When a French SAS raises money from an overseas founder, venture fund or corporate investor, ordinary shares are not always enough. The investor may request a preferential dividend, a liquidation preference, enhanced information rights, a conversion mechanism or a carefully limited vote. The founders, meanwhile, may need to protect the operating team’s control and preserve a clear path to a later funding round. French law can accommodate that negotiation through actions de préférence, usually translated as preference shares.

The difficult part is not choosing an English label for the security. It is turning the commercial bargain into enforceable French corporate rights, obtaining the right decision under the SAS’s articles, managing any procedure for avantages particuliers (particular benefits), and completing the capital increase and filing without leaving the foreign investor with a contract that the company’s share register or Kbis does not reflect. This guide addresses the issue of new preference shares by a French SAS, rather than the sale of existing shares. It explains the corporate documents, approval sequence, foreign-investor file, INPI filing and tax points that should be checked before completion.

For the wider framework, see the firm’s French company creation and corporate structuring page. This article concentrates on the narrower investor-facing question: how to issue and register a preference class when the subscriber is based outside France.

I. How can a French SAS issue preference shares to a foreign investor?

A. What rights can preference shares give an overseas investor?

A société par actions simplifiée (SAS) is a simplified joint-stock company. It may have one shareholder, known as a SASU (société par actions simplifiée unipersonnelle, or one-member SAS), or several shareholders. Article L. 227-1 of the French Commercial Code states: « Une société par actions simplifiée peut être instituée par une ou plusieurs personnes qui ne supportent les pertes qu’à concurrence de leur apport. » In English, the shareholders’ liability is limited to their contributions. The same article applies compatible rules governing public limited companies to the SAS, while giving effect to the SAS’s specific statutory framework. The official text is available in Article L. 227-1 of the French Commercial Code.

Article L. 228-11 supplies the central rule for preference shares. It permits the creation, at incorporation or during the company’s life, of shares “avec ou sans droit de vote” (with or without voting rights) carrying particular rights of any kind, on a temporary or permanent basis. The statute states that these rights are defined by the articles. That sentence is decisive for a foreign investor: a subscription agreement or shareholders’ agreement can explain the bargain, but the rights attached to the class of shares must be drafted into the French articles if they are to operate as corporate rights against the company and future holders. The current wording is in Article L. 228-11 of the French Commercial Code.

The opening sentence reads: « Lors de la constitution de la société ou au cours de son existence, il peut être créé des actions de préférence, avec ou sans droit de vote ». The quoted French wording confirms that the instrument can be introduced both at incorporation and in a later financing. It does not, however, supply the economic terms. Those terms still have to be made precise in the articles.

The articles should identify the class precisely. A useful description normally states the number of shares, their nominal value, issue price, the share premium, the holder’s rights, the duration of any temporary right, the event that activates it, and the method used to calculate it. A label such as “Series A Preferred Shares” is not enough. The articles should say what the preference actually does, how it ranks against ordinary shares, and what happens if the company has insufficient distributable profit or insufficient sale proceeds.

The commercial rights commonly considered in a French SAS investment include:

• Preferential dividends. The class may receive a priority before ordinary shares, a fixed formula, a cumulative amount carried forward when no distribution is possible, or a participating right after the priority has been paid. The articles should state whether the right is cumulative or non-cumulative, whether it is calculated on the subscription price or another reference, and whether it is capped. A “fixed” percentage does not make a dividend automatically payable: the company must still comply with the rules governing distributions and its actual accounts.
• Liquidation or sale preference. The investor may negotiate a distribution waterfall on a liquidation, merger, sale of the business or other liquidity event. The drafting must define the trigger, the amount returned first, the treatment of remaining proceeds and the interaction with debt, transaction expenses and other classes. A promise that looks like a guaranteed repayment can create a different economic and tax analysis from genuine risk-bearing equity.
• Voting arrangements. Article L. 228-11 permits voting rights to be adjusted for a determined or determinable period, suspended or removed. In an unlisted company, shares without any voting right cannot represent more than half of the share capital. Article L. 228-11 also provides that an issue breaching that ceiling may be annulled. The rule is not a general prohibition on unequal voting. In Cass. com., 13 March 2024, no. 22-12.205, the Commercial Chamber held, on the point before it, that only shares deprived of all voting rights count for the half-capital ceiling; it did not treat every low or economically modest vote as a non-voting share for that calculation.
• Conversion rights. The articles may organise conversion into ordinary shares or another preference class, with a ratio, timetable, adjustment events and the person entitled to elect conversion. A foreign investor often wants conversion before an exit or a later financing. Founders should check the effect on the capital table at every possible conversion date, not only on the day of subscription.
• Redemption or repurchase mechanics. Article L. 228-12 sets conditions for redeemable preference shares, including advance provisions in the articles and limits connected with distributable sums, reserves and equality among shareholders in the same situation. The statutory text should be read before a redemption promise is included in an investment term sheet. It is available at Article L. 228-12 of the French Commercial Code.

Other protections, such as an investor consent right over a new financing, a sale of key assets, a change of business or the appointment of a director, may belong partly in the articles and partly in a pacte d’associés (shareholders’ agreement). The distinction matters. A shareholders’ agreement is a contract between its signatories; it does not automatically bind a later shareholder who did not accede to it, and breach generally creates contractual remedies rather than changing the company’s share structure. The articles are a public corporate instrument filed through the French register system. A coherent package should therefore say which promise is a share right, which is a voting or governance rule, which is a personal undertaking and which is a closing condition.

A foreign investor should also ask whether the proposed class is intended to be held by an investment vehicle, an operating parent or an individual. The legal holder affects signing authority, beneficial-owner information, tax analysis, sanctions screening and the documents that will be requested by the bank or filing platform. The fact that the investor is not resident in France does not prevent a subscription in a French SAS. It does make the evidence and execution chain more important.

B. Which articles and shareholder approvals are required?

The first document to review is the existing French version of the articles, not the English term sheet. Article 1835 of the French Civil Code requires the articles to be in writing and to determine, among other matters, the contributions of each shareholder, the corporate form, name, registered office, object, capital, duration and operating rules. Article L. 210-2 of the Commercial Code likewise identifies the form, duration, corporate name, registered office, corporate object and share capital as matters determined by the articles. The two official provisions are available at Article 1835 of the French Civil Code and Article L. 210-2 of the French Commercial Code.

Next, identify the decision-making route written into the SAS’s articles. Article L. 227-9 provides that the articles determine which decisions must be taken collectively by the shareholders and the forms and conditions for doing so. It also reserves certain matters, including a capital increase, to collective shareholder action under the conditions set by the articles. The current text is at Article L. 227-9 of the French Commercial Code. An SAS does not necessarily use the same meeting, quorum and notice vocabulary as a société anonyme (SA, or public limited company). A written consultation, unanimous instrument, electronic vote or meeting may be valid depending on the articles. Calling an “extraordinary general meeting” in English while ignoring the French decision clause is a common source of avoidable risk.

The operative sentence is: « Les statuts déterminent les décisions qui doivent être prises collectivement par les associés dans les formes et conditions qu’ils prévoient. » The decision notice should therefore identify the precise clause in the articles and reproduce the applicable voting method. That is especially important where the foreign investor signs through a holding company and a power of attorney.

The approval package normally has two layers. The first resolution decides the capital increase and, where needed, the creation of a new preference class. It should set out the number of shares, nominal value, issue price, share premium, subscription period, investor identity or class definition, payment method and powers given to the president to complete the transaction. The second layer amends the articles so that the capital, share classes and rights match the resolution. The closing authority should be limited: it should not allow the president to change the economic rights negotiated with the investor without a further approval.

The choice between a class issued to a defined category of investors and an issue reserved for a named investor also affects the review. Article L. 228-15 provides that the creation of preference shares gives rise to the procedure for avantages particuliers when the shares are issued for one or more specifically named persons. In that situation, the statutory text identifies a commissaire aux apports (contribution auditor) who is a commissaire aux comptes (statutory auditor, commonly abbreviated CAC) and who must not have performed a mission for the company during the previous three years or perform one for the company. Read the current wording at Article L. 228-15 of the French Commercial Code.

The trigger is expressed in the statute as « lorsque les actions sont émises au profit d’une ou plusieurs personnes nommément désignées ». That wording is why the identity of the subscriber should be settled before the resolution is drafted. A transaction described as a class issue in one document and as a reserved issue for a named fund in another can lead to the wrong report and voting analysis.

This is not a box to tick after signing. The company should decide before the shareholder vote whether the proposed preference is an advantage granted to a named person, whether an existing class is being used, which report is required and who may vote. The report, notices, resolution wording and investor’s abstention or participation must all be consistent. When the issue is made into a class already created, Article L. 228-15 sends the evaluation of the resulting particular benefits to the special report referred to in Article L. 228-12. A French corporate lawyer and the relevant auditor should map that route to the exact facts rather than importing an SA form without adaptation.

Existing preference shareholders also require attention. Their rights can be affected by a new class, a new issue, an increase or reduction of capital, a conversion ratio or a later merger. Article L. 228-16 states that, in a capital modification or amortisation, the effects on preference-share holders are determined by the competent corporate decision and may also be recorded in the articles. That rule can be reviewed in the official Article L. 228-16 of the French Commercial Code.

The risk is particularly high when a later resolution changes the rights of a class. In Cass. com., 10 July 2024, no. 22-15.836, the Court of cassation held that an operation modifying the rights attached to shares can constitute a conversion for the application of Article L. 228-15, even when the shares keep the same name. The case concerned a reduction in a preferential dividend and the participation of the affected holders in the vote. The Court treated the voting irregularity as capable of causing nullity. The practical lesson is simple: do not let the holder of the class vote as though the holder were unaffected when the resolution changes that class’s rights.

The Court stated: « Constitue une conversion d’actions […] toute opération emportant modification des droits attachés aux actions converties. » The bracketed omission is shown only to keep the quotation short; the legal proposition is the Court’s own wording. A future amendment should be screened under that test even if the class keeps its original label.

The same decision also shows why an English closing checklist should identify the legal nature of each resolution. A reduction of the investor’s dividend, the creation of a new class, a conversion, a capital increase and an amendment to a shareholders’ agreement are not interchangeable acts. Each can have a different voting rule, report, majority and challenge. The articles should contain an intelligible method for future amendments, and the investment agreement should require the parties to follow that method.

Article L. 228-12 uses the language of the SA’s extraordinary general meeting and a special report from the statutory auditors. Through Article L. 227-1, compatible SA rules can inform the SAS, but the SAS’s mandatory rules and its own articles remain central. The safest resolution therefore identifies the legal basis, the SAS decision form, the report actually obtained, the majority recorded and the authority used to complete the issue. The company should retain signed minutes, attendance or voting evidence, reports, subscription forms and the final amended articles in one closing file.

One sentence of Article L. 228-12 is particularly useful when drafting: « Les modalités de conversion des actions de préférence peuvent également être fixées dans les statuts. » The investor should not leave the conversion formula to a later negotiation if the parties already know the intended trigger, ratio and adjustment method.

II. What documents and filing steps does a foreign investor need?

A. How should the subscription, capital increase and foreign documents be prepared?

Before the vote, convert the commercial term sheet into a cap-table model and a legal implementation schedule. Start with the pre-money and post-money valuation, then calculate the number of ordinary and preference shares, the percentage held after subscription, the nominal capital increase and the share premium. Test the table under at least three outcomes: no dividend, a liquidity event with insufficient proceeds to satisfy the preference in full, and a later financing that triggers anti-dilution or conversion. A percentage that looks protective in the term sheet may produce a very different result once the French nominal capital, share premium and existing classes are included.

Decide whether the investor will pay in cash, contribute assets or use a combination. Cash subscription requires proof of payment and a clean link between the subscriber, the sending account and the company’s capital-increase file. An asset contribution can require a contribution auditor, a valuation report and additional ownership or transfer evidence. Intellectual property, intra-group receivables and shares in another company should not be described merely as “cash equivalent” without checking the applicable contribution rules. If the investor uses a foreign holding company, verify its capacity to subscribe and its power to make the investment under its own law.

The French documents should normally include a detailed investment or subscription agreement, the draft amended articles, the shareholder resolutions, the report or reports required for the operation, subscription forms, proof of funds, the updated cap table and a closing certificate. The agreement can contain conditions precedent: satisfactory legal due diligence, approval by the competent shareholder body, delivery of corporate authorisations, opening or confirmation of the capital-deposit account, completion of beneficial-owner information and receipt of any regulatory clearance. It should also state what happens if the filing office rejects or asks for a correction.

For a corporate investor, the foreign-document file commonly includes a recent registry extract or certificate of incorporation, the foreign articles or constitutional document, a board or shareholder authorisation, proof of the signatory’s authority, an ownership chart and beneficial-owner information. For an individual, the file commonly includes identity and address evidence, bank details and information required to identify the ultimate beneficial owner. The French company should ask the bank, not assume, whether each document needs an apostille, legalisation, a certified copy or a sworn French translation. Requirements differ according to the country of origin, the document and the institution receiving it.

The greffe is the court registry serving the company’s commercial register. The RCS (registre du commerce et des sociétés) is the commercial and companies register. A Kbis is the official extract showing a company’s registered information from that register. These terms are not interchangeable with the investor’s home-country certificate. A foreign certificate can prove that the investor exists, but it does not replace the French SAS’s updated Kbis after the capital increase has been registered.

The filing route now runs through the INPI formalities system. INPI means Institut national de la propriété industrielle, the French national institute that operates the electronic business-formalities portal. The portal feeds the RNE (registre national des entreprises, or national register of businesses) and the relevant register data. The company should prepare the French filing data before the closing date: new capital, new share classes, amended articles, management information, beneficial owners and the exact date of completion. An English translation prepared for the investor is useful for review, but it is not a substitute for accurate French corporate filing data.

The investor and the company should also agree who will sign and who will submit. A foreign director may sign through a power of attorney, but the power must identify the transaction and be executed in a form accepted by the recipient. An electronic signature is not automatically equivalent for every supporting document. If the corporate investor uses a chain of authorisations, keep the chain together: certificate of existence, constitutional documents, board or shareholder approval, authority of the signatory and any apostille or translation. Missing one link can delay a bank, the INPI portal or the registry’s review.

Finally, screen the proposed rights for conflicts with the existing articles, transfer restrictions, approval clauses, pre-emption rights, investor-consent provisions and earlier preference classes. Article L. 228-11 allows the voting right to be suspended or removed only within the statutory framework and its ceiling. It also contains a rule on the preferential subscription right for certain preference shares with limited participation in dividends, reserves or liquidation proceeds, subject to contrary articles. The decision should therefore state whether existing holders keep, waive or are otherwise treated under any pre-emption or preferential subscription right. Do not treat a waiver signed in an English term sheet as a complete French corporate act.

B. How do you file the issue with INPI and control the tax and exit consequences?

Once the subscription is completed, the company must update the share capital and statutory information through the applicable formalities channel. INPI explains that a company modification formalité is used when information changes and that the modification must be declared within one month; it also identifies changes such as the first closure date and other information that can affect the registered record. The current official guidance is available on the INPI page for modifying a company. The exact list of attachments depends on the operation and the portal’s current requirements, so the filing should be checked against the generated receipt and any request for correction.

A typical completion sequence is:

1. the shareholders adopt the capital-increase and preference-share resolutions in the form required by the SAS articles;
2. the investor signs the subscription documents and pays the agreed amount, with the nominal amount and share premium identified;
3. the president records completion, obtains the evidence required for the contribution and updates the share register and cap table;
4. the company signs the amended articles and submits the modification through the INPI portal with the resolutions, report, payment or deposit evidence and foreign corporate documents;
5. the company answers any request from the INPI, the greffe or another authority, then obtains the updated RCS data and Kbis; and
6. the parties store a final closing pack containing the registered articles, filing receipt, updated register evidence, investor documents, reports, minutes and the post-closing cap table.

Publication can also need checking. BODACC means Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official bulletin for civil and commercial announcements. Depending on the formalité and the information changed, a legal notice or an official announcement may be required. The company should confirm the publication step in the INPI workflow and retain proof rather than assuming that the online submission alone completes every publicity obligation.

Tax treatment should be addressed before the investor pays. The issue price is usually split between nominal value and share premium, but the accounting, corporate-tax and withholding consequences depend on the structure and the parties. The fact that a preference share carries a priority dividend does not make every payment a debt interest payment. Conversely, a structure that removes nearly all equity risk, guarantees a fixed return and arranges a pre-agreed repurchase can invite a recharacterisation analysis.

The facts in CAA Versailles, 23 February 2023, no. 20VE00572 illustrate that point. The court examined a cross-border arrangement involving preference shares, a fixed and cumulative preferential dividend, a guarantee and a forward sale. On the evidence in that case, the arrangement was treated for tax purposes as a guaranteed financing rather than the risk-bearing participation claimed by the taxpayer. That decision does not make a normal French SAS preference issue unlawful. It does show why the economic substance, the issuer’s ability to distribute, the investor’s actual risk and any repurchase agreement should be documented consistently.

For a foreign individual receiving French-source dividends, the tax position can involve French withholding and a treaty with the investor’s country of residence. The official tax administration page states that, from 1 January 2026, dividends paid to a non-resident individual are subject to a 12.80% withholding rate, subject to applicable treaty rules and the taxpayer’s situation. That information appears on impots.gouv.fr’s page on dividends. A foreign corporate investor requires a separate analysis, including the applicable treaty, any parent-subsidiary regime, beneficial ownership, substance and documentation. The company should obtain a tax memo before promising a net return or inserting a withholding-tax gross-up.

Cross-border classification can matter even before a dividend is paid. In Conseil d’État, 25 July 2025, no. 489925, the court explained that preference shares are a statutory option under Article L. 228-11 and that their absence is not, by itself, the decisive feature for distinguishing a foreign company comparable to a French SARL or SAS. The decision is a useful warning against comparing the English name of a foreign company with a French label. The analysis should examine the company’s actual legal features, shareholder structure and statutory freedom.

Build the investor’s exit expectations into the first draft. If a preference class is converted, Article L. 228-14 addresses conversion into ordinary shares or another preference class and opposition consequences where the operation reduces capital in circumstances covered by the text. If a merger or demerger is later proposed, Article L. 228-17 provides for equivalent particular rights or an exchange ratio taking account of rights abandoned; absent equivalent rights, a special shareholder approval is required. The official provisions are at Articles L. 228-14 to L. 228-17 of the French Commercial Code and Article L. 228-17 of the French Commercial Code.

A practical pre-closing checklist should ask the following questions in writing:

• Do the articles authorise the proposed decision form, majority, notice period, quorum and delegation?
• Does the resolution create a new class, issue into an existing class, amend a class or convert existing shares?
• Are the preference rights fully stated in the French articles, including duration, ranking, calculation, trigger and limits?
• Is the investor named, and if so, has the particular-benefits and independent-CAC analysis been completed?
• Have affected holders been excluded from any vote on rights that are being converted or changed?
• Does the post-money cap table test the no-vote ceiling, future dilution, conversion and liquidation outcomes?
• Are the foreign investor’s existence, authority, beneficial-owner, apostille, legalisation and translation documents complete?
• Have the bank, tax adviser and company secretary agreed the evidence of funds, withholding treatment and filing attachments?
• Will the updated RNE, RCS data and Kbis reflect the new capital and the class of shares?
• Does the shareholders’ agreement match the articles, or does it contain a clear remedy if a signatory breaches a personal undertaking?

The most frequent failure is a mismatch between documents. The English term sheet promises a liquidation preference, the French articles say only that the investor receives ordinary shares, the resolution uses an incorrect majority, and the INPI filing reports a capital amount that does not match the deposit certificate. Each inconsistency can become a negotiation problem or a dispute. The company should use one agreed economic schedule and have every document checked against it before the subscription becomes irrevocable.

The second failure is treating the post-filing Kbis as cosmetic. The Kbis is evidence of the company’s registered identity, not a substitute for the articles or the share register, but a discrepancy between the registered capital and the closing file can obstruct banking, a later financing, a sale or due diligence. The final check should compare the registered information, amended articles, share register, investor certificate and cap table. If the filing office requests a correction, answer it within the stated period and preserve the correspondence.

Conclusion

A foreign investor can subscribe for preference shares in a French SAS, but the transaction is a French corporate-law capital increase with a cross-border evidence layer. The commercial bargain must be expressed in the articles under Article L. 228-11, placed within the SAS decision rules under Articles L. 227-1 and L. 227-9, and tested against the special-benefits and conversion safeguards in Articles L. 228-12 and L. 228-15. The parties should then align the subscription agreement, resolutions, reports, foreign authorisations, payment evidence, INPI formalité, RNE and RCS records, Kbis, tax memo and future-exit mechanics.

The safest closing file is one in which a reader can trace every investor right from the agreed term sheet to a numbered clause in the French articles, from that clause to a valid shareholder decision, and from the decision to the registered corporate information. That discipline protects the foreign investor’s priority and gives the founders a usable governance framework for the next financing, conversion, merger or exit.

Need a quick opinion on your case

A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm can clarify the proposed preference rights, approval route and foreign-investor documents.

The firm can review the French articles, investment agreement, cap table and INPI filing sequence before funds are released.

Call Maître Reda Kohen’s office at +33 6 46 60 58 22 or use the contact form.