Many foreign founders plan their French payroll from a USD or GBP budget. The question “can a French company pay an employee in dollars or pounds?” is therefore practical, but it has three different legal layers: the currency used to measure the salary, the currency actually delivered to the employee, and the currency used for French payroll, social-security and tax reporting. Treating those layers as interchangeable is the source of most disputes. For a worker habitually carrying out the employment in France, the euro is the starting point and French mandatory employment rules remain central, even if the parent company is American, British, Canadian, Swiss or based in another country. A foreign-currency package can be structured, but an unexplained promise of “USD salary” or “GBP salary” leaves the parties arguing about the exchange-rate date, the gross amount, bank charges, social contributions and the value of benefits. This article gives a decision framework for a foreign-owned company employing in France. It is distinct from the choice between an SAS, a SARL, a branch and a subsidiary, although the same questions should be settled when the first French employment contract is prepared. For the broader corporate set-up, the company can also consult this French company formation and legal structure resource.
I. Can a French company lawfully set an employee’s salary in US dollars or pounds?
A. Why is the euro the starting point for a France-based employee?
The first distinction is between a currency of account and a currency of payment. The currency of account is the unit used to express the economic promise: for example, USD 120,000 per year or GBP 90,000 per year. The currency of payment is the money actually transferred when the monthly salary is paid. A contract can create serious uncertainty when it states only “salary: USD 10,000 per month” without saying whether the employee must receive dollars, whether the employer may pay the euro equivalent, and which exchange rate controls the calculation.
French monetary law begins with a simple rule. Article L. 111-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code states: La monnaie de la France est l’euro.
The same starting point appears in Article 1343-3 of the French Civil Code: Le paiement, en France, d’une obligation de somme d’argent s’effectue en euros.
Both statements are available in the official text of Article L. 111-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code and Article 1343-3 of the Civil Code.
Article 1343-3 does not make every international payment impossible. It recognises payments in another currency where the obligation arises from an international transaction or a foreign judgment. It also allows the parties to agree payment in a foreign currency between professionals where the use of that currency is commonly accepted for the transaction. Those exceptions must be read together with the mandatory rules of employment law. An individual employee is not simply another commercial counterparty negotiating an invoice. The company should therefore avoid relying on the exception in the abstract and should identify the international facts that make the currency relevant.
The Monetary and Financial Code also contains a specific cross-reference for wages. Article L. 112-10 provides that salary is paid under the conditions fixed by Article L. 3241-1 of the French Labour Code. That official cross-reference appears in the salary-payment provisions of the Monetary and Financial Code. Article L. 3241-1 allows payment in cash, by crossed cheque or by transfer to a bank or postal account held by the employee or jointly held by the employee. It adds the short but important sentence: Toute stipulation contraire est nulle.
The full rule is in Article L. 3241-1 of the Labour Code.
In practice, a company employing someone in France should normally calculate and pay the monthly French salary in euros. The employee may hold a multi-currency account, and a bank may convert an incoming payment automatically, but the account’s technical ability to receive dollars does not answer the legal question. Nor does the employee’s nationality change the payment framework. A French employee, a British employee and an American employee working in France can all be protected by the same French wage rules if the employment is governed by French law.
The difference becomes clearer if the founder compares three possible arrangements:
| Arrangement | What the contract promises | Where the main risk lies |
|---|---|---|
| Euro salary | A fixed gross amount in euros, paid to the employee’s account in euros | Ordinary payroll compliance; limited currency dispute |
| Foreign reference, euro settlement | A USD or GBP target converted into a euro gross amount under a defined method | Validity of the international rationale and clarity of the conversion rule |
| Foreign-currency salary paid abroad | A foreign amount paid in the country where the work is performed | Correct classification of an international or expatriate employment, applicable law and social-security coordination |
The third arrangement is not the normal solution for a person who works in France for the French entity. A France-based employee cannot be turned into an expatriate merely by choosing dollars or pounds in the contract. The place where work is habitually performed, the employer’s establishment, the reporting line, the social-security affiliation and the organisation of the work remain relevant. The French public guidance on an employee expatriated abroad expressly treats the currency of remuneration as one item in a wider international assignment package, rather than as a substitute for analysing the place of work. It should not be used to bypass French employment obligations for a worker who remains in France.
The contract’s language is a separate point. Article L. 1221-3 of the Labour Code provides that a written employment contract is drafted in French, with a translation where the employee is foreign and requests it. A currency clause does not cure a language or information defect. The company can provide an English working version for a foreign founder, but it should make the French contractual text and the currency mechanics consistent. The wording of Article L. 1221-3 of the Labour Code should be checked at the time of drafting.
There is also a practical banking point. A euro payment to an account in another European Union country may be possible through the Single Euro Payments Area, or SEPA, subject to the applicable payment rules. A bank account outside the euro area can introduce conversion fees and delays, but those banking effects should be allocated expressly. They do not justify a payroll file that alternates between a USD gross figure, a GBP net figure and an unexplained euro transfer. The employee must be able to reconcile the contract, payslip and amount received.
For a founder deciding how to proceed, the safe starting question is not “which currency does our group use?” It is “what amount must the French employee receive as gross remuneration under French payroll, and how will every monthly euro amount be evidenced?” Only after that answer is fixed should the group consider adding a foreign-currency reference for budgeting or international alignment.
B. When can an international connection support a dollar or pound reference?
A foreign-currency reference is easier to defend when it reflects a real international feature of the work, not merely the convenience of the parent company’s spreadsheet. Relevant facts may include a genuine assignment outside France, a role whose principal activity is connected to foreign operations, a compensation policy applied across several countries, revenue or transactions directly denominated in the selected currency, or a contract under which part of the work and payment are performed abroad. None of those facts creates an automatic permission. They help explain why the currency has a direct relationship with the employment.
Article L. 112-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code states the general rule that automatic indexation of prices of goods or services is prohibited, subject to statutory exceptions. Article L. 112-1 is not a complete answer to a wage dispute, but it warns against a vague clause whose only operation is to make a euro salary rise and fall with a currency market unrelated to the job. Article L. 112-2 focuses on clauses based on indices or prices that have no direct relationship with the purpose of the agreement or with the activity of one of the parties. Its official wording is available in Article L. 112-2 of the Monetary and Financial Code.
The question is therefore one of substance and drafting. A clause that says “the employee is paid the equivalent of USD 10,000 at the spot rate” may be analysed differently from a clause that says “the employee receives a fixed gross salary of €9,200, reviewed once a year by amendment after the group’s compensation review.” The first can expose the employer to a monthly currency claim. The second gives a clear French payroll amount and leaves future changes to a documented process. If the first model is necessary, the contract should explain why USD or GBP is connected to the activity and how the euro payment is calculated.
The leading official decision for a genuinely foreign assignment is the French Supreme Court’s Social Chamber judgment of 25 October 1990, appeal no. 87-40.852. The employee was engaged for work in Iraq, and part of the remuneration was linked to the local currency and paid in that foreign country. The Court upheld the clause because, on the facts found, la clause était en relation directe avec l’objet de la convention
. That judgment supports a narrow proposition: a foreign-currency mechanism can make sense where the job is actually performed abroad and the currency is tied to that foreign execution. It does not establish that a French office may label every domestic salary in dollars.
The same decision illustrates why the contract must separate salary from expatriation benefits. The case involved a foreign posting, local living conditions and a currency component designed for the country of work. A French company cannot copy the currency sentence from an expatriation package and place it in a domestic French employment contract while removing the foreign assignment, local expenses and payment location that gave the clause its commercial logic.
Another useful boundary appears in the Social Chamber judgment of 14 March 2006, appeal no. 04-43.119. The case concerned successive contracts and work in Saudi Arabia, but the official summary notes that the employment relationship had des liens étroits avec la France
. The Court accepted the application of French law after considering the full circumstances: the French parties, the French contractual framework, the salary references and the social-protection arrangements. This matters to a foreign founder because an international group structure or an overseas assignment does not, by itself, remove the mandatory French framework. The chosen currency is one fact among many, not a jurisdictional switch.
The Social Chamber judgment of 3 July 2019, appeals nos. 18-12.873 and 18-12.874, is especially useful for avoiding overstatement. The record concerned French contracts for professional basketball players that referred to US dollars. The lower-court reasoning reproduced in the official decision stated that the amount “devait être converti en euros au taux de change en cours au moment de son paiement”. The Supreme Court rejected the appeals because the employer had not properly advanced the legal argument that the salary clause was an unlawful indexation clause. The judgment therefore cannot be read as a blanket ruling that every French salary may be paid in dollars, nor as a blanket ruling that every reference to dollars is void. It shows how the exact wording, the pleadings and the evidence of the parties’ common intention can decide the result.
A more recent litigation record, the Bordeaux Court of Appeal decision under RG no. 25/04340, also shows the practical danger. The dispute involved a bonus stated in dollars and a demand for the euro equivalent. Because the official page is a lower-court record, it should be treated as a current litigation illustration rather than a general rule of the Supreme Court. Its value for a founder is procedural: once payment has been made several times in different ways, the parties may argue about the reference currency, the conversion date, previous practice and whether the currency bears a direct relationship to the work.
The company should record the international rationale before signature. A board or shareholder memo can explain the group’s compensation policy, the employee’s foreign-facing responsibilities, the currencies in which the business invoices or receives revenue, and whether any work will be carried out outside France. The employment contract should then state the legal and economic consequence of those facts. This evidence is more useful than an after-the-event email saying that the parent company always pays in USD.
The clause should also avoid confusing a fixed foreign amount with an indexation mechanism. A fixed USD amount converted into euros on each payment transfers exchange-rate movement into the employee’s gross salary. A fixed euro amount with a discretionary annual review does not do the same thing. A euro salary plus a separately described foreign-assignment allowance may be more appropriate where the employee genuinely travels or works abroad. Each model has tax, social-security and contractual consequences, so the document should say what is fixed, what is variable and who controls the evidence.
Finally, nationality and residence require separate analysis. A foreign founder who moves to France belongs to a mobility or immigration analysis, and a property purchase belongs to a real-estate analysis. This article concerns the company’s employment of a person whose work is connected to France. A worker living abroad and working habitually abroad for a French group may trigger a different conflict-of-laws and social-security assessment. The company must not use this article’s domestic payroll model for that situation without a separate review.
II. How should a foreign founder run French payroll when the budget is in dollars or pounds?
A. How should the employment contract and exchange-rate formula be drafted?
The most reliable drafting method is to make the euro payroll number visible even when the commercial package is negotiated in USD or GBP. The contract should state the annual gross salary, the monthly gross salary or the calculation that produces it, and the currency in which the employer will run French payroll. If the parties also want a foreign-currency reference, the reference should appear as a second, carefully defined element. It should never be left to an accountant, bank or employee to infer the intended formula from a headline figure.
At minimum, the clause should answer the following questions:
- What is the base? Is USD 120,000 an annual gross amount, an annual net target, a total package including benefits, or a budget before employer charges? A French employer should avoid promising a net figure that it cannot control because the employee’s tax rate, social contributions and benefits may change.
- What is the currency of payment? State whether the employee receives euros into the designated account. If a foreign-currency transfer is permitted, identify the account, payment route, conversion responsibility and bank-fee allocation.
- What rate is used? Identify the source, such as a named published reference, a bank’s documented rate or another objectively reproducible source. “The exchange rate on the day” is incomplete unless the parties define the time zone, valuation time, bid or mid-market rate, and treatment of a non-business day.
- What is the conversion date? The contract can use the last business day before payroll, the scheduled payment date or another fixed date. It should state the rule for a late payment caused by the employer, a bank closure or a correction.
- Which amount moves? Does the rate convert the foreign reference into euro gross salary before contributions, or is the euro gross salary fixed and the foreign figure only informational? The contract should not mix a net foreign target with a gross French payslip.
- What happens to variable pay? Bonuses, commissions, equity awards, signing payments and severance should each have a currency and valuation rule. A bonus clause that says “USD 20,000” without a payment date can create a second dispute even if the monthly salary is clear.
- Who bears the risk? State whether currency movement affects the employee’s euro gross pay, the employer’s group budget, or neither. If the business wants a cap, floor or annual reset, state the mechanism and the need for an amendment where the change is contractual.
- How are benefits treated? Housing, travel, insurance, car benefits and foreign allowances should be valued and reported separately. Do not hide a recurring benefit inside a foreign-currency headline salary.
The contract should ideally present an example without making the example the operative rule. Suppose the agreed reference is USD 120,000 per year, or USD 10,000 per month. If the defined rate is 1 USD = €0.92 on the conversion date, the gross monthly payroll amount is €9,200. If the same rate is 1 USD = €0.85, the amount is €8,500. If the rate is 1 USD = €0.98, it is €9,800. The example lets the employee see who bears the movement. It also shows why “USD 120,000 salary” is not the same economic promise as “€9,200 gross salary, with an annual review.”
The employer should calculate statutory minimums and collective-agreement requirements against the legally relevant euro remuneration. The applicable collective agreement, classification, working time, paid leave, overtime and minimum-wage rules should not disappear because the parent company’s budget is in another currency. Where a variable rate could drive the monthly euro amount below a mandatory threshold, the contract should include a compliance floor and a correction process. The floor should be drafted as a legal safeguard, not as a promise that the company can ignore the foreign-currency formula.
French payslip rules make documentary discipline essential. Article L. 3243-2 requires the employer, when salary is paid, to give a supporting document described as une pièce justificative dite bulletin de paie
. The rule is in Article L. 3243-2 of the Labour Code. Article R. 3243-1 sets out the information that the payslip contains, including the employer, the employee, the period, remuneration elements, contributions and payment information. The current text is available in Article R. 3243-1.
The payslip should make the reconciliation transparent. A useful payroll file can show the contractual foreign reference, the source and date of the rate, the resulting euro gross salary, employee deductions, employer contributions, withholding tax and the net amount transferred. If the payroll software supports only euros, retain the foreign-reference calculation as an annex or internal payroll record. If the software shows both currencies, label one as the legally operative euro payroll amount and the other as a reference. A future auditor, employee or court should be able to reproduce the calculation without relying on a screenshot of a currency application.
Article L. 3242-1 makes the timing equally important. It states that remuneration is paid monthly, and the official text records: Le paiement de la rémunération est effectué une fois par mois.
The provision is available in Article L. 3242-1 of the Labour Code. A clause that leaves the exchange rate until after the expected payday can turn a currency calculation into a late-payment dispute. Fix the rate sufficiently early for the employer to pay on time, and document any correction on the next payroll rather than silently changing the original amount.
The clause should be consistent with the employee’s other documents. The offer letter, employment contract, payroll instruction, payslip, bonus statement, bank payment and accounting entry should use the same annual or monthly base. If an English offer says “gross USD” while the French contract says “net EUR,” the inconsistency is not cosmetic. It can affect evidence of the agreed salary, the calculation of paid leave, the reference for termination payments and the employer’s exposure to back pay.
The employee’s acceptance of payslips is not a substitute for correct drafting. Article L. 3243-3 of the Labour Code provides that accepting a payslip without protest cannot amount to waiving salary or accessories owed under law, regulation, collective agreement or contract. The official reference is Article L. 3243-3. A company should therefore correct a discovered currency error and retain the calculation, rather than argue that several unchallenged payslips have permanently settled the issue.
Three drafting models can be useful:
Model 1 — fixed euro payroll: “The employee’s annual gross remuneration is €110,400, paid in twelve monthly gross instalments of €9,200. Any foreign-currency figure used in group budgeting is informational and does not alter the euro amount.” This is the cleanest option for a domestic France-based role.
Model 2 — defined foreign reference with euro settlement: “The parties use a monthly reference of USD 10,000 because the employee’s role is directly connected to the group’s USD-denominated international operations. The French payroll amount is the euro equivalent of that reference, converted on the last business day preceding payroll using the named published rate. The amount is gross, and the employer pays the resulting euro amount to the employee’s designated account.” This model still requires a factual review of the international connection and the selected rate.
Model 3 — genuine foreign assignment: “For the period during which the employee habitually performs the assigned duties in the named foreign country, the local assignment letter states the local currency, payment location, allowances and social-security arrangements. The French payroll and return arrangements are adjusted to the applicable expatriation or posting rules.” This model should not be used for a worker who actually remains in France.
The wording should also address termination. If the employee leaves mid-month, which rate values the final salary? Is severance calculated from a fixed euro reference, an average of prior euro gross salaries or another legally required base? What happens to an unpaid USD bonus? How are paid-leave balances valued? These questions should be answered before a dispute, because a termination is precisely when a currency movement can turn a modest drafting ambiguity into a significant claim.
The company should retain the evidence for each conversion: the downloaded or archived rate, the date and time, the payroll calculation, the payslip, the payment confirmation and any correction. An internal policy can nominate one person to approve the rate and one person to reconcile the bank payment. A foreign parent should not overwrite the French payroll file with a consolidated group figure. The French entity remains responsible for the documents it issues as employer.
B. How should URSSAF, DSN, tax and foreign-company obligations be handled?
Currency choice does not remove French social-security obligations. “URSSAF” means the Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales, the French network that collects social contributions and certain related charges. For a French employer, the euro gross salary feeds the payroll calculation, the employee’s payslip and the monthly social reporting. For a foreign company without a French establishment, a different registration route may be available, but the employee’s French work still requires a French compliance analysis.
Article L. 242-1 of the French Social Security Code provides the foundation for contributions based on employment income under the general scheme. The current official text is in Article L. 242-1 of the Social Security Code. The point for a founder is straightforward: the fact that a group budget is denominated in USD or GBP does not turn salary into a non-payroll expense. The euro value used for the French payroll must be analysed for employee and employer contributions, benefits in kind, recurring allowances, bonuses and other remuneration.
“DSN” means déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly nominative social declaration sent through the French payroll system. The DSN, payslip, accounting entry and payment should reconcile. A foreign payroll provider that reports only the USD amount may not produce a usable French DSN. Before the first hire, the French entity should ask its payroll provider to confirm that it can record the contractual currency reference, the euro gross amount, the contribution base, the withholding tax and the payment date without manual inconsistencies.
The formal route is different if the employer has no establishment in France. Article L. 243-1-2 of the Social Security Code allows an employer whose business has no establishment in France to meet certain declaration and payment obligations through a single designated collection body. The official text is available in Article L. 243-1-2. URSSAF’s Foreign Companies service explains that a foreign company hiring in France may use the service to register, declare employment and cessation, and declare and pay social contributions. The English guidance is available at URSSAF Foreign Companies service.
The TFE, or Titre firmes étrangères (Foreign Companies Title), is another administrative tool for an employer based abroad without a French establishment. The public description says that it can cover registration with URSSAF, hiring formalities such as the DPAE and employment contract, and social declarations for contributions. “DPAE” means déclaration préalable à l’embauche, the pre-hiring declaration. The official Service Public entry is the TFE information page. The TFE is an administrative simplification; it is not permission to pay a France-based employee outside the French wage framework.
The company should decide its employer route before signing. A French subsidiary with a French establishment will generally follow ordinary French employer registration, payroll and DSN processes. A foreign parent with no French establishment should examine whether the Foreign Companies service, a French entity, a local establishment or another compliant arrangement is appropriate. The answer can affect who issues the contract, who files the DPAE, who pays URSSAF, who handles occupational health and who maintains the payroll evidence. It should not be decided solely by asking which bank can send USD.
Tax withholding creates another reconciliation point. Article 204 A of the French General Tax Code provides the basis for the withholding system for income falling within the relevant salary rules; see the official text in Article 204 A of the General Tax Code. “PAS” means prélèvement à la source, the French pay-as-you-earn withholding mechanism. The employer should calculate the withholding on the legally relevant euro remuneration and report the amount through the required payroll channels. A foreign-currency budget is not a separate tax base.
The employee’s tax residence can change the withholding analysis. For example, Article 182 A of the General Tax Code addresses withholding on French-source salaries paid to people who are not tax-resident in France, subject to its conditions and exceptions. The current official text is at Article 182 A. The company should not assume that an employee with a foreign passport is a non-resident, or that an employee with a foreign bank account is outside French tax rules. Residence, place of work, treaty provisions and the payer’s status require separate evidence.
The French tax authority also explains how income received from abroad is treated and converted for French reporting. Its information page on foreign income is available at impots.gouv.fr guidance on income received from abroad. That guidance is not a substitute for analysing the employer’s payroll, but it reinforces the need to convert foreign amounts consistently and preserve the rate and date used. A company should distinguish the employee’s personal tax return from the employer’s withholding and reporting duties.
The first-employee checklist should include:
- Confirm the employing entity, its French establishment and its registration route before the start date.
- Confirm whether the worker habitually works in France, works abroad, travels, or is genuinely posted or expatriated.
- Choose the French payroll currency and state the euro gross amount or reproducible conversion formula.
- Check the applicable collective agreement, classification, statutory minimums, working time and benefits.
- Complete the DPAE and set up the required URSSAF or Foreign Companies process.
- Configure the DSN and payslip so the contract, gross salary, contributions, withholding and payment reconcile.
- Agree the rate source, conversion date, rounding, bank charges, correction procedure and termination calculation.
- Archive the employment contract, French version, foreign reference schedule, rate evidence, payroll reports and bank confirmations.
The company should also test one simulated month before the first live payment. Use a strong and a weak exchange-rate scenario, then check whether the euro gross salary remains compliant with the contract and mandatory rules. Reconcile employee contributions, employer charges, PAS, net payment and the accounting entry. Test a late-payment correction and an end-of-employment calculation. The exercise often reveals that the group’s finance spreadsheet assumes a net USD amount while French payroll software requires a gross euro amount.
Bank charges should be allocated expressly. If the employer sends euros and the employee’s bank converts them into dollars, the employee may receive a different foreign amount because of the bank’s spread. If the employer sends dollars from a foreign account, the French payroll record may still need to show the euro amount and the conversion used. Neither model should be advertised as a guaranteed net amount unless the employer accepts the additional cost and has a lawful method for calculating it. The contract should identify whether the company or the employee bears intermediary fees and whether those fees can reduce the amount received.
The employer should avoid unilateral monthly changes to the conversion method. A rate source is not equivalent to a discretionary power to choose the most favourable rate after seeing the market. If the business later wants to move from a USD reference to a fixed euro salary, or from a daily conversion to an annual review, it should document the change and obtain the employee’s agreement where the contractual remuneration is affected. A board resolution, payroll note or parent-company instruction cannot automatically replace an employment-contract amendment.
When a dispute begins, the relevant file should be assembled in chronological order: offer, French contract, translations, amendments, compensation policy, payroll instructions, rate evidence, payslips, DSN acknowledgements, bank statements and correspondence about any correction. Under Article L. 3243-2, the payslip is a supporting document; under Article L. 3243-3, its acceptance does not erase a claim. A clear file can distinguish a genuine conversion disagreement from an unpaid salary, a bank fee, a tax-residence question or a social-security registration failure.
The company should use the official French formalities portal for corporate and employer steps where applicable. The Guichet unique, the single online portal for business formalities, is available through formalites.entreprises.gouv.fr. That portal does not replace URSSAF or payroll registration, but it helps a foreign founder keep the corporate registration and employment sequence separate. The company’s Kbis, meaning the official extract of registration in the French Trade and Companies Register, identifies the entity; it does not prove that the employee’s payroll has been correctly registered.
One final risk concerns group control. A foreign parent may approve a compensation package in dollars, while the French subsidiary signs the contract and pays the employee. The board minutes, intercompany funding instructions and group payroll file should therefore identify the French entity’s responsibility. An intercompany recharge in USD does not change the employee’s gross salary, and a French payroll cost in euros does not become a deductible parent-company payment merely because the invoice is in pounds. Corporate accounting, transfer pricing, payroll and employment law should be reconciled rather than collapsed into one currency label.
Conclusion
A French company can negotiate with an international employee by reference to US dollars or pounds, but the answer is not a simple permission to send foreign currency from a foreign bank account. For a person who habitually works in France, the euro is the legal and operational starting point. The company should normally state a French gross salary in euros, pay it through the compliant French process, produce a reconciled payslip and report the remuneration to URSSAF and the tax authorities. If a USD or GBP reference is commercially necessary, the contract should identify the genuine international connection, distinguish the currency of account from the currency of payment, define the rate source and date, allocate bank costs, protect mandatory minimums and explain bonuses and termination payments. The decisions in appeals nos. 87-40.852, 04-43.119, 18-12.873 and 18-12.874 show why context, direct relationship, French ties and precise pleadings matter. Before the first French hire, a foreign founder should run one complete payroll simulation and have the contract, conversion annex, DPAE, DSN and payment evidence tell the same story.
Need a quick opinion on your case
A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm can help you secure the currency clause, French payroll process and supporting documents.
We can review the employment contract, payslips, exchange-rate method, URSSAF route and cross-border tax position before a currency dispute becomes a wage claim.