Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Your French Company Owes You Money: How a Foreign Owner Recovers a Shareholder Loan, Charges Interest and Passes a Tax Audit

You wired 80,000 euros from London or New York to your new French company so it could pay the deposit on the office, fund the first payroll and survive until revenue arrives. Your French accountant booked the transfer as an avance en compte courant, a shareholder current account advance, and told you it was the simplest way to fund the business. A year later you ask for the money back and the answer is confusing: the new manager says the funds are blocked, the accountant warns about tax, and the bank asks for a loan agreement you never signed. This guide explains the full answer in plain English. A compte courant d’associe is the running account in the company’s books that records every advance a shareholder leaves at the disposal of the company on top of share capital, plus any interest, repayments and charges. It is not capital, it is a loan, and French law treats it as one. You will learn when you can demand repayment at any time from abroad, when a written lock-up stops you, what interest you can charge and deduct, and how the French tax administration attacks these loans during an audit.

Every French acronym in this article is decoded on first use. The Kbis is the official company identity certificate issued by the greffe, the registry of the commercial court. The RCS is the Registre du commerce et des societes, the trade and companies register where your company and its managers are recorded. The INPI, the Institut national de la propriete industrielle, runs the Guichet unique, the single online portal where companies are registered and updated. The SIRET is the fourteen-digit identifier of your French establishment. The BODACC is the Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the gazette where capital transactions are published. SAS means societe par actions simplifiee, the flexible company form most foreign founders choose. SARL means societe a responsabilite limitee, the traditional limited liability company run by a gerant. IS means impot sur les societes, French corporate income tax. CGI means Code general des impots, the tax code. CMF means Code monetaire et financier, the monetary and financial code. DSN means declaration sociale nominative, the monthly payroll return. With these keys in hand, the rules below read like ordinary business logic backed by hard texts.

I. Can you get your shareholder loan back from your French company at any time from abroad?

The short answer is yes in principle, unless you signed a paper that says otherwise. French courts treat an ordinary shareholder advance as a loan for an indefinite term, which the lender can call back at any moment. The danger for foreign owners is never the principle, it is the paperwork: a missing agreement makes repayment easy but interest hard, while a signed lock-up or a cash shortage makes repayment legally possible but practically painful. The two sections below separate these situations so you can locate your own case within minutes.

A. How repayment on demand works when no lock-up was signed

A shareholder advance is legally a loan of fungible things. Article 1892 of the Civil Code defines it in these words: “Le prêt de consommation est un contrat par lequel l’une des parties livre à l’autre une certaine quantité de choses qui se consomment par l’usage, à la charge par cette dernière de lui en rendre autant de même espèce et qualité.” Money is the classic consumable thing, so the company that received your euros must return as many euros of the same kind. Because no repayment date was fixed, the loan runs for an indefinite term, and the lender sets the end by demanding payment.

The Cour de cassation, the French supreme court for civil matters, confirmed this in a published ruling of its commercial chamber on 12 February 2025, appeal number 23-17.483, a case about a shareholder who demanded both the price of redeemed shares and the balance of his current account. The Court approved the appeal judges for holding that “sauf stipulation contraire, tout associé était en droit d’exiger à tout moment et peu important les motifs de sa demande le remboursement du solde de son compte courant, dès lors que l’avance ainsi consentie constituait un prêt à durée indéterminée”. In plain English: unless the parties agreed otherwise, any shareholder can demand repayment of the credit balance of his current account at any time, for any reason, because the advance is a loan for an indefinite term. The full ruling is published at Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 12 February 2025, no. 23-17.483. For a foreign parent company that never signed a lock-up, this sentence is the whole case: send a written demand, and the company owes the balance.

Three practical consequences follow. First, the demand needs no justification. You do not have to explain why the parent needs the cash, and the French subsidiary cannot answer that the funds are more useful inside the company. Second, the demand should be written, dated and provable from abroad: a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt to the registered office, doubled by email to the manager with the account statement attached, starts the clock cleanly. Third, the claim is subject to the ordinary five-year limitation for personal actions. Article 2224 of the Civil Code provides: “Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d’un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l’exercer.” Eachof your advances starts its own clock, so old dormant balances from the incorporation year can expire while you wait. A yearly statement signed by the manager restarts the discussion and proves the balance.

Direction matters, and foreign founders often confuse the two. When you lend to your French company, you are the creditor and the rule above protects you. When the French company lends to you, the individual shareholder or director, French company law largely forbids it. Article L. 223-21 of the Commercial Code states for the SARL: “A peine de nullité du contrat, il est interdit aux gérants ou associés autres que les personnes morales de contracter, sous quelque forme que ce soit, des emprunts auprès de la société, de se faire consentir par elle un découvert, en compte courant ou autrement, ainsi que de faire cautionner ou avaliser par elle leurs engagements envers les tiers.” The parallel ban for public limited companies is article L. 225-43 of the Commercial Code: “A peine de nullité du contrat, il est interdit aux administrateurs autres que les personnes morales de contracter, sous quelque forme que ce soit, des emprunts auprès de la société, de se faire consentir par elle un découvert, en compte courant ou autrement, ainsi que de faire cautionner ou avaliser par elle leurs engagements envers les tiers.” Note the exception built into both texts: legal entities, personnes morales, are outside the ban. A foreign parent company structured as a legal entity can therefore hold a debit or credit current account that an individual director could never hold. Individuals who let their personal current account go into debit face nullity of the loan plus potential criminal exposure for misuse of company assets, so keep personal drawings and parent-company funding in strictly separate accounts.

Enforcement from abroad follows ordinary civil procedure. If the advance is simply stuck and no tax dispute has started yet, our earlier guide on recovering a stuck shareholder loan from abroad covers the pure recovery route, while this article adds the interest, withholding and audit layers. If the French company ignores your registered demand, your lawyer sends a formal notice, mise en demeure, giving a final deadline, then files an action for payment before the commercial court or the judicial court depending on the nature of the parties. Provisional relief exists: when the balance is undisputed because the company’s own accounts show it, the president of the court can order interim payment in refere proceedings within weeks. Attach the wire transfer slips from your foreign bank, the company’s ledger showing the credit, the latest approved accounts, and the unanswered demand letters with postal receipts. Companies that discover the dispute alongside a frozen bank account should coordinate both fronts, as explained in our guide on recovering funds when a French company bank account is frozen or closed. And founders still at the setup stage should revisit the complete setup guide for foreign founders, from bank account to Kbis to first hire, which shows how to document the first advance before it becomes a dispute.

B. How a written lock-up, repayment schedule or set-off changes the answer

The words “sauf stipulation contraire”, unless otherwise agreed, in the 2025 ruling carry the entire second half of this article. Parties can agree that the advance stays in the company for a fixed period, and French courts enforce that promise. The classic instruments are the convention de blocage, the lock-up agreement by which the shareholder promises not to demand repayment before a fixed date, and the convention de compte courant, the current account agreement that sets interest, statements and repayment terms. Banks routinely require them before lending to the company: your shareholder funds stay subordinated while the bank loan runs. Tax-driven documents can lock you too: an advance booked as a long-term subordinated loan to strengthen equity for a tender or a visa file will be read as a fixed-term commitment.

A valid lock-up must be written, precise and accepted. It states the blocked amount, the release date or the notice period, the interest during the freeze, and the sanction for early demand. A vague board minute noting that shareholders will leave funds available as long as needed does not meet that test against a lender who never signed it. Conversely, a lock-up you signed with the bank as co-party binds you even when the subsidiary changes manager or ownership. Before demanding repayment, pull the full financing file: the bank loan offer, the subordination letter, the shareholders agreement, and every email where you accepted a freeze. If none names your advance with a date, the default rule of repayment on demand survives, and you can write the demand letter with confidence.

Lock-ups expire, and expiry must be managed. Calendar the release date, then send the demand by registered letter the week it passes, because some agreements renew tacitly if nobody speaks. Where the agreement requires six months notice, send notice early and date it precisely; a premature court action filed during the notice period will be thrown out as premature. Where the company genuinely lacks cash, consider the middle paths French practice offers: a staged repayment schedule, echelonnement, signed by the manager with default interest; a set-off, compensation, against a debt you owe the company such as unpaid capital or a management fee invoice; or a conversion of part of the advance into capital by formal increase, which strengthens the balance sheet but kills future repayment of the converted part. Each path needs a board or shareholder decision, an updated ledger, and a filing where required, because an informal netting discovered during an audit looks like hidden income to both sides.

The cross-border trap is authority. From abroad, you cannot walk into the bank and sign, so give your French lawyer or accountant a written power of attorney limited to the repayment file, and insist that the manager who signs the schedule actually holds signing power on the Kbis extract dated that week. Check the RCS entry online before wiring anything back: a manager removed without publication still binds the company toward third parties in many cases, while a newly appointed manager without publication may lack visible authority toward the bank. If the company is already insolvent, stop and take insolvency advice first: demanding repayment on the eve of a cessation des paiements, the legal date when the company can no longer meet current liabilities with available assets, exposes the payment to claw-back, and the right move becomes filing the claim in the collective proceedings rather than seizing. Our guide on how a foreign parent dissolves and liquidates a French subsidiary explains the orderly exit when repayment is no longer realistic.

II. How do you charge interest and survive a French tax audit on the loan?

Repayment gets your principal back, but interest decides whether the operation made economic sense and whether the tax administration leaves you alone. France allows shareholders to charge interest, then caps the deduction, taxes the income, and punishes undocumented arrangements. Foreign lenders face one extra layer: withholding tax and transfer pricing when the lender sits outside France. The two sections below walk through rate and paperwork first, then the cross-border tax stack.

A. What interest rate can you charge and what paperwork makes it deductible?

Start with the civil law baseline, which is permissive. Article 1905 of the Civil Code states: “Il est permis de stipuler des intérêts pour simple prêt soit d’argent, soit de denrées, ou autres choses mobilières.” You may charge interest on a money loan. But the rate must be in writing. Article 1907 of the Civil Code provides: “L’intérêt est légal ou conventionnel. L’intérêt légal est fixé par la loi. L’intérêt conventionnel peut excéder celui de la loi, toutes les fois que la loi ne le prohibe pas. Le taux de l’intérêt conventionnel doit être fixé par écrit.” No written rate means no agreed rate. The Cour de cassation drew the consequence for current accounts in a commercial chamber ruling of 24 May 2017, appeal number 15-27.376, concerning a deposit current account whose balance was said to bear interest at a rate set by one party without any document stating the figure. The Court quashed the appeal judgment with this holding: “alors qu’à défaut d’écrit fixant le taux conventionnel, le taux légal est applicable au solde débiteur d’un compte courant à compter de la date d’ouverture du compte”. In plain English: without a written document fixing the agreed rate, the statutory legal rate applies to the debit balance of a current account from the date the account was opened. The ruling is published at Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 24 May 2017, no. 15-27.376. For foreign parents, the lesson is blunt: sign a one-page loan letter stating principal, rate, calculation base and payment dates before the first interest accrual, or accept the legal rate, which is published twice a year and is usually far below market.

The mirror rule punishes sloppy payers and protects careful ones. Article 1906 of the Civil Code provides: “L’emprunteur qui a payé des intérêts qui n’étaient pas stipulés ne peut ni les répéter ni les imputer sur le capital.” Interest paid without agreement cannot be reclaimed or credited against principal. So undocumented interest paid by the French company is lost money that still counts as taxable income for the recipient, the worst of both worlds.

Tax deduction is where the cap bites. When the French company pays interest to an individual shareholder, article 39, paragraph 1-3 of the General Tax Code allows deduction only within this limit: “Les intérêts servis aux associés à raison des sommes qu’ils laissent ou mettent à la disposition de la société, en sus de leur part du capital, quelle que soit la forme de la société, dans la limite de ceux calculés à un taux égal à la moyenne annuelle des taux effectifs moyens pratiqués par les établissements de crédit et les sociétés de financement pour des prêts à taux variable aux entreprises, d’une durée initiale supérieure à deux ans.” This average rate, published quarterly in the Journal officiel, is the ceiling most small companies live under. Deduction also requires fully paid-up capital: if the 1,000 euros of registered capital were never actually wired, no interest is deductible at all until liberation is complete. When the lender is a related company rather than an individual, article 212, paragraph I of the General Tax Code adds a second ceiling: “Les intérêts afférents aux sommes laissées ou mises à disposition d’une entreprise par une entreprise qui est son associée ou par une entreprise liée, directement ou indirectement, au sens du 12 de l’article 39, sont déductibles : a) Dans la limite de ceux calculés d’après le taux prévu au premier alinéa du 3° du 1 du même article 39 ou, s’ils sont supérieurs, d’après le taux que cette entreprise emprunteuse aurait pu obtenir d’établissements ou d’organismes financiers indépendants dans des conditions analogues”. In practice the French subsidiary deducts interest up to the published average rate automatically, and beyond that only with a bank-style comparability file proving an independent lender would have charged that price for the same risk, currency and term.

The audit file that survives has six pieces. One, the signed advance agreement with amount, currency, rate or rate formula, interest dates and repayment terms. Two, proof of the wire and of each interest payment through the bank, never cash. Three, quarterly statements of the current account signed by both sides. Four, the shareholder or board approval of the related-party agreement where required, discussed in the next section. Five, the capital liberation proof from the bank certificate or the Kbis history. Six, the transfer pricing memo when the amounts are material, comparing the rate to independent loans. The impots.gouv.fr documentation on current account interest and the official rate tables, the service-public.fr business guide on shareholder current accounts and the INPI Guichet unique filings for capital proof together frame what inspectors expect. Interest booked without any of the first three documents is routinely reclassified as a hidden profit distribution, non-deductible with penalties, while the recipient is still taxed on it.

B. How do withholding tax, transfer pricing and approval rules apply to a foreign lender?

A foreign lender adds three gates to the same loan. The first gate is banking monopoly. Article L. 511-5 of the Monetary and Financial Code states: “Il est interdit à toute personne autre qu’un établissement de crédit ou une société de financement d’effectuer des opérations de crédit à titre habituel.” Habitual lending is reserved to licensed banks. A one-off parent advance to its own subsidiary is occasional, not habitual, and the statute opens an explicit group exception. Article L. 511-7 of the Monetary and Financial Code provides that “Les interdictions définies à l’article L. 511-5 ne font pas obstacle à ce qu’une entreprise, quelle que soit sa nature, puisse” and lists as item 3: “Procéder à des opérations de trésorerie avec des sociétés ayant avec elle, directement ou indirectement, des liens de capital conférant à l’une des entreprises liées un pouvoir de contrôle effectif sur les autres”. A foreign parent controlling its French subsidiary can therefore fund it by treasury loans and current account advances, provided the relationship shows effective capital control and the operations stay inside the group. Document control with the share register and the ultimate beneficial owner filing, and never use the French subsidiary as a conduit to lend onward to unrelated French businesses, which would cross back into the monopoly.

The second gate is the related-party approval, the procedure des conventions reglementees. In a SARL, article L. 223-19 of the Commercial Code requires: “Le gérant ou, s’il en existe un, le commissaire aux comptes, présente à l’assemblée ou joint aux documents communiqués aux associés en cas de consultation écrite, un rapport sur les conventions intervenues directement ou par personnes interposées entre la société et l’un de ses gérants ou associés.” The meeting votes, the interested party does not vote, and unapproved agreements still bind the company but leave the manager liable for harmful consequences. In an SAS, article L. 227-10 of the Commercial Code sets the parallel rule: “Le commissaire aux comptes ou, s’il n’en a pas été désigné, le président de la société présente aux associés un rapport sur les conventions intervenues directement ou par personne interposée entre la société et son président, l’un de ses dirigeants, l’un de ses actionnaires disposant d’une fraction des droits de vote supérieure à 10 % ou, s’il s’agit d’une société actionnaire, la société la contrôlant au sens de l’article L. 233-3.” A foreign parent holding more than ten percent of votes, or controlling the SAS shareholder, falls squarely inside. In a single-shareholder company the formality lightens to an entry in the decision register, but the entry must exist. Auditors ask for this report first; its absence turns a clean loan into a governance finding and can support a claim for damages against the manager if the rate was off-market.

The third gate is tax at the border. Interest paid by the French company to a foreign parent may face French withholding tax, retenue a la source, subject to reduction or exemption under the applicable double tax treaty and, inside the European Union, under the interest and royalties directive implemented in French law. The domestic collection mechanics for individuals illustrate the logic: article 125 A, paragraph I of the General Tax Code provides that “Les personnes physiques fiscalement domiciliées en France au sens de l’article 4 B qui bénéficient d’intérêts, arrérages et produits de toute nature de fonds d’Etat, obligations, titres participatifs, bons et autres titres de créances, dépôts, cautionnements et comptes courants, ainsi que d’intérêts versés au titre des sommes mises à la disposition de la société dont elles sont associées ou actionnaires et portées sur un compte bloqué individuel, sont assujetties à un prélèvement lorsque la personne qui assure le paiement de ces revenus est établie en France”. For companies, the parallel provisions tax interest paid by a French debtor, then treaties reallocate the right to tax. Before paying interest abroad, obtain the lender’s tax residence certificate, check the treaty article on interest in the exact version in force, file the treaty relief form with the paying agent, and keep proof that the recipient is the beneficial owner. Paying gross without a certificate and hoping the treaty applies is the single most common reassessment in this file.

Transfer pricing closes the triangle. When parent and subsidiary are related, the interest rate must match what independent parties would have agreed, the arm’s length standard. A zero-interest loan from a foreign parent to a profitable French subsidiary can be challenged as an abnormal act of management only in narrow cases, but an excessive rate charged to a French subsidiary to strip profits is challenged routinely: the excess over the arm’s length rate is added back to taxable profit with penalties, and may be reclassified as a deemed distribution subject to withholding. Build the memo before the payment, not after the audit notice: lender credit analysis, group rating, loan term, currency, subordination, guarantees, and at least three comparable independent loans or bonds from the same period. File the country-by-country and master file obligations when thresholds are met, and reconcile the interest in the corporate tax return form 2065 with the ledger. Our corporate tax guide for foreign owners, French corporate tax at 25 percent, branch versus subsidiary and paying on time, shows where the interest line sits in the wider IS return, and the foreign tax administration’s own guidance plus the treaty network complete the picture.

Conclusion

A shareholder loan from a foreign parent to a French company is a real loan with real teeth. Without a signed lock-up, you can demand the credit balance at any time for any reason, as the commercial chamber of the Cour de cassation confirmed in February 2025, and the five-year limitation in article 2224 of the Civil Code is the only clock that runs against you. With a signed freeze, the paper governs until release, and the disciplined path is notice, schedule, set-off or conversion rather than a premature lawsuit. Interest must be written to exist beyond the legal rate, as the same Court held in May 2017 on the visa of article 1907 of the Civil Code, and it is deductible only within the published average-rate ceiling of article 39 of the General Tax Code and the related-party ceiling of article 212, with fully paid capital as a precondition. Group treasury loans are lawful under article L. 511-7 of the Monetary and Financial Code, related-party agreements need their report and vote under article L. 223-19 or article L. 227-10 of the Commercial Code, and cross-border interest needs its residence certificate and treaty form before the wire leaves France. Keep the agreement, the wires, the statements, the approvals and the pricing memo in one file, and the advance that funded the adventure can come home without financing a reassessment.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Send us your shareholder loan agreement or current account statement today: a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm to check repayment rights, the deductible interest rate and the withholding position. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or write via the contact page.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
3 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.