Cabinet Kohen Avocats · Paris

—

Maître Reda KOHEN intervient en droit immobilier, droit des sociétés et droit des affaires à Paris. Première analyse : 80 € TTC, réponse personnelle sous 24 heures.

100 % confidentiel · Secret professionnel · Sans engagement

Barreau de Paris Immobilier, sociétés, affaires Fiche CNB avocat.fr
Maître Reda KOHEN, avocat au Barreau de Paris
Maître Reda KOHEN
Avocat au Barreau de Paris

British Visitor in France: What to Do if a Hospital Refuses Your GHIC or EHIC After Brexit

A British visitor who falls ill in France after Brexit may be told that a Global Health Insurance Card (GHIC) or an older European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) cannot be processed. That sentence does not answer the real question. Is the provider public or private? Was the treatment medically necessary during a temporary stay, or was it planned before departure? Were you refused medical care, refused the French cashless process, or simply asked to pay a local contribution? The remedy is different in each case.

For a qualifying temporary visitor, a UK-issued GHIC, a still-valid UK EHIC, or a Provisional Replacement Certificate (PRC) can support access to medically necessary state healthcare in France. The card is not a travel-insurance policy, a promise that every bill will be free, or a substitute for the French residence-based system. If you live in France, the usual route may instead be a registered S1 or French health-insurance affiliation. This article explains the visitor route: how to protect emergency care, obtain a PRC, preserve the right documents, recover an amount wrongly paid, and challenge a refusal without confusing a French hospital’s billing desk with the UK authority that funds your entitlement.

I. Can a British visitor use a GHIC or EHIC in France after Brexit?

A. What healthcare is covered and who is eligible?

Brexit did not remove every reciprocal healthcare right for a person insured in the United Kingdom who makes a temporary visit to France. The post-Brexit framework is based principally on the social-security provisions attached to the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, while separate Withdrawal Agreement rules protect certain people who were already living across the Channel before the end of the transition period. The practical document depends on that status.

A UK resident who is ordinarily and legally resident in the United Kingdom will normally use a UK GHIC for a visit to France. A valid existing UK EHIC can continue to be used until its expiry in the cases recognised by the reciprocal arrangements. A British national who has protected rights under the Withdrawal Agreement may be entitled to a UK EHIC rather than a GHIC. The card must be valid and the visitor must be entitled to use it when the treatment occurs. The GOV.UK France health guidance states the operational rule plainly: a visitor needs a GHIC or a valid existing EHIC to obtain medically necessary state healthcare in France.

“Medically necessary” does not mean only treatment that saves a life. It covers care which cannot reasonably wait until the visitor returns to the United Kingdom, assessed by the treating clinician and the circumstances of the stay. It can include an accident, an acute illness, treatment for a chronic or pre-existing condition, pregnancy-related care, prescribed medicines and hospital treatment. It does not cover a trip whose purpose was to obtain planned treatment. A consultation arranged in advance, an elective operation, or a course of treatment deliberately scheduled in France requires a different analysis and, where appropriate, prior authorisation such as an S2 form.

The French Service-Public guidance for foreign visitors describes the local effect of the card: it covers unexpected and medically necessary care, including hospital, dental, pharmaceutical and laboratory expenses, and gives the visitor the same access conditions as French insured persons when the provider is part of the recognised system. That does not mean that every French bill is paid in full. France has co-payments, fees that a local patient may also bear, and providers outside the state or conventionné system. “Conventionné” means that the provider operates within the statutory reimbursement framework. Private clinics and private treatment are a frequent reason for a GHIC dispute.

Three exclusions should be identified before anyone argues with a billing office. First, a GHIC or EHIC does not pay for private healthcare merely because the private clinic is located in France. Secondly, it does not pay for medical repatriation to the United Kingdom, changes to flights or accommodation, or other travel-insurance risks. Thirdly, it does not turn planned treatment into an emergency claim. The GOV.UK France health guidance confirms that the card gives access to state care, may leave a local co-payment, and does not replace travel and medical insurance.

French legislation also helps separate medical access from the funding dispute. Article L. 1110-5 of the French Public Health Code recognises “le droit de recevoir, sur l’ensemble du territoire, les traitements et les soins les plus appropriés”, meaning the right to receive the most appropriate treatment and care throughout the territory. That principle is assessed in the light of health and urgency; it is not a statutory promise that the British visitor has no bill. The immediate clinical decision must not be held hostage to an argument about which institution will later reimburse the provider.

Do not use the visitor card as a substitute for residence registration. A British pensioner or other person living in France may have UK-funded healthcare through an S1 registered with the local Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie, or CPAM, meaning the local primary French health-insurance fund. A resident may instead be affiliated to the French system through work or residence. The existing guide on healthcare in France after Brexit, S1 registration and a CPAM refusal addresses that resident problem. Presenting a GHIC for a settled resident can create the wrong file and delay the correct one.

B. What should the hospital or doctor do with the card?

The card should be presented to a public hospital, a doctor or another provider within the French statutory system, together with a passport or other identity document when requested. Ask the admissions or billing department to record the card number, the date of treatment and the fact that the stay is temporary. If the card cannot be read, has expired, was lost, or has not arrived, contact NHS Overseas Healthcare Services and request a PRC. A PRC is a temporary document issued when the visitor needs care but cannot produce the GHIC or EHIC; the NHS says that it provides the same level of cover as the card.

The request should be made as soon as treatment is needed, not after a dispute has become impossible to document. Keep the hospital’s name, department, admission number and the name or job title of the person who says that the card is refused. Ask a calm, specific question: is the provider refusing the card because it is private, because the treatment is not medically necessary, because the card cannot be verified, or because the office does not know the cross-border process? Those are not interchangeable reasons. A written invoice marked “patient,” a written refusal, or an email from the hospital is much more useful than a recollection of a hurried conversation.

If the matter is urgent, seek treatment first. Article R. 1112-11 of the Public Health Code refers to admission being decided, outside recognised emergencies, on the basis of a medical certificate. The statutory wording includes “hors les cas d’urgence reconnus par le médecin ou l’interne de garde de l’établissement”: outside emergencies recognised by the hospital doctor or doctor on duty. A receptionist’s uncertainty about a GHIC is not a medical finding that the patient is not entitled to necessary treatment. In a life-threatening situation, call 15 or 112, follow the medical team’s instructions and ask someone accompanying you to deal with the documents.

A refusal of the cashless process is not always a refusal of treatment. French healthcare may require a patient to advance all or part of the cost, even where the reciprocal arrangement later allows reimbursement. If the hospital accepts the clinical admission but says that the foreign card cannot be processed at the desk, ask for the care to continue, obtain a detailed invoice and pursue the funding route. If a doctor or hospital refuses to provide necessary care because you are British or because you hold a qualifying reciprocal-healthcare document, record that fact separately and use the complaint route described below.

Public-hospital status matters. Article L. 6112-3 of the Public Health Code lists the establishments that provide the French public hospital service. A private clinic may have a contract or may be able to treat you, but its status and charges must be checked; a GHIC is not an instruction to a private provider to absorb its private tariff. Before signing a financial undertaking, ask whether the facility is public, conventionné or private, whether a standard French tariff will apply, and which part is a local patient contribution rather than a recoverable foreign-insurer amount.

Before leaving the provider, request a complete file. It should normally contain the dated and signed French feuille de soins, meaning the treatment form used for reimbursement, every invoice, proof of payment, prescriptions, test results where relevant, and the bulletin de sortie, meaning the hospital discharge document, if you were admitted. Photograph the documents, but keep originals. Note the dates on which the card, a PRC or a copy of the card was shown. If a family member paid, record the payer and keep proof linking that payment to your treatment.

II. How can you recover the money and challenge a wrong refusal?

A. What should you do if you paid the French bill?

There are two funding institutions in the background: the French CPAM or other local health-insurance body handling the French-side paperwork, and the UK authority responsible for the GHIC or EHIC. The correct route depends on the documents, the provider and the reciprocal arrangement. Do not assume that sending the same invoice simultaneously to every body will accelerate payment. It can create duplicate reimbursement, contradictory answers and a more difficult audit.

For a UK visitor treated in France, the French public-information route is practical. The Service-Public page explains that a British visitor can submit the dated and signed feuille de soins, the discharge document if there was hospitalisation, prescriptions, and a copy of the GHIC or PRC to the CPAM for the place of treatment. The request should also give the permanent address and bank references, including IBAN or BIC where requested. Its section on UK visitors and reimbursement warns that the French fund will not necessarily reimburse the whole expenditure. That is a reminder to distinguish the statutory share from local co-payments, private supplements and non-covered expenses.

The British route is equally important where the hospital refused or could not process the card. The NHS instructs a person who paid for care covered by a UK GHIC or EHIC to use the refund process of NHS Overseas Healthcare Services and send the claim form with receipts and supporting evidence. The evidence may include confirmation that the treatment was state-provided, proof of payment, insurance documents if an insurer paid, and discharge documents. The NHS page also says that a person who believes they were incorrectly charged should contact that service and preserve the treatment file. That is the right place to ask whether the UK authority will issue a PRC retrospectively or confirm entitlement to the hospital.

Use a short chronology rather than a long emotional explanation. A useful file can be organised as follows:

  1. the date you entered France and the temporary purpose of the visit;
  2. the date and nature of the unexpected illness, accident or treatment;
  3. the GHIC, EHIC or PRC status on the day of treatment;
  4. the provider’s status, its address and whether it was public or private;
  5. the exact amount billed, the amount paid and the payer’s identity;
  6. the documents handed over and the response received; and
  7. the reimbursement request, its delivery proof and every subsequent decision.

Send copies by a method that creates a date and proof of delivery. If the hospital has already transferred the invoice to a recovery department, write to both the hospital’s bureau des admissions, meaning its admissions and billing office, and the recovery contact. State that you are not disputing a lawful French co-payment; you are asking for the statutory cross-border entitlement to be applied or for the amount paid to be reviewed. Ask the provider not to add collection charges while the GHIC, EHIC or PRC verification is pending. Do not ignore a formal demand for payment, but do not sign a new settlement that waives a reimbursement claim without advice.

French legislation confirms that the statutory system distinguishes covered care from every expense connected with a journey. Article L. 160-8 of the Social Security Code provides that sickness protection includes coverage of medical and hospital costs, among other categories. The operative right still depends on the person’s insured status, the applicable international instrument and the type of care. Article L. 160-1 of the same Code sets the French health-coverage framework for people who meet the statutory conditions; it does not turn every visitor into a French resident insured person.

It is important not to quote the wrong French provision to a CPAM. Article R. 160-1 of the Social Security Code concerns medically necessary care received by people covered under French provisions during a temporary stay in another European state. It says that, where the insured person advanced the cost, reimbursement is made according to the rules of the state of stay or, with the insured person’s agreement, under French rules. That article is useful for understanding the structure of European coordination, but a British visitor treated in France must also rely on the UK–EU arrangement and the UK’s proof of entitlement. The practical documents and the competent institution should therefore be checked rather than assumed.

Planned treatment is different again. Article R. 160-3 of the Social Security Code refers to conventions with establishments in another European state and the conditions for hospital treatment. A UK visitor who travelled to France specifically for a procedure should not present the case as an accidental GHIC refusal. Obtain the relevant prior authorisation or accept that the treatment may be privately funded. A false characterisation can undermine an otherwise genuine claim for unexpected care.

B. How do you challenge a French refusal and protect the deadline?

Start by identifying the decision-maker. A hospital billing clerk may have refused to process a card without refusing medical care. A doctor may have refused an appointment or treatment. The CPAM may have issued a written decision refusing reimbursement. NHS Overseas Healthcare Services may have rejected a refund because the visitor was not eligible, the care was private, or the evidence did not prove a temporary stay. Each decision needs its own letter. Sending a general complaint to the wrong institution is the most common reason a claim loses time.

If the issue is a provider’s refusal of care, ask for the reason in writing and send a factual complaint to the provider’s director or complaints department, with a copy to the local CPAM when the dispute concerns the French statutory system. Article L. 1110-3 of the Public Health Code states: “Aucune personne ne peut faire l’objet de discriminations dans l’accès à la prévention ou aux soins.” In English, no person may be discriminated against in access to prevention or care. The same article allows a person who believes they suffered an unlawful refusal of care to refer the facts to the director of the local health-insurance body or to the relevant professional order. It provides for an acknowledgement, information to the professional and, in appropriate cases, conciliation.

That protection does not mean that every refusal to accept a GHIC is discrimination. A private clinic can explain that it does not participate in the public reimbursement process. A provider can ask for payment of a local co-payment. A hospital can require proof that the person is insured and that the care is within the temporary-stay rules. The potential problem is a refusal that is actually based on nationality, a protected status or an unjustified refusal to provide necessary care, rather than a legitimate distinction between state and private treatment.

If the CPAM has made a formal reimbursement decision, preserve the date on which it was notified. Social-security disputes fall within the scope described by Article L. 142-1 of the Social Security Code, which opens with the words “Le contentieux de la sécurité sociale comprend les litiges relatifs” — social-security litigation includes disputes relating to the application of social-security legislation and regulations. The precise jurisdiction depends on the decision and the type of dispute, so do not treat a rejection email as if it were automatically a court judgment.

The usual first French step is a commission de recours amiable, or CRA, meaning the amicable-review commission within the social-security body. Article R. 142-1 of the Social Security Code provides that the commission “doit être saisie dans le délai de deux mois à compter de la notification de la décision” — it must be seized within two months from notification of the decision. Treat two months as a hard working deadline. Send the appeal to the address and method stated in the decision, attach the decision, the GHIC/EHIC/PRC evidence, the medical and billing file, and explain exactly what reimbursement is sought.

Article L. 142-4 of the Social Security Code adds the procedural consequence: “Les recours contentieux … sont précédés d’un recours préalable” — court proceedings in the relevant matters must be preceded by a prior administrative appeal. A CRA appeal is not a formality to postpone until the NHS has finished reviewing the UK-side claim. If the French decision has a two-month period, lodge a protective, reasoned appeal in time and explain that the UK-side confirmation is being sought. Keep the proof of dispatch and the acknowledgement.

A refusal by a French doctor or hospital can also be raised through the cross-border administrative assistance route identified by Service-Public, including the SOLVIT service where the conditions are met. This is not a damages action and it does not replace a time-limited court or CRA route. It can help when the difficulty is an administration or provider failing to apply a European reciprocal-rights process. For a serious injury, a substantial bill, a threatened enforcement action or an allegation of discriminatory refusal, obtain legal advice rather than relying on an informal helpdesk response.

The strongest appeal normally answers five questions in five short parts: why the stay was temporary; why the treatment could not reasonably wait; why the provider was within the public or statutory system; which valid document proved UK entitlement; and exactly which sum should be reimbursed after subtracting any lawful local contribution. Attach the card or PRC, identity page, travel evidence if needed, medical note, invoices, payment proof, discharge document, correspondence and the provider’s status. If a private insurer paid part of the bill, state that openly and identify the amount still claimed. The aim is to make the eligibility decision verifiable, not to ask the reviewer to reconstruct the entire journey.

Do not let the words “refused GHIC” hide a residence problem. If the visitor was already living in France, the relevant evidence may include the residence permit, S1 registration, French social-security number and proof of affiliation. If the trip was for planned medical care, the relevant file may require S2 authorisation. If the treatment was at a private clinic, the travel policy may be the primary route. If the card was valid and the care was unexpected at a public provider, the file should focus on verification, the PRC, the invoice and reimbursement. Those distinctions often decide the outcome before any court is involved.

Conclusion

A British visitor is not automatically uninsured in France after Brexit, but a GHIC or EHIC is a limited reciprocal-healthcare document, not a French residence card and not travel insurance. Protect the medical emergency first. Confirm whether the provider is public or private, obtain a PRC if necessary, ask for the refusal or invoice in writing, and keep every medical and payment document. Use the CPAM route for the French-side file and NHS Overseas Healthcare Services for a UK-funded refund or entitlement confirmation. If a formal CPAM decision is issued, calculate the two-month CRA period immediately. If the problem is a refusal of care rather than a billing dispute, use the Public Health Code protections and record the facts. The difference between an administrative misunderstanding and a legally challengeable refusal lies in the evidence, the correct institution and the deadline.

Need a quick opinion on your case

Telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.

We can review a refused GHIC or EHIC claim, a French hospital invoice, a PRC problem or a CPAM response.

+33 6 46 60 58 22

Contact the firm

Source : Cour de cassation – Base Open Data « Judilibre » & « Légifrance ».

What our clients say

4,9259 Google reviews
Share your review
kader ladjouzi
6 days ago

Best real estate and business lawyer in Paris. A compassionate and attentive lawyer, with a wonderful team. Thank you, Maître KOHEN

Translated from French

Janou SAMUEL
1 month ago

Thank you to Maître KOHEN for his analyses of recent case law regarding fraudulent concealment in real estate sales. This reinforces my decision to pursue an action for rescission that I am considering after acquiring a house affected by serious defects intentionally concealed by the seller and not reported by the real estate agent; also defects (rising damp) characterized by progressive through-cracks and damp patches, not reported by the real estate agent… Worse, defects concealed by the latter or on his initiative under a coat of paint and polystyrene tiles glued to the ceiling of a bedroom. And said real estate agent was the drafter of the preliminary contract, which naturally contains no information regarding any of these defects. I would just add that, being 77 years old and suffering from cognitive impairment, I am certain the real estate agent thought I would not be able to uncover the deception and, above all, characterize fraudulent intent, let alone initiate legal proceedings given the complexity and length of the process... That is why I am opting for criminal proceedings, insofar as the intentional concealment of defects by the seller and then by the real estate agent

Translated from French

Paul MALIK (powlo)
4 months ago

Maître Reda KOHEN assisted me in a dispute concerning a sale agreement with a defaulting party. He provided professional and responsive support, and I highly recommend him.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Legal advice is only valuable if it arrives on time — delighted to have been there when needed. Thank you for your kind words.

Rayan Kallout
5 months ago

I highly recommend Maître Reda Kohen. Thanks to his explanations, I was able to recover my security deposit in a situation that seemed blocked. He was responsive, clear, and very professional. A big thank you for his invaluable help!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

The return of the security deposit is a more common rental dispute than one might think; glad that the situation was resolved quickly. Thank you for this feedback.

Naji Jouahri
5 months ago

Excellent support from Maître Kohen in a case combining business law and real estate law. Clear legal analysis from the first meeting, right through to the hearing. Professional and accessible lawyer, I highly recommend his firm in Paris 17.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Cases at the intersection of business law and real estate law require a comprehensive overview — that's the core of the firm's practice, from the initial meeting to the hearing. Thank you for this precise recommendation.

Halim Tunde
5 months ago

Maître Kohen assisted me in recovering unpaid debts from a defaulting tenant. Procedure mastered from start to finish, from the payment order to eviction. Human, attentive, and always reachable. Thank you for your work.

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Collecting unpaid rent requires a procedure handled from start to finish, without downtime — glad to have seen yours through to completion. Thank you for this testimonial.

Cha
5 months ago

As a young student living in an apartment, my landlord tried to make me leave my accommodation even though he had sent me no termination notice. I therefore contacted Mr. Reda Kohen to help me as I couldn’t handle the situation alone. In just 3 days everything was resolved, Maître Kohen defended me and accompanied me with an irreproachable level of commitment and efficiency. I can only recommend his professionalism!

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

An irregular termination notice does not terminate a lease: delighted that the situation was resolved in a few days. Good luck with your studies.

Asmaa Maazaz
6 months ago

I turned to Maître Kohen for a complex real estate dispute and I highly recommend his firm. He is very professional; he thoroughly analyzed my case from the very first appointment and clearly explained the possible options. Thanks to his expertise, we achieved a very favorable outcome. Responsive, a good teacher, and committed, he is a lawyer you can truly trust. Yours faithfully, Miss Maazaz

Translated from French

Reply from the firm

Thank you very much, Miss Maazaz, for this feedback. Analytical rigor and responsiveness are essential commitments of our law firm specializing in real estate law in Paris, where each case requires a tailored approach. Delighted that we were able to achieve a favorable outcome. The firm remains at your disposal. Best regards.