A founder who lives outside France can run a French company without personally moving to France, but distance does not remove the company’s accounting obligations. The real question is therefore more precise than “must I hire a French accountant?” French law does not generally force a SAS, SARL, SASU or EURL to appoint an external expert-comptable (a regulated French chartered accountant). The company may organise its bookkeeping internally or through a compliant group structure. It must nevertheless record its transactions, close annual accounts, file the documents required by its legal form and keep evidence that the accounts are regular, sincere and reliable.
For a foreign-owned company, the practical risk is not the absence of a particular provider. It is the gap between a foreign finance process and French legal evidence: missing invoices, unsupported intercompany entries, a French VAT return prepared from incomplete data, a shareholder who approves accounts without the closing file, or a registered-office and beneficial-owner record that no longer matches the group chart. The president or manager remains the company’s legal decision-maker even when a provider prepares the numbers.
This guide answers the remote-founder question in a strict sequence. It distinguishes the expert-comptable from the commissaire aux comptes (statutory auditor), explains the records a French company must maintain, and builds a 90-day workflow for bookkeeping, tax, VAT, annual accounts and INPI filing. It also identifies the evidence to retain when a foreign parent, a French manager or an accounting provider later disagrees about who was responsible for a missed deadline.
I. Do you need a French accountant for a company owned by foreigners?
A. Is an external expert-comptable legally mandatory for a French SAS, SARL or SASU?
The short answer is no: French law does not impose a universal duty to appoint an external expert-comptable merely because a company is owned by non-French shareholders or managed from another country. The French tax administration gives the same answer in its official guidance, stating: “Aucune disposition légale et réglementaire n’oblige une entreprise ou une société à recourir aux services d’un expert-comptable externe.” The guidance is available on impots.gouv.fr. The absence of a mandatory appointment is different from the obligation to produce compliant accounts and tax documents.
A French company can therefore choose between several models. The president of a SAS or SASU, the manager of a SARL or EURL, or an employee of the company may coordinate an internal bookkeeping function. A cloud accounting system may be used. A foreign parent may supply financial information or shared-service support, subject to the group’s legal, tax and data-security arrangements. The company can also hire an external expert-comptable under a written engagement letter. The choice is organisational; the statutory duties remain attached to the French company.
The first distinction is between an expert-comptable and an ordinary bookkeeper. An expert-comptable is a regulated professional who may carry out accounting work for third-party clients within the scope of the profession and who is registered with the French professional order. A payroll bureau, software vendor or overseas bookkeeper may assist with data preparation, but the French company should not assume that any commercial provider can perform regulated accountancy work for an unrelated entity. Service-Public’s official accounting guidance explains the company’s accounting obligations and directs businesses to the relevant expert-comptable and statutory-auditor resources; the provider’s professional status and exact mission should still be checked before signature.
The engagement letter is the boundary document. It should say whether the provider records purchase and sales invoices, reconciles the bank, maintains the fixed-asset register, prepares payroll, files VAT, prepares the corporate-tax return, drafts annual accounts, prepares shareholder resolutions, files with the greffe (the registry of the competent commercial court), monitors beneficial-owner information or merely gives technical assistance. If the engagement letter says “bookkeeping” but excludes VAT returns and annual filing, the foreign founder must allocate those tasks elsewhere. A low monthly fee does not silently expand the provider’s legal mission.
The Cour de cassation made this point in Commercial Chamber, 28 April 2004, no. 01-14.089. After examining a dispute about a company’s expert-comptable, it held that “la mission d’établir et de déposer les déclarations fiscales avant l’expiration du délai légal n’incombe à l’expert-comptable que si elle lui a été confiée.” In English, filing tax returns is not automatically included merely because an accountant maintains some of the books. A founder who expects one provider to handle the entire French compliance chain must obtain that allocation in writing.
The second distinction is between an expert-comptable and a commissaire aux comptes, usually called a statutory auditor. The expert-comptable prepares or assists with accounting and tax work. The statutory auditor performs a legal audit or certification mission when the law requires an appointment, when the company voluntarily appoints one, or when a group structure triggers the relevant rules. The statutory auditor is not a substitute bookkeeper, and the existence of an expert-comptable does not by itself remove a statutory audit obligation.
For a foreign-owned company, the statutory-auditor question can arise from the group rather than from the nationality of the shareholders. Article L. 821-43 of the Commercial Code provides that entities controlling companies must appoint a statutory auditor when the group exceeds the regulatory criteria for two of three measures: consolidated balance-sheet total, consolidated turnover before tax and average staff. The exact thresholds should be checked at the date of the relevant financial year and against the current official guidance. The text is available on Légifrance. A foreign parent should therefore give its French accountant the group chart and group financial data rather than treating the French subsidiary in isolation.
The practical answer for most foreign founders is consequently: an external French expert-comptable is optional as a provider, but a French-compliant accounting process is not. If the founder has no French finance employee, no bilingual group controller and no reliable system for French filings, engaging an expert-comptable is usually the safest operational choice. That conclusion is based on risk and evidence, not on a rule that makes the appointment legally compulsory.
B. What must the company keep if the founder manages the books from abroad?
The core obligation comes from Article L. 123-12 of the Commercial Code. It requires a commercial trader, including a company that is commercial by its legal form, to record movements affecting its assets and liabilities chronologically, perform an inventory at least every twelve months and establish annual accounts at the end of the financial year. The official text says: “Toute personne physique ou morale ayant la qualité de commerçant doit procéder à l’enregistrement comptable des mouvements affectant le patrimoine de son entreprise.” The rule applies whether the shareholders live in Paris, London, New York, Dubai or Singapore.
Annual accounts are not a single spreadsheet. Article L. 123-12 refers to a balance sheet, an income statement and notes, which form an inseparable whole. Article L. 123-13 explains how the balance sheet separates assets, liabilities and equity, how the income statement records revenue and expenses without using the payment date as the decisive accounting date, and how the notes complete the information. Its operative wording is: “L’annexe complète et commente l’information donnée par le bilan et le compte de résultat.” A foreign parent’s consolidated management report cannot replace the French company’s own annual accounts.
Article L. 123-14 imposes the quality standard: “Les comptes annuels doivent être réguliers, sincères et donner une image fidèle du patrimoine, de la situation financière et du résultat de l’entreprise.” The English concepts are regularity, sincerity and a faithful image. They matter when a founder uses a foreign chart of accounts, posts shareholder advances in a group ledger or converts a foreign-currency invoice. The company should map the group reporting accounts to the French chart of accounts and preserve the reconciliation, exchange-rate method and supporting document.
Remote bookkeeping is compatible with these rules, but the file must be auditable in France. Article L. 123-22 states: “Les documents comptables sont établis en euros et en langue française.” It also requires accounting documents and supporting evidence to be retained for ten years and prohibits blanks or alterations in the records. A foreign parent can preserve the original English invoice, German bank statement or US contract, but the French accounting file should identify the amount in euros, the accounting treatment, the date, the counterparty and the link to the original document. Where the tax administration requests it, a certified translation may also be needed.
The records normally include the journal, the general ledger, bank statements, invoices issued and received, credit notes, customs records, expense claims, payroll data, fixed-asset evidence, inventory work, loan agreements, shareholder-current-account statements and intercompany reconciliations. A company with no turnover still has transactions to record: share capital, bank fees, formation costs, director expenses, accounting fees, rent, software subscriptions, shareholder advances and perhaps foreign-exchange movements. “No revenue” is not the same as “no accounting.”
The small-company simplifications do not eliminate the duty to keep reliable books. Article L. 123-25 allows eligible legal entities under the simplified real-tax regime to use an abridged notes format and, in specified circumstances, to record receivables and payables at year-end. It does not create a general foreign-founder exemption and does not authorise a company to keep an incomplete or unsupported ledger. The tax regime must be confirmed with the company’s own turnover, activity and group status.
The company also has a filing obligation after approval of the accounts. A SARL uses Article L. 232-22, which requires the accounts and allocation-of-result decision to be deposited with the greffe within one month after approval, or within two months when the deposit is made electronically. The article begins: “Toute société à responsabilité limitée est tenue de déposer au greffe du tribunal.” An SAS or SASU uses Article L. 232-23, which sets the corresponding filing rule for a company by shares. The founder must calculate the deadline from the actual approval date, not from the date on which the accountant first sent a draft.
Article L. 232-24 gives the registrar a route to notify the president of the commercial court when the filing obligation in Articles L. 232-21 to L. 232-23 is not performed. The word “greffe” is therefore not a translation detail: it identifies the filing channel and the court registry that can escalate a missing deposit. INPI’s official annual-accounts guidance explains the electronic Guichet unique route, the documents to upload and the electronic-signature requirement. The foreign shareholder may sign through the permitted process, but responsibility for selecting the correct documents remains with the company.
In short, a founder can operate the accounting process from abroad only if the company can answer five questions at any time: what was recorded, when was it recorded, which evidence supports it, who reviewed it and which French filing or payment used it? If one answer depends on an informal message to an overseas bookkeeper, the process is not yet robust enough for a French company.
II. How should a foreign-owned French company organise remote bookkeeping?
A. What should the first 90-day accounting workflow contain?
The first step is to appoint a compliance owner in the French company. That person may be the president, manager, an employee, an authorised representative or the group controller, but the appointment should be written. The owner receives notices, maintains the deadline calendar, controls access to the professional tax account and confirms that a delegated provider has completed each task. A foreign parent can remain the commercial decision-maker while giving the French company a local operational owner. A power of attorney should specify the permitted formalities and the right to correct a rejected filing.
The second step is to build a written engagement map. Put the expert-comptable’s letter of mission beside a responsibility table showing who supplies documents, who reviews entries, who approves the tax return, who pays tax, who prepares the shareholder resolution and who files the accounts. Include the communication language, response time, secure document channel, backup contact, data export rights and termination handover. Confirm whether the service includes French VAT, corporate income tax, contribution foncière des entreprises (CFE, the local business-property contribution), payroll, URSSAF (the organisation collecting many French social-security contributions), annual accounts and INPI filing.
The third step is to open the evidence architecture. Give every transaction a unique source document and retain the original file without replacing it with a renamed screenshot. The accounting system should link invoices to bank entries, contracts to recurring charges, payroll to the monthly declaration and shareholder advances to the signed agreement or resolution. For an intercompany invoice, retain the agreement, the service description, the calculation, the VAT analysis, the payment and the group reconciliation. For an expense paid by a foreign director, retain the receipt, business purpose, currency conversion and approval.
The fourth step is a monthly close. A workable close has a fixed cut-off date, a list of missing documents, a bank reconciliation, a review of receivables and payables, an intercompany confirmation, a VAT ledger reconciliation and a management sign-off. The foreign founder should receive a short dashboard showing cash, unpaid taxes, unpaid payroll contributions, shareholder-current-account balances, VAT position and unusual entries. The dashboard does not replace the French ledger; it gives the legal owner a way to detect a missing filing before the authority does.
The fifth step is to map the company’s tax profile. Impôt sur les sociétés (IS) is French corporate income tax. The company should confirm its IS regime, financial year-end, result-return date, instalments, first-year treatment and professional tax-account access. Article 1668 of the General Tax Code provides the instalment framework and refers to quarterly payments: “L’impôt sur les sociétés donne lieu au versement … d’acomptes trimestriels.” The official impots.gouv.fr results-taxation guidance and tax calendar should be checked for the company’s actual year-end rather than relying on a generic calendar stored by the parent.
VAT needs its own reconciliation. Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) is French value added tax. Confirm whether the company is under a franchise, simplified or normal regime; whether returns are monthly or quarterly; whether it has an intra-European VAT number; and whether a tax representative is needed for a foreign entity or activity. Before a return, reconcile the sales ledger to invoices, bank receipts, credit notes, import evidence and customer location. Keep the legal reason for charging French VAT, applying a reverse charge or treating a transaction as outside the scope. A foreign founder should never let the accounting provider file from a sales spreadsheet that lacks the underlying invoices.
CFE is another separate line. A new company may have an initial declaration in its creation year even where no CFE is payable for that year. Later notices appear in the professional tax account. The company should record the registered premises, activity, surface and any change in the local establishment. The official impots.gouv.fr creation-year page provides the relevant form and instructions. The accounting provider’s mission should identify whether it prepares this declaration; the company should retain the submitted form and acknowledgement.
The annual close should begin at least eight weeks before the financial year-end. Request the trial balance, bank statements, fixed-asset list, depreciation schedule, inventory evidence, customer and supplier ageing, tax accounts, payroll accounts, loan schedules, shareholder-current-account statements and intercompany confirmations. Ask specifically about foreign-currency balances and whether the group reporting pack differs from the French statutory accounts. An account that is correct for consolidation may require a French statutory adjustment. The adjustment and the reason should be documented, not left in an unexplained reconciliation column.
After the accounts are final, prepare the corporate approval file. It should contain the balance sheet, income statement, notes, proposed allocation of profit or loss, management report where required, statutory-auditor report where applicable and the resolutions or minutes. For an SAS, read the articles before fixing the approval method. For a SASU, record the sole shareholder’s decision. For a SARL, prepare the meeting and notice documents required by the company’s form. A foreign shareholder should have a bilingual explanation of material items, even if the legally signed document must be in French.
Immediately after approval, calculate the filing deadline and assign INPI submission. Upload the correct accounts, resolution and any permitted confidentiality request. Obtain the acknowledgement, check that the filing status is accepted and store the final public extract or filing confirmation. If the Guichet unique rejects the filing, record the rejection reason, owner, correction and new submission date. A rejected form is not a completed filing.
The relationship with the provider should also be reviewed. A 22 January 2026 decision of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence, no. 21/18040, concerned a company that had entrusted its accounting to an expert-comptable. The court stated: “Une telle mission s’accompagne d’un devoir d’information et de conseil qui en est l’accessoire.” The case involved VAT advice and a loss-of-chance assessment, not a rule making an accountant mandatory. It shows why the mission letter and the information exchanged during the engagement matter when a foreign founder later says that a tax choice was never explained.
For a remote founder, the 90-day workflow can be reduced to three control meetings: an onboarding meeting to identify legal form, year-end, tax regime and group structure; a monthly closing meeting to resolve missing evidence; and an annual approval meeting to validate accounts, resolutions and filing. Each meeting should produce a dated action list. The company should preserve the list with the accounting file because it shows when a risk was identified and who had to act.
B. Who is liable when accounts, filings or evidence are missing?
The company’s delegation of bookkeeping does not transfer every legal responsibility away from its director. The president or manager remains the person who must ensure that the company’s corporate decisions, filings and payments are made. A provider may be liable for a professional error within its mission, but the company must prove the mission, the breach, the loss and the causal connection. The safest approach is to prevent the dispute by recording who was supposed to do what, when the company sent the documents and when the provider warned of a problem.
The risk becomes serious where there is no accounting or where the ledger is so incomplete that the company cannot be managed. In a 26 June 2025 judgment, Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence, no. 24/07000, the court held: “L’absence de tenue de comptabilité constitue une faute de gestion susceptible d’engager sa responsabilité.” The decision concerned a liquidation and an insufficiency of assets. It does not mean that a late invoice automatically creates personal liability. It shows, however, that a director cannot treat missing books as a harmless administrative defect when the lack of accounts removes the company’s ability to see its financial position and contributes to the loss.
The Cour de cassation has also required the causal analysis to be specific. In Commercial Chamber, 9 June 2022, no. 21-11.083, it stated that “chaque faute retenue a contribué à l’insuffisance d’actif.” The case concerned a director’s liability in a collective proceeding. For a foreign founder, the lesson is practical: preserve the bank trail, closing files, correspondence about warnings, tax notices, cash forecasts and the date on which the company knew or should have known about a deficit. A court cannot sensibly measure the effect of a missing accounting process without a reliable chronology.
Late or inaccurate books can produce several different consequences. The commercial court may require the company to file annual accounts. A tax authority may request books and supporting documents, reject a deduction, assess tax or examine VAT. A bank or payment provider may suspend onboarding until it receives a current Kbis and financial information. A shareholder may challenge an approval decision or ask for information. In insolvency, the liquidator may use missing accounts as evidence of a management fault. These consequences are distinct; the company should not wait for one proceeding to reveal a problem in another.
False or fictitious entries are more serious than an untidy file. Article 1743 of the General Tax Code covers a person who knowingly omits or makes another person omit entries, or knowingly records inaccurate or fictitious entries in the journal or equivalent documents. The opening wording is: “Est également puni des peines prévues à l’article 1741.” A foreign founder should never ask a provider to backdate an invoice, hide a shareholder advance, remove a loss, split a transaction to alter VAT or create a document that did not exist. Correcting a genuine accounting error is a documented adjustment; manufacturing evidence is a different act.
The director’s personal risk is not automatic merely because an accountant made a mistake. A company may have a contractual claim against its expert-comptable where the engagement letter covers the task and the error caused a demonstrable loss. The 2004 decision in no. 01-14.089 shows the importance of proving the scope of the mission. The 2026 decision in no. 21/18040 shows that an accounting mission can carry an ancillary information and advice duty. Neither decision removes the need for the company to prove the financial impact. A lost tax option, a penalty, additional VAT, financing loss or professional cost should be calculated from contemporaneous records.
When a deadline is at risk, use a written escalation in four steps. First, notify the legal representative and the provider of the precise missing item and legal deadline. Second, obtain a written position: will the provider file, what document is needed, and what risk does the provider identify? Third, submit a compliant correction or late filing through the authorised channel and preserve the acknowledgement. Fourth, review the engagement letter and insurance position before deciding whether a claim is appropriate. Switching providers without exporting the ledger, journals, reconciliations and tax submissions can make the evidence problem worse.
The foreign parent should maintain a permanent “French company compliance pack” containing:
- the articles, current Kbis and INPI filing receipts;
- the expert-comptable engagement letter, professional registration details and responsibility table;
- the chart of accounts, monthly closes, bank reconciliations and intercompany schedules;
- all invoices, contracts, expense evidence, payroll records and tax payment confirmations;
- the VAT analysis, CFE documents, corporate-tax returns and professional-account notices;
- the approved annual accounts, shareholder decision, filing receipt and any confidentiality request;
- the group ownership chart, beneficial-owner analysis, identity evidence and amended declarations;
- the warnings, rejected filings, corrections, powers of attorney and written decisions about late or disputed work.
Review the pack quarterly and after each change of director, registered office, shareholder, group parent, activity, VAT regime or employee. Explain every acronym to the group board. The Kbis is the official commercial-register extract; the RCS is the commercial and companies register; the RNE is the national register of businesses; the greffe is the court registry; INPI is the French industrial-property institute that operates the business-formalities route; URSSAF collects many social-security contributions; BODACC is the official bulletin for certain commercial notices; TVA is value added tax; IS is corporate income tax; and CFE is the local business-property contribution. Clear vocabulary prevents a foreign parent from confusing a registration receipt with a tax return or a statutory audit with bookkeeping.
The main decision is therefore not “French accountant or no French accountant.” It is whether the French company can prove a complete chain from transaction to ledger, from ledger to tax return, from closing to shareholder approval and from approval to INPI filing. If the answer is no, appoint a regulated expert-comptable with a carefully written mission, give that provider the group information needed to identify VAT and audit issues, and keep the director’s review role visible in the file. If the answer is yes, an internal or remote model can work, but it must follow the same French evidence rules.
Conclusion
A French company owned by foreign shareholders does not automatically need to hire an external French expert-comptable. It does need compliant books, annual accounts, French and euro accounting documents, supporting evidence, tax and VAT controls, corporate approvals and timely filing with the appropriate French channel. The legal representative remains the person who must organise those controls, even when a provider performs the technical work.
For a founder abroad, the safest operating model is a written engagement map, a monthly close, a 90-day deadline calendar, a complete group and beneficial-owner file, and an annual accounts process that starts before year-end. The expert-comptable and statutory auditor must be kept distinct. A remote process is acceptable when it is documented, reviewable and capable of producing the evidence required by Légifrance, Service-Public, INPI and the French tax administration.
Need a quick opinion on your case
Book a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm about your French company, accounting process or cross-border compliance issue.
We can review the urgent filing, the provider’s mission, the director’s exposure and the documents needed to regularise the position.
+33 6 46 60 58 22 — Maître Reda Kohen.
Contact the firm through the secure form or start with the French company-formation and corporate-law desk.