Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

UK Private Pension in France After Brexit: How to Declare It, Recover UK Tax Withheld and Claim Treaty Relief

A British person who settles in France after Brexit may continue to receive a pension from a former UK employer, a personal pension provider, a SIPP or an annuity. The payment does not become tax-free simply because it arrives in a French bank account, and UK tax withheld at source does not by itself prove that the French return can be left unchanged. The reliable order is to classify the pension, establish treaty residence for the relevant year, identify the France–UK rule that allocates taxing rights, report the gross amount in the correct French return, and then claim relief for tax that was withheld in the wrong country or paid twice. This article deals with an ordinary private or workplace pension paid to an individual whose tax residence is in France. It distinguishes that case from the UK State Pension, a Civil Service or other government pension, a QROPS, an ISA withdrawal and a pension death benefit. It covers the practical evidence needed for a French tax return, a UK repayment claim and a correction of an assessment. The words “tax relief” are not a substitute for a treaty analysis: the outcome depends on the pension contract, the source of the payment, the person’s residence and the documents proving how each authority treated the income.

I. Which UK private pension rules apply when you live in France after Brexit?

A. How do you classify the pension before filing?

The first question is not whether the money was paid in pounds or euros. It is what legal right produced the payment. A pension statement headed “retirement income” can hide several different regimes. Before entering an amount in a tax form, obtain the scheme rules, the provider’s tax statement and the original award or drawdown paperwork. If the documents do not identify the scheme, ask the provider for a written description of the benefit rather than guessing from the bank narrative.

A private pension will commonly be a personal pension, a stakeholder pension, a self-invested personal pension (SIPP), an occupational pension paid by a private employer, a defined-benefit pension, a defined-contribution drawdown, or an annuity purchased with pension savings. These labels describe the funding or payment mechanism; they do not alone settle the treaty classification. A pension paid for past employment is normally examined under Article 18 of the France–UK convention, but a public-service pension may fall under Article 19. The provider’s identity, the former employer and the legal source of the entitlement matter.

Do not merge the following receipts into one line without testing them:

  • The UK State Pension is a social-security benefit with its own administrative and treaty questions. Its treatment is not automatically the same as a private workplace pension.
  • A Civil Service, armed forces, local-government or other government-service pension can engage the public-functions rule in Article 19. Nationality, the paying body and the nature of the past service may affect the exception.
  • A QROPS, meaning a qualifying recognised overseas pension scheme, may involve an overseas provider, transfer rules and separate reporting issues. Calling a transfer “a pension payment” does not prove that Article 18 applies to every movement of funds.
  • An ISA withdrawal is normally a withdrawal from a savings wrapper, not a pension. It must be analysed as savings or investment income, or as a return of capital, according to the facts.
  • A lump-sum commutation, serious-ill-health payment, pension commencement lump sum, death benefit or inherited pension right may have a different domestic and treaty analysis from recurring retirement instalments.

French domestic law supplies the starting point for a person whose domicile fiscal, meaning French tax residence, is in France. Article 4 A of the French General Tax Code states that people with their tax domicile in France are liable to income tax on their entire income. Article 4 B of the same Code sets out the domestic indicators, including the household or principal place of stay, professional activity and centre of economic interests. These rules explain why a UK pension must normally be reviewed in France once the recipient has genuinely settled there, even if the pension provider and the bank account remain in the UK.

Residence is assessed for the tax year concerned. Keep the move date, French lease or ownership documents, utility records, family timetable, work records, health-registration evidence and travel calendar. If the UK also treats you as resident, the treaty tie-breaker must be applied. Article 4 of the published France–UK convention compares a permanent home, the closer personal and economic relations, habitual abode and nationality, with an agreement between the competent authorities as the final route. The English text is also available in the official GOV.UK version of the 2008 UK–France Double Taxation Convention. A British passport, a UK current account or a National Insurance record cannot decide the result on its own.

The domestic French classification is also important. Article 79 of the General Tax Code includes pensions, retirement benefits and life annuities in the overall income-tax base, subject to the provisions that apply to the particular benefit. The normal French calculation may include a statutory allowance. Article 158 of the General Tax Code contains the rules for determining net taxable income, including the treatment of pensions and retirement annuities. Those domestic rules are applied alongside the treaty; the treaty does not permit a taxpayer to remove a payment from the French return merely because the United Kingdom also issued a tax statement.

Obtain at least one document that proves the legal nature of the benefit and one that proves the amount actually paid. Useful documents include the scheme booklet, pension award letter, annual pension statement, P60 or equivalent provider statement, payslips, drawdown instructions, annuity contract, transfer history, bank statements and correspondence about tax code or withholding. If the payment comes from more than one scheme, create a separate line for each scheme. A single annual bank total is too compressed to show whether a public pension, a private pension and an investment withdrawal have been mixed.

Ask the provider whether it treated you as a UK resident or a non-UK resident, which tax code it used, whether emergency tax was applied, and whether tax was withheld under PAYE. PAYE is the UK pay-as-you-earn withholding system. The answers are evidence of what the payer did; they are not a ruling on the France–UK treaty. A provider can withhold UK tax under its ordinary payroll information while the treaty gives France the exclusive right to tax a private pension received by a treaty resident of France. That is the situation in which a repayment or relief-at-source claim should be considered.

Separate recurring income from capital. If you withdrew the whole fund, commuted a pension or received a one-off payment, do not place it automatically beside twelve monthly instalments. The official French pension guidance discusses particular treatment for retirement payments in capital, including an optional flat-rate method and the quotient method where the statutory conditions are satisfied. The result can depend on the legal source, the payment date, whether the payment replaces a low pension, and whether the relevant conditions are met. Preserve the provider’s description and the fund calculation before choosing a French reporting line.

Finally, test whether the benefit has any connection with a trust, company, partnership or overseas pension vehicle. A payment received through an intermediary does not necessarily change the beneficial owner, but it can change the evidence and the domestic classification. This desk does not cover company creation or a corporate pension structure. If a trust, a transfer, a non-UK scheme or several beneficiaries are involved, record that fact at the beginning of the file and obtain advice before treating the receipt as an ordinary private pension.

B. Which country may tax a private pension under the France–UK treaty?

For an ordinary private pension paid for past employment, the central provision is Article 18, not Article 17. The official English treaty text says that the pension “shall be taxable only in that State.” In context, that short passage follows the rule that a pension paid to a resident of a Contracting State for past employment is taxable only in that State, subject to the public-service provision in Article 19. If the recipient is treaty-resident in France and the payment is within Article 18, France is normally the state with the exclusive taxing right for the pension.

That conclusion is not reached by looking at the provider’s address alone. Article 18 uses the residence of the recipient and the nature of the past employment. A UK provider can pay a pension to France; a French bank can receive it; and the payment can still be a UK-source payment in an everyday sense while the treaty assigns the taxing right to France. Conversely, a pension paid by a public body may require the Article 19 analysis. Read the articles together and keep a short classification note in the file.

Article 19 is the reason that “all UK pensions are taxed in France” is unsafe. Public remuneration and pensions connected with government service are subject to a separate rule, with exceptions that can depend on the recipient’s nationality and on the service performed. A former Civil Service employee, a member of the armed forces or a local-government employee should identify the payer and the former post before relying on Article 18. The prior article on a UK Civil Service pension in the local corpus is therefore not a substitute for this private-pension analysis.

The treaty text does not eliminate the French filing obligation. Article 24 contains the method for eliminating double taxation. Its French-side mechanism can require income that is taxable only in the United Kingdom to remain visible in the calculation of French tax, followed by a credit subject to the convention’s conditions and limits. The precise effect depends on the category of income, the French form for the relevant year and whether the UK treatment satisfies the treaty condition. “Taxed in France only” and “not shown in France” are two different statements.

The current GOV.UK guidance on tax when you live abroad warns that a pension may be taxable in the country of residence, the UK or both under domestic law, and that the treaty determines where tax is ultimately due. It also tells a person moving abroad to notify the relevant UK authorities. A French resident should therefore coordinate the UK payer’s withholding position with the French return rather than relying on a payroll code that was created before the move.

A practical example shows the order of reasoning. Assume a French treaty resident receives £18,000 during the calendar year from a private defined-benefit pension. The provider has deducted £2,000 under PAYE. First, confirm that the payment is private employment pension income and not a government pension, transfer, ISA withdrawal or death benefit. Second, establish the euro amount using a documented exchange-rate method for the French return. Third, report the amount under the French rules and apply the Article 18 and Article 24 analysis. Fourth, claim repayment or relief for the UK amount if the treaty gives France the exclusive right to tax. The calculation does not promise a refund of exactly £2,000: the UK repayment, any French liability and any treaty credit are separate steps.

A second example is more difficult. A person receives £10,000 from a private pension and £8,000 from a Civil Service pension. The two amounts must not be totalled and labelled “UK pension”. The first may fall under Article 18; the second may engage Article 19. The French declaration should preserve the split, and each UK tax statement should be matched to the treaty provision used. If a French assessment has treated both payments alike, the correction should explain the classification error with the provider and employment documents.

The Conseil d’État’s decision No. 435907 of 12 February 2020 is not a private-pension judgment, but it is a useful authority on the evidence needed for Article 24 relief. The official decision of the Conseil d’État, 9th and 10th chambers sitting together, No. 435907 examined the France–UK convention and held that the relevant income must be within the UK tax base for the treaty condition, while effective UK payment of tax was not necessarily required in the circumstances considered. The decision also addressed French social contributions. Its practical lesson is narrow but important: a nil UK bill is not the same as an absence of UK reporting, and a treaty claim must be supported by the UK return or another document showing how the income was treated.

Do not transfer that decision mechanically to every pension. It concerned the interpretation of Article 24 in a particular file and does not decide whether your pension is private or public, whether a lump sum is recurring pension income, or whether a French social charge applies to you. Use it to organise proof, not to skip the classification stage. The article of the treaty that allocates the pension is still Article 18 or Article 19 according to the facts.

The French withholding rules can create further confusion. Article 204 A of the General Tax Code provides the domestic framework for withholding at source and instalments. Article 182 A concerns withholding on certain French-source salaries and pensions paid to persons who are not French tax residents. It is not a general authorisation to apply a French payroll deduction to a UK private pension received by a French resident. Identify who pays, where the payer is established and which country’s system made the deduction.

There can also be a separate foreign-account issue. If the UK pension is paid into a UK account, a French resident should review Article 1649 A of the General Tax Code and the corresponding account declaration form. The account-reporting question is distinct from the pension-income question. Declaring the pension does not automatically complete the foreign-account declaration, and declaring the account does not replace the pension entry.

II. How do you declare a UK private pension and recover tax withheld?

A. What should you report in France and what evidence should you keep?

A French tax resident normally reports foreign income through the annual déclaration de revenus, meaning the French annual income-tax return. For a UK pension, the relevant route commonly involves the main Form 2042 and the foreign-income annex, Form 2047, but the exact boxes and instructions depend on the year and on the type of payment. The official impots.gouv.fr guidance on declaring wages, salaries and pensions and the current form instructions should be checked for the year being filed. A box number copied from an old blog post is weak evidence.

The Service-Public guidance on declaring retirement pensions confirms the general French approach to pension reporting and points readers towards the applicable declaration process. The fact that the pension is paid by a UK provider does not move it outside the French return. State the gross entitlement and then apply the French calculation and treaty method required for the relevant category. Do not report only the amount that reached the bank account after UK PAYE, provider charges or currency conversion.

France and the UK use different tax-year conventions. France generally reports the calendar year, while the UK tax year runs from 6 April to 5 April. A UK P60 may therefore cover a period that does not match the French year. Build a monthly schedule showing the date, gross amount, tax withheld, net amount, currency and payer. Then aggregate the amounts that belong to the French calendar year. If the provider issues only an annual statement, ask how the figure was calculated and whether it covers payments or entitlement for the UK tax year.

Use a consistent, documented currency conversion. Keep the original sterling figure, the euro figure entered in the French return, the exchange-rate source or method and the period to which the rate relates. Do not round each monthly payment in a way that creates a material difference from the annual total, and do not use the net bank transfer as the conversion base. If the pension was partly withheld at source and later repaid, retain both the original and corrected figures so that France can see which amount was ultimately taxable and which amount was only a temporary deduction.

The French tax return may require the foreign pension to be reported even where the treaty prevents a second full income-tax charge. This can preserve the progressive calculation for other income and allows the administration to apply the treaty credit or exemption method. The current Article 170 of the General Tax Code requires a detailed annual declaration from the taxpayer within the statutory framework. The treaty does not replace that obligation; it controls the consequences after the amount has been identified.

Keep the following evidence together in a dated folder:

  • the pension scheme rules, award letter, contract or provider description showing whether the pension is private, workplace, public-service, annuity, drawdown or death-related;
  • the provider’s annual statement, monthly payslips, P60, PAYE coding notice and any document showing gross pension and UK tax withheld;
  • the French residence evidence for the tax year, including the move timeline and any UK residence material used for the treaty tie-breaker;
  • the monthly sterling-to-euro schedule, exchange-rate source and explanation of the French calendar-year total;
  • copies of the Form 2047 and Form 2042 entries, the submission acknowledgment and the resulting avis d’impôt, meaning French tax notice;
  • the UK Self Assessment return, tax calculation, repayment notice and correspondence with HMRC where the pension was included in a return;
  • the completed treaty-relief form, residence certificate, correspondence with the pension provider and proof of delivery; and
  • bank statements showing gross receipts and withheld amounts, without treating the bank statement as the sole proof of the pension’s legal nature.

Separate the tax file from the healthcare file. An S1 certificate or registration with the French health system may establish access to healthcare or the allocation of social-security costs; it does not decide the income-tax classification of a private pension. Likewise, a British residence permit, visa, driving licence or French bank account may assist the factual residence history but cannot replace the treaty analysis.

Review the payment method at the same time as the income return. If a UK account is used, test whether the account declaration rules apply and whether the account was opened, held, used or closed during the relevant year. If the account is jointly held, identify the legal and beneficial ownership. If an agent or family member receives the pension temporarily, preserve the mandate and the onward transfer. These facts can matter when the French administration compares the payer’s record, the bank trail and the return.

Recurring income and a capital payment should be displayed on different lines in your internal schedule. For a lump sum, obtain the provider’s legal reason for payment, the date the right became available, the amount before tax and any election made in the UK. French guidance on retirement pensions identifies possible capital-payment regimes such as a flat-rate option or the quotient method, but eligibility must be checked against the current statutory conditions. Do not select the most favourable-looking option in an online form without retaining the calculation that shows why it applies.

Read the French tax notice after filing. Check the gross amount, the foreign-income line, the treaty credit or effective-rate treatment, the social-contribution lines and the withholding already credited. Compare the notice with your own schedule, not only with the final amount to pay. An assessment can contain the right total but the wrong category, or a correct pension amount but an omitted treaty mechanism. Those errors become harder to explain after several years of subsequent returns.

B. How do you claim UK treaty relief or correct an overpayment?

If UK tax was withheld from a private pension that should be taxable only in France under Article 18, start with the UK treaty-relief route. The official HMRC page for Form France-Individual states: “Use form France-Individual to apply for relief at source or to claim repayment of UK Income Tax.” The same official material explains that the form is for residents of France receiving pensions, purchased annuities, interest or royalties arising in the UK. This is the document to examine where the payer continues to deduct UK income tax after the move.

Relief at source and repayment are different procedures. Relief at source asks the payer to stop or reduce future UK withholding once the French residence and treaty entitlement have been certified. Repayment seeks the return of UK tax already deducted. Complete the form for the relevant income and period, obtain the French tax-residence certification required by the form, and send it through the route specified by HMRC or the pension provider. Keep a full copy, the date of dispatch, the postal or electronic proof of delivery and the response.

Do not assume that the provider can decide the treaty question from a phone call. Ask for written confirmation of the tax code, the date from which relief was applied, the gross amount covered and any amount that must still be claimed from HMRC. If the pension is paid by several providers, make a separate file for each payer. A relief-at-source approval for one private pension does not automatically cover a second provider or a public-service pension.

If the UK tax was withheld through PAYE, the UK Self Assessment position may also need correction. The provider’s statement, the P60 and the HMRC calculation should be reconciled. A UK repayment may be due because the treaty gives France the taxing right, because the tax code was wrong, because emergency tax was applied, or because the person’s total UK liability was lower for another reason. State which ground is being used. A generic request for a refund does not show whether the France–UK treaty was applied.

At the same time, correct the French return if the pension was omitted, reported net of UK tax or entered under the wrong category. The annual return should disclose the correct gross amount and apply the treaty method, even if the objective is to recover UK tax. Otherwise the UK repayment file and the French file may describe different amounts. Create a reconciliation with these lines: gross pension, UK tax withheld, UK tax ultimately due, French euro equivalent, French tax attributable under the notice and treaty relief claimed.

For a French assessment already issued, send a clear request to the relevant tax office through the secure messaging service in the taxpayer’s online account. Identify the tax year, assessment number, pension provider, amount entered, amount that should have been entered and the legal reason for the change. Attach the provider statement, the UK tax documents, the residence evidence, the exchange-rate schedule and the relevant treaty pages. If the assessment must be formally challenged, use a réclamation, meaning a formal tax claim, and preserve the applicable deadline. An informal message may open a dialogue, but it should not be treated as a substitute for every procedural safeguard.

Explain the treaty request in a sequence that an officer can audit. First, the recipient was treaty-resident in France for the year. Second, the payment was an ordinary private pension for past employment and falls under Article 18 rather than Article 19. Third, the amount was reported in the French return in the required form. Fourth, UK withholding was made at source and is shown by the provider and HMRC records. Fifth, Article 24 prevents an unreconciled double charge and the relief requested is limited to the amount supported by the treaty and the French assessment. Avoid saying only that “the UK has already taxed it”; that sentence does not identify the treaty provision or the requested remedy.

The Conseil d’État decision No. 435907 should be used carefully in this evidence exercise. Its official text considered whether income was within the UK tax base and whether effective UK payment was required for the treaty mechanism in the circumstances before the court. It supports the proposition that the UK tax-base evidence matters, but it does not turn every UK pension into an Article 24 credit or remove the need to prove French residence. If the UK tax was zero because of an allowance, keep the UK return and calculation showing that the pension was nevertheless reported or included in the relevant tax base.

Article 24 can produce a credit, an exemption with progression or another treaty result depending on the provision applied. Do not claim a UK repayment and a French credit for the same UK tax without checking the mechanism. A refund of UK tax already withheld may reduce the amount that can be treated as foreign tax paid; a French credit may be limited by the French tax attributable to the relevant income. The final calculation should distinguish a tax that was temporarily withheld and repaid from tax that was definitively borne.

If the dispute concerns both tax and social contributions, isolate the two issues. The treaty’s definition of French tax, the French domestic contribution rules and the Article 24 credit mechanism must be read together. The Conseil d’État’s No. 435907 decision shows why a tax notice should be examined line by line. Do not promise that a treaty pension classification automatically removes every social charge. Identify the contribution, its base, the applicable exemption or credit and the evidence of any social-security position separately.

If the UK or French authority rejects the claim because the two countries disagree about residence or treaty interpretation, the convention includes a mutual-agreement procedure. Article 26 of the official France–UK convention text sets out that route and its time framework. It is not a replacement for filing the domestic UK and French claims. The taxpayer should first preserve the domestic remedies and then examine whether the facts and the timing justify a request to the competent authority.

A correction is stronger when it states what is not being requested. For example: the taxpayer is not asking France to ignore the pension; the taxpayer is asking France to record the gross pension, apply the correct treaty article and remove or credit the French charge as the convention and current return instructions require. The taxpayer is not asking HMRC to refund an amount with no explanation; the taxpayer is asking for relief at source or repayment because the recipient was resident in France and the private pension falls within Article 18. This precision reduces the risk that one authority answers a different question.

Review historic years separately. The year of arrival can involve a residence transition; later years may have a stable French residence; a year with a lump sum may require a different calculation; and a year with a provider change may contain two withholding systems. For each year, store the residence conclusion, pension classification, gross amount, currency method, UK treatment, French declaration, treaty relief and procedural deadline. Do not reuse a favourable conclusion from a recurring pension for a later transfer or death benefit without checking the new event.

The practical sequence can be summarised as follows:

  1. Collect the provider documents and classify each pension payment before adding totals.
  2. Establish French domestic and treaty residence for the tax year.
  3. Separate private, public-service, State Pension, lump-sum, transfer and non-pension receipts.
  4. Prepare the French calendar-year gross amount and the documented sterling-to-euro conversion.
  5. File the French return and foreign-income annex using the current instructions.
  6. Reconcile the French notice with UK PAYE, Self Assessment and provider statements.
  7. Use Form France-Individual for relief at source or repayment where the treaty supports it.
  8. Submit a formal French correction or claim if the assessment is wrong, while preserving the deadline and payment position.

The most common errors are avoidable. Do not report only the net amount received. Do not treat a P60 as a French calendar-year statement. Do not classify a pension by the provider’s brand name. Do not assume that Brexit cancelled the double-taxation convention. Do not use a State Pension or Civil Service analysis as if it covered a private occupational pension. Do not request a UK refund without a French residence file. Do not claim that a French treaty credit equals the UK withholding without reading Article 24 and the current form. Finally, do not omit the foreign bank-account review simply because the pension itself was declared.

Conclusion

A UK private pension paid to a British resident in France after Brexit must be handled as a classification and evidence exercise. Establish the French and treaty residence position, identify whether the payment is genuinely private and connected with past employment, and keep it separate from a State Pension, a public-service pension, a QROPS, an ISA withdrawal and any capital or death benefit. Article 18 of the France–UK convention may give France the exclusive taxing right, but that conclusion does not remove the French reporting duty. Report the gross amount using the current Form 2042 and Form 2047 instructions, reconcile the French calendar year with the UK tax year, and keep the documents showing the UK tax-base treatment and any PAYE deduction. If UK tax was withheld, examine Form France-Individual for relief at source or repayment and correct the French assessment if the pension was omitted or misclassified. When the authorities disagree, a carefully documented domestic claim and, where appropriate, the convention’s mutual-agreement procedure are safer than a general request for “tax relief”.

Need a quick opinion on your case

A telephone consultation can be arranged within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the France–UK treaty position, the pension classification, the French declaration and the steps needed to recover UK tax withheld.

+33 6 46 60 58 22

Contact the firm

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
2 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.