Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

French Succession Tax Clearance Certificate for a UK Heir: How to Release a French Bank Account After Death?

A French bank account can become practically unavailable after the account holder dies, even where the balance is needed to pay funeral costs, preserve a property or settle French inheritance tax. For a British heir or UK executor, the difficulty is often not the existence of the money but the proof required before the bank will release it. The bank may ask for evidence of the succession, the identity and authority of the beneficiaries, a French tax declaration and a tax certificate.

The key documents are the déclaration de succession (the French succession-tax declaration), the certificat de non-exigibilité (a certificate that no French succession tax is payable or currently exigible) and the certificat d’acquittement (evidence that the tax due has been paid). The correct document depends on the estate. A British heir should not assume that a UK grant of probate, a will or a death certificate alone will unlock a French account.

This guide deals with a person’s French estate after death: bank accounts, tax clearance, notarial evidence, payment and refusal remedies. It does not cover the purchase of French property or the creation of a company. Where the blocked asset is a French house and the immediate problem is tax before a sale, see our separate guide on the French inheritance-tax deadline when an inherited property cannot be sold. The present question is narrower: how can a British family move from a frozen French bank balance to a document the bank can accept?

I. How can a UK heir prove the succession and obtain the French bank-release certificate?

A. Which French form and tax certificate does a British heir need?

The first step is to identify the French tax event correctly. The bank’s internal procedure may begin on notification of the death, but the French tax deadline runs from the date of death and not from the date on which a British executor receives the estate papers. Article 641 of the French General Tax Code gives the ordinary declaration periods. For a death in metropolitan France, the period is six months. In other situations covered by the article, the period is one year. The text states: De six mois, à compter du jour du décès. A beneficiary living in England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland does not receive an automatic extension because the estate is cross-border.

The French forms depend on the facts and the assets. The tax administration’s official guidance on when and where to declare identifies the succession forms, including form 2705, form 2705-S and form 2706. A bank balance, securities account or other financial asset must be placed in the overall succession picture. A form cannot safely be prepared by looking only at the account that happens to be frozen. The declaration may also need the deceased’s French and foreign assets, liabilities, gifts, insurance policies and the rights of the spouse or other beneficiaries.

For a British family, the place of death and the deceased’s residence should be recorded before the form is completed. A person who died in France may have a six-month period even if the principal executor works in the UK. A person who died in the UK may fall within the twelve-month rule, but that does not eliminate the need to contact the French tax service or establish the location of French assets. The date, place and tax status should be supported by primary documents rather than an assumption made from the address shown on the bank statement.

The relevant service for a non-resident estate is another practical point. The tax administration’s official payment-service guidance identifies the Recette des non-résidents at Noisy-le-Grand for situations within its competence. The address and submission method should be checked at the time of filing. Sending a complete file to the wrong local office can create a delay that looks like a bank problem but is really an allocation problem within the tax administration.

The certificate question should be stated in the same terms as the bank’s request. If the succession is not taxable or the administration confirms that no duty is payable, the bank may ask for a certificat de non-exigibilité. If duty is payable and has been settled, the bank may ask for a certificat d’acquittement or equivalent evidence of payment. The official guidance on a certificate of non-exigibility or payment explains that a non-resident heir may need this document to obtain the release of funds held by a French bank. The exact name used by the bank and the tax office should be copied into the written request.

Do not confuse a certificate of non-exigibility with a decision that the succession has no legal heirs. The first is a tax document. The second is a succession and authority question. A bank can ask for both. It may require an acte de notoriété (a French deed identifying the heirs), the will, civil-status documents, proof of the relationship, identity documents and a mandate for the person corresponding with it. A tax certificate on its own does not prove that the person presenting it is entitled to receive the balance.

French payment law explains why the tax certificate cannot be treated as an optional administrative extra. Article 1701 of the General Tax Code requires registration duties to be paid before the relevant formality and states: Nul ne peut en atténuer ni différer le paiement, subject to statutory exceptions. A British executor who sends a bank letter saying that the account will be used to pay the tax has not necessarily satisfied that rule. The file must establish whether the estate is exempt, whether a payment has been made or whether a regulated payment facility has been requested and accepted.

There are also practical distinctions between the tax declaration and the document requested by the bank. The declaration calculates and reports the succession. The certificate gives the bank an official basis for releasing or transferring funds. The bank may accept a receipt temporarily while waiting for the final certificate, or it may insist on the formal certificate before allowing any movement. Ask the bank to state the requirement in writing, including whether it will accept a certified copy, an electronically issued document, a translation or a document sent directly by the notary or tax office.

A British executor should build a date table before asking for the certificate:

  • the date and place of death;
  • the deceased’s last French or UK residence and tax residence;
  • the date on which the French bank was notified;
  • the account numbers and approximate balances, without sending unnecessary banking data by unsecured email;
  • the date on which the notary opened the file and the date on which the French declaration should be filed;
  • the date on which French duty was paid, or the date on which a payment facility was requested; and
  • the date on which the bank’s document request or refusal was received.

This chronology matters because a bank may say that the account is waiting for tax clearance while the tax service is waiting for a declaration, or the notary may say that the tax form is waiting for a document from the bank. The family should identify the first missing document and the person responsible for obtaining it. A general instruction to “release the inheritance” is less useful than a request for the exact certificate, the exact supporting form and the exact recipient address.

Where the estate includes several French accounts, do not assume that a single certificate will automatically answer every bank’s internal request. The tax document may cover the succession as a whole, but a bank may still need its own account mandate, account statements, identity checks or proof of beneficiary authority. Ask the notary to describe the scope of the certificate and ask each bank whether it needs the original, a certified copy or a direct transmission.

B. What proof does a French bank need before releasing the account?

The bank-release file has three layers: proof of death, proof of the people entitled to the estate and proof that the French tax position has been dealt with. A British death certificate may need an apostille or an authorised French translation, depending on what the bank and notary accept. A UK will or grant of probate may need to be read alongside the applicable succession law. The bank is not deciding the full conflict-of-laws question, but it cannot responsibly transfer the funds to someone whose authority is uncertain.

The starting civil-law rule is Article 724 of the French Civil Code. It provides that heirs designated by law are seized by operation of law of the deceased’s property, rights and actions, using the words: Les héritiers désignés par la loi sont saisis de plein droit. That does not remove the need for documentary proof. It explains the legal transmission of the estate; the bank still needs to know which persons are the heirs, whether a will changes the distribution, whether there is a surviving spouse and who can give effective instructions.

The bank may also ask the notary to explain how a foreign executor fits into the French process. A UK executor can have authority under the UK probate system, but the French bank may require a French deed, a translated grant, a power of attorney or direct confirmation from the notary. The safe approach is to ask the bank and the notary to identify the authority they will accept before arranging a translation or an apostille. This avoids obtaining an expensive document that proves a power the bank does not use for French accounts.

Non-resident estates are expressly contemplated by Article 807 of the General Tax Code, which contains rules relevant to declarations and beneficiaries who are not resident in France. The provision does not turn every British executor into a French tax representative, and it does not replace the bank’s identity checks. It does show why the residence of the beneficiary and the deceased should be stated clearly instead of leaving the tax office to infer the cross-border facts from a UK address.

If there are two or more heirs, the tax and banking consequences can diverge. Article 1709 of the General Tax Code provides for the liability of heirs, legatees or beneficiaries and recognises the joint liability of co-heirs under the statutory rules. One British heir may be able to produce the tax documents while another heir refuses to sign a bank instruction. Conversely, a bank may accept a certificate but require the signatures or authority of every person entitled to the balance. A private family agreement does not necessarily change the administration’s rights or the bank’s compliance obligations.

Joint accounts need separate analysis. The death of one account holder does not automatically mean that the surviving holder owns every euro free of the succession. The account agreement, the source of the money, the contributions of each holder and the succession rules may all matter. A bank may allow ordinary transactions by the survivor while preserving the deceased’s share for the succession, or it may freeze the account until the notary has allocated the balance. The survivor should not transfer the entire balance to a UK account before the French tax and succession position has been documented.

Do not merge a deposit account with life insurance. A French assurance-vie (life-insurance policy) may have a beneficiary clause and a separate tax treatment. A current account, savings account, securities account and insurance policy can require different documents and different requests. If the bank has grouped them under one “estate” case number, ask for a written inventory of the products and the release condition for each product. A certificate suitable for a bank deposit may not decide the insurer’s beneficiary review.

Securities accounts create another practical issue. A bank may be willing to transfer listed investments to the heirs but require proof of the tax position before transferring or selling them. The account statement should be taken at the date of death and updated at the date of transfer. Changes in value do not automatically alter the amount reported for every tax purpose, and a sale after death may create a separate capital-gains or allocation question. The executor should ask for a transaction history rather than relying on the current screen balance.

Prepare a bank-facing document pack in a controlled order:

  1. a cover letter identifying the deceased, the account, the UK executor or heir and the requested action;
  2. the death certificate and any translation or apostille that the bank has confirmed it needs;
  3. the will, grant of probate, deed of notoriety and civil-status documents establishing the persons entitled;
  4. the French succession declaration or proof of filing;
  5. the certificate of non-exigibility, certificate of payment or accepted payment arrangement;
  6. the bank’s own release or transfer mandate signed by the correct persons; and
  7. bank details verified through a safe channel, with a request for a confirmation before a large transfer.

Send only the documents needed for the stated purpose. A British executor should be careful with passport copies, bank details and unredacted statements. Use the bank’s secure portal where available. Keep a transmission log with the file name, date, recipient and any automated confirmation. If the bank later says that it did not receive the certificate, the executor should be able to show exactly what was sent and to whom.

Finally, ask the bank for a partial-release position. Some estates need a limited amount for funeral expenses, insurance, urgent repairs or tax, while the final distribution remains pending. A bank may have a controlled procedure for a limited payment or may require the notary to authorise it. A request for a limited release is different from a demand for final distribution and may help the family solve the immediate cash problem without pretending that the succession is complete.

II. What can a UK heir do if the account is needed for tax or the bank refuses release?

A. Can the French tax be paid or deferred while the account is blocked?

A frozen account can produce a circular problem: the bank wants proof that French tax has been dealt with, while the heir wants to use the account to pay that tax. The solution depends on whether the succession is non-taxable, whether another source of funds exists and whether the estate qualifies for a regulated payment facility. Do not treat the bank’s freeze as an automatic suspension of the tax deadline.

French law recognises payment facilities in defined circumstances. Article 1717 of the General Tax Code derogates from the ordinary payment rule and states that payment may be fractionated or deferred under rules fixed by decree. The official wording is: peut être fractionné ou différé selon des modalités fixées par décret. That provision is a gateway to the regulatory rules; it is not a promise that every heir with a blocked bank account can wait until the bank releases the money.

Article 396 of Annex III to the General Tax Code addresses the fractionated-payment credit for death transfers. The implementing schedule normally begins with a payment when the declaration is filed, then limits the number and period of the later payments. Where at least half of the taxable estate consists of illiquid assets, the regulations may allow a longer period and more payments if the conditions are met. A bank deposit is liquid in economic terms, but it can be inaccessible in practice; that fact should be explained with the bank’s written freeze and not simply described as an illiquid asset without checking the statutory category.

Article 397 of Annex III concerns specific deferred-payment situations, including certain bare-ownership and family-business arrangements. A British heir who receives full ownership of a cash account should not rely on a bare-ownership rule merely because a notary has not yet completed the distribution. The legal structure, the beneficiary’s rights and the reason payment is being deferred must be matched to the text in force.

The regulatory provisions on Articles 401 and 402 of Annex III address interest and the first payment for fractionated or deferred credit. Service Public’s current succession-payment guidance explains the practical limits, the need to make the request with the declaration, the role of the heirs’ agreement and the need for guarantees. It describes an ordinary arrangement of up to one year and three instalments, with a longer period and up to seven payments in the relevant illiquid-estate category. The notary should produce the proposed schedule and the guarantee terms in writing.

A tax facility is not the same as the certificate requested by the bank. The administration may accept the request and issue a document recording the facility, but the bank may still require an initial payment, a guarantee or a certificate describing the amount that remains due. Ask both institutions to state what document will unlock the account. If the bank will transfer money directly to the tax office or notary, ask for the procedure and the amount required. That controlled transfer may solve the circularity without releasing the entire balance to a private account.

Interest needs to be modelled. Article 1727 of the General Tax Code provides for late-payment interest and sets the statutory rate at 0.20 per cent per month under the current text, subject to the article’s starting-date and exception rules. The rate should not be confused with the interest attached to an accepted payment facility, a bank overdraft or a UK bridge loan. The file should show the amount of tax, the date from which interest could run, the cost of the proposed facility and the consequence of a missed payment.

Late filing creates a different risk. Article 1728 of the General Tax Code addresses increases for a declaration that is not filed on time, higher consequences after a formal notice and the most serious concealment situations. For succession declarations, the timing depends on the statutory deadline and the notice history. A blocked bank account is a fact to explain in the request; it is not a reason to leave the declaration unfiled while the family waits for a bank employee to decide what to do.

The proposed solution should be concrete. It may consist of a payment from another estate asset, a transfer authorised by the bank directly to the tax office, a guarantee over another asset, a contribution from a co-heir, a bridge facility or an application for fractionated payment. The request should identify the amount available immediately, the account that is blocked, the certificate sought, the proposed guarantee and the date on which the next payment will be made. A sentence saying “the money is in the account” does not show that the money is presently accessible.

The decision of the Commercial Chamber on 13 March 2024, no. 22-16.190, shows why the choice of a deferred-payment mechanism must be made carefully. In that decision, the Court held that the taxpayer’s choice in the statutory option implique un choix irrévocable du contribuable. The case concerned a specific property and bare-ownership mechanism, not an ordinary bank account. Its practical lesson for a British heir is to compare the tax amount, interest, guarantee and release consequences before signing an option that cannot later be changed simply because the bank remains slow.

Keep the estate account, the tax account and the personal account separate. If a co-heir pays the French tax from personal funds, record whether the payment is a recoverable contribution, a loan or an advance against distribution. If the bank eventually transfers the frozen balance to one heir, obtain written instructions from all persons entitled and preserve the calculation. The release document should not be used to hide a disagreement about shares or to make an informal distribution that the notary has not approved.

B. How should a UK heir challenge a refusal and coordinate UK Inheritance Tax?

A bank refusal and a tax refusal are different decisions. A bank may say that the certificate is missing, the heir’s authority is incomplete, the translation is unacceptable, the signature is not verified or the account product requires a separate process. The tax office may say that the declaration is incomplete, the amount is unpaid, the requested certificate cannot be issued or the payment arrangement lacks a guarantee. Ask for a dated written decision from the institution that refused the step. Do not rely on a telephone description passed through the notary.

The written request should ask five questions:

  1. What exact document is missing or rejected?
  2. Which person must issue, sign or certify it?
  3. Does the refusal concern the tax amount, the identity of the heirs, the payment method or the bank’s compliance procedure?
  4. What amount, if any, can be transferred directly to pay tax or urgent estate costs?
  5. What is the next deadline and what proof of submission will be accepted?

If the tax amount or legal basis is disputed, the heir should not confuse a request for a certificate with a tax appeal. Article L. 277 of the French Book of Tax Procedures provides a formal route for a taxpayer who contests the merits or amount of an assessment, subject to its requirements on the challenged bases and guarantees. The text states: L’exigibilité de la créance et la prescription de l’action en recouvrement sont suspendues when the statutory conditions are met. This is a formal suspension mechanism, not a general pause caused by a frozen account.

The Commercial Chamber decision of 25 May 2022, no. 19-21.414, illustrates the importance of identifying the procedural step. The decision records a payment-stay request qui suspendait l’exigibilité des droits de succession. The case does not mean that an informal email to a bank or notary suspends every succession debt. A British heir who wants the effect of a formal tax challenge should state the contested amount, the legal basis, the guarantees and the recipient, then preserve proof that the request was received.

A declaration can also be filed on time but fail to be registered because the administration refuses the associated payment. In the Commercial Chamber decision of 1 June 2023, no. 21-24.890, the Court held: la taxation d’office n’est pas applicable lorsque la déclaration a été faite dans le délai légal mais n’a pas été enregistrée en raison d’un refus de l’administration. This is a narrow procedural point. It does not turn a bank freeze into a tax exemption, but it makes proof of timely filing important where the family is later challenged for a failure to declare.

The decision of 5 April 2023, Commercial Chamber, no. 23-40.001, is also useful as a warning against confusing taxable entitlement with received cash. The QPC referral contains the expression lorsque la perception d’un revenu ou d’une ressource est soumise à une imposition in its discussion of the payment question. It was not a final ruling that every succession tax bill must wait until money is received. Its practical value is to force the executor to show the exact gap between the taxable right, the blocked account and the cash that is actually available.

A recent bank refusal should be analysed with the same discipline. Keep the bank’s letter, the secure-message reference, the tax office receipt, the notary’s cover letter, the form submitted, the certificate request, the translation invoice and the response deadline. If a translation is rejected, ask whether the bank requires a sworn translation, a French translator’s certification or an apostille. If a grant of probate is rejected, ask whether the missing element is the grant itself, the chain of authority or proof that French assets fall within the grant’s scope.

The UK tax side must run in parallel. French succession tax and UK Inheritance Tax are separate taxes. The official GOV.UK guidance on paying Inheritance Tax states that UK tax is generally due by the end of the sixth month after death and explains the relationship between payment and probate. It also recognises that an estate may need a payment arrangement where funds cannot immediately be released. That UK timetable does not extend the French deadline and a French certificate does not complete the UK IHT return.

The France–UK allocation question is governed in part by the official convention on succession and estate duty, signed in 1963 and brought into force in 1964. The convention contains situs and credit provisions. The executor should preserve the French declaration, the French assessment, the certificate and the payment receipt so that any UK relief or credit claim is supported by primary evidence. A bank-release certificate proves a French administrative position; it does not decide the deceased’s domicile or the entire UK tax liability.

HM Revenue & Customs’ double-taxation relief guidance and its France and foreign property manual should be read together with the current UK facts. HMRC may need a copy of the French declaration, proof that French duty was assessed or paid and evidence of the treaty situs analysis. Its manual on pre-1975 conventions also explains why a France–UK estate cannot be analysed by applying a newer treaty model mechanically. The executor should coordinate the two files but keep each country’s forms, deadlines and receipts identifiable.

The internal correspondence should also distinguish a tax certificate from a bank transfer instruction. A certificate may be sent to the bank without authorising the bank to transfer the balance to the executor. Conversely, a transfer mandate may be signed while the tax certificate remains outstanding. Use separate headings in the file: “authority to receive”, “French tax status”, “bank release condition” and “UK tax evidence”. This makes it easier to identify what can be solved immediately and what requires a decision by the notary, the tax office or the bank.

A useful decision tree is:

  • If no French succession tax is payable, obtain the non-exigibility certificate and submit the heir-authority documents to the bank.
  • If tax is payable and cash is available elsewhere, pay or secure the tax, obtain the payment certificate and ask the bank to release the account under a verified mandate.
  • If tax is payable but the only cash is frozen, ask the bank whether it can transfer the required amount directly to the tax office or notary and ask the tax service what certificate will be issued after that payment.
  • If the estate qualifies for fractionated or deferred payment, submit the request with the declaration, proposed guarantee and written cash-flow explanation before the deadline.
  • If the amount or legal basis is disputed, separate the tax challenge from the bank release request and consider the formal suspension route under Article L. 277.
  • If the UK may also charge Inheritance Tax, open the HMRC evidence file immediately and preserve the French documents in a form that can be translated and produced later.

The separate article on Form 2705 for a British heir explains the late-filing and correction problem. It should be read alongside this article rather than substituted for it. A correctly completed form may still leave the bank waiting for a certificate, and a certificate request may fail if the underlying form is incomplete. The two steps belong in the same chronology but answer different questions.

When the bank does not respond, send a formal request through the channel required by its complaints procedure and ask for a final position. When the tax office does not respond, ask the notary or authorised representative to obtain proof of receipt and a written status. If the delay threatens a tax deadline, property insurance, funeral payment or preservation of the estate, state that consequence and attach proof. A clear record of urgency is more useful than repeated messages that do not identify the legal or operational step requested.

The strongest file is therefore not the longest file. It is a controlled sequence: death, heirs, declaration, tax certificate, bank condition, payment or challenge, transfer authority and UK evidence. A British executor can coordinate the sequence from the United Kingdom, but each French document should be prepared in the form accepted by the French institution receiving it. The bank, the notary and the tax office should not be left to guess who is responsible for the next action.

Conclusion

A UK heir cannot assume that a French bank will release an inherited account on the basis of a British death certificate or grant of probate alone. The bank normally needs proof of the heirs, the French succession declaration and the appropriate tax document: a certificate of non-exigibility where no duty is due, or evidence of payment and any accepted arrangement where duty is payable.

The practical route is to identify the six- or twelve-month deadline, contact the correct non-resident tax service, ask the bank to state its exact release condition and keep authority, tax and transfer documents separate. If the account is needed to fund tax, request a controlled payment or a regulated fractionated or deferred facility rather than waiting informally. If a refusal concerns the tax amount, authority or procedure, obtain it in writing and use the correct appeal or suspension route. Keep the French and UK tax files coordinated but distinct, with the France–UK convention and primary receipts preserved for any later credit claim.

Need a quick opinion on your case

We can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm to review the French succession certificate, the bank’s refusal and the documents available from the United Kingdom.

Bring the death certificate, will or grant of probate, the bank’s written request, the French tax form or calculation, the notary’s correspondence and any UK Inheritance Tax papers.

+33 6 46 60 58 22

Contact the firm through the online form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.