Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse offerte, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can British visitors drive in France after Brexit with a UK driving licence and no international driving permit?

Short answer: in most ordinary holiday and short-visit situations, a British visitor may drive in France with a valid UK photocard driving licence and does not need an international driving permit (IDP). Brexit has not turned every British tourist into a French licence applicant. The practical difficulty is classification: the rules for a visitor are different from the rules for a person who has made France their normal residence, and a rental company may impose conditions that are stricter than French driving law.

This distinction matters at the roadside. A driver may need to show a physical licence, passport or identity document, the vehicle registration document, insurance evidence and, for a hire car, the rental agreement. A paper UK licence, a licence issued by a Crown Dependency or overseas territory, a lost licence, an expired licence, a medical restriction or a move to France can change the analysis. A document that is sufficient for immigration or for a car-hire desk is not automatically sufficient for every legal question.

This article answers the question for a British reader travelling in France after Brexit. It explains the short-stay rule, the international-driving-permit exceptions, the boundary with French residence, the documents to keep in the car and the steps to take if a police officer, insurer or rental company challenges the licence. It also identifies the main legal texts and decisions that become relevant when a simple roadside question turns into a dispute.

I. Can a British visitor drive in France with a UK licence after Brexit?

A. Is a UK photocard licence enough for a holiday or short visit?

For a normal visit, the starting point is straightforward: carry a valid UK photocard licence, and check that the categories shown on it cover the vehicle you intend to drive. The French term permis de conduire means driving licence. A UK photocard is the primary licence document; an IDP is an additional translation document where one is required, not a replacement for the national licence.

The French government’s Brexit guidance states that a tourist may drive in France for the duration of the stay with a UK driving licence, and that an IDP is not normally necessary. The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs gives the same practical direction for a short stay: a UK licence can be used without an IDP unless the particular licence format creates a problem, such as the absence of a photograph. The official French Service-Public guidance on foreign driving licences and the France Diplomatie guidance on driving abroad should be checked before departure if the licence or journey is unusual.

UK government guidance is consistent with that position. The GOV.UK international driving permit guidance says that a UK photocard licence is enough for driving in France and lists France under the countries for which an IDP is not needed. It also warns that a paper licence, or a licence issued by Gibraltar, Guernsey, Jersey or the Isle of Man, may require an IDP or another supporting document. The GOV.UK France travel advice adds a useful practical warning: a hire company may apply its own conditions even where French law does not require an IDP.

“UK licence” therefore needs to be read accurately. It normally means a licence issued by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) for Great Britain or by the Driver and Vehicle Agency in Northern Ireland, rather than a photocopy, a provisional licence that does not authorise the journey, or an international document standing alone. A photocard whose validity has expired is not rescued by the fact that the driver still knows how to drive. A damaged card, an unreadable category, an endorsement that affects entitlement or a licence held subject to a restriction should be treated as a warning sign.

France also distinguishes the entitlement to drive from the physical evidence of that entitlement. Article R. 222-1 of the French Code de la route, meaning the French Highway Code, provides that a qualifying national licence “est reconnu en France sous réserve d’être en cours de validité”. In plain English, recognition depends on the licence being valid. The current text of Article R. 222-1 of the Code de la route is especially important for UK documents because it preserves the treatment of licences issued by a state that was an EU member when the licence was issued, subject to the statutory conditions.

That provision is not a blanket answer to every British driving question. It does not authorise a person whose entitlement has been suspended or cancelled in the issuing country. It does not enlarge a category B entitlement to cover a heavier vehicle. It does not remove a French driving ban. It does not make a scan on a phone equal to a physical licence when an officer asks for the original document. It also does not override a rule applying to a person who has acquired normal residence in France.

For an ordinary visitor, the following preparation is sensible:

  • check the expiry date and every driving category on the photocard;
  • carry the physical photocard rather than relying on a photograph or an app;
  • carry a passport or other accepted identity document;
  • confirm that the vehicle’s registration and insurance documents will be available;
  • if driving a hire car, obtain written confirmation from the rental company about the licence, age, endorsements and any IDP requirement;
  • if the licence is paper, damaged, unusual or issued by a Crown Dependency or overseas territory, obtain individual guidance before travelling.

The IDP question is often made more complicated by language. In French, an IDP is a permis de conduire international, meaning an international driving permit. It is an official multilingual rendering of the national driving licence under the relevant international road-traffic arrangements. It is not a French driving licence and it is not a free-standing right to drive. The GOV.UK guidance on international driving permits makes the practical limitation clear: the national licence remains the document that establishes the underlying entitlement, and an IDP may be needed only for a particular licence format, issuing territory or destination.

A British visitor with a standard, valid photocard should not obtain an IDP merely because Brexit appears on the itinerary. The IDP becomes relevant when the licence format, issuing territory, vehicle-rental contract or destination requirement calls for it. The better question is not “Am I British?” but “What exact licence do I hold, who issued it, what vehicle am I driving, and what does the company or authority require?”

B. When does a British driver need an IDP or a French exchange?

The most important boundary is between a visitor and a person who has acquired résidence normale. This French term means normal residence: the place where a person usually lives, assessed under the applicable driving-licence rules. It is not automatically the same as owning a house, holding a second-home visa, spending one long holiday in France or having a French bank account. Conversely, repeatedly calling a move a “visit” will not prevent the authorities from examining the facts if France has become the person’s ordinary home.

Immigration status and driving-licence status overlap in practice but are not identical. The 90-day-in-180-day Schengen limit concerns permission to remain as a visitor. The exchange deadline concerns normal residence for driving purposes. A person can comply with one system and still create a problem under the other. A British citizen who relocates to France should therefore obtain a residence permit where required and separately analyse whether the UK licence must be exchanged.

For a resident holding a licence issued by a non-EU or non-EEA state, Article R. 222-3 of the Code de la route sets a one-year recognition period after normal residence is acquired, subject to the conditions governing recognition. The official text says that the licence is recognised “jusqu’à l’expiration d’un délai d’un an après l’acquisition de la résidence normale de son titulaire”. The official text of Article R. 222-3 also states that, once the period has expired, the licence is no longer recognised and no longer confers a right to drive in France. A resident cannot wait until a police check to discover that the exchange window has closed.

The UK has a special post-Brexit history. The Withdrawal Agreement and the implementing French rules preserve recognition for UK licences issued before 1 January 2021 in the relevant circumstances. The French decree of 29 July 2021 concerning United Kingdom driving licences amended the wording of the Highway Code to refer to a state that was a member of the European Union or party to the European Economic Area at the date of issue. That historical date should be proved where it matters. The issue date is not always the date printed next to a later renewal, so a resident may need a certificate of entitlement or other evidence from the issuing authority.

For a UK licence first issued after the relevant Brexit transition date, a British citizen who settles in France generally follows the exchange rules for a licence issued outside the European Union and European Economic Area. The English Service-Public guidance on exchanging a foreign licence explains the one-year framework, the normal-residence condition and the online application route. The French authorities may ask for proof that the licence was genuinely obtained in the issuing country, proof of driving entitlement and a translation by an authorised translator where a document is not in French.

Article R. 222-2 deals with the exchange of a European licence by a person normally resident in France. It also identifies situations in which an exchange can become mandatory, including a French road offence resulting in a restriction, suspension, cancellation or loss of points. The official text of Article R. 222-2 should be read with the individual facts. A short-term visitor does not become subject to the resident exchange route simply because a French officer sees a UK photocard at a traffic stop.

The courts have repeatedly insisted that the administration must examine the legal reality of the foreign entitlement rather than relying only on the appearance of a card. In Conseil d’État, 2 October 2025, no. 494453, the court stated that “il appartient à l’autorité saisie d’une demande de permis de conduire de s’assurer notamment de la réalité et de la validité des droits à conduire”. The decision concerned an exchange application, not a tourist’s ordinary day trip, but its lesson is portable: a document must correspond to a real and valid driving right. Category codes limited to the issuing territory, a medical restriction or a suspension can change the outcome.

Earlier decisions illustrate the same boundary. In Conseil d’État, 28 July 2017, no. 400767, the court addressed the one-year period and the requirement to establish normal residence. In Conseil d’État, 20 February 2019, no. 419143, the court examined evidence connected with a foreign licence and its exchange. These cases do not create an extra document requirement for a tourist, but they show why a resident facing refusal should keep the issue date, entitlement record, residence evidence and correspondence with the authorities.

The IDP itself does not extend a resident’s right to drive. It cannot reset the one-year recognition period, cure an expired national licence or turn a non-exchangeable licence into an exchangeable one. It is equally ineffective against a French prohibition. The Cour de cassation, Criminal Chamber, 17 May 2022, no. 21-85.611, held that a French licence invalidation carries an inability to drive in France even where the defendant holds a foreign licence or an IDP. The court’s formulation is direct: “L’invalidation du permis de conduire français entraîne nécessairement l’interdiction du droit de conduire sur le territoire national français, quand bien même le prévenu serait titulaire d’un permis délivré par un autre Etat ou d’un permis international.” This is a safety boundary, not a rule that turns every visitor’s valid UK licence into an invalid one.

Similarly, the Cour de cassation, Criminal Chamber, 8 January 2013, no. 12-80.501, confirms that a foreign licence cannot be used to bypass a French cancellation. The Cour de cassation decision no. 19-80.597 addresses the recognition of a foreign licence during the applicable period. The practical conclusion is narrow and useful: if the UK entitlement is valid, the journey is a genuine short stay and the vehicle category is covered, the visitor rule normally applies; if France is now home or the entitlement is restricted, a separate resident analysis is needed.

A resident who has received an exchange refusal should not simply continue driving with an IDP. Ask for the refusal and its reasons in writing, preserve the ANTS application record and identify what the administration says is missing. ANTS is the Agence nationale des titres sécurisés, France’s National Agency for Secure Documents, and is the online channel used for many licence exchanges. Depending on the reason, the response may require a missing entitlement certificate, an authorised translation, evidence of issue and residence, or an administrative challenge. That is a different problem from a visitor who needs to know whether a photocard can be used for a fortnight’s driving holiday.

II. What should a British driver carry and do if stopped in France?

A. Which licence, vehicle and insurance documents must be shown?

A driver should plan for the roadside question “Can you prove that you are authorised to drive this vehicle here?” The answer is built from several documents, not from nationality alone. Keep the original UK photocard, passport or accepted identity document, vehicle registration document, insurance evidence and rental paperwork together. The French term certificat d’immatriculation means the vehicle registration certificate, commonly called the “carte grise”. The French term assurance responsabilité civile means third-party liability insurance.

Article R. 233-1 of the Code de la route requires a driver to present a document authorising driving and the vehicle’s registration document. The current wording refers to “tout titre numérique ou physique justifiant de son autorisation de conduire”, meaning any digital or physical title proving the authorisation to drive. The official text of Article R. 233-1 also distinguishes immediate non-presentation from failure to produce a requested document within the additional period. It states that failure to produce the documents within five days is punished by a fourth-class fine.

For a British visitor, “digital” should not be treated as an invitation to leave the photocard at home. French digital driving documents and foreign licence systems do not necessarily interact. A screenshot does not demonstrate current validity as reliably as the original, and a rental company or police officer may need to see the physical card. Carry the original even if the DVLA account or an insurance app is available.

If the licence has been lost or stolen in France, contact the police or gendarmerie and the UK issuing authority promptly. Article R. 233-1 recognises a loss or theft receipt for a limited period; the statutory text refers to a document valid for a maximum of two months in the relevant situation. That receipt does not prove every driving category for every journey and does not necessarily satisfy a rental company. Ask the issuing authority what replacement or entitlement evidence it can provide, and do not assume that a police report alone is a substitute for a licence.

The vehicle documents matter just as much. If you drive your own UK-registered vehicle, keep the registration evidence and insurance proof accessible. If you drive a French-registered vehicle belonging to a friend, obtain permission and ensure the insurance permits the use. If you hire a vehicle, keep the rental contract in the car or available electronically and know the named drivers. If you cross borders, check whether the insurer or rental contract requires additional proof for the countries on the itinerary.

Vehicle weight and passenger capacity can also alter the licence analysis. Article R. 221-4 of the Code de la route defines the French driving categories; for category B, the ordinary limit concerns vehicles up to 3.5 tonnes with a limited passenger capacity, subject to the detailed statutory exceptions. Read the official Article R. 221-4 categories if you plan to drive a large motorhome, tow a substantial trailer or carry more passengers than a standard car. A valid UK category B licence does not automatically answer a French category question where the vehicle exceeds the relevant limits.

Insurance is a separate legal requirement. Article L. 211-1 of the French Insurance Code requires the person who has custody or drives a motor vehicle to have the required liability cover. The official text of Article L. 211-1 states that the person must be covered by insurance guaranteeing that liability. Driving without the required insurance can be a criminal offence under Article L. 324-2 of the Code de la route, which provides for a fine of up to €3,750; see the official Article L. 324-2 text.

Do not confuse the absence of an IDP with the absence of insurance. A UK photocard may be enough to establish the licence entitlement, while the insurer may still require evidence that the policy covers the particular vehicle, driver, country and use. An accident can expose gaps that are invisible at the rental desk. Before leaving the port or airport, confirm the policy number, assistance telephone number, excess, permitted drivers and any territorial restriction.

Rental-company rules deserve their own check. French driving law and a private contract operate at different levels. A company may ask for an IDP, a DVLA entitlement check, a minimum period of licence holding, a translation, a credit card in the main driver’s name or a particular age threshold. If the desk refuses the car, the dispute may concern the contract rather than the legality of driving on French roads. Save the booking terms and any email in which the company confirmed that the documents were accepted. The GOV.UK IDP guidance expressly advises drivers to check the car-hire company’s requirements.

A practical document pack should contain:

  • the valid UK photocard licence, and an IDP only if the licence format, territory, contract or authority requires it;
  • passport or another identity document;
  • the vehicle registration certificate or a clear rental-company copy;
  • insurance evidence and the insurer’s assistance details;
  • the hire contract, authorised-driver details and emergency contact;
  • evidence of any replacement, loss, theft, medical or entitlement issue that affects the licence.

Keep copies securely, but use copies as a backup rather than as the primary proof. A photograph can help a lawyer or insurer understand the document after an incident; it does not necessarily satisfy the officer at the time of the check. If a document contains a restriction or endorsement, obtain a written explanation before driving instead of relying on an informal translation.

B. What happens after a challenge, fine or refusal at the roadside?

If stopped, remain calm and identify the precise issue. Ask whether the officer is questioning the validity of the UK licence, the need for an IDP, the vehicle category, the insurance, the registration document or the driver’s residence. Those are different questions with different evidence. Show the original documents, avoid arguing from a search result on a phone and note the officer’s reference, station and any document retained.

If the officer says the licence is not immediately accepted, ask what document can be produced and by what date. Article R. 233-1 distinguishes an immediate failure to present from a failure to produce documents after a request. Its sanction wording is “est puni de l’amende prévue pour les contraventions de la quatrième classe” for the relevant failure to produce within the statutory period. Do not promise that a later document will erase an offence; use the period to provide what was requested and to obtain legal advice.

The risk is more serious if the allegation is that the driver had no licence corresponding to the vehicle. Article L. 221-2 of the Code de la route addresses “Le fait de conduire un véhicule sans être titulaire du permis de conduire correspondant à la catégorie du véhicule considéré”. The official Article L. 221-2 text sets out the criminal penalty and the possible fixed-fine mechanism. The classification depends on the actual entitlement, vehicle and circumstances. A visitor should not accept a serious accusation on the assumption that an IDP will solve it.

There is also a difference between an informal warning, a ticket and a criminal allegation. A French avis de contravention is a notice of a road offence. An amende forfaitaire is a fixed fine offered under the applicable procedure. An avis d’amende forfaitaire majorée is a notice of an increased fixed fine after the original payment or challenge period has passed. Read the document’s title, reference number, offence, amount and deadline. A French administrative website may be involved, but the notice itself tells you which process applies.

For a standard notice, the official ANTAI page on designation and contestation explains that a challenge is a request for exemption or a complaint to the public prosecutor’s officer, not a message asking ANTAI to decide the case. ANTAI is the Agence nationale de traitement automatisé des infractions, the National Agency for the Automated Processing of Offences. The public guidance currently refers to 45 days for an ordinary notice and one month for an increased fixed fine, with special rules for certain automated road offences and notices sent abroad. Use the deadline printed on the notice if it differs, and keep proof of online submission or registered post.

Some grounds of challenge require a consignation, meaning a deposit of the relevant amount that is not the same thing as accepting guilt. The ANTAI guidance on designation and contestation warns that some grounds require this deposit and that ANTAI does not decide whether the challenge is admissible or cancel the notice. If the allegation concerns a UK licence, attach a concise explanation, the licence copy where appropriate, entitlement evidence, travel dates, rental documents and any official guidance that addresses the rule. Do not send irrelevant material that obscures the central issue.

A foreign address does not make a French notice optional. Notices can be sent to the address associated with the vehicle or identified during the stop, and a missed deadline may increase the amount or narrow the procedural options. A visitor who returns to the United Kingdom should appoint someone to monitor post and online records if the matter is unresolved. Payment, challenge and a request for information have different legal effects; choose the route only after reading the notice and the underlying allegation.

If the problem is a rental-company refusal rather than a police ticket, preserve the contractual evidence. Record the time, desk, names if available, documents shown, refund offered and alternative transport costs. Ask the company to identify the clause relied on. A company that required an IDP should be assessed against the booking terms and the information supplied before payment. The question may become one of contract, consumer information and loss rather than a question under the Highway Code.

If the problem is an insurer’s refusal after a collision, notify the insurer within the contractual period, preserve the accident report, photographs and witness details, and avoid making an admission about licence validity before the facts are established. The insurer may ask whether the driver was authorised, whether the vehicle category was covered and whether the policy conditions were met. A valid UK licence, an IDP and insurance cover answer separate parts of that analysis. An IDP cannot create cover that the policy excludes.

If the authorities treat the visitor as a French resident, ask them to state the factual basis: date of arrival, residence permit, tax or household evidence, registration, length and purpose of stay, or another fact. The administration cannot resolve every residence question by looking only at the nationality printed on the licence. Conversely, a person who has genuinely settled in France should not present a visitor argument that the evidence disproves. A short written chronology often prevents an avoidable misunderstanding.

For an exchange or recognition dispute, the judicial decisions are useful because they identify the evidence the administration may examine. Conseil d’État no. 494453 confirms the need to verify the reality and validity of driving rights. Conseil d’État no. 400767 concerns the one-year framework, and Conseil d’État no. 419143 shows the importance of documentary proof. A refusal should be analysed against the exact rule, not against a general statement that Brexit changed everything.

For a criminal allegation, the case law on foreign licences is an essential warning. In Cour de cassation no. 21-85.611, an IDP did not neutralise a French invalidation. The earlier Cour de cassation no. 12-80.501 reached the same kind of boundary concerning a foreign licence and a French cancellation. These decisions do not remove the ordinary visitor entitlement; they show that an international document cannot override a domestic ban or a loss of the right to drive.

Finally, check that the problem is not simply an expired document or an unrecognised category. The administration may ask for evidence from the issuing authority; an authorised translation may be required for documents not written in French. The Service-Public guidance on licences obtained outside Europe describes the evidence and translation issues for the resident exchange route. A visitor should use that page as a warning about what may be needed if the stay becomes a move, not as a reason to file an exchange application before every holiday.

Conclusion

Yes, a British visitor can normally drive in France after Brexit with a valid UK photocard licence and no international driving permit. The position changes if the licence is paper, issued by a Crown Dependency or overseas territory, damaged, expired or restricted; if the vehicle falls outside the relevant category; if the rental contract requires an IDP; or if France has become the driver’s normal residence.

The safest pre-departure test is simple: identify the issuing authority, confirm validity and categories, carry the physical photocard, check the rental contract, keep registration and insurance evidence, and separate the visitor rule from the one-year resident exchange framework. If stopped, identify the exact document or entitlement being challenged and respect the written deadline. If the matter involves a fine, an insurer, an exchange refusal or an allegation of driving without the correct licence, obtain advice before paying, signing or continuing to drive.

Need a quick opinion on your case

If a UK licence, an IDP, a residence move or a French roadside notice has created uncertainty, you can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm. The review can focus on the licence documents, the vehicle, the rental or insurance contract, the notice and the next procedural deadline.

Call Maître Reda Kohen on +33 6 46 60 58 22 or use the firm’s contact page to send the essential documents securely.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

Janou SAMUEL
2 weeks ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
3 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
4 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
4 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
4 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
4 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
5 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.

chaymaa aouadi
6 months ago

I called upon Maître Reda Kohen, a real estate lawyer in Paris, and I am fully satisfied with his support. Very professional, responsive and attentive. He quickly analyzed my case, clearly explained the legal strategy and effectively defended my interests. Thanks to his expertise and determination, we obtained a very favorable outcome. I highly recommend Maître Kohen to anyone looking for a real estate lawyer in Paris.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

A big thank you for this feedback. It is exactly this kind of return that gives full meaning to our commitment to real estate law in Paris. Your satisfaction is our best recommendation.