Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

Can a British-Irish Citizen Vote in French Municipal Elections After Brexit? Registration and Proof

For a British citizen who is also an Irish citizen, the answer to “can I vote in French municipal elections after Brexit?” is potentially yes. The decisive fact is not a Withdrawal Agreement residence permit, ownership of a French home, payment of French tax or the number of years spent in France. It is the person’s legally recognised nationality when the electoral right is exercised. Irish nationality gives the person the status of a citizen of the European Union; a British passport alone does not.

This distinction matters in practice. A British national with no French or other European Union nationality cannot use residence in France to recreate the municipal voting right lost when the United Kingdom left the European Union. A British-Irish national may instead apply through the French rules for a non-French European Union voter. A British-French national uses the ordinary French electoral roll as a French citizen. These are different legal routes, with different evidence and different mistakes to avoid.

This guide focuses on municipal elections: the election of the municipal council of the commune, meaning the French municipality. It explains the nationality test, the liste électorale complémentaire, meaning the supplementary electoral roll for European Union citizens, the documents to prepare and the remedies available after a refusal by the mairie, meaning the town hall. The current framework is anchored in the French Constitution, the Electoral Code, the post-Brexit case law of the Cour de cassation and the official French and British guidance linked below.

I. Can a British-Irish citizen vote in French municipal elections after Brexit?

A. Why Irish nationality changes the Brexit answer

Brexit did not remove every possible electoral route from a person who holds a British passport. It removed the route that depended only on British nationality being treated as European Union nationality. If the same person is also an Irish national, the legal analysis starts from the Irish nationality, not from the British passport or the colour of the residence card.

Irish nationality must be real and already acquired. A family connection, an application that has not been completed, an entitlement that has not been established or a belief that an Irish grandparent would be enough does not by itself prove that the applicant is an Irish citizen. The French electoral authority needs a document or a reliable official record from which the nationality can be identified. A current Irish passport is the clearest practical document, but a nationality certificate, a naturalisation certificate or a Foreign Births Registration record may be relevant according to the way the nationality was acquired.

The European Union’s official explanation states the general rule in direct terms: If you are an EU national living in another EU country, you have the right to vote and stand as a candidate in municipal elections in that country. That rule is reflected in the French constitutional and statutory framework. A person who holds Irish nationality is an EU national even if that person also holds British nationality and even if the person has lived in France for many years as a British beneficiary of the Withdrawal Agreement.

Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union supplies the European Union citizenship background, while the French constitutional rule is more specific for municipal elections. Article 88-3 of the Constitution refers to the right being available to “aux seuls citoyens de l’Union résidant en France”. The important words are “citizens of the Union”. The provision does not say that every long-term resident, property owner or residence-card holder may vote. It identifies a category based on European Union citizenship.

The Electoral Code applies that constitutional rule to municipal voting. Article LO 227-1 provides that “Les citoyens de l’Union européenne résidant en France, autres que les citoyens français, peuvent participer à l’élection des conseillers municipaux”. An Irish national who resides in France and is not French therefore falls within the statutory description, subject to the remaining conditions. The fact that the person is also British does not cancel the Irish nationality.

This is the point at which the British-Irish situation differs from the case decided by the Cour de cassation. In its decision of 1 October 2020, second civil chamber, no. 20-16.901, the Court considered a British national resident in France who had been removed from the electoral roll after the United Kingdom’s withdrawal. The Court stated that « le Royaume-Uni a cessé d’être un État membre de l’Union » and rejected the application for re-registration. The official decision is available on Légifrance, and the Court’s English explanation is available from the Cour de cassation.

That decision is decisive against a British-only application based on residence. It is not a decision that Irish nationality is irrelevant. A person who proves Irish nationality is not asking the French court or the town hall to treat a British passport as an EU passport. The person is invoking a separate nationality that remains the nationality of an EU Member State. The application must be prepared around that distinction.

The same reasoning applies if the second nationality is French. A British-French citizen does not need the non-French EU voter route merely because the person also has a British passport. The person can be registered as a French citizen on the ordinary French electoral roll. The practical risk is that a form, database entry or official exchange may describe the person only as British, leading to the wrong question being asked. The remedy is then to prove the French nationality and request the correct registration, not to argue that the Withdrawal Agreement itself preserves an EU electoral right.

For a British-Irish applicant, the Irish route is usually the relevant one where the applicant is not French. The applicant should say clearly that the request is made as an Irish citizen resident in France, while disclosing the British nationality where the form requires all nationalities. Omitting the British nationality is unnecessary and can create an avoidable inconsistency. The legal argument is stronger when the identity record is complete and the applicant explains which nationality supplies the European Union status.

Irish nationality also has to exist at the relevant time. If an Irish passport has expired, that does not automatically prove that Irish nationality has ended, but it makes the evidential file less straightforward. The applicant should renew the passport or obtain an official nationality document before submitting a time-sensitive electoral application where possible. If names differ between the Irish document, British passport, French lease and municipal record, add the marriage certificate, deed poll or other name-change document that explains the difference.

A residence permit issued under the Withdrawal Agreement remains important for immigration, work and residence rights, but it is not an electoral passport. The British Government’s guidance for people living in France says, for British nationals covered by that guidance, You cannot vote in French elections unless you hold French citizenship. That sentence must be read with the relevant qualification: a British-Irish person does hold another EU nationality, so the person’s Irish status must be assessed. The residence permit protects a different legal interest and should not be presented as the source of the municipal vote.

B. What the right to vote covers—and what it does not

The immediate right is participation in the election of municipal councillors in the municipality where the Irish citizen resides. It is not a general right to take part in every French election. The nationality, residence and registration conditions are specific to each type of election. A registration for a municipal supplementary roll should not be assumed to settle participation in a European Parliament election, a national election or a referendum.

French law draws a further line between voting and holding office. Article 88-3 of the Constitution limits the offices that may be held by a non-French EU citizen. The text states that “Ces citoyens ne peuvent exercer les fonctions de maire ou d’adjoint”. In English, an Irish citizen who is not French may be eligible to vote and may, subject to the statutory conditions, stand for the municipal council, but cannot exercise the functions of mayor or deputy mayor. The municipal vote and the right to become mayor must not be treated as the same entitlement.

Article LO 228-1 of the Electoral Code is the relevant French provision for eligibility to the municipal council. It begins with the words “Sont en outre éligibles au conseil municipal” and then sets conditions for nationals of another EU Member State. The British-Irish candidate should therefore verify the candidate rules separately from the voter-registration rules. A refusal to place someone on the voter list does not automatically answer every question about candidate eligibility, and a candidate filing has its own electoral timetable.

The right does not depend on property ownership. Owning a house in France, paying taxe foncière (property tax) or paying French income tax may help show a connection with a municipality, but none of those facts substitutes for Irish, French or another qualifying EU nationality. Conversely, an Irish citizen may have the right even when the person rents, moves between addresses or has no French property. The file must separate tax evidence, residence evidence and nationality evidence instead of presenting them as interchangeable.

Nor does length of residence transform a British-only national into an EU voter. Five years, ten years or a permanent Withdrawal Agreement residence card may be highly relevant to residence rights and future nationality planning, but they do not rewrite the nationality condition in Article 88-3 and Article LO 227-1. The Cour de cassation’s decision no. 20-16.901 is particularly important for this reason: a claim based only on residence after Brexit cannot overcome the loss of EU citizenship.

The legal position is also different from the right to vote in the United Kingdom. A British-Irish person may have a separate UK electoral entitlement under UK law, depending on registration and the election concerned. That question is not decided by the French municipal list. The GOV.UK guidance on living in France should be checked for UK elections, while the French town hall and French Electoral Code govern the French municipal registration. The two registers must not be confused.

There is also a practical issue of choice and record accuracy. A person who has both Irish and British passports should not expect a French official to infer Irish nationality from an English-language surname, a place of birth or an Irish address from decades earlier. The application should identify the Irish nationality expressly and attach the document that proves it. If the applicant is also French, the file should identify that nationality and use the ordinary French roll instead of a supplementary EU roll.

In other words, the first legal question is not “did Brexit take my vote away?” It is “which nationality am I relying on, and can I prove it?” For a British-only citizen, the answer remains unfavourable for French municipal elections. For a British-Irish citizen, the answer can be favourable because the person is an EU national. For a British-French citizen, the answer can be favourable through French nationality. The distinction should appear on the first page of the evidence file.

The existing general article on British citizens and French municipal voting after Brexit deals with the broad British-only rule and refusal context. This article addresses the narrower Irish dual-nationality route, because treating the two situations as identical can cause a qualifying Irish voter to use the wrong form or an unqualified British-only voter to bring the wrong challenge.

II. How can a British-Irish citizen register and challenge a refusal in France?

A. Which electoral roll and documents should you use?

The registration process should be treated as a short legal file, not as a casual request at the counter. Article LO 227-2 of the Electoral Code states that people in the EU category must be registered, on request, on a supplementary electoral roll. The French text requires them to be “inscrites, à leur demande, sur une liste électorale complémentaire”. The request is therefore active: the applicant should submit it, identify the correct list and keep proof of the date on which it was made.

Before filing, decide whether the applicant is relying on Irish nationality or French nationality. If the applicant is Irish but not French, the supplementary municipal roll is the natural route. If the applicant is French as well as British or Irish, the ordinary French electoral roll is the more coherent route. If the applicant has neither French nor another EU nationality, the supplementary roll cannot be used merely because the person has a Withdrawal Agreement card.

A useful document set contains the following items:

  1. An Irish passport that identifies the applicant, preferably current, or another official document that proves Irish nationality. If the evidence is a certificate or registration record rather than a passport, include the original details and a readable copy.

  2. The British passport and the French residence document, not as substitutes for Irish nationality but to make the identity and Brexit-residence history transparent.

  3. Proof of the applicant’s real domicile or continuous residence in the municipality: for example, a lease, recent utility bill, tax document, insurance document or other evidence that matches the address stated on the application.

  4. Evidence explaining any change of name, different spellings, married names or transliteration between the Irish, British and French documents.

  5. The written declaration required for an EU national, including nationality, address and the statement that the applicant has not been deprived of electoral rights in the home state, where the form requires it.

  6. A complete copy of the application, every attachment, the date of submission and the name or electronic address of the receiving office.

Article LO 227-4 specifies the additional identity and declaration material for a non-French EU national. It requires a document proving identity and a written declaration identifying “Sa nationalité ; b) Son adresse sur le territoire de la République”. The applicant should read the current form carefully, because a municipality may request a clearer copy or a document that resolves an identity discrepancy. A request for clarification is not automatically a lawful refusal; ask what is missing and provide it in writing.

The residence condition is also substantive. Article LO 227-1 treats residence as a real domicile or a continuous residence in France. A holiday home, an occasional stay or an address used only for correspondence may not establish the same position as a genuine residence in the municipality. The applicant should therefore ensure that the address on the form, the proof of address and the electoral municipality correspond. If the applicant has recently moved, keep evidence for both addresses and record the date of the move.

The official Service-Public information explains that an EU citizen from another Member State may vote in French municipal elections if the person lives in France, is at least eighteen, retains civil and political rights and registers on the appropriate list. Its practical guidance on registration and supporting documents is available on the official elections page. It should be checked for the deadline and the current filing route applicable to the next election, because an online process or a paper process may be subject to a date that changes.

Do not assume that registration on a European list proves registration on the municipal list. France uses complementary electoral arrangements for EU nationals, and the application must identify the election concerned. If a person wants to participate in both relevant categories of election, make the requests and retain the confirmations separately. A mairie employee may understand “European list” to mean a different register from the one the applicant intended.

The distinction is clearer when the French register is considered. Article L 16 describes the ordinary list as being extracted from “un répertoire électoral unique et permanent”. A British-French citizen should check the ordinary French registration route. An Irish-British citizen who is not French should check the complementary municipal list. Using the wrong form can create an administrative refusal even when the underlying nationality is sufficient.

There is no advantage in describing the application vaguely as a “Brexit voter request”. The phrase can lead the official to focus on the British-only rule. State the legal basis accurately: “I am a national of Ireland, an EU Member State, resident in this commune, and I request registration on the complementary electoral list for municipal elections.” Add the British nationality in the identity information and attach the Irish evidence. The written wording should make the decisive fact easy to verify.

Article L 9 of the Electoral Code says that “L’inscription sur les listes électorales est obligatoire”. That general rule does not grant a right to a person who does not meet the nationality conditions; it describes the importance of being properly registered once entitled to vote. In a dual-nationality file, the practical objective is to make the correct registration visible in the records before polling day, rather than waiting for a polling-station problem.

After submission, check the registration through the official verification service or ask the mairie for written confirmation. Save the confirmation, the date and the list on which the person was entered. If an online account shows the person as British only, contact the office promptly with the Irish evidence. If the answer is verbal, send a short email recording the request and asking for confirmation. A contemporaneous paper trail is more useful than a later recollection at the polling station.

For a person whose Irish nationality has just been recognised, timing and documents matter even more. The Irish passport may arrive after the French electoral deadline. In that situation, obtain the official nationality decision or certificate, ask the mairie which document it accepts, and do not submit a declaration that overstates an uncompleted application. If a translation is requested, ask whether an official translation is required and preserve the original document as well as the translation.

The following comparison is a useful internal check before filing:

Personal status French municipal route Core proof
British national only No EU supplementary-list route after Brexit Residence documents cannot replace EU nationality
British-Irish national, not French Request the complementary municipal electoral list Irish nationality, identity, address and electoral declaration
British-French national Use the ordinary French electoral roll French nationality, identity and residence documents
British-Irish-French national Use the ordinary French electoral roll as a French citizen French nationality and current municipal address

This table is not a substitute for checking the current form. It is a way of preventing the most common conceptual error: treating all British residents as one legal category. The same family may contain a British-only spouse, a British-Irish spouse and a British-French child, each with a different registration analysis.

B. What can you do if the mairie refuses or misses the application?

A refusal should be classified before it is challenged. There is a major difference between a lawful refusal because the applicant has only British nationality, an incomplete application because the Irish evidence was not attached, a wrong-list error because the applicant used the ordinary French form, and an administrative mistake where a valid Irish national was treated as British only. The remedy and the evidence depend on that classification.

Start by requesting the reason in writing. Ask the mairie to identify whether it considers that the applicant lacks EU nationality, lacks residence in the commune, lacks electoral capacity, missed a filing deadline, supplied an inadequate identity document or applied for the wrong list. A general statement such as “British citizens cannot vote” is incomplete where the applicant has Irish nationality. The response should address the Irish nationality expressly.

Build one chronological file. Place the application first, then the acknowledgment, Irish passport or certificate, British passport, residence permit, proof of address, name-change material, declaration, emails, screenshots and the refusal. Add a short chronology with the submission date, the date the municipality responded, the date the electoral list was published and the date of the election. This allows a lawyer or court to distinguish a nationality dispute from a deadline dispute.

Article LO 227-3 connects the complementary lists to the wider electoral-register and appeal rules. The article provides for the complementary lists to be handled through the electoral-register framework and makes the relevant remedies available to people on those lists. The official text is on Légifrance. A refusal should therefore be tested against the actual electoral-list procedure rather than treated as an ordinary residence-permit dispute.

Article L 20 of the Electoral Code states that an elector may ask the judicial court to order registration or removal in the circumstances covered by the provision. Its time rule is precise: “Le recours est formé dans un délai de sept jours à compter de la publication de la liste électorale.” The seven-day period is not a general seven days from the date of every email. Identify the legally relevant publication date and obtain advice immediately if that date is close.

The same article contains a separate route for an error that is purely material. It allows a person claiming a material error to apply to the judicial court up to polling day, under the conditions set by the text. That route may assist where the Irish nationality was proved but a name, address or registration entry was transcribed incorrectly. It cannot be used to turn a British-only resident into an EU voter or to bypass the nationality condition in Article LO 227-1.

The competent court terminology also matters. The French expression tribunal judiciaire means the judicial court. The electoral-register remedy is not simply an application to an immigration prefecture, and it is not answered by renewing a Withdrawal Agreement residence card. The applicant should identify the judicial court with territorial jurisdiction, the applicable form and the documents required for an urgent electoral application. A court file should contain the written refusal, not only a statement that someone at the counter disagreed.

The strongest challenge for a British-Irish applicant usually has four elements. First, prove that Irish nationality already exists. Second, prove residence in the relevant commune. Third, show that the application was made for the complementary municipal list and complied with the declaration requirements. Fourth, show the administrative error or unlawful reason for refusal. A general argument about the unfairness of Brexit is less focused and does not replace those four points.

Article LO 227-4 is useful when a mairie says that the identity file is incomplete. It expressly refers to identity, nationality, address and the statement concerning loss of electoral rights. If the applicant has an Irish passport but the official believes the address is not established, answer the address point. If the official believes the Irish passport does not match the British identity document, answer the name point. If the official believes the applicant is not an EU national, answer that point with the Irish evidence. Separating the issues avoids a refusal based on an assumption that was never corrected.

Do not sign a declaration that says the applicant is Irish if the person has merely submitted an application for Irish citizenship. Do not state that the person is French if a naturalisation application is still pending. Article LO 227-5 makes the risk serious: a person who knowingly makes false declarations to obtain registration on a complementary list may face “un an d’emprisonnement et de 15 000 euros d’amende”. The correct response to uncertainty is to obtain the official nationality evidence, not to guess on an electoral form.

If the applicant is a candidate rather than only a voter, act even faster. Article LO 228-1 concerns eligibility for the municipal council and Article 88-3 excludes the offices of mayor and deputy mayor for a non-French EU citizen. A candidate should preserve the candidate declaration, list filing, response from the election office and the precise deadline. A voter-registration remedy should not be assumed to suspend or extend the time for lodging a candidate list.

The court should also be told what outcome is sought. If the applicant wants entry on the complementary municipal list, say so. If the applicant is French and wants ordinary registration, say so. If the address is wrong, request correction of the entry. If the person has no qualifying EU nationality, do not ask the court for an order that contradicts Article 88-3 and Article LO 227-1. A precise request helps the court determine whether it is correcting a record or being asked to create a right that the law does not grant.

The Cour de cassation’s decision no. 20-16.901 also limits the argument that the British-only rule is discrimination on nationality. The official case information explains that the loss of the right to vote and stand in municipal elections following Brexit was not treated as prohibited nationality discrimination in the circumstances of that case. A British-Irish applicant should not recycle that unsuccessful argument. The useful distinction is factual and legal: the applicant is not asking for an exception to the British-only rule but is proving Irish EU nationality.

If the mairie refuses to examine the Irish document because the applicant presented the British passport first, send a written correction immediately. Identify the Irish nationality, attach the evidence, quote the relevant Electoral Code provision and request a reasoned response. If the office corrects the record, retain the confirmation. If it maintains the refusal, the chronology will show that the decisive information was presented and ignored, which is materially different from an application that never mentioned Irish nationality.

Future European legislation should be monitored without assuming that every announcement changes the current French form. The EU has adopted a recast on arrangements for EU citizens voting and standing in local elections, but national implementation and French administrative instructions still matter. The present French analysis remains based on the Constitution, the current Electoral Code and the current municipal registration procedure. A future change may simplify information or remedies; it cannot be used today as a reason to submit incomplete nationality evidence.

The same care applies to online forms. Save the confirmation page as a PDF, record the submission reference, take a screenshot showing the list requested and keep the email header. If the platform accepts only a British nationality field and provides no Irish option, do not silently select an inaccurate answer. Contact the mairie, ask for the appropriate procedure and record the technical problem. A technical obstacle is easier to address when the applicant can show the screen, date and precise field that prevented an accurate application.

When a person has recently moved, do not wait for an informal promise that the file will be “sorted later”. Electoral lists have dates. Article L 20’s seven-day appeal rule and the separate material-error route show why an applicant needs the list publication date, not only a general assurance from the town hall. If the next election is close, send the written application, ask for a written response and seek urgent legal advice on the correct court procedure at the same time.

Finally, distinguish an electoral refusal from a residence refusal. A residence-card renewal, an address change on a Withdrawal Agreement document, a visa application or a social-security registration may involve the prefecture, the ANEF online immigration platform or another authority. A municipal electoral application is a separate file. The nationality proof may overlap, but the decision-maker, legal basis and remedy do not. Mixing the two files can waste the short time available for an electoral challenge.

Conclusion

A British-Irish citizen living in France can, in principle, vote in French municipal elections because Irish nationality remains European Union nationality. The person must still be resident in the relevant commune, possess electoral capacity, apply on request to the correct supplementary municipal list and provide the identity, nationality, address and declaration documents required by the Electoral Code. The right is not created by a British passport, a Withdrawal Agreement residence permit, property ownership or years of residence.

The practical sequence is clear. Confirm which nationality supplies the right. If it is Irish and the person is not French, prepare the complementary-list application. If the person is also French, examine the ordinary French electoral roll. Ask the mairie for written confirmation, preserve every deadline and challenge a genuine administrative error promptly before the competent tribunal judiciaire. Do not use a false declaration, and do not confuse the French municipal register with UK electoral rights.

The British-Irish case is therefore not the same as the British-only case decided in Cour de cassation no. 20-16.901. It is also not the same as a British-French registration. The decisive work is to prove the correct nationality and place the evidence before the correct electoral authority in time. A refusal based on “British nationality” alone should be answered by a documented Irish-nationality application, not by an unsupported claim that Brexit residence rights preserve the former EU vote.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm to review your nationality evidence, French electoral registration or mairie refusal.

For a first assessment, call +33 6 46 60 58 22 or use the firm’s contact form. Keep your Irish and British identity documents, proof of address, application, refusal and electoral deadline available.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.