Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can a French Company Hire Its First Employee Before Receiving Its SIRET Number?

For a foreign founder setting up a business in France, the first employee often arrives before the administration has finished assigning every identifier. The employment contract may be ready, the office may be open, and the start date may be commercially urgent, while the company’s SIRET number is still pending in the French one-stop shop. SIRET means the establishment identification number issued through the French business register system. The question is whether the absence of that number makes the employment impossible, or whether another filing route exists.

The short answer is conditional. If the French company or establishment is already in the registration process and its creation is awaiting validation, the employer can prepare the first hire and send the paper DPAE, the déclaration préalable à l’embauche (pre-employment declaration), to the territorially competent URSSAF, the French network that collects social-security contributions and family-benefit contributions. The declaration must reach the URSSAF before the employee starts. Once the SIRET is assigned, the employer must regularise the electronic record as instructed. A founder must not simply replace the missing number with an invented number or allow the person to start first.

That administrative solution is different from hiring in the name of a company that has not yet acquired legal personality. A French commercial company normally obtains legal personality on registration. Before that point, the people acting for a company in formation can remain personally responsible for the commitments they make. The following guide separates the corporate existence question from the social-security filing question, then sets out a practical sequence for a foreign-owned company hiring its first French employee.

I. Can a French company hire its first employee before receiving its SIRET number?

A. What is the difference between a company in formation, a registered company and a pending SIRET?

The first question is not the number printed on a form. It is the identity of the legal employer on the proposed first day of work. A foreign founder may have signed the articles of a French société par actions simplifiée (SAS, simplified joint-stock company), société à responsabilité limitée (SARL, private limited liability company) or another vehicle. That signature does not, by itself, create the French legal person.

Article L. 210-6 of the French Commercial Code states that commercial companies have legal personality from their registration with the Registre du commerce et des sociétés (RCS, the Commercial and Companies Register). The official text begins: « Les sociétés commerciales jouissent de la personnalité morale à dater de leur immatriculation au registre du commerce et des sociétés. » It adds: « Les personnes qui ont agi au nom d’une société en formation avant qu’elle ait acquis la jouissance de la personnalité morale sont tenues solidairement et indéfiniment responsables des actes ainsi accomplis ». The same provision allows the registered company to take over those commitments. This is the reason a founder should not treat a draft employment contract as proof that the future company is already an employer.

The parallel rule in Article 1842 of the French Civil Code says that companies other than the specified exceptions acquire legal personality on registration. Until registration, relations between the associates are governed by the company agreement and general contract principles. In practical terms, an employment arrangement signed before registration needs a carefully drafted mechanism: it can be signed for the company in formation with a clear condition and later takeover, but the founder and any other signatory must understand the personal exposure before the legal person exists.

That issue must be distinguished from a SIRET delay after the company has reached the registration stage. SIREN means the national identification system for enterprises and their establishments. SIRET is the establishment identifier, generally composed of the company’s SIREN and a location number. A company can therefore have a real corporate project and an establishment whose registration data are still being processed, while the final SIRET has not yet appeared in the founder’s records.

The official Service Public explanation of SIREN and SIRET numbers describes them as identifiers assigned following the enterprise’s registration formalities. The number is administrative evidence; it is not a substitute for the legal personality obtained through registration. Conversely, a delay in the number does not automatically erase a company’s employer duties if the competent administration has provided a route for the establishment to make its first declaration.

The registration pipeline should be read alongside the French business register rules. Article R. 123-220 of the Commercial Code includes private legal persons and establishments in the national register maintained by the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE, the French national statistics institute), and provides that legal persons in formation are entered in the relevant register. That entry does not mean that every corporate act is safe before final registration; it shows why the legal file and the identifier file must be kept in parallel.

For a foreign founder, the formalities are normally submitted through the French business formalities one-stop shop, operated within the INPI, the Institut national de la propriété industrielle (National Institute of Industrial Property). The INPI information portal should be checked for the current filing route, document format and requests for correction. A receipt showing that a creation or establishment filing is pending is important evidence, but it does not give permission to omit the DPAE. The firm’s French company-formation and international-founder hub can be used for the wider formation sequence, while this article focuses on the first employee and the pending SIRET.

The registered-office file is also separate. Article L. 123-11 of the Commercial Code requires a legal person seeking RCS registration to justify its enjoyment of the premises where its registered office is installed, including a lawful shared or domiciliation arrangement where the statutory conditions are met. A French registered office helps identify the establishment and the competent URSSAF. It does not, on its own, prove that the company’s employee can start without a pre-employment declaration.

The distinction can be summarised in three situations:

  1. Company not yet registered. The legal person does not yet have full legal personality. A founder who signs or promises employment in its name may carry personal liability under Article L. 210-6. The contract should be reviewed as a pre-registration commitment and taken over by the company after registration if that is the chosen route.
  2. Company registered, establishment record or SIRET pending. The company is the intended employer, but the establishment identifier is not yet available. The first-hire DPAE procedure can be handled through the paper route described by the URSSAF for an establishment awaiting validation. The start date remains conditional on a compliant declaration before work begins.
  3. SIRET assigned but access not yet activated. The employer should use the SIRET, complete the online employer account or payroll registration, and ensure that the DPAE, payroll and monthly filings are linked to the correct establishment. An account-activation delay is not a reason to postpone a declaration until after the first day.

The contract date and the work-start date should not be confused. A foreign founder can negotiate and sign a contract in advance, subject to the company and registration conditions, but the employee should not perform work, attend the normal first day or begin a probationary period before the DPAE requirement has been met. A probationary period is part of employment; labelling the first days as “onboarding”, “training” or “testing” does not remove the filing duty when the person is already working for the business.

That point is especially important when the founder wants the employee to prepare the French launch before the company is fully operational. Emails, customer calls, product work, sales activity, coding, administrative tasks and paid availability may all demonstrate that work has begun. A foreign group should not ask a candidate to work informally while waiting for a SIRET and then attempt to backdate the contract or the DPAE.

B. What must a foreign founder check before the first employee starts?

The central rule appears in Article L. 1221-10 of the Labour Code. The official text provides: « L’embauche d’un salarié ne peut intervenir qu’après déclaration nominative accomplie par l’employeur auprès des organismes de protection sociale désignés à cet effet. » In English, the employee cannot be hired until the employer has made the nominative declaration to the designated social-protection bodies. The rule is about the sequence, not merely about the existence of a number in the company’s welcome pack.

The detailed content of the DPAE is set out in Article R. 1221-1 of the Labour Code. The official text lists: « La déclaration préalable à l’embauche comporte les mentions suivantes : 1° Dénomination sociale ou nom et prénoms de l’employeur, code APE, adresse de l’employeur, numéro du système d’identification du répertoire des entreprises et de leurs établissements ainsi que le service de santé au travail dont l’employeur dépend s’il relève du régime général de sécurité sociale ; 2° Nom, prénoms, sexe, date et lieu de naissance du salarié ainsi que son numéro national d’identification s’il est déjà immatriculé à la sécurité sociale ; 3° Date et heure d’embauche ; 4° Nature, durée du contrat ainsi que durée de la période d’essai éventuelle pour les contrats à durée indéterminée et les contrats à durée déterminée dont le terme ou la durée minimale excède six mois ». In English, the form requires the employer’s corporate name, APE activity code, address, the SIRET-system identification number and occupational-health service, together with the employee’s identity and birth information, start date and time, and contract details. APE refers to the activity code assigned to the establishment. The provision explains why an ordinary electronic DPAE may ask for a SIRET even when a newly created establishment is still waiting for it.

The foreign founder should therefore check four separate identities before sending anything:

  1. the exact registered name of the French employer, including accents and punctuation;
  2. the establishment address and the place where the employee will work;
  3. the employee’s identity, date and place of birth, and social-security number if already known; and
  4. the expected start date, start time, contract type and any probationary period.

An error in the founder’s translation, a shortened group name or a foreign parent company’s registration number can create a mismatch. The French employer is the company or foreign entity legally employing the person, not automatically the parent company that pays the incorporation costs. If the worker is employed by a foreign company with no French establishment, a separate foreign-firm employer route may apply; it should not be mixed with the DPAE for a newly registered French subsidiary.

The employer must also identify the correct labour and immigration position. If the first employee is a foreign national, the employer must check the employee’s authority to perform the proposed work in France before the start date. The French Ministry of Labour’s official guidance on employer obligations when hiring includes this check among the obligations connected with recruitment and warns that failures in hiring formalities can lead to penalties for illegal work.

The employment contract should identify the French employer, registered office or establishment, job, working location, remuneration, applicable collective agreement where relevant, start date and conditions. Collective agreement means the sector agreement that may add rules on classification, minimum pay, working time, notice and benefits. The official Service Public guidance on finding the applicable collective agreement for a first employee explains that the applicable agreement normally follows the employer’s main activity. A foreign founder should not copy the parent company’s foreign employment template without checking those French requirements.

Where the first employee is intended to work from home, a coworking space or a client site, the work location still matters. Under Article R. 1221-3 of the Labour Code, the DPAE is sent to the collection organisation covering the establishment where the employee will work, and to the relevant occupational-health service. If the employee will work in more than one place, the company should document the principal establishment and seek confirmation from the competent URSSAF rather than choosing an office only because it is the founder’s address.

The DPAE is not just a notice sent to one mailbox. Under Article R. 1221-2 of the Labour Code, it also performs a number of connected formalities: employer registration with the general social-security scheme for a non-agricultural first employee, employee registration with the health-insurance fund, employer affiliation to unemployment insurance, application to an occupational-health service and request for the post-hiring information and prevention visit or the appropriate medical examination. This is why a founder should coordinate the DPAE with the payroll provider, occupational-health service and tax file.

The company should also decide whether it is employing under an indefinite-term contract, a fixed-term contract or an apprenticeship contract. CDI means contrat à durée indéterminée, an indefinite-term contract; CDD means contrat à durée déterminée, a fixed-term contract. The contract type affects the information entered in the DPAE and may trigger additional rules. A foreign founder should not select a CDD merely because the SIRET is pending or because the French launch is described as a trial phase.

Finally, the file should record who has authority to act. A foreign parent may give a power of attorney to a French lawyer, accountant, payroll provider or local officer. That authority should cover the relevant filing and should be retained with the incorporation resolution. It does not transfer the employer’s legal obligations away from the company. The foreign founder remains responsible for ensuring that the start date, DPAE, contract and work authorisation all tell the same story.

II. What should a company do if its SIRET is still pending?

A. How should the employer file the DPAE, prepare payroll and organise the first day?

The specific answer to a pending SIRET is supplied by the official URSSAF process. The URSSAF DPAE guidance explains that a first DPAE can trigger the employer’s account with URSSAF. It also addresses the situation where an establishment’s creation is still being validated through the one-stop shop: while waiting for the SIRET, the employer completes the Cerfa DPAE form for each employee and sends it to the geographically competent URSSAF by post before the employee takes up the position. The employer keeps proof of the mailing and, after the SIRET is assigned, records the declarations online.

Cerfa is the French administrative form system. The point of the paper route is not to avoid the DPAE; it is to make the declaration possible when the electronic service cannot yet accept the establishment’s final identifier. The founder should use the current form and instructions, not an old PDF copied from a foreign group’s files. The form should identify the company and pending establishment as the URSSAF instructs, with the requested corporate, address and employee information. If the URSSAF gives an identifier or asks for an additional document, that response belongs in the permanent payroll file.

The timing is strict. Article R. 1221-4 of the Labour Code states: « La déclaration préalable à l’embauche est adressée au plus tôt dans les huit jours précédant la date prévisible de l’embauche. » “Before the start” therefore does not mean months in advance, and “within eight days” does not permit the employer to wait until the employee has already worked. The HR calendar should set the mailing date, the expected delivery or receipt evidence, the first day and the SIRET follow-up date.

The electronic route is the ordinary route when the employer can use it. The paper exception is governed by Article R. 1221-5 of the Labour Code, which provides: « La déclaration préalable à l’embauche est effectuée par voie électronique. A défaut d’utiliser la voie électronique, la déclaration est effectuée au moyen d’un formulaire fixé par arrêté des ministres chargés du travail et de la sécurité sociale ». The same article requires: « L’employeur adresse ce formulaire, signé par lui, à l’organisme mentionné à l’article R. 1221-3 par lettre recommandée avec demande d’avis de réception envoyée au plus tard le dernier jour ouvrable précédant l’embauche, le cachet de la poste faisant foi. » The employer keeps a copy of the letter and postal receipt until the receipt document is obtained. The unavailability of one transmission method does not remove the declaration obligation through the other method.

The URSSAF guidance is practical on the record that should be preserved: the completed form, the signed covering letter, the registered-mail receipt, proof of delivery if available, the employer’s registration-file receipt, and every response from URSSAF. The founder should scan the file without changing the original dates or replacing an unclear scan. A later online entry should refer back to the original paper filing rather than becoming a new declaration with a different start date.

The receiving body must send a receipt document. Under Article R. 1221-7 of the Labour Code, the official rule is: « L’organisme destinataire adresse à l’employeur un document accusant réception de la déclaration et mentionnant les informations enregistrées, dans les cinq jours ouvrables suivant celui de la réception du formulaire de déclaration. » If the employer does not contest the information within two working days after receiving that document, it is evidence of the declaration, as the same provision states: « A défaut de contestation par l’employeur des informations figurant sur ce document, dans le délai de deux jours ouvrables suivant la réception de celui-ci, le document constitue une preuve de la déclaration. » This time window should be built into the launch plan, especially where the employee’s first day is close to the planned mailing date.

The employer must give the employee a copy of the DPAE or the acknowledgement. Article R. 1221-9 of the Labour Code states: « Lors de l’embauche du salarié, l’employeur lui fournit une copie de la déclaration préalable à l’embauche ou de l’accusé de réception. » It also says: « Cette obligation de remise est considérée comme satisfaite dès lors que le salarié dispose d’un contrat de travail écrit, accompagné de la mention de l’organisme destinataire de la déclaration. » The contract should therefore name the URSSAF recipient when the company uses the paper route, while the separate acknowledgement is still kept and supplied when available.

At the same time, the employer must prepare the personnel register. Article L. 1221-13 of the Labour Code provides: « Un registre unique du personnel est tenu dans tout établissement où sont employés des salariés. Les noms et prénoms de tous les salariés sont inscrits dans l’ordre des embauches. Ces mentions sont portées sur le registre au moment de l’embauche et de façon indélébile. » RUP means registre unique du personnel, the single personnel register. A foreign founder should create it before the first day and confirm that the establishment address and employee identity match the contract and DPAE.

Occupational health must be planned as part of the same sequence. The DPAE includes a request to join an occupational-health service and a request for the information and prevention visit in the cases covered by Article R. 1221-2. Article L. 4624-1 of the Labour Code provides that every worker receives individual health monitoring and that the information and prevention visit occurs after hiring, within the regulatory timetable. The pending SIRET is not a reason to leave the appointment to an undefined later date.

Payroll should be prepared even if the first salary is paid after the SIRET arrives. The employer should obtain the gross remuneration, working time, bank details, tax-withholding information, collective-agreement classification, social-security details and any work-authorisation evidence. The payroll provider should know that the company is in an establishment-registration phase and should confirm how the first payroll will be linked to the employer account. The company should never put a fictitious SIRET on a payslip, a contract or a government submission.

The payslip creates a separate identifier issue. Article R. 3243-1 of the Labour Code lists the mandatory payslip information, including the employer’s name and address, the activity nomenclature and, for an employer registered in the national establishment register, the establishment registration number referred to in the Commercial Code. If the first pay date arrives while the identifier is still unresolved, the accountant or payroll provider should obtain written instructions from the competent administration and avoid fabricating a number. The SIRET follow-up should be urgent, but the company must also preserve the correct payroll record.

Monthly reporting follows the same logic. Article L. 133-5-3 of the Social Security Code requires employers to send a déclaration sociale nominative (DSN, the monthly nominative social declaration) containing the employee’s place of activity, contract characteristics, remuneration, contributions, working time and contract dates. A DSN is not a replacement for the pre-hiring DPAE. The company should ask its payroll provider and URSSAF how the first DSN is to be linked once the SIRET is issued, and it should correct any incomplete or inaccurate data promptly.

For a founder who has not yet obtained a French payroll platform, the simplified services may help after the establishment can be identified. The TESE, or Titre emploi-service entreprise (company employment-service title), combines several employer formalities for eligible businesses. The official URSSAF TESE guidance explains how the contract and DPAE can be handled through that service. TESE is a procedural tool, not a permission to have a worker start without a DPAE and not a substitute for resolving the establishment identifier.

If the employer is in fact a foreign company with no establishment in France, the facts may point to the URSSAF foreign-firms service rather than a French subsidiary’s DPAE. The URSSAF guidance for foreign firms explains that a company established abroad without a French establishment that employs a person in France must declare and pay the relevant French social contributions, and that an identification number can be assigned after validation. A foreign founder should choose one employer model before the first day: French subsidiary, French branch or foreign employer without a French establishment. Switching labels after work has begun creates avoidable risk.

The tax account should also be opened as soon as the company can be identified. The official impots.gouv.fr creation guidance explains that the business formalities one-stop shop sends the creation declaration to the relevant bodies, including the business tax department and URSSAF, and that the transmission results in registration in the national business registers and the assignment of the SIRET by INSEE. The company should keep its tax, payroll and corporate-registration addresses consistent, then use the professional tax account for the employer’s corporate and VAT obligations once access is available.

The employer’s first-day checklist should be concrete:

  1. confirm that the intended employer has been properly formed or that the pre-registration commitment is expressly understood and capable of later takeover;
  2. confirm the establishment address, work location and competent URSSAF;
  3. sign the employment contract with the correct employer and start date;
  4. send the electronic DPAE or, if the establishment’s creation is still being validated and the route requires it, the signed Cerfa form by registered post before the start;
  5. preserve the filing and postal evidence;
  6. check foreign-employee work authorisation where relevant;
  7. enter the employee in the RUP and arrange occupational-health follow-up;
  8. prepare payroll, the payslip and DSN process without inventing a SIRET; and
  9. enter the declaration online and update the payroll and tax systems after the SIRET is assigned.

B. What are the legal risks, the evidentiary rules and the corrective steps after a late filing?

The first risk is starting work before the DPAE. Article L. 1221-11 of the Labour Code provides a penalty for non-compliance with the prior-declaration obligation, calculated by reference to three hundred times the hourly rate of the guaranteed minimum referred to in the Labour Code. That is not a flat “three hundred euros” rule. The amount and recovery process should be checked against the current notice, but the legal point is stable: a foreign founder cannot treat the DPAE as a post-hiring administrative clean-up.

The second risk is intentional concealment of salaried employment. Article L. 8221-5 of the Labour Code begins: « Est réputé travail dissimulé par dissimulation d’emploi salarié le fait pour tout employeur : » It then includes: « 1° Soit de se soustraire intentionnellement à l’accomplissement de la formalité prévue à l’article L. 1221-10 , relatif à la déclaration préalable à l’embauche ; » and covers intentional failure to issue a payslip or make the required salary and social-contribution declarations. A genuine administrative delay documented with the paper route is different from asking someone to work off the books, backdating a start date or disguising an employee as a freelancer.

The third risk concerns misclassification. A startup may propose an independent-contractor agreement to avoid waiting for the employer account. That solution is not safe where the person works under the company’s direction, with its tools, schedule, customers and reporting line. In Cour de cassation, Second Civil Chamber, 26 November 2020, no. 19-24.303, the Court validated the assessment of facts showing « un lien de subordination juridique à l’égard de celle-ci ». The quoted phrase means a legal relationship of subordination. The decision concerned the factual classification of work and an URSSAF adjustment, not a SIRET delay, but it is a direct warning against using a contractor label to avoid the first-employee obligations.

Evidence of the filing also matters in an employment dispute. In Cour de cassation, Labour Chamber, 13 October 2021, no. 20-17.838, the Court held that the lower court had misread an URSSAF information document « mentionnant qu’une déclaration préalable à l’embauche avait été déposée par la société AD Immo le 15 janvier 2013 ». That exact phrase came from the Court’s reasons. The case shows why the employer should keep the DPAE form, the recipient’s acknowledgement, the post receipt and URSSAF correspondence. An unexplained screenshot or a later payroll entry may not tell the same evidentiary story.

The fourth risk is using a number belonging to the wrong entity. A foreign parent may have a SIREN, a French subsidiary may have a different SIREN, and each establishment may have a different SIRET. The number on a bank document, an invoice, a payroll file and a DPAE should correspond to the employer and establishment concerned. Under Article R. 123-237 of the Commercial Code, a registered person must identify its unique company number, RCS registration and registered office on invoices, orders, price lists, advertising documents and business correspondence. That rule concerns commercial documents rather than the DPAE, but it illustrates the same principle: do not merge the parent and subsidiary records.

The fifth risk is a delay that becomes a failure of correction. The employer should monitor the registration request, answer INPI or registry requests promptly, and update the DPAE and payroll data as soon as the SIRET is issued. The RNE is the Registre national des entreprises (National Business Register), while the RCS is the commercial register administered through the registry office, known in French as the greffe. A Kbis is the official extract showing key RCS information. The Kbis, RNE entry and payroll file should eventually display the same employer and establishment information.

If the employee has already started and the employer discovers that the DPAE was not filed, the company should not backdate a new declaration or delete internal records. It should make a written incident record, contact the competent URSSAF or payroll provider, collect evidence of the actual start time and work performed, regularise the declarations and evaluate the social, tax and employment consequences. The corrective strategy must distinguish a technical rejection, a late transmission, an incorrect employer identifier and a deliberate omission. Each calls for a different response.

If the paper DPAE was sent but the SIRET was later assigned and the online record was not entered, the employer should keep the original evidence and follow the URSSAF instruction for recording the declaration. The online record should reproduce the original employee and start-date information. A duplicate with a changed start date may create the appearance that the company attempted to cure a late filing after a control. The safer file contains a short chronology: incorporation filing, establishment submission, DPAE preparation, registered-letter date, first day, receipt, SIRET assignment and online regularisation.

If the DPAE is rejected, the founder should identify the exact rejection reason before changing the first day. Common problems include a name or address mismatch, a wrong establishment, an incorrect contract code, a missing employee identity detail or an unavailable employer account. The company should ask URSSAF or its payroll provider whether the paper route remains available, then send the corrected filing before the employee starts if time remains. A candidate’s commercial urgency does not change the statutory order.

If the company has no French establishment at all, it should reassess whether the French subsidiary plan is still appropriate. The foreign-firms service may be the correct employer route, but the contract, payroll, work authorisation, social-security and tax analysis must then be built around the foreign employer. Creating a nominal French address only to obtain a SIRET, while all business and management facts point elsewhere, may create corporate, tax and employment inconsistencies. The legal model should follow the real activity and the real employer.

Foreign founders should also protect the employee’s information. A passport, birth record, social-security number, bank details and work-authorisation document should be transmitted only through the agreed secure payroll or administrative channel. The employee’s French personal data should not be distributed through a foreign group mailing list simply because the parent company’s HR team is abroad. A clean information trail helps the company answer a URSSAF query and reduces the risk of inconsistent filings.

The legal calendar continues after the first declaration. The company should track the SIRET, SIREN, RNE and RCS records; the DPAE acknowledgement; RUP entry; occupational-health appointment; first payroll; DSN deadlines; social-contribution payments; withholding-tax obligations; collective-agreement requirements; paid-leave records; and any changes of address or establishment. The professional tax account on impots.gouv.fr allows a business to consult and pay several professional taxes, including corporate tax and VAT services once the account and relevant services are activated. The first employee therefore starts a compliance calendar, not a single formality.

A founder should be able to answer these questions from the file:

  1. Which legal person is the employer on the first day?
  2. Which establishment is the employee attached to, and where will the work take place?
  3. Was the DPAE sent before the first working time, and by which route?
  4. If the SIRET was pending, where is the registered-letter proof and which URSSAF instruction was followed?
  5. Does the contract identify the correct employer, start date, job, remuneration and collective-agreement framework?
  6. Was the employee entered in the RUP and directed into occupational-health follow-up?
  7. How will the first payslip and DSN be linked to the establishment once the number is available?
  8. Are the foreign parent, French company, payroll provider and tax account using the same corporate identity?

If the answer to the fourth question is no, the company should stop relying on assumptions and obtain a written administrative route before the start date. If the answer to the first question is no because the company has not yet been registered, the issue is more serious than an absent SIRET: it is the personal-liability risk of acting for a company in formation. If the answers are documented, the pending number is usually a manageable registration problem rather than a reason to abandon the French launch.

Conclusion

A French company can, in a limited and documented situation, prepare its first employee’s start while the establishment’s SIRET is still pending. The decisive step is the DPAE, not the number alone. When the establishment creation is awaiting validation, the URSSAF route is to complete the paper Cerfa declaration for each employee and send it to the competent URSSAF before the employee begins work, keeping proof of the mailing and later entering the declaration online once the SIRET is assigned.

The answer changes if the company has not yet acquired legal personality. A company in formation is not the same as a registered employer, and the founder who acts too early may remain personally responsible for the commitment. The contract, DPAE, registered office, employee identity, work authorisation, RUP, occupational health, payroll and DSN must be coordinated as one launch file.

For a foreign founder, the safest sequence is simple: identify the true employer, confirm the establishment and work location, file the DPAE before the first working time, preserve the evidence, update the SIRET record when assigned, and never invent an identifier or backdate a correction. That sequence allows the business to move quickly while keeping the first French employment relationship legally traceable.

Need a quick opinion on your case

We can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

You can speak with Maître Reda Kohen about the first-employee filing sequence, a pending SIRET or an URSSAF request.

Call Maître Reda Kohen on +33 6 46 60 58 22, or use our contact form to explain your French company and hiring plans.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
3 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.