Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

UK Savings Interest in France After Brexit: How to Declare It, Claim Treaty Relief and Challenge an Incorrect Tax Bill

Moving from the United Kingdom to France does not make the interest on a British savings account disappear from the French tax analysis. The important questions are where you were tax resident when the interest was credited, whether the payment is legally interest rather than a dividend or pension payment, what the France–UK tax treaty assigns to each country, and whether the account itself had to be reported. Brexit changed immigration and residence formalities, but it did not replace the ordinary residence rules or remove the income-tax convention between France and the United Kingdom.

This guide is for an individual British reader who lives, or is settling, in France and keeps a UK current account, savings account, fixed-term deposit, bond or similar interest-bearing product. It explains the French forms, the treaty route, the UK reporting question and the evidence needed to correct an incorrect bill. It does not treat a UK ISA, pension wrapper, trust, company account or property investment vehicle as an ordinary savings account. Those products can change the legal classification and need a separate review.

I. Is UK savings interest taxable in France after Brexit, and what does the treaty do?

A. How do French residence and the type of UK interest decide the tax?

Start with residence, not nationality. A British passport does not by itself preserve UK tax residence, and a French residence permit does not by itself prove that France is the only country entitled to tax. French domestic law uses the idea of domicile fiscal, meaning tax residence. Article 4 A of the French General Tax Code states that people whose tax domicile is in France are liable to French income tax on their whole income. The text begins: Les personnes qui ont en France leur domicile fiscal sont passibles de l’impôt sur le revenu en raison de l’ensemble de leurs revenus.

The next question is how French law identifies that domicile. Article 4 B of the General Tax Code refers to the household or principal place of stay, professional activity and centre of economic interests. These are alternative indicators. A person who has moved the family home, daily life and principal activity to France may be French resident even if a British bank account, a UK address or regular visits to England remain. Conversely, owning a French second home or paying a French local tax does not automatically settle the issue if the person’s real home and economic life remain elsewhere.

Build the residence file for the relevant calendar year. Record the date of the move, where each member of the household lived, days spent in France and the UK, the home available in each country, work or business activity, school arrangements, healthcare registration, voting or administrative steps, and where investment decisions were made. Bank location is evidence of an account, not a conclusive residence test. The date on which interest was paid or credited must then be matched to that residence timeline.

The case law shows why a simple day-count is unsafe. In the Commercial Chamber judgment of 30 May 2000, no. 98-10.983, the Cour de cassation upheld an assessment based on the centre of the taxpayer’s economic interests, where the French assets and gross French income were material. The full decision says that the lower court had légalement justifié sa décision selon laquelle M. X… avait en France le centre de ses intérêts économiques. That judgment concerned wealth tax and older facts, not a British savings account, but it illustrates the evidential approach: the administration and court look at the overall economic pattern rather than the label placed on one account.

A more recent administrative decision applies the same statutory language to a person who said she had moved abroad. In CAA Paris, 17 January 2025, no. 23PA04058, the court considered the household, employment and financial assets together and concluded that the taxpayer had retained the centre of her economic interests in France. The decision is available on Légifrance under no. 23PA04058. It records that the taxpayer doit être regardée comme ayant conservé le centre de ses intérêts économiques en France. The case is not a direct ruling on UK deposit interest, but it is a useful warning for anyone who assumes that a foreign address or foreign bank account alone defeats French residence.

Keep the UK analysis separate. The UK tax year generally runs from 6 April to 5 April, whereas French income-tax reporting follows the calendar year. GOV.UK’s residence guidance explains that UK residence can depend on the automatic tests and the sufficient-ties test, and that split-year treatment is available only when its statutory conditions are satisfied. “Split year” means dividing a UK tax year between a resident period and a non-resident period under a defined case; it is not a general election to allocate each interest payment to the more favourable country. Keep a UK tax-year schedule and a French calendar-year schedule, then reconcile the payment dates.

Classify the payment before calculating it. A normal deposit account produces interest. A distribution from a company is a dividend. A pension provider may describe a payment as interest or growth even though French law treats the product under pension rules. A bond coupon, a discount on a debt security, a cash-management product, a loan to a company, an investment fund distribution and a payment from a trust may each need a different analysis. The bank’s description is relevant, but it is not always the final French legal classification.

For ordinary foreign-source interest, Article 120 of the General Tax Code places foreign dividends, interest and other investment products within the French income-tax framework. It includes Les dividendes, intérêts, arrérages et tous autres produits des actions de toute nature from foreign companies and also addresses interest and products from foreign debt instruments. A UK savings account therefore remains relevant to a French return even when the bank has no French branch and the cash never passes through a French account.

Article 158 of the General Tax Code confirms that the income rules do not distinguish simply between French and foreign source. Its first paragraph says that the net income categories are assessed sans qu’il y ait lieu de distinguer suivant que ces revenus ont leur source en France ou hors de France. It also states that cash income is normally attributed to the year of payment or to the year in which it is credited to an account. That timing matters where interest is capitalised, paid monthly, paid at maturity or posted after a move from the UK to France.

Do not assume that a UK label creates a French exemption. A British ISA is designed under UK law, and a product can remain tax-advantaged in the UK while producing income that France analyses under its own rules. The existence of an ISA, a notice saying “tax free”, or a UK personal savings allowance does not answer the French question. An ISA may need a product-specific review, but the ordinary savings-interest article should identify the account type, the gross interest, the credit date and the French treatment before any relief is claimed.

For a standard individual investment income case, the domestic French default is the prélèvement forfaitaire unique (PFU), meaning the single flat-tax system. Article 200 A of the General Tax Code includes foreign-source income at its gross amount and sets the income-tax component of the forfaitary rate at 12.8 per cent. The official text provides: Les revenus mentionnés au premier alinéa du présent 1° de source étrangère sont également retenus pour leur montant brut. The same provision says that source tax is credited only within the credit allowed by an international convention.

The PFU presentation commonly used for taxable interest is 12.8 per cent income tax plus French social levies, known as prélèvements sociaux. The current Service-Public guidance on savings and investment income describes the PFU as comprising income tax at 12.8 per cent and social levies, and explains the possible progressive-scale option. Do not treat a 30 per cent calculation as automatic in every personal situation. Social-security affiliation, exemptions, the product, the tax year and the global election can affect the result. The return should show the legal category and the relief position, not only a round percentage.

The gross figure must be converted into euros using a consistent, documented method. Keep the sterling statement, the date on which the interest was paid or credited, the exchange-rate source, the euro amount entered, and any UK tax withheld. If a bank gives a single annual statement while the interest was credited monthly, retain the monthly entries and explain the reconciliation. If the interest was capitalised into the account, identify the date on which it became available or was credited under the product terms. A later transfer of the money to France is not necessarily the date on which the income arose.

B. Does the France–UK treaty prevent double taxation of savings interest?

Brexit did not cancel the France–UK convention on income and capital gains. The relevant convention was signed in London on 19 June 2008, entered into force on 18 December 2009 and remains available in the official GOV.UK treaty text. The French publication is the Decree publishing the France–UK convention on Légifrance. The treaty is applied after the domestic residence analysis; it does not replace that analysis.

For ordinary bank interest, Article 12 is the key provision. The French text returned from the official treaty source states: Les intérêts provenant d’un Etat contractant et dont le bénéficiaire effectif est un résident de l’autre Etat contractant ne sont imposables que dans cet autre Etat. The English version on GOV.UK says that interest arising in one contracting state and beneficially owned by a resident of the other state is taxable only in that other state. In the usual case, a French treaty resident who beneficially owns interest arising from a UK bank is taxed in France, while the treaty restricts UK taxation of that interest.

“Beneficial owner” is important. It means the person who is entitled to enjoy the income, not merely an agent, nominee or conduit. Article 12 also defines interest broadly as income from debt claims, including government securities and bonds, and excludes amounts treated as dividends under Article 11. If a UK payment comes from a company loan, a permanent establishment, a structured arrangement or a trust, the ordinary deposit-account explanation may not fit. The treaty itself contains exceptions for a permanent establishment and for excessive interest arising from special relationships.

Classification can therefore change the treaty article. A distribution from a UK company may fall under Article 11 rather than Article 12. A pension payment may be considered under the pension article. UK property rent belongs to the immovable-property analysis. Interest connected with a business may be examined with the business-profits and permanent-establishment provisions. Before copying a bank label into a tax return, obtain the annual certificate, product terms, account type and, where necessary, the instrument or trust documents.

The UK domestic position still matters for filing. GOV.UK’s guidance for people living abroad lists savings interest among UK income and says that a person living abroad may need a Self Assessment return if there is taxable savings interest from UK banks or building societies. It also explains that a double-taxation agreement can provide relief where the country of residence taxes the same income. The treaty result and the practical HMRC filing route are related but not identical: do not omit a UK filing merely because the treaty ultimately assigns the taxing right to France.

In practice, there are three different situations. First, the UK bank pays the interest without withholding UK tax. You normally declare the gross interest in France and preserve the treaty analysis. Secondly, the UK bank has withheld tax even though Article 12 appears to allocate the taxing right to France. The first remedy may be a claim to HMRC or the bank, using the current treaty-relief procedure and a French residence certificate or other proof requested by HMRC. Thirdly, both countries have assessed tax and the classification or residence position is disputed. In that case, preserve both notices and pursue the appropriate correction in each country rather than inventing a French credit.

A foreign tax credit is not a universal refund button. The French tax administration’s guidance on foreign income distinguishes different treaty credit methods and asks the taxpayer to report the gross foreign income before foreign tax. A credit must match the treaty article and the tax actually paid. If Article 12 gives France exclusive taxing jurisdiction, the better route for an erroneous UK deduction may be recovery or treaty relief in the UK, not a French credit that the treaty does not authorise.

Conversely, do not use Article 12 to erase a genuine French liability. The treaty allocates taxing rights; it does not exempt a French resident from filing a French return, identifying the account, converting the amount into euros or answering a request for evidence. Nor does it decide a residence tie-breaker without facts. A correct file states the domestic rule, the treaty residence conclusion, the Article 12 classification, the gross figure, the country tax actually withheld and the remedy sought.

Residence must be tested for the period in which the interest arose. A person who arrived in France during a year may have UK-resident and French-resident periods, but the result depends on both domestic laws and the treaty. A payment credited just before the move is not automatically French income merely because the funds were transferred to a French account later. A payment credited after the move is not automatically French simply because the bank statement covers a UK tax year. Use the product’s credit dates and the residence evidence together.

If the two countries claim residence, the treaty’s residence article must be examined with the permanent home, personal and economic relations, habitual abode and any nationality tie-breaker that applies. Keep a short written memorandum in the file. It should state the facts, the documents, the rule applied and the conclusion for each tax year. This is especially valuable for a retired British owner who maintains a UK home, receives a UK pension, keeps savings in England and spends part of the year in France: the account itself is only one fact among several.

II. How do you declare UK savings interest in France and challenge a wrong bill?

A. Which French forms and evidence must a British resident prepare?

Prepare the French return as two linked but separate declarations: the income and the existence of the foreign account. The income question asks how much interest was received or credited and how it is taxed. The account question asks whether the UK account was opened, held, used or closed during the year. A zero balance or a year without interest does not automatically remove the account-reporting obligation. A person can have no taxable interest and still have a Form 3916 obligation.

For the wider move, residence and first-return context, see our guide to the first French tax return after moving from the UK. This article adds the narrower savings-interest, treaty and correction analysis, so the two pages should be read together rather than treated as duplicates.

For foreign income, start with the current French Form 2047 and its notice, titled the declaration of income received abroad. The interest should be calculated gross before any UK deduction, converted into euros and placed in the category and lines required by the year’s instructions. The amount is then transferred to the relevant French income-tax return, usually Form 2042 or its online equivalent. The exact boxes can change between tax years and product types, so use the live form and notice rather than copying a box number from an old forum answer.

Article 170 of the General Tax Code supplies the statutory filing basis. It requires a person liable to French income tax to file a detailed declaration and provides that people domiciled or tax-domiciled in France who receive abroad products covered by Article 120 must include them in the return. The operative wording requires them de comprendre ces revenus dans la déclaration prévue au 1. This is why a British bank statement cannot be left in a drawer simply because the bank did not pre-fill a French form.

Use the official Form 3916 or 3916-bis for the account itself when the current instructions require it. Article 1649 A of the General Tax Code requires French-domiciled individuals to declare the references of accounts opened, held, used or closed abroad together with the income return. It states: Les personnes physiques, les associations, les sociétés n’ayant pas la forme commerciale, domiciliées ou établies en France, sont tenues de déclarer, en même temps que leur déclaration de revenus ou de résultats, les références des comptes ouverts, détenus, utilisés ou clos à l’étranger.

Form 3916 is not a substitute for Form 2047. The first identifies the account; the second reports foreign income. A UK current account used only for bills may still need to be listed even if it earned no interest. A savings account with interest needs both analyses. Check the current exceptions for payment accounts used solely for specified online transactions, and do not extend an exception beyond its wording. Keep the account number or identifier, bank name and address, opening and closing dates, account-holder status, joint-holder details and the dates on which the account was used.

Reconcile the bank statement to the tax return. The evidence pack should show:

  • the annual interest certificate and the underlying monthly or quarterly statements;
  • the gross sterling interest, every credit date and the euro conversion method;
  • any UK tax withheld, the certificate or calculation supporting it, and the amount actually paid;
  • the account-opening, account-closing and account-reference information for Form 3916;
  • the French Form 2047, Form 2042 and Form 3916 or 3916-bis as filed;
  • the UK Self Assessment return or correspondence, if one was required;
  • proof of the French move, residence and social-security affiliation for the year; and
  • all messages exchanged with the French tax office or HMRC about residence, withholding or treaty relief.

Use a schedule rather than a single total. A useful table has one line per account and payment: bank, product, account holder, gross GBP, payment or credit date, exchange-rate source, gross EUR, UK tax withheld, French form line, treaty article and supporting document. This prevents a common error in which the taxpayer reports the net amount received in pounds, converts it at year-end and then claims a credit without proving that UK tax was actually paid.

Keep the French and UK tax years distinct. France normally asks for the income received during the calendar year. The UK return may cover 6 April to the following 5 April. A UK annual certificate can therefore include periods that straddle two French returns. Split the statement by the actual French payment or credit dates, then preserve the UK certificate as the source document. If a bank’s statement uses “accrued”, “paid”, “capitalised” or “available” differently, ask the bank to explain the product terms rather than choosing the date that produces the lower tax.

Consider the return’s pre-filled information critically. Foreign interest may be absent from a French pre-filled return because the payer is outside the French reporting chain. It may also appear under a wrong category or an incorrect conversion. The absence of a pre-filled number is not a clearance. The presence of an amount is not an admission that the amount is correct. Compare it with the bank certificate and correct or supplement the return with a written explanation where the interface does not show the full treaty or foreign-income detail.

On the UK side, use the current HMRC instructions for a person living abroad. GOV.UK’s foreign-income reporting guidance says that a UK resident usually uses Self Assessment for foreign income, while the guidance for UK income received abroad identifies taxable savings interest as a reason a non-resident may still need to report. The treaty may reduce or eliminate UK tax, but a bank’s withholding practice, a personal allowance, the residence status and the relief procedure can change the practical filing result. Retain the UK filing even when the final UK tax is nil.

Do not group every UK financial product under “savings”. A cash ISA, a stocks and shares ISA, a SIPP, a workplace pension, a bond, a company distribution and a trust payment can raise different questions. The payment certificate, product terms, ownership and beneficial entitlement should be retained. If an account contains both cash interest and investment distributions, separate them in the schedule. A single gross figure can hide a classification error that later causes the French tax office to apply the wrong rate or the wrong treaty article.

B. What should you do after a late return, omitted account or incorrect assessment?

Act in stages. If the filing service is still open and the problem is a missing interest amount, wrong category or omitted account, correct the online return or use the secure messaging service in the French tax account. The official impots.gouv.fr correction guidance explains that a correction can be requested through the secure mailbox when the online service cannot change the relevant item. State exactly what was filed, what is wrong, what the corrected amount is and which documents support it.

If an assessment notice has already been issued, use a réclamation contentieuse, meaning a formal tax claim against the assessment. The claim should identify the tax, year, notice, date of mise en recouvrement (the date the tax was entered for collection), amount disputed, legal grounds and requested relief. Attach the bank certificate, gross-to-euro schedule, treaty analysis, proof of residence, proof of any UK tax and copies of the filed forms. A message saying “the bill is wrong” is weaker than a short calculation that shows the exact line to remove, add or credit.

For income tax, the general claim deadline is normally 31 December of the second year following the year in which the tax was assessed, as indicated on the notice. The current Service-Public timetable for tax claims gives the example that income tax assessed in 2026 is normally challengeable until 31 December 2028, subject to special rules. Do not wait for the last week. A correction of a declaration, a formal claim about an assessment and a claim against a UK withholding can have different starting points and different documents.

Separate the principal tax from penalties and interest. Article 1727 of the General Tax Code provides for interest on a tax debt not paid within the legal period and states that the interest rate is 0.20 per cent per month in its applicable text. A taxpayer who can show a genuine correction, a declared amount, a clear treaty position or an administrative error should ask specifically for the interest and penalties to be withdrawn or recalculated. Do not assume that an appeal against the principal automatically cancels every accessory amount.

Late filing and omission can trigger different percentages. Article 1728 of the General Tax Code provides, for a late income declaration, a 10 per cent increase in the ordinary case, 40 per cent after a formal notice is not followed within the stated period, and 80 per cent in the situations listed in the text. Article 1758 A addresses late, inaccurate or incomplete income declarations that reduce the tax and provides a 10 per cent increase, rising to 20 per cent after a formal notice in the circumstances described. The correct response depends on the notice, the taxpayer’s conduct and the exact omission.

Use the voluntary correction history. If the account was accidentally omitted but the interest was declared, say so and provide the original interest return, the account statement and the corrected 3916. If the account and interest were both omitted, prepare a year-by-year schedule and explain when the omission was discovered. If the account belonged to an estate, was jointly held, or was only subject to a power of attorney, explain the legal status and supporting documents. A correction is not an admission that every transfer into the account was taxable income; source-of-funds evidence may be needed to distinguish capital, gifts, inheritances and interest.

Article 1649 A has a separate account-reporting purpose. The provision also says that sums, securities or values transferred abroad or received from abroad through non-declared accounts are presumed to be taxable income unless proved otherwise. That presumption makes bank-history evidence important, but it does not mean that every transfer is automatically interest. A clear ledger should identify salary, pension, savings capital, inheritance, gift, sale proceeds and interest separately. Where the administration relies on unexplained credits, respond with the source document for each material entry and an explanation of the account’s use.

Ask for payment relief when cash flow is the problem. A French tax claim does not normally suspend payment by itself. The Service-Public guidance on tax claims and court proceedings explains that the taxpayer can request a sursis de paiement, meaning a deferral of the disputed payment, but conditions and guarantees may apply. The request should state the amount contested, the amount accepted, the financial consequence and the security offered if required. Keep the claim and the payment-deferral request together but treat them as separate procedural requests.

If the French tax office rejects the claim or does not answer, the next route depends on the tax and the decision. The file should first contain the original claim, proof of filing, documents sent, the administration’s response or the expiry of the response period, and a precise statement of the remaining dispute. A court application is not a substitute for the preliminary claim where that claim is required. For UK withholding, use the HMRC treaty-relief or repayment route in parallel and do not allow a French deadline to expire while waiting for a UK response.

A practical challenge often turns on one of four errors: the account was treated as French because the bank had a French group name; the net sterling payment was reported instead of the gross interest; a dividend or ISA payment was treated as ordinary deposit interest; or a treaty credit was claimed without proof of UK tax. Write the correction around that error. Identify the document, show the corrected calculation and quote the legal rule that gives the requested outcome. The objective is to make the administration’s next action obvious.

For example, assume a British resident in France receives £4,000 of gross interest from an ordinary UK savings account during a French calendar year, with no UK withholding. The file should record each credit date, convert each amount into euros using the documented method, report the gross euro total on Form 2047 and the relevant French return, and report the UK account on Form 3916 or 3916-bis if required. The treaty analysis should identify the person as the beneficial owner, Article 12 as the relevant provision and France as the taxing state, subject to the facts. The account declaration and the income declaration are both part of the file.

Now change the facts. The bank has withheld UK tax and the taxpayer has a certificate showing the deduction. The French return should still begin with the gross income and the correct French classification. The taxpayer should then test whether the France–UK convention permits a French credit or instead assigns exclusive taxing rights to France and requires a UK repayment. The claim should not simply subtract the UK deduction from the gross interest. That approach can produce a wrong French base, a wrong credit and an unexplained mismatch with the bank certificate.

In a third example, the taxpayer arrived in France in October and the UK statement covers 6 April to 5 April. The statement cannot be copied into one French return without separating the actual credit dates. The residence file must establish the French and UK positions for the relevant periods, and the treaty tie-breaker must be applied if both domestic systems claim residence. A spreadsheet showing the dates and allocation is more persuasive than a general statement that the move occurred “during the year”.

Finally, preserve the digital trail. Download the original bank certificate, not only a screenshot; save the French return receipt and message reference; keep the HMRC submission and any certificate of residence; and save the notice showing the date of collection. If the bank later changes the statement, retain both versions and note why. The tax office needs to see a reliable chain from the account transaction to the form, from the form to the assessment, and from the assessment to the remedy requested.

Conclusion

For a British person living in France, UK savings interest is normally analysed through French residence, the French classification of the payment, the gross amount and Article 12 of the France–UK convention. Brexit does not make a British account invisible. Report the interest through the current foreign-income process, report the foreign account separately where required, keep the UK tax-year and French calendar-year records distinct, and claim treaty relief only on evidence that matches the payment and the treaty article. If a wrong assessment has already been issued, a structured claim with the bank certificate, currency schedule, residence evidence, forms and legal calculation gives the French tax office a clear route to correct it.

Need a quick opinion on your case

We offer a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.
We can review your UK interest, French return, treaty position and challenge documents.

+33 6 46 60 58 22
You can also use the contact form.

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.