Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

UK State Pension Stopped in France After a Life Certificate Request: DWP Evidence and Appeal

If your UK State Pension has stopped while you are living in France, a missed or rejected Life Certificate may be the cause. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uses this form to check that a pensioner living abroad is still entitled to receive payment. A suspension can also result from a postal failure, an incomplete witness section, an address mismatch, or a document that reached the wrong processing team. It is therefore important to establish what happened before treating the missing payment as a tax, banking, or Brexit problem.

This article deals with the urgent, practical question: what can a British pensioner in France do after the DWP says that a Life Certificate was not received or was not accepted? It explains the evidence to collect, the way to ask for reinstatement and arrears, and the escalation route when the DWP does not correct its record. It also separates the DWP process from France’s own rules. The French certificat de vie is a French proof-of-life certificate, but it is not automatically a substitute for the form requested by the DWP. The words may look similar; the institution, legal basis, file number, and remedy can be different.

I. Why has my UK State Pension stopped in France after a Life Certificate request?

A. What the DWP Life Certificate proves—and what Brexit changes

The DWP Life Certificate is an overseas payment-control document. The DWP is not asking you to prove that you hold a French residence permit, that you are tax-resident in France, or that you have a right to use the French healthcare system. It is asking for confirmation that you are alive and remain the person entitled to the UK State Pension being paid to you. The official UK Life Certificate guidance describes the purpose in those terms and instructs a recipient abroad to complete and return the form when the DWP asks for it.

That distinction matters after Brexit. Moving to France, obtaining a Withdrawal Agreement residence card, registering a French address, or receiving a French tax number does not itself close the DWP’s overseas pension-control procedure. The UK State Pension remains a UK benefit administered by the DWP. Your residence in France may affect taxation, healthcare coordination, bank arrangements, and communications, but it does not turn the DWP Life Certificate into a French immigration form. Nor does a French residence card prove the fact that the DWP is checking.

You should also distinguish four documents which are often confused:

  • A DWP Life Certificate is issued or requested by the UK pension administration for a UK payment.
  • A French certificat de vie, meaning a French proof-of-life certificate, may be used by a French pension institution or by a foreign pension provider that accepts a French form. It is not interchangeable with every foreign institution’s form.
  • A French titre de séjour is a residence permit. It proves immigration status, not necessarily that the recipient is alive on the date requested by a pension administrator.
  • An S1 is a healthcare registration document. It may help a pensioner access French healthcare, but it does not answer a DWP Life Certificate request.

The DWP page on State Pension payments abroad explains that a person living overseas may be asked to complete a Life Certificate and that payments may be suspended if the form is not returned. The instruction is not limited to people who have moved recently. A long-established resident of France can receive a request because the DWP’s control cycle, address record, or payment file requires confirmation.

The fact that a request arrives after many years of uninterrupted payment does not make it invalid. Equally, the fact that you sent something back does not establish that the DWP received a valid form. The legal and factual question is more precise: did the DWP receive the requested evidence, in the form and within the time stated in the request, and did it associate that evidence with the correct pension record?

Read every page of the request before completing it. Check the pensioner’s name, National Insurance number, date of birth, address, reference number, date of the request, return address, and any deadline. Use the current form supplied by the DWP rather than an old copy downloaded from an internet forum. If the form requires a witness, follow the form’s conditions exactly. Do not assume that a family member, neighbour, local official, or professional is automatically acceptable. A witness who signs in the wrong place, omits a required detail, or does not satisfy the form’s conditions can create a rejection even where the pensioner is plainly alive.

The witness question is particularly important in France. A mairie is a French town hall. A mairie may be able to certify a French document or explain a local administrative practice, but it does not control the DWP’s overseas pension file. Ask the DWP what it accepts if you cannot find a witness who meets the wording on the form. Do not replace a requested DWP form with a mairie certificate merely because both documents use the expression proof of life. Keep the original instructions with your evidence so that the person reviewing your file can see what was requested.

Brexit can make the paper trail longer without changing the basic proof required. An address may be written differently in English and French. A British surname may appear with or without a middle name. A French postal code may be entered in a field designed for a UK postcode. Mail can also be redirected after a move, and a pensioner may use a representative’s address without formally updating the DWP record. Each difference should be explained in the cover letter. The objective is to remove an identity or routing doubt, not to send a large undifferentiated bundle of papers.

The DWP’s Life Certificate form and instructions also make clear that a certificate should not be sent unless it has been requested. This is a useful safeguard. Sending an unsolicited document to a generic department can create a new correspondence item without connecting it to the pension record. If a payment has already stopped, use the request letter and the official contact route identified by the DWP, and state clearly that the communication concerns a suspended UK State Pension following a Life Certificate request.

The France–UK relationship does not eliminate the need to analyse the payment source. A UK State Pension, a private workplace pension, a personal pension, a survivor’s pension, and a French retraite are not the same benefit. The payer may be DWP, a UK pension provider, a French caisse de retraite (pension fund), or an insurer. A letter mentioning “life certificate” must be matched to the payer named in the letter. If two institutions have sent requests, open two separate timelines and do not assume that one response satisfies both.

B. Why a completed certificate can still be followed by a stopped payment

A stopped payment is a result, not an explanation. Before choosing a remedy, identify the exact point at which the file failed. The most common possibilities are not limited to a pensioner refusing to cooperate. They include:

  • The request never reached the correct French address because the DWP held an old address, an incomplete address, or an address that did not match the payment record.
  • The form was completed but not signed by the pensioner, not witnessed, or signed by a witness who did not satisfy the instructions.
  • The form was returned to a wrong address, placed in an envelope without the reference page, or sent after the stated deadline without an explanation.
  • The DWP received the form but scanned it under a different record because a National Insurance number, date of birth, or surname was missing or inconsistent.
  • International post was delayed, a return envelope was lost, or the DWP’s processing queue had not been updated when the next payment cycle ran.
  • The form was sent to a UK pension department even though the letter required a different overseas-payment address, or it was sent through an unofficial channel that cannot be matched to the case.
  • The pensioner changed bank account, lost access to a bank, or saw a payment rejected by the bank at the same time as the Life Certificate issue.

These scenarios require different evidence. A postal receipt can prove that an envelope was accepted by La Poste or another carrier; it does not prove what the DWP found inside the envelope. A scan of the signed form can show what was sent; it does not by itself prove delivery. A bank statement can show that no credit arrived; it does not establish whether the DWP suspended, recalled, rejected, or redirected the payment. Put the items together in chronological order.

There are at least five different events that a pensioner may describe as “the pension stopped”:

  1. The DWP issued a suspension decision because it says the Life Certificate was missing.
  2. The DWP says payment was authorised, but the bank rejected or returned the transfer.
  3. The pension was paid but the amount changed because of exchange rates, deductions, tax, or a separate adjustment.
  4. The bank account was closed or restricted, so the payment never became available.
  5. A payment was delayed during an administrative review without a formal suspension being communicated.

Ask the DWP to identify which event occurred and the date on which it took effect. If the letter only says that payment has stopped, ask whether the account is suspended, the payment is held, the address is under review, or the transfer has been returned. A precise answer prevents a pensioner from sending proof-of-life documents to the wrong team while the real problem is a bank mandate.

The distinction is also important for arrears. If the DWP reinstates the pension, the correction of future payments and the recovery of missed instalments may be handled separately. Do not assume that an automatic restart answers the arrears question. Ask for the first missed payment date, the amount withheld, the date of reinstatement, and the calculation of any amount due. Retain the letters showing what the DWP accepted and what it did not accept.

French law cannot be used as a shortcut to a DWP decision. Several French provisions refer to proof of existence because France operates its own pension controls. They are useful to understand the vocabulary and to avoid mixing files, but they do not turn the DWP into a French social-security body. For example, the current Article L. 161-24 of the French Social Security Code states, in the official wording, “Le bénéficiaire d’une pension de vieillesse d’un régime de retraite obligatoire résidant en dehors des territoires mentionnés à l’article L. 111-2, de Mayotte, de la Polynésie française justifie chaque année de son existence à l’organisme ou au service de l’Etat assurant le service de cette pension.” In English, this concerns a beneficiary of a compulsory French old-age pension residing outside the territories specified by the Code. It is not a rule saying that a British resident in France can replace a DWP form with a French certificate.

The same caution applies to Article L. 161-24-1, which addresses the possibility of proving existence through technical devices using biometric data under conditions fixed by law and regulation. That provision belongs to the French Social Security Code. It does not give a British pensioner an automatic digital alternative to the DWP’s paper process. If the DWP request says that a signed form and witness are required, ask the DWP before relying on another method.

There is a further reason not to treat every certificate as equivalent: a certificate is evidence for a particular decision-maker. The decision-maker needs to be able to identify the person, the relevant benefit, the date of the declaration, and the authority or witness who completed it. A certificate prepared for a French fund may contain all those facts and still be rejected by the DWP if it is not the document requested in the DWP’s procedure.

II. How can a British pensioner restore payment and challenge the decision?

A. What evidence and immediate steps should you send to the DWP?

Start with a short chronology. It should fit on one page and use dates rather than general descriptions. Record the date of the DWP request, the date it was received in France, the date the Life Certificate was signed, the identity and capacity of the witness, the date and method of posting, the tracking or receipt number, the date of the last payment received, the first missed payment, every call or message to the DWP, and every response. If a document was returned to you, photograph the envelope before opening it and keep the postal marks.

Create an evidence pack in this order:

  • The DWP request, including every page and the envelope if available.
  • A copy or scan of the completed Life Certificate before posting.
  • Any page showing the witness’s signature, name, address, profession, or relationship to the pensioner, if the form asks for those details.
  • Proof of posting, tracking, delivery, or an explanation from the carrier if delivery cannot be confirmed.
  • A bank statement or payment history showing the last received payment and the first missing payment, with unrelated transactions redacted.
  • A clear identity and National Insurance reference page, using only the information the DWP asks for.
  • Evidence of an address change, if the address on the request was incomplete or old.
  • Copies of previous correspondence and a list of telephone calls, including dates, departments, and reference numbers.

Do not send the only original Life Certificate unless the DWP specifically requires it and you have no safe alternative. If a new form is requested, complete the new form carefully even if you believe the earlier form was valid. State in the covering letter that the new form is provided without abandoning the argument that the earlier form was sent on time. This protects the immediate payment issue while preserving the evidence of an administrative or postal failure.

The covering letter should be factual and easy to scan. Put “UK State Pension suspended after Life Certificate request” at the top, followed by the pensioner’s full name, National Insurance number, date of birth, current French address, telephone number, email address if used by the DWP, and the DWP reference. Then answer four questions:

  1. What did the DWP ask for?
  2. What did the pensioner send, when, and to what address?
  3. When did payment stop?
  4. What action is requested now?

The requested action should be explicit. Ask the DWP to link the enclosed evidence to the correct pension record, confirm whether the suspension remains active, reinstate payment, and calculate arrears from the first missed instalment if the pension remained payable. Ask for written confirmation if the DWP believes that the Life Certificate is invalid, late, incomplete, or associated with another record. If a document is missing, ask for the exact document and the reason it is required.

Use the return address and communication channel stated in the current DWP request. The official guidance on reporting a change while receiving State Pension abroad is a starting point, but the address printed on an individual Life Certificate request may be more specific. Keep proof of every dispatch. If you telephone, make a note of the time, the name or identifier of the adviser, the case reference, the explanation given, and any promise to call back. A telephone call can move a file forward; a dated letter is usually easier to prove later.

If the pensioner has difficulty dealing with the DWP personally, ask about the DWP’s accepted authority or representative process. A family member can assist with documents, but assistance is not the same as authority to discuss a confidential pension file. Use the DWP’s own form or instructions for consent, power of attorney, or third-party authority. Do not send a general French mandate and assume that it gives the representative access to a UK benefit record.

If you are in France, a mairie may help with a French proof-of-life document, identity copy, or a local explanation of how an official signature is certified. Treat that material as supporting evidence unless the DWP has confirmed that it accepts it in place of its own form. If a translation is requested, ask whether an informal translation is sufficient or whether the DWP requires a particular form of certification. Do not spend money on a formal translation before establishing what the DWP will actually use.

If the pensioner also receives a French pension, open a separate French file. The French expression caisse de retraite means pension fund, but it can refer to different institutions with different processes. A French request should show the fund’s name, the benefit, the deadline, and the method of transmission. The French control-of-existence provisions illustrate why the requested body matters. Article L. 161-24-2 of the Social Security Code says, in the official text, “La suspension du versement de la pension de retraite dans le cas où le bénéficiaire ne justifie pas de son existence ne peut avoir lieu qu’à l’expiration d’un délai fixé par décret.” This is a French rule about a French pension context; it is not a deadline for replying to the DWP.

French law also provides for shared management of proof of existence among compulsory pension regimes. Article L. 161-24-3 states, “Les régimes obligatoires de retraite mutualisent la gestion de la preuve d’existence ainsi que les modalités de son contrôle au moyen du groupement mentionné à l’article L. 161-17-1, dans des conditions fixées par décret.” This explains why a French pension file may be routed through a shared mechanism. It does not allow a French fund to correct a DWP suspension.

The implementing rules reinforce the identity of the requesting organisation. Under Article D. 161-2-27, the official French text says, “Seul l’organisme ou le service de l’Etat désigné … peut demander au bénéficiaire de fournir, au plus une fois par an, un justificatif d’existence.” The phrase justificatif d’existence means proof-of-life document. The provision is useful as a warning against answering several institutions with one unexplained certificate. Check who sent the request and which pension it concerns.

Article D. 161-2-28 deals with information about a death being shared among members of the French groupement. Its official wording begins, “Le ou les membres du groupement … ayant connaissance … du décès … en informent sans délai les autres membres.” This is not a rule about a living British claimant’s DWP appeal. It is cited because a dual-pension household must keep the UK and French administrative records separate and correct any mistaken death or identity signal quickly.

Finally, Article 1983 of the French Civil Code contains the principle, “Le propriétaire d’une rente viagère n’en peut demander les arrérages qu’en justifiant de son existence, ou de celle de la personne sur la tête de laquelle elle a été constituée.” A rente viagère is a life annuity. This old civil-law provision is not the legal foundation of a DWP State Pension Life Certificate, and it should not be presented as though it were. It shows, however, why proof of existence appears in several French legal contexts that are not interchangeable with the British administrative process.

The practical result is a two-column file:

UK DWP file French pension or local file
DWP Life Certificate request French certificat de vie or fund request
UK National Insurance number and DWP reference French pension number and caisse de retraite reference
DWP return address and payment record French fund’s transmission channel
UK suspension, reinstatement, and arrears request French decision, payment, and French appeal route

Do not send a French social-security appeal to the DWP, and do not send a DWP Life Certificate to a French fund without checking the recipient. Correct routing is part of the evidence.

B. What can you do when the DWP does not correct the suspension?

If the first submission does not resolve the payment, send a second written request that identifies the earlier submission and asks for a review of the record. Attach the chronology, not a new pile of unlabelled documents. State that the payment has stopped, the date of the first missed instalment, the date on which the Life Certificate was sent, and the remedy sought. Ask the DWP to confirm in writing whether it accepts the certificate, rejects it, or cannot locate it.

Ask specific questions rather than relying on a general complaint:

  • What date was the suspension applied?
  • What reason and rule were recorded?
  • Was the Life Certificate received, and if so, on what date?
  • Was it rejected for a missing signature, witness issue, identity mismatch, late receipt, or another reason?
  • Is the pension record blocked for a separate address, bank, death, or representation issue?
  • What document or action will release the suspension?
  • From what date will missed instalments be recalculated if entitlement continued?

Use the complaint or escalation route stated on the current DWP correspondence. The GOV.UK State Pension abroad guidance should be read together with the individual decision or request letter because contact routes can change. When you ask for a review, keep the language measured: the central point is that the DWP should identify the evidence it received and give a reasoned answer about reinstatement. Do not describe an administrative error as fraud unless there is evidence for that allegation.

The UK appeal path depends on the decision actually made. A Life Certificate suspension may be dealt with through an administrative correction, a complaint, or a formal decision route. Read the decision letter for any mandatory reconsideration or appeal instruction and its deadline. If the letter does not explain how to challenge the suspension, ask the DWP to identify the applicable review route in writing. The Social Security (Claims and Payments) Regulations 1987 provide part of the regulatory background for UK social-security administration, but a pensioner should not infer a remedy or deadline from a general regulation link without checking the actual decision and the current DWP instructions.

Do not miss a time limit while waiting for an informal reply. If a letter gives a deadline for review or appeal, submit a protective challenge before that date and explain that supporting evidence has already been sent or is enclosed. Keep the certificate of posting and a complete copy. If you receive a new decision, calculate the next deadline from that decision and do not assume that a telephone assurance extends it.

A French appeal route may apply to a French pension decision, not to the DWP suspension. Under Article L. 142-4 of the French Social Security Code, “Les recours contentieux formés dans les matières mentionnées aux articles L. 142-1, à l’exception du 7°, et L. 142-3 sont précédés d’un recours préalable, dans des conditions prévues par décret en Conseil d’Etat.” The English meaning is that certain court proceedings in the listed French social-security matters must be preceded by a prior remedy under the regulatory conditions. This does not require a DWP claimant to file a French recours préalable.

For a qualifying decision by a French social-security body, Article R. 142-1 identifies the commission de recours amiable, meaning the amicable review commission, and provides in the official text, “Cette commission doit être saisie dans le délai de deux mois à compter de la notification de la décision contre laquelle les intéressés entendent former une réclamation.” That two-month period belongs to the French route described by the provision. It is not a two-month DWP Life Certificate deadline. Keeping the two systems separate protects both claims.

If the DWP still does not act, consider what evidence a lawyer would need to assess the next step. Prepare:

  • The original request and every subsequent DWP letter.
  • The completed certificate, witness information, and postal proof.
  • Bank statements showing the interruption and any financial consequences.
  • The one-page chronology and a transcript of important calls.
  • The exact wording of any refusal, suspension, or review outcome.
  • Evidence of the pensioner’s authority if a representative is acting.
  • A calculation of arrears, with assumptions clearly identified.

The legal question may then be one of administrative record correction, entitlement, procedural fairness, payment recovery, or a dispute about the body responsible for the decision. The correct forum cannot be selected merely because the pensioner lives in France. A French address does not automatically give a French court jurisdiction over every DWP decision, and a UK payment does not remove the practical importance of French evidence, translations, postal records, or local representation. The decision letter, the paying body, the applicable review route, and the urgency should be checked together.

Explain financial urgency in concrete terms. If the missing State Pension affects rent, medical treatment, care, or essential bills, identify the amount and the date on which the problem arose. This does not replace the Life Certificate, but it helps the reviewing body understand why a prompt written response is needed. Do not exaggerate hardship or submit irrelevant medical material. A concise evidence of immediate impact is more useful than a long personal narrative.

If a pensioner has cognitive, physical, or language difficulties, organise assistance early. A representative can help reconstruct postal events, request a replacement form, and keep deadlines. The representative should preserve the pensioner’s own signature and identity evidence and use the DWP’s prescribed consent process. If a French notary, mairie, bank, or medical professional has been involved, record precisely what that person certified and for whom. A professional’s signature does not change the identity of the institution deciding the pension.

The request for arrears should be repeated at each substantive stage. Ask for the first missed payment, the reinstatement date, the gross and net amounts, any deductions, and the method used to calculate the balance. If the DWP says the pension was not payable for a period, ask for the legal and factual reason. If it says the payment was sent but returned, ask for the transfer date and return information so that the bank issue can be addressed separately.

There is no advantage in sending contradictory versions of events. If the first form was sent late, say so and explain why. If the form was signed by a person whose eligibility as witness is uncertain, request a new form and identify the uncertainty. If the address changed, give both addresses and the effective date. Credibility is strengthened by a clear correction; it is weakened by omitting a fact that later appears in the DWP record.

The same approach applies if the DWP says the pensioner did not respond at all. Do not argue only that the pensioner is alive. The response should establish how the request was answered, what was sent, where it was sent, and how the DWP can now identify the answer. The issue is proof connected to the correct pension record, not a general declaration made to the internet or to a French authority.

Conclusion

A UK State Pension stopped in France after a Life Certificate request should be treated as an evidence and payment-file problem until the DWP gives a precise reason. Brexit, a French residence card, an S1, a French tax number, or a certificate prepared for another pension does not automatically answer the DWP’s request. Start with the DWP letter, identify the payer, preserve the form and envelope, and build a dated chronology.

Send the requested form again when necessary, without discarding proof that the first form was posted. Use the DWP’s current return address and official contact channel. Ask for the exact reason for the suspension, the date it began, the document needed to release it, reinstatement, and a calculation of arrears. If the answer is not corrected, use the review or appeal instructions in the decision letter and protect any stated deadline.

Keep a separate file for any French pension. The French certificat de vie, the caisse de retraite, the commission de recours amiable, and the French Social Security Code belong to a French administrative route. They may matter to a dual-pension household, but they do not replace a DWP Life Certificate or create a DWP appeal by themselves. The official UK instructions and the exact decision should control the British file.

The strongest file is usually short, chronological, and verifiable: request, completed certificate, witness details, proof of posting, bank evidence, correspondence, and a clear remedy. Where payment is urgently needed or the DWP continues to reject evidence without a reason, a lawyer can analyse the decision, jurisdiction, representation, and recovery of arrears on the documents actually held.

Need a quick opinion on your case

You can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review the DWP request, the Life Certificate evidence, the suspension correspondence, and the steps needed to seek reinstatement.

Call Maître Reda Kohen on +33 6 46 60 58 22.

You can also use the contact form to send the essential dates and documents securely.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.