For a British family moving to France, a school refusal often arrives at the worst possible moment: the move has already taken place, the child has left a school in the United Kingdom, and a mairie or school office asks for a French residence permit before it will even examine the application. The legal answer requires two questions to be kept apart. The first is the child’s right to education and the procedure for obtaining a school place. The second is the family’s right to enter or remain in France after Brexit.
A titre de séjour is a French residence permit. It proves an immigration status, but it is not the document that creates the child’s right to attend a public school. French education law applies the compulsory-education rules to French and foreign children alike. The administration may request proof of identity, age, residence, parental responsibility, vaccination and previous schooling. It may also assess the child’s level and assign the child to the appropriate class. Those checks are different from demanding a residence card as an automatic precondition.
This distinction does not regularise an overstay. A British child who is entitled to attend school may still need a visa or residence document to live in France lawfully. The practical strategy is therefore to secure the school application and the immigration file at the same time, keep each authority within its legal role, obtain any refusal in writing, and act quickly if the child is left without education.
I. Can a British child attend a French school after Brexit without a residence permit?
A. What is the child’s right to education and how does it interact with Brexit residence status?
The starting point is the child, not the nationality of the passport. Article L. 131-1 of the Code de l’éducation (Education Code) states: “L’instruction est obligatoire pour chaque enfant dès l’âge de trois ans et jusqu’à l’âge de seize ans.” The current text is available on Article L. 131-1 of the Education Code. The rule covers each child within the age range. It is not expressed as a benefit reserved for French nationals or EU nationals.
The wider principle is set out in Article L. 111-1 of the same Code. The public education service must ensure the schooling of all children “sans aucune distinction”. That short phrase matters in a British case because Brexit changed the immigration position of British nationals, but it did not turn nationality into a lawful reason to exclude a child from compulsory education. Article L. 111-2 adds: “Tout enfant a droit à une formation scolaire”. The complete provision is available through the Légifrance provisions on the right to education.
There are several common British-family situations. A child may have lived in France before 1 January 2021 with a parent protected by the Withdrawal Agreement. A Withdrawal Agreement Residence Permit, often called a WARP in English and a titre de séjour accord de retrait in French, then concerns the family’s residence rights. A child may instead have arrived after Brexit with a long-stay visa, a family route, a visitor status or another ordinary immigration route. A third child may be temporarily staying with a parent or another responsible adult while the family arranges its move. These routes change the immigration evidence, but they do not create a general rule that a school may reject a child merely because a residence card is not yet in the file.
The United Kingdom’s own guidance makes the same separation useful for British readers. The GOV.UK guidance on living in France explains that children who moved to France before 1 January 2021 do not need a WARP while they are under 18, although they must apply for the relevant document at the prefecture when they turn 18, or earlier if they need it for work. It also explains the role of a DCEM, the document de circulation pour étranger mineur, when a minor with rights under the Withdrawal Agreement travels. A DCEM is a travel document for a foreign minor; it is not a school-admission substitute and it is not the same thing as a residence permit.
The French government’s public information for British nationals also distinguishes a child’s stay from the school procedure. The page on what British people and their family members must do to live in France deals with residence applications, family members and the Withdrawal Agreement. It should be read alongside, not instead of, the education rules. A parent should not tell a school that a pending residence application gives an unlimited right to remain in France. Conversely, a mairie should not tell a parent that the absence of a residence card automatically prevents the child’s enrolment when the child is otherwise within the education system and the application is supported by the required factual documents.
The distinction becomes particularly important for a child aged between three and sixteen. The school must deal with the child’s education, assessment and placement. The prefecture or consular authority deals with the right to enter or remain. A school letter can sometimes be evidence in an immigration file, but school registration does not itself grant a visa, extend the 90-day visitor period or create a Withdrawal Agreement right. Parents should therefore avoid asking the school to decide an immigration question and should avoid presenting the education application as a substitute for the residence application.
The position is even stronger where a child already lives in the commune or is under the responsibility of a person who can demonstrate the actual arrangement. Article L. 131-5 of the Education Code provides that a child subject to compulsory education is registered through the school list and the mayor’s certificate. The same article says: “La domiciliation des parents à l’étranger ne peut être une cause de refus d’inscription”. The current text is available on Article L. 131-5 of the Education Code. For a British family, this is a direct answer to the argument that the parents’ UK address, by itself, defeats the application.
That provision does not eliminate the need to identify where the child actually lives or who is responsible for the child. It prevents the administration from turning the parents’ foreign domicile into a blanket exclusion. A family staying with relatives, in temporary accommodation or in a place that has not yet become a conventional long-term home should explain the arrangement and document it. The application should make clear where the child sleeps, which adult exercises day-to-day responsibility, which school sector is requested and how the family can be contacted.
The case law confirms that the permit question cannot be used as a shortcut to refuse all schooling. In its decision of 24 January 1996, no. 153746, the Conseil d’État held that the relevant rules implied that a foreign student could be admitted “au moins à titre provisoire” before obtaining a first residence permit. The decision, which concerned a refusal to assign a foreign pupil to secondary education because he could not produce a residence card, is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État, 24 January 1996, no. 153746. The factual setting is older, but the legal logic remains a valuable safeguard when a school or authority treats immigration documentation as an automatic bar to education.
A parent should nevertheless distinguish a refusal based solely on nationality or the absence of a residence permit from a lawful placement decision. A child may need an assessment after arriving from a British school. The administration may need to determine the year group, examine available places or direct the family to the collège or lycée in the correct sector. It may also need to establish parental responsibility where the child is staying with an adult who is not a parent. Those steps are not, by themselves, a refusal of education.
B. What documents does a British family need for a mairie, school, college or lycée application?
For a first installation in France, the usual order is mairie first and school second for primary education. The official Service-Public guide for a primary pupil arriving from abroad states that the first registration is made at the mairie and then at the school. It explains that the child’s school skills may be assessed from the age of six and that an arriving pupil may be placed in an ordinary class or in a UPE2A. UPE2A means unité pédagogique pour élèves allophones arrivants, a teaching unit supporting newly arrived pupils whose first language is not French. The unit is an educational placement, not an immigration sanction.
For a collège or lycée, meaning a French lower-secondary school or upper-secondary school, the route is different. The family should contact the school or the DSDEN, the direction des services départementaux de l’Éducation nationale, which is the department-level education authority. The official Service-Public guide for a collège or lycée pupil arriving from abroad explains that a pupil coming from a non-French school may undergo an assessment and that the family should contact the school of the sector or the DSDEN if it seeks a school outside that sector. A British child who has attended school in England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland should therefore expect questions about the last year completed, subjects studied, reports and the level of French. None of those questions is a disguised requirement to produce a residence card.
The practical file should be prepared in two copies, with a scan in a single folder. It should normally contain the child’s passport or identity document, the child’s full birth certificate where available, the parents’ identity documents, evidence of parental responsibility, a recent address document, vaccination evidence, school reports, the last school’s departure certificate and any decision or correspondence about the proposed class. A British birth certificate or school report may need a translation into French for the authority to use it efficiently. The family should ask the authority whether a sworn translation is required for the particular document rather than ordering expensive translations of every page before the school has identified the missing item.
Where the child has moved from a UK school, ask that school for a dated letter confirming the last day attended, the year group and the main subjects. The French administration may call the departure certificate an exéat or certificat de radiation. It is evidence of the previous school position; it does not prove that the child has a French immigration status. If the UK school cannot issue an exéat because the child was educated at home, online or in an independent setting, give the French authority a short written explanation and provide the available academic records.
Proof of address needs careful handling. A lease, utility bill, tax notice or accommodation certificate can establish the address, but a British family may initially have none of these in its own name. In that situation, the file can explain whether the family is hosted by a relative, staying in temporary accommodation or occupying a property under a pending lease. The host may provide an attestation d’hébergement, meaning a signed statement of accommodation, together with the host’s identity document and address evidence. A hotel or serviced accommodation should provide a dated invoice or booking certificate. The goal is to show the factual connection with the commune, not to manufacture a permanent address.
Article L. 131-6 of the Education Code states: “Chaque année, à la rentrée scolaire, le maire dresse la liste de tous les enfants résidant dans sa commune”. The provision also says that the list of documents that may support the registration request is fixed by decree. It is available on Article L. 131-6 of the Education Code. This gives the mairie a real administrative role, but it does not give the mairie unlimited discretion to invent an immigration condition. Ask the mairie to identify the legal basis for every additional document requested and to confirm whether the missing item prevents registration or merely delays completion of the file.
Article L. 131-5 also protects families without a stable housing pattern. It says that the status or mode of accommodation of families living in the commune cannot be a reason to refuse the registration of a child subject to compulsory education. That does not mean that a parent may choose any school in France. The local authority still has to apply the school map, available places and any lawful priority rules. It means that a child should not be left without any route to education because the family is temporarily hosted or because the parents are not yet recorded as householders on a French utility account.
If the mayor refuses or neglects the school-list registration, the legislation provides a corrective mechanism. Article L. 131-5 refers to the DASEN, the directeur académique des services de l’Éducation nationale, acting under delegation from the prefect. It provides that, after requiring the mayor to act, the DASEN can make the registration where there is no legitimate reason for the refusal. Article L. 2122-34 of the General Local Authorities Code describes the underlying substitution power: “le représentant de l’Etat dans le département peut, après l’en avoir requis, y procéder d’office”. The official text is available on Article L. 2122-34 of the General Local Authorities Code.
The family should therefore identify the authority that has actually blocked the application. A mairie may have refused to place the child on the school list. A school director may have refused to complete admission despite a municipal certificate. A collège or lycée may be waiting for the DSDEN’s assessment. A private school may be declining a new contract because of capacity or its own admission rules. Each situation requires a different letter and, if necessary, a different court. Treating every problem as a prefecture dispute wastes time and makes the evidence less clear.
There is also a limit on the family’s claim. In its decision of 5 March 2014, no. 359458, the Conseil d’État held that the rules protecting education do not give parents “le droit de choisir librement l’établissement”. The official decision is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État, 5 March 2014, no. 359458. If the requested school has no place, the administration may need to offer another suitable school. A refusal of one preferred school is not automatically a refusal of all schooling. The application should therefore ask for either the requested place or a written alternative assignment that keeps the child in education without an unexplained gap.
II. What can parents do when French school enrolment is refused or delayed?
A. How should a British parent challenge a mairie, school or DSDEN refusal?
The first step is to convert an oral refusal into a dated document. Ask the official to state whether the problem is the absence of a residence permit, the absence of proof of address, the lack of a vaccination record, an unresolved parental-responsibility issue, the need for an assessment or the absence of a place in the requested school. Send the request by email and, where the child has already lost school time, by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. Keep the original message, the delivery evidence, the reply and a short chronology.
The wording should be factual. State the child’s date of birth, nationality, current address or accommodation, previous school, requested level, date of the first application and the exact answer received. Attach the passport, birth record, address evidence and school records. State that the application is for schooling and that the family is dealing separately with any visa or residence process. That sentence prevents the authority from misunderstanding the purpose of the file. It also makes it harder for a later response to say that the family asked the school to regularise its immigration status.
When a formal administrative decision is issued, request the reasons if they are absent or incomplete. Article L. 211-5 of the Code of Relations between the Public and Administration provides: “La motivation exigée par le présent chapitre doit être écrite et comporter l’énoncé des considérations de droit et de fait”. The text is available on Article L. 211-5 of the Code of Relations between the Public and Administration. A statement such as “no residence card, therefore refused” should be answered by asking the authority to identify the precise legal rule that makes the document a condition of school registration, the factual reason for any address objection and the alternative school route proposed.
For a primary-school refusal by the mairie, send a formal request for reconsideration to the mayor and copy the DSDEN and the prefect’s education service. The letter should refer to Article L. 131-5, the child’s actual connection with the commune and the absence of any written legitimate reason. Ask the DSDEN to use the mechanism that allows it to proceed after requiring the mayor to act. The purpose is not to threaten the mairie; it is to direct the file to the public authority that can correct a failure to register the child.
For a school-level refusal, send the same evidence to the school director and the DSDEN, but ask them to identify the admission stage. If the mairie has not yet issued the certificate, the school may be waiting for the municipal step. If the certificate has been issued, the school should explain whether the issue is capacity, class placement, missing health evidence or a document that can be supplied later. If the child has arrived from a non-French school, request the assessment appointment rather than accepting an indefinite instruction to wait.
For a collège or lycée, contact the school of the sector and the DSDEN simultaneously. Explain whether the child can begin ordinary classes immediately, needs a French-language assessment or may benefit from UPE2A support. A child arriving from Britain should not be treated as incapable of learning because English is the first language. The education authority can organise an assessment and a support plan. Service-Public explains that a newly arrived pupil may be evaluated and placed according to skills; that procedure is a way to decide the educational support, not a reason to leave the child outside the school system.
The 2002 national circular remains useful when the officer relies specifically on the missing residence permit. The official text says: “l’inscription, dans un établissement scolaire, d’un élève de nationalité étrangère, quel que soit son âge, ne peut être subordonnée à la présentation d’un titre de séjour”. It is published on Légifrance’s official circular on the enrolment and schooling of foreign pupils. The circular should be read with current legislation and the child’s actual facts, but it gives the parent a precise answer to a blanket documentary refusal.
The Conseil d’État’s decision of 19 December 2018, no. 408710, is particularly relevant where the authority argues that the family’s housing situation is irregular or unsafe. The Court held that the refusal of all schooling to children who actually resided in the commune was “entaché d’illégalité”, even though the occupation of the land had been unlawful and involved health risks. The official decision is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État, 19 December 2018, no. 408710. The case does not give a family a right to occupy property. It does show that housing and immigration difficulties cannot automatically justify eliminating the child’s access to education.
A formal appeal should not wait for endless email exchanges. Article R. 421-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice provides that a court claim must generally be brought within two months of notification or publication of the challenged decision. The text says: “dans les deux mois à partir de la notification ou de la publication de la décision attaquée”. It is available on Article R. 421-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice. A parent can submit a recours gracieux, meaning a request to the authority that made the decision, or a recours hiérarchique, meaning a request to the superior authority. Neither should be treated as a reason to ignore the court deadline. The filing strategy must be checked against the notification, the wording of the decision and the applicable rules.
The written application should ask the court for a precise outcome. If the mairie refused the school-list registration, seek annulment or an order requiring the authority to register the child. If a preferred school is full, ask for a lawful alternative assignment rather than an order that would displace another child without a legal basis. If the decision is based on the absence of a residence permit, attach the circular, Article L. 131-5 and the documents showing the child’s identity, age and actual situation. If the child has already missed lessons, explain the dates and the educational consequences rather than relying only on a general statement of anxiety.
B. Which urgent remedy protects the child’s education while the immigration file continues?
Urgency changes the procedure when a child is left without a school place. A référé-suspension is an emergency application asking the administrative judge to suspend a decision while the main claim is examined. Article L. 521-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice requires urgency and a serious argument capable of creating doubt about the legality of the decision. The provision is available on Article L. 521-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice. In practice, the parent normally needs a main claim for annulment as well as the urgent application.
A référé-liberté is more exceptional. It is an application asking the judge to protect a fundamental freedom where the harm is grave, manifestly unlawful and urgent. Article L. 521-2 states that the judge may order the necessary measures and must rule within forty-eight hours. The official text is available on Article L. 521-2 of the Code of Administrative Justice. The parent must show more than administrative inconvenience. The evidence should demonstrate the absence of any actual educational solution, the child’s age, the length of the interruption, the authority’s refusal or inaction and the practical consequences of waiting for an ordinary judgment.
In its order of 15 February 2017, no. 407355, the Conseil d’État recognised that depriving a child of “toute possibilité de bénéficier d’une scolarisation” may amount to a serious and manifestly unlawful interference with a fundamental freedom, provided that a particular urgency justifies the judge’s intervention. The official decision is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État, 15 February 2017, no. 407355. The order does not mean that every disagreement about a school, timetable or class creates a référé-liberté. It is aimed at the child who has no real educational route and needs immediate protection.
The decision of the Conseil d’État judge of 28 May 2024, no. 493952, shows how the administration may defend an urgent application. The case concerned a proposed school outside the usual sector, safer in the circumstances and equipped with a specialised class for allophone children. The judge found no “atteinte grave et manifestement illégale au droit à l’éducation” because an alternative arrangement existed and could provide suitable educational and social support. The decision is available on Légifrance, Conseil d’État, 28 May 2024, no. 493952. A British parent should therefore ask for an enforceable alternative immediately if the preferred school is unavailable. An application that says only “we want this school” is weaker than an application proving that the child has been left with no workable placement.
The evidence for urgency should be simple and chronological. Include the date the UK school ended, the date the family arrived, every request to the mairie or school, the oral or written refusal, the child’s age, any special educational needs, the number of school days missed and the date of any immigration appointment. Include evidence of temporary accommodation and the proposed journey to the school. If the child has limited French, explain what language support has been requested and whether an assessment has been offered. If the administration has proposed a school in another commune, explain the transport, safety and educational reasons for accepting or challenging that proposal.
The immigration file should proceed in parallel. A British family that arrived after 31 December 2020 may need a long-stay visa, a visitor route, a family route, a student route or another ordinary residence basis. A family protected by the Withdrawal Agreement may need to prove the date of residence, continuity of residence and the child’s relationship with the qualifying British national. A child’s school place can support the factual picture, but it does not replace the visa or residence application. The parent should give the school only the immigration documents needed to explain the child’s situation and should not allow the education file to be treated as a general investigation into the parent’s private finances.
The travel consequences also deserve a separate check. GOV.UK explains that a child under 18 with Withdrawal Agreement rights may need a DCEM when travelling, especially to demonstrate the right to return without being treated as a short-stay visitor. A school registration certificate is not the same document. If the family plans to travel to Britain during the school year, it should check the child’s passport, residence evidence, DCEM position and any pending application before departure. A child who is physically unable to return to France may lose the immediate benefit of a school place even though the school’s legal decision was correct.
Private education requires a further distinction. A public-school refusal by a mairie is controlled by the public education and municipal rules described above. A private school may have a contract of enrolment, limited capacity and its own selection process, subject to applicable anti-discrimination and education rules. The parent should ask whether the decision is a refusal to form a new contract, a temporary suspension pending documents or a disciplinary decision during an existing school year. The route may involve the school’s governing body or a civil court rather than the same administrative remedy used against a mayor. The 2002 circular is still a strong response to a residence-permit demand in a school setting, but it does not create an unconditional right to a place in every private institution.
A good urgent file ends with a workable order. It should identify the child, the school level, the public authority responsible, the exact document that has been rejected, the proposed school and the measure required. It should ask for registration on the school list, an admission appointment, an assessment, a referral to UPE2A, or a suitable alternative place. It should also ask the judge to set a short compliance period if the child has already missed lessons. The request should not ask the education judge to issue a residence permit or to decide a complex immigration dispute that belongs to the prefecture or a separate court.
Parents should retain proof after the child returns to school. Keep the municipal certificate, the school admission confirmation, the class assignment, the UPE2A or assessment record, the timetable and any later request for documents. If the authority later says that the child was never registered, these records prove the date and legal route of admission. If a future residence or nationality application asks for evidence of continuity in France, the school record may also help establish the child’s factual life in the country, although the immigration authority will apply its own rules.
Conclusion
A British child who is within France’s education system cannot be excluded from schooling simply because Brexit has made the family’s residence documentation more complicated. The core rules are clear: education is compulsory from age three to sixteen; the public education service must not discriminate between children; parents living abroad, temporary housing and the absence of a stable address are not automatic reasons to refuse a child’s registration; and a foreign pupil’s enrolment cannot be made automatically dependent on a residence permit.
The family still has to prove the facts that allow the authorities to place the child: identity, age, parental responsibility, actual accommodation, vaccination and previous schooling. It must also deal separately with the visa or residence route. If a mairie refuses the school-list registration, address the mayor and the DSDEN. If a school delays admission, ask for the precise missing step and request an assessment or alternative place. If there is a written refusal or a total absence of schooling, protect the two-month court deadline and consider a référé-suspension or référé-liberté where the evidence shows genuine urgency.
The strongest case is precise. It does not ask a French school to solve an immigration problem, and it does not allow an immigration document to be used as a blanket reason to leave a child without education. It identifies the authority, the child’s factual situation, the rule that has been misapplied, the documents already supplied and the concrete measure needed for the child to attend school without delay.
Need a quick opinion on your case
You can arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.
We can review the refusal, the documents and the next procedural step before your child loses more school time.
+33 6 46 60 58 22 — Maître Reda Kohen