a bargain price sometimes reflects a litigation risk that the market has already priced in.

Once the judge orders a forced sale, the creditor’s lawyer files the sale dossier at the court registry: the cahier des conditions de vente. Under Article R. 322-10 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings, this file must contain a description of the property, the terms of the sale, a copy of the summons served on the debtor and a certified mortgage statement established at the date of publication of the seizure order, and it must state the enforcement title and an account of the sums claimed. This file is the single most important document for any bidder, foreign or French. It tells you what the creditor claims, what registered charges exist, on what title the seizure rests, and under which conditions the sale will take place. Any bidder may consult it at the registry, and a prudent foreign buyer has it reviewed by counsel before spending a euro on travel or surveys. If the file is thin, out of date or internally inconsistent, treat that as a warning rather than a detail.

The starting price is set by the creditor, not by the court. Article L. 322-6 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings provides, “Le montant de la mise à prix est fixé par le créancier poursuivant.” In other words, the reserve price is the pursuing creditor’s figure, and if nobody bids the creditor is declared the purchaser at that amount. The debtor may ask the judge to fix a reserve reflecting the market value where the initial figure is manifestly too low, but the creditor can only be declared purchaser at its own initial figure. For the foreign bidder this has two consequences. First, a low reserve is a marketing signal, not a valuation: it is designed to attract bidders, and competitive bidding often carries the price far above it. Second, an abnormally low reserve can indicate a creditor that simply wants a quick exit, which is good news, or a property with hidden difficulties that regular local buyers already know about, which is not. Never bid on the reserve alone; establish your own maximum from comparable sales, the works budget and the occupation position, and stick to it in the room.

Bidding itself is a formal exercise that surprises many foreigners: you cannot simply raise your hand. Article R. 322-40 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings states, “Les enchères sont portées par le ministère d’un avocat inscrit au barreau du tribunal judiciaire devant lequel la vente est poursuivie.” Every bid must therefore be placed through a lawyer registered at the bar of the court conducting the sale, and each lawyer may carry only one mandate. A buyer based in London, New York, Geneva or Dubai must give a written power of attorney to a local avocat (attorney) before the hearing, agree a precise ceiling in writing, and arrange the payment guarantee the lawyer will need. Article L. 322-7 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings adds, “Sous réserve des incapacités tenant aux fonctions qu’elle exerce, toute personne peut se porter enchérisseur si elle justifie de garanties de paiement.” Anyone may bid, including a non-resident foreigner, provided they show guarantees of payment, which in practice means a bank guarantee or bank cheque lodged through the lawyer. There is no requirement of French nationality or residence, but there is an absolute requirement of preparation: a bidder who arrives without a lawyer and without secured funds cannot participate at all.

The sale takes place at a public hearing before the judge. Article L. 322-5 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings provides, “L’adjudication de l’immeuble a lieu aux enchères publiques à l’audience du juge.” The judgment of sale, the jugement d’adjudication (adjudication judgment), is then notified to the debtor, the registered creditors, the purchaser and anyone whose challenge was decided. Note carefully that only a sale judgment which rules on a dispute can be appealed, and then within fifteen days of notification, under Article R. 322-60 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings. A buyer who hopes to challenge the outcome afterwards has almost no room: the time to raise objections is before and during the procedure, not after the hammer. That is why experienced bidders settle every question of title, occupation and price before the hearing date, and treat the hearing as an execution step rather than a moment of reflection.

B. What the Adjudication Transfers: a Forced Sale With Almost No Warranty

The legal effect of a successful bid is stated bluntly by the statute. Article L. 322-10 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings provides, “L’adjudication emporte vente forcée du bien saisi et en transmet la propriété à l’adjudicataire.” The auction effects a forced sale and transfers ownership of the seized property to the successful bidder. But the same article immediately limits what is transferred: the purchaser receives no more rights than the seized debtor had, while the debtor owes delivery of the property and a warranty against eviction. You step exactly into the debtor’s shoes for the extent of the rights, with a claim for delivery and a guarantee against being dispossessed by a third party with a better title. Everything else that a buyer in an ordinary sale would expect must be verified in advance, because it will not be supplied afterwards.

The sharpest difference from an ordinary purchase concerns hidden defects. In a private sale, Article 1641 of the Civil Code makes the seller liable for hidden defects that render the property unfit for its intended use or diminish that use so far that the buyer would not have bought, or would have paid less, had they known. At auction, that protection disappears. Article 1649 of the Civil Code states, “Elle n’a pas lieu dans les ventes faites par autorité de justice.” The hidden-defects warranty simply does not apply to sales made by order of the court. Damp, subsidence, a failing roof, non-compliant electrics, an infestation discovered after you take possession: none of these gives you a price reduction or rescission against the seized debtor. The same exclusion applies to the vice caché (hidden defect) case law that foreign buyers sometimes read about in connection with ordinary French purchases. Those rulings concern private sales; your auction purchase belongs to a different regime, and you must price the risk of unknown defects into your maximum bid or commission a survey before the hearing wherever access is possible.

The mandatory technical surveys, the dossier de diagnostic technique (technical survey file), deserve a clear-eyed comment. In ordinary sales a battery of diagnostics on asbestos, lead, energy performance, gas and electricity must be annexed to the deed, and errors can generate liability for the surveyor or the seller. In a seizure sale the file may contain diagnostics of uneven quality or age, and in some cases the debtor’s lack of cooperation means surveyors could not access every room. Even where the surveys are complete, they inform your bid rather than protect you after it: remember that the hidden-defects warranty is excluded, so a diagnostic that understates a problem does not give you a claim against the debtor. Claims against a surveyor who made a measurable error remain possible in theory, but pursuing a surveyor from abroad over a property you bought at a discount is slow, uncertain and rarely economic. Read the surveys as clues, visit when visits are organised, budget a margin for the unknown, and never assume the file tells the whole story.

Occupation is the second great source of disappointment. The purchaser is entitled to delivery, but delivery of an occupied property means dealing with the occupants: the debtor themselves, family members, a tenant with a lease still running, or occasionally an occupant with no right at all. A lease granted before the seizure may be binding on the purchaser, and removing occupants requires enforcement steps through a commissaire de justice (judicial officer, formerly huissier), with statutory delays and winter protections that can stretch over many months. The sale file describes the occupation as known to the creditor, but the description may be outdated on the day of the sale. Before bidding, clarify who lives in the property, under what title, and what it will cost in time and money to recover vacant possession. A flat sold 30 percent below market value but occupied by a protected tenant for six more years may be no bargain at all for a buyer who wanted a holiday home next summer.

Easements, boundary positions and planning status follow the same rule: you take the property as it is. A servitude (easement) for passage, drainage or view, a shared driveway, an encroaching extension, a swimming pool built without permission, a pre-emption right that the sale file mentions in passing: all of these survive the auction and bind you. French municipalities and certain public bodies hold pre-emption rights over defined areas, and while the auction process accommodates them, you should confirm before bidding whether any such right affects the property and whether it was duly purged. Planning certificates, alignment orders and the local plan should be checked at the town hall for any property where you intend to extend, convert or develop. None of this is exotic; it is the same due diligence as for a private purchase, except that after the auction you have no seller to turn against if you missed something. Our Paris real estate law page describes how the team assists international buyers with these checks before they commit funds.

One piece of good news should be recorded accurately. The price you pay is distributed to the creditors through the court-supervised distribution procedure, the distribution du prix (distribution of the price), and it is that payment mechanism which clears the property of the registered mortgages and charges that burdened the debtor. You do not pay the debtor and hope the creditors release their securities; the court machinery allocates the funds. But this protection covers only what the procedure covers. Charges and rights that are not attached to the seized debt, rights of occupants, easements, long leases, and public-law constraints are not wiped out by the distribution. The mortgage statement in the sale file shows the registered picture at publication date; your lawyer completes it with up-to-date searches and explains, line by line, what disappears on distribution and what stays with the property permanently.

II. The Traps That Cost Foreign Bidders Money and How to Avoid Them

A. The Ten Days After the Hammer: Overbids, Deposits and the Defaulting Bidder

Many foreign buyers believe the auction ends when the judge declares them the successful bidder. In a French seizure sale, it does not. For ten days after the adjudication, anyone may outbid you by offering at least one-tenth more than the price you achieved. Article R. 322-50 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings states, “Toute personne peut faire une surenchère du dixième au moins du prix principal de la vente.” Any person may file an overbid of at least one-tenth of the principal sale price. The overbidder need not have attended the hearing, need not be a creditor, and need not give any reason. If a valid surenchère (overbid) is filed, the property goes back to auction at the new, higher starting price, and you, the original bidder, are released but lose the property unless you choose to bid again at the new hearing. Budget and psychology must both absorb this: the hammer price is provisional for ten days, and only the expiry of that period without an overbid makes your purchase definitive.

The overbid procedure is deliberately demanding, and the Cour de cassation enforces its formalities strictly, in both directions. Article R. 322-51 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings provides, “A peine d’irrecevabilité, la surenchère est formée par acte d’avocat et déposée au greffe du juge de l’exécution dans les dix jours suivant l’adjudication.” Under penalty of inadmissibility, the overbid must be filed by a lawyer at the enforcement judge’s registry within ten days of the sale. The lawyer must certify receipt of an irrevocable bank guarantee or bank cheque for one-tenth of the principal price, and the overbid cannot be withdrawn once filed. The overbidder must then notify the creditor, the original purchaser and the debtor within three working days, failing which the overbid itself is inadmissible. In Cass. 2nd civ., 10 June 2021, No. 19-21.935, the Court drew a precise line between defects that kill the overbid and defects that merely allow annulment: “Il résulte de ces textes que, si la déclaration de surenchère doit être dénoncée par acte d’huissier de justice ou par notification entre avocats au créancier poursuivant, à l’adjudicataire et au débiteur saisi, à peine d’irrecevabilité, c’est à peine de nullité, supposant la démonstration d’un grief, que cette dénonciation doit rappeler les dispositions de l’article R. 311-6 et du deuxième alinéa de l’article R. 322-52, et que doit y être jointe une copie de l’attestation prévue au deuxième alinéa de l’article R. 322-51 du même code.” Failure to notify the right persons in the right form makes the overbid inadmissible outright, while omitting the statutory reminders or the guarantee certificate in the notification exposes it to annulment only if a grievance is shown. For the original bidder this means the ten-day period is not a formality: have your lawyer monitor the registry, verify any overbid immediately, and challenge it within the fifteen-day contestation window if it is defective, because once a valid overbid stands, the property returns to the market.

The mirror risk is your own default. French law gives the successful bidder two months to pay, then shows no mercy. Article R. 322-56 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings requires payment to the sequestrator or consignment with the Caisse des dépôts within two months of the definitive sale, failing which the property is put up for re-auction, with statutory interest running automatically after the deadline. And Article L. 322-12 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings states, “A défaut de versement du prix ou de sa consignation et de paiement des frais, la vente est résolue de plein droit.” If the price is not paid or consigned and the costs are not paid, the sale is resolved as of right. The defaulting bidder, the fol enchérisseur (defaulting bidder, literally the mad bidder), then faces the folle enchère (re-auction on default): the property is resold at their risk, and if the resale price is lower they must pay the difference, without any right to recover sums already paid or to benefit if the resale price is higher. A foreign buyer whose funds are stuck in a cross-border transfer, whose bank withdraws financing, or who simply miscalculated the additional costs can therefore lose the property, owe the shortfall on resale, and forfeit what was already paid. Never bid with money that is not already available and transferable in France.

Three Cour de cassation rulings map the boundaries of this default regime, and each carries a lesson. First, late payment can still save the sale: in Cass. 2nd civ., 1 October 2020, No. 19-12.830, the Court held, “Ce n’est, dès lors, qu’en l’absence de consignation ou de versement du prix et de paiement des frais à la date où le juge statue que la résolution de la vente peut être constatée, à l’occasion de la procédure de réitération des enchères ou par une action tendant à cette seule résolution.” Resolution can only be declared if the price and costs remain unpaid on the day the judge rules, whether in re-auction proceedings or in a standalone action. Paying late, after the two months but before the judge decides, therefore cures the default, with interest. Second, the special enforcement regime excludes ordinary sales law: in Cass. 2nd civ., 3 February 2022, No. 20-19.522, the Court ruled, “Ces dispositions, d’ordre public, impliquent que si elle peut être demandée à titre principal en cas de défaut de paiement du prix, la résolution de la vente ne peut l’être que sur le fondement des dispositions spéciales du code des procédures civiles d’exécution, qui dérogent à celles du droit commun de la vente, et tant que le prix de vente n’a pas été payé.” These public-policy provisions mean resolution for non-payment can only be pursued under the special enforcement provisions, which override the ordinary law of sale, and only while the price remains unpaid. A party cannot invoke Article 1654 of the Civil Code, which states, “Si l’acheteur ne paye pas le prix, le vendeur peut demander la résolution de la vente” because the enforcement code displaces it entirely. Third, the defaulting bidder keeps procedural rights: in Cass. 2nd civ., 9 June 2022, No. 20-21.352, the Court quashed a re-auction conducted without summoning the defaulting purchaser, holding that the defaulting bidder, who remains owner until resolution is declared, must be called to the re-auction hearing as a party. The lesson for the incoming buyer at a re-auction is symmetrical: check that the defaulter was duly summoned, or the resale itself can be annulled.

For the foreign bidder, these rules condense into four operational commands. Fund the full price plus costs in France before the hearing, through a French bank account capable of issuing the required guarantees and cheques. Calendar the ten-day overbid period and instruct your lawyer to watch the registry rather than assuming silence means success. Calendar the two-month payment deadline from the definitive sale and start the transfer mechanics immediately, because international wires, currency conversions and foreign-exchange controls do not suspend French time limits. And if you are bidding at a re-auction following a default, verify service on the defaulter just as carefully as you verify title, since a resale pronounced without them can collapse months later.

B. Paying, Taking Possession and Securing Title: the Two-Month Clock, the Occupants and the Final Deed

Payment mechanics deserve close attention because they differ completely from an ordinary conveyance. There is no compromis de vente (preliminary sale agreement) with staggered deposits, no mortgage condition, no notaire holding a deposit while the buyer arranges finance. The price must be paid or consigned within two months of the definitive adjudication, together with the costs of the sale, and Article L. 322-4 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Proceedings provides that the notarial deed of sale is drawn up only on consignment of the price and proof of payment of the costs. No consignment and no proof of costs means no deed, and no deed means no registered title. The taxe de publicité foncière (land registration tax) and transfer duties apply to auction purchases as they do to private sales, at the standard rates for the department, plus the taxed costs of the proceedings and your own lawyer’s fees. Foreign buyers sometimes compute their ceiling from the hammer price alone and discover afterwards that duties, costs, interest for late payment and the works budget add 15 to 25 percent. Compute the all-in figure first, then derive your maximum bid by subtraction, not the other way round.

Financing an auction purchase with a mortgage is theoretically possible and practically treacherous. No statute forbids borrowing to pay the adjudication price, but no bank will lend against a property you do not yet own, and the two-month clock does not wait for a credit committee. Lenders experienced in French auctions offer bridging arrangements or pre-approved facilities secured on other assets, with drawdown conditional on the adjudication judgment. If you intend to borrow even partially, the facility must be negotiated, documented and ready to draw before you bid, with the funds deliverable to the sequestrator or the Caisse des dépôts within the deadline. A loan offer subject to valuation, title review or committee approval is not a funding plan for an auction; it is a hope. Cash buyers should still confirm transfer logistics: large cross-border wires can trigger compliance reviews lasting days or weeks, and currency movements between the hearing and payment date are at your risk. The safest structure is cleared funds sitting in a French account, in euros, before the hearing, in an amount covering price, duties, costs and a margin for interest.

Taking possession is the next stage, and it rewards buyers who investigated occupation before bidding. The adjudication judgment is your title: it transfers ownership and entitles you to delivery, and it is the document the judicial officer enforces if occupants refuse to leave. Where the property is vacant, handover can be quick once the deed is drawn up. Where the debtor or third parties remain, you must proceed through formal enforcement: a command to vacate served by a judicial officer, statutory time limits, possible recourse to the judge for delays, and the winter truce that suspends most residential evictions from November to March. Each step takes weeks or months, and occupants may raise defences, from claims of a lease to applications for additional time, that only a lawyer can assess. None of this means occupied properties should never be bought; professional investors buy them routinely at prices reflecting the delay. It means the discount must be measured against a realistic possession timetable established before the bid, not discovered afterwards. Ask your lawyer for a written possession scenario with best, middle and worst cases, and make the worst case part of your price.

Leases and easements require the same advance reading. A residential lease in force at the date of seizure generally binds the purchaser, with its rent, term and renewal rights, and buying a tenanted flat at auction means becoming a landlord under French tenancy law from the day of the sale. Commercial leases, furnished lets and agricultural tenancies each carry their own mandatory regimes. Easements of passage, drainage, light or support, boundary determinations and joint-ownership arrangements survive the sale and cannot be renegotiated unilaterally. The mortgage statement and the sale file identify the registered position, but unregistered or disputed situations, a tenant who claims an unwritten extension, a neighbour who claims a prescriptive passage, a garage used for years without title, only emerge from visits, neighbourhood enquiries and targeted searches. Commission those checks during the listing period. After the adjudication, the law treats you as having accepted everything the file disclosed and everything a diligent buyer would have found.

A final word on the deed and the after-sale position. Once the price is consigned and the costs paid, the notarial deed is established and published at the land registry, giving you a registered title opposable to third parties. Keep the full chain of documents indefinitely: the sale file, the adjudication judgment, proof of consignment and payment, the deed, and all correspondence with the lawyer and the judicial officer. If a creditor, an occupant or a neighbour challenges your title later, that file is your defence. If you resell within a few years, your own buyer’s notaire will examine the auction origin closely, and a complete file shortens that review considerably. Foreign owners who hold through a société civile immobilière (property holding company) should ensure the adjudication and the deed correctly name the purchasing entity, since a mismatch between the bidder’s mandate and the registered owner creates months of corrective work. And where the property needs works before it can be let or lived in, remember that French planning, co-ownership and energy-performance rules apply to you exactly as to any owner: the auction gave you a price advantage, not a regulatory exemption.

Conclusion

A French seizure auction offers foreign buyers something the private market rarely provides: a transparent, court-supervised mechanism where the highest prepared bidder wins, without chains, gazumping or seller prevarication. The price of that transparency is a strict, unforgiving procedure. The seizure order conditions everything and its nullity destroys everything; the reserve price is the creditor’s opening figure, not a valuation; bids pass exclusively through a local lawyer with payment guarantees; the hidden-defects warranty does not exist in judicial sales; a stranger may overbid you within ten days; you must pay within two months or lose the property at your own risk and expense; and you take occupants, leases, easements and planning constraints as they stand. None of these features makes auctions unsuitable for foreigners. Non-residents bid successfully every week, and the statute expressly allows anyone to bid subject to payment guarantees. What separates the successful foreign bidder from the casualty is preparation done before the hearing: reading the sale file with counsel, verifying procedure and title, visiting, funding the all-in cost in France, mandating a local lawyer with a written ceiling, and pricing occupation and works honestly. Do that work, and the auction room becomes what it should be, a place to buy well. Skip it, and the cheapest property in the catalogue becomes the most expensive lesson in your portfolio. Before the next list of sales is published, line up the funds, the lawyer and the checks described above, and bid only when all three are in place. Further background on how the team supports international buyers across purchase, financing and disputes is available on our Paris real estate law page.

Need a quick opinion on your case

If you are considering bidding for a French property at auction or already face an overbid, a payment deadline or an occupant after an adjudication, a telephone consultation with one of our lawyers within 48 hours can clarify your position, costs and options. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via our contact page with a short description of your situation.

Source: Cour de cassation – “Judilibre” & “Légifrance” Open Data.

What our clients say

4,9255 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
2 days ago

Best real estate and business law attorney in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.