{"id":2154880,"date":"2026-10-22T18:09:05","date_gmt":"2026-10-22T16:09:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/"},"modified":"2026-10-22T18:09:05","modified_gmt":"2026-10-22T16:09:05","slug":"british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/","title":{"rendered":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer"},"content":{"rendered":"

You are British, you live in France or you are spending a few weeks in your French house, and a car hits you on a pedestrian crossing in Bordeaux, or someone drives into the back of your car on the A10 near Poitiers. You are shaken, you may be in hospital, and the paperwork is in French. The first question is simple: who pays for your injuries, and what happens if the insurer offers you far less than your losses? The answer is reassuring. France has one of the most protective road-accident systems in Europe, built around a statute called the loi Badinter<\/em> (the Road Traffic Victims Act of 5 July 1985). Because the crash happened on French soil, it is French compensation law that decides what you receive, even if you are British, even if you have gone back to the United Kingdom, and even if the vehicle that hit you was registered in Britain or Spain. The liable driver’s insurer must make you a reasoned compensation offer within strict statutory deadlines, and if the offer is late, incomplete or too low, the law gives you concrete weapons: penalty interest at double the legal rate, a second medical assessment, and ultimately the French judge. Brexit changed none of this. You do not need a green card to drive in France, but you do need valid insurance, and the British side of the system still works through French bodies that deal with foreign vehicles every day. This article explains, step by step, which law applies to your crash, who exactly has to pay, how your status as pedestrian, passenger, cyclist or driver changes your rights, the precise timetable the insurer must follow, and how to challenge a refusal or an offer that undervalues your injury.<\/p>\n

I. The crash happened in France, so French law decides your compensation and names your payer<\/h2>\n

A. Where the damage occurred fixes the applicable law, and every motor vehicle on a French road is inside the Badinter system<\/h3>\n

When a British resident is injured in France by a French driver, a Spanish lorry or another British motorist on holiday, the first legal question is which country’s law governs the claim. The answer comes from an international treaty that France applies to every cross-border road crash, the Hague Convention of 4 May 1971 on the law applicable to traffic accidents. The Cour de cassation recalls its object in these terms: “Selon le premier de ces textes, cette Convention a pour objet de d\u00e9terminer la loi applicable \u00e0 la responsabilit\u00e9 civile extracontractuelle d\u00e9coulant d’un accident de la circulation routi\u00e8re, quelle que soit la nature de la juridiction appel\u00e9e \u00e0 en conna\u00eetre.<\/a>” And where the vehicles involved are registered in different States, “Il r\u00e9sulte du deuxi\u00e8me et du troisi\u00e8me que, lorsque les v\u00e9hicules impliqu\u00e9s sont immatricul\u00e9s dans des Etats diff\u00e9rents, la loi applicable est la loi interne de l’Etat sur le territoire duquel l’accident est survenu.<\/a>” (Cour de cassation, First Civil Chamber, 15 June 2022, appeal No 21-13.306, published in the Bulletin, cassation). In plain terms: injured in France, French compensation law applies, even if you live in Manchester, even if your medical treatment continues in England, and even if your lost earnings are in pounds sterling. The Cour de cassation has also confirmed that French courts must apply this Convention to determine the applicable law, even when ruling urgently: “En statuant ainsi, alors que la Convention de La Haye du 4 mai 1971 sur la loi applicable aux accidents de la circulation routi\u00e8re a \u00e9t\u00e9 ratifi\u00e9e par la France, la cour d’appel qui, m\u00eame statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, \u00e9tait tenue d’en faire application pour d\u00e9terminer la loi applicable au litige, a viol\u00e9 le texte susvis\u00e9.<\/a>” (Cour de cassation, First Civil Chamber, 18 November 2020, appeal No 19-17.924, published in the Bulletin, cassation). An English court hearing such a case would apply the same conflict rule and therefore French law to the substance of the claim, although in practice most British victims claim directly in France, where the insurer, the experts and the judge are.<\/p>\n

live in France or you are spending a few weeks in your French house, and a car hits you on a pedestrian crossing in Bordeaux, or someone drives into the back of your car on the A10 near Poitiers. You are shaken, you may be in hospital, and the paperwork is in French. The first question is simple: who pays for your injuries, and what happens if the insurer offers you far less than your losses? The answer is reassuring. France has one of the most protective road-accident systems in Europe, built around a statute called the loi Badinter<\/em> (the Road Traffic Victims Act of 5 July 1985). Because the crash happened on French soil, it is French compensation law that decides what you receive, even if you are British, even if you have gone back to the United Kingdom, and even if the vehicle that hit you was registered in Britain or Spain. The liable driver’s insurer must make you a reasoned compensation offer within strict statutory deadlines, and if the offer is late, incomplete or too low, the law gives you concrete weapons: penalty interest at double the legal rate, a second medical assessment, and ultimately the French judge. Brexit changed none of this. You do not need a green card to drive in France, but you do need valid insurance, and the British side of the system still works through French bodies that deal with foreign vehicles every day. This article explains, step by step, which law applies to your crash, who exactly has to pay, how your status as pedestrian, passenger, cyclist or driver changes your rights, the precise timetable the insurer must follow, and how to challenge a refusal or an offer that undervalues your injury.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

French compensation law for road accidents sits in a single statute, Law No 85-677 of 5 July 1985, universally called the loi Badinter<\/em> after the minister who carried it, which created a fast, largely automatic indemnity system alongside the ordinary courts. Its Article 1 defines the field as follows: “Les dispositions du pr\u00e9sent chapitre s’appliquent, m\u00eame lorsqu’elles sont transport\u00e9es en vertu d’un contrat, aux victimes d’un accident de la circulation dans lequel est impliqu\u00e9 un v\u00e9hicule terrestre \u00e0 moteur ainsi que ses remorques ou semi-remorques, \u00e0 l’exception des chemins de fer et des tramways circulant sur des voies qui leur sont propres.<\/a>” Three points matter for a British reader. First, the word impliqu\u00e9<\/em> (involved) is deliberately wide: the vehicle does not need to have touched you. A car that forces your bicycle off the road without contact, or a lorry whose sudden braking throws you inside a coach, is involved. Second, passengers carried under a contract, for example on a French coach excursion or in a taxi, are covered too. Third, only railways and trams running on their own reserved tracks are excluded; everything else with a motor, from a car to a delivery van to a tractor, is in.<\/p>\n

Once a motor vehicle is involved, the driver who caused the crash has almost no escape. Article 2 of the same law states: “Les victimes, y compris les conducteurs, ne peuvent se voir opposer la force majeure ou le fait d’un tiers par le conducteur ou le gardien d’un v\u00e9hicule mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l’article 1er.<\/a>” Neither an unforeseeable event (force majeure<\/em>) nor the fault of a third party can be raised against you by the driver or the keeper of the vehicle. A French court will not listen to a driver who says a sudden gust of wind, a burst tyre or another motorist’s manoeuvre excuses everything. For the victim, this is the foundation of the whole system: you do not have to prove the driver was at fault in the way English negligence law demands. Involvement of the vehicle plus your bodily injury is enough to open the right to compensation, and the only debates left concern the narrow statutory exceptions examined below.<\/p>\n

So who physically pays you? In the standard case, the insurer covering the civil liability (responsabilit\u00e9 civile<\/em>) of the vehicle involved. After an accident you exchange details and complete the joint accident report (constat amiable<\/em>), the familiar blue-and-yellow form, which is not an admission of liability but a factual record that speeds up the file. If the vehicle that hit you is British, the system still works: the United Kingdom remains in the green-card system, and the British government confirms that no green card is needed for driving in the EU, while valid vehicle insurance remains compulsory<\/a>. A British insurer answers for crashes in France through its French correspondent, and where the foreign insurer is sued, it is represented in France by the French central motor bureau, the Bureau central fran\u00e7ais<\/em>. That is exactly what happened in a case decided by the Cour de cassation on 28 March 2019, where the widow of a pedestrian killed by a Spanish-registered lorry sued in France the Bureau central fran\u00e7ais as representative of the Spanish insurer Allianz Espagne. If the driver who hit you is unknown, because it was a hit-and-run, or has no insurance, a public body steps in: the guarantee fund for compulsory damage insurance, the Fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages<\/em>. Article L421-1 of the Insurance Code provides: “Le fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages indemnise, dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues aux 1 et 2 du pr\u00e9sent I, les victimes ou les ayants droit des victimes des dommages n\u00e9s d’un accident survenu en France dans lequel est impliqu\u00e9 un v\u00e9hicule au sens de l’article L. 211-1 .<\/a>” The same article specifies that the fund pays for bodily injury “Lorsque le responsable des dommages est inconnu<\/a>” and “Lorsque le responsable des dommages n’est pas assur\u00e9, sauf par l’effet d’une d\u00e9rogation l\u00e9gale \u00e0 l’obligation d’assurance.<\/a>” The French administration describes this safety net in English on its official service-public.fr pages, including the page devoted to compensation by the guarantee fund after a road accident<\/a>. A British victim is therefore never left without a payer: foreign insurer, French correspondent, central bureau or guarantee fund.<\/p>\n

B. Pedestrian, passenger or cyclist, your own mistake almost never cancels compensation, while a driver faces a stricter test<\/h3>\n

French law divides victims into two groups, and the distinction decides everything about which arguments the insurer can raise against you. If you were a pedestrian, a passenger, a cyclist, a scooter rider hit by a car, or simply standing beside your broken-down vehicle, Article 3 of the loi Badinter protects you with unusual strength: “Les victimes, hormis les conducteurs de v\u00e9hicules terrestres \u00e0 moteur, sont indemnis\u00e9es des dommages r\u00e9sultant des atteintes \u00e0 leur personne qu’elles ont subis, sans que puisse leur \u00eatre oppos\u00e9e leur propre faute \u00e0 l’exception de leur faute inexcusable si elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 la cause exclusive de l’accident.<\/a>” Read that sentence carefully, because it contains a double lock. The insurer cannot reduce your bodily-injury compensation for an ordinary mistake on your part: crossing slightly outside the zebra stripes, cycling without a helmet, stepping onto the road while looking at your telephone. Only an inexcusable fault<\/em> (faute inexcusable<\/em>) can exclude you, and only if that fault was the exclusive cause<\/em> of the accident, meaning the driver’s behaviour played no role at all. In practice the two conditions together are so hard to meet that non-driving victims are compensated in the great majority of cases, with reductions remaining the exception.<\/p>\n

The same article adds a reinforced shield for the most vulnerable. Its second paragraph provides: “Les victimes d\u00e9sign\u00e9es \u00e0 l’alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, lorsqu’elles sont \u00e2g\u00e9es de moins de seize ans ou de plus de soixante-dix ans, ou lorsque, quel que soit leur \u00e2ge, elles sont titulaires, au moment de l’accident, d’un titre leur reconnaissant un taux d’incapacit\u00e9 permanente ou d’invalidit\u00e9 au moins \u00e9gal \u00e0 80 p. 100, sont, dans tous les cas, indemnis\u00e9es des dommages r\u00e9sultant des atteintes \u00e0 leur personne qu’elles ont subis.<\/a>” A British child knocked off a bicycle on the way to a French school, a 75-year-old British retiree hit while crossing to the market in Eymet, or a disabled adult with an 80 per cent incapacity rating are compensated in all cases. There is only one reservation, stated in the third paragraph: “Toutefois, dans les cas vis\u00e9s aux deux alin\u00e9as pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents, la victime n’est pas indemnis\u00e9e par l’auteur de l’accident des dommages r\u00e9sultant des atteintes \u00e0 sa personne lorsqu’elle a volontairement recherch\u00e9 le dommage qu’elle a subi.<\/a>” Deliberately seeking the injury, typically attempted suicide on a road or motorway, is the single exclusion. Nothing else removes the right.<\/p>\n

What counts as an inexcusable fault for an adult victim? The French courts use a stable definition, recalled in the 2019 Cour de cassation case mentioned above: an inexcusable fault is “la faute volontaire d’une exceptionnelle gravit\u00e9 exposant sans raison valable son auteur \u00e0 un danger dont il aurait d\u00fb avoir conscience<\/em>“, that is, a deliberate fault of exceptional seriousness, exposing its author without valid reason to a danger of which he should have been aware. In that case, a pedestrian had been standing safely beside his properly parked car on a motorway refuge, then suddenly and for no known valid reason walked onto the carriageway of the motorway at the exit of a bend that hid visibility, in front of a lorry travelling in the right-hand lane at the authorised speed, which had insufficient distance to avoid him. The Cour de cassation approved the court of appeal’s conclusion in these terms: “Mais attendu qu’ayant relev\u00e9 que C… J…, qui se tenait debout \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 de sa voiture, stationn\u00e9e en bon \u00e9tat de marche, sur un refuge o\u00f9 il se trouvait en s\u00e9curit\u00e9, s’est, sans raison valable connue, soudainement engag\u00e9 \u00e0 pied sur la chauss\u00e9e de l’autoroute, \u00e0 la sortie d’une courbe masquant la visibilit\u00e9 pour les v\u00e9hicules arrivant sur les voies, devant un ensemble routier circulant sur la voie de droite \u00e0 la vitesse autoris\u00e9e, qui n’a pas dispos\u00e9 d’une distance suffisante pour l’\u00e9viter, la cour d’appel, qui n’\u00e9tait pas tenue de suivre les parties dans le d\u00e9tail de leur argumentation, ni de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 la recherche vis\u00e9e par la seconde branche, qui ne lui \u00e9tait pas demand\u00e9e, a pu en d\u00e9duire qu’\u00e9tait caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e la faute inexcusable de la victime et que cette faute \u00e9tait la cause exclusive de son dommage ; qu’elle a ainsi l\u00e9galement justifi\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision ;<\/a>” (Cour de cassation, Second Civil Chamber, 28 March 2019, appeal No 18-15.168, published in the Bulletin, rejection). The lesson for a British reader is clear: walking onto a motorway carriageway for no reason is the textbook example. Ordinary carelessness in town, by contrast, is not an inexcusable fault, and the insurer that invokes it must also prove it was the exclusive cause, which fails whenever the driver was speeding, distracted or badly positioned.<\/p>\n

Drivers are treated differently, and British motorists driving their own car or a hire car in France must understand this asymmetry. Article 4 provides, in a single sentence: “La faute commise par le conducteur du v\u00e9hicule terrestre \u00e0 moteur a pour effet de limiter ou d’exclure l’indemnisation des dommages qu’il a subis.<\/a>” Any fault by the driver, even a light one, can reduce the compensation for his or her own bodily injury, and a serious fault can remove it entirely. A British driver who drifts across the white line, drives after drinking, or joins a motorway without looking may therefore recover only part of the losses, or nothing, for personal injury, while the passengers in the same car remain fully protected under Article 3. Note that this concerns the driver’s own injuries; the driver’s liability towards others is unaffected. Two further provisions complete the picture. For damage to property, such as your crushed bicycle, your broken spectacles or your dented car, Article 5 states: “La faute, commise par la victime a pour effet de limiter ou d’exclure l’indemnisation des dommages aux biens qu’elle a subis. Toutefois, les fournitures et appareils d\u00e9livr\u00e9s sur prescription m\u00e9dicale donnent lieu \u00e0 indemnisation selon les r\u00e8gles applicables \u00e0 la r\u00e9paration des atteintes \u00e0 la personne.<\/a>” Property follows an ordinary fault logic, but wheelchairs, prostheses and medical devices prescribed by a doctor are compensated under the generous bodily-injury rules. And where the victim dies or is gravely injured, the suffering of close relatives, called indirect victims (victimes par ricochet<\/em>), follows the direct victim’s fate, because Article 6 provides: “Le pr\u00e9judice subi par un tiers du fait des dommages caus\u00e9s \u00e0 la victime directe d’un accident de la circulation est r\u00e9par\u00e9 en tenant compte des limitations ou exclusions applicables \u00e0 l’indemnisation de ces dommages.<\/a>” A spouse’s bereavement claim cannot exceed what the direct victim could have obtained.<\/p>\n

II. The insurer works to a fixed timetable, and every refusal or low offer can be challenged before the judge<\/h2>\n

A. From the accident report to the reasoned offer, the deadlines run in your favour and your consent is never final on the spot<\/h3>\n

Once liability in principle is established, which as shown above is nearly automatic for non-driving victims, the system moves to money, and here again the statute protects the victim with deadlines that bind the insurer, not you. After completing the joint accident report at the scene and notifying the insurer under your policy, the injured person sends a claim for compensation (demande d’indemnisation<\/em>) with medical certificates, sick-leave notes and proof of expenses. The insurer will usually order a medical examination (expertise m\u00e9dicale<\/em>) by a doctor it appoints. The official service-public.fr page on compensation for bodily injury after a road accident, which describes each step, states that the victim is summoned at least 15 calendar days before the examination date, may be accompanied by a doctor of his or her choice, and that the expert’s report must be sent by the insurer within 20 days following the examination (Accident de la route: indemnisation des victimes de dommages corporels<\/a>). Bring every document to that examination: hospital discharge summaries (comptes rendus d’hospitalisation<\/em>), prescriptions, physiotherapy invoices, proof of home help paid privately, and evidence of lost earnings, because the expert’s report will structure the entire offer. A British victim treated partly in England should have the English records translated and sent to the expert; an incomplete file produces an incomplete offer.<\/p>\n

The central obligation is the reasoned offer (offre d’indemnit\u00e9 motiv\u00e9e<\/em>). Article L211-9 of the Insurance Code provides that “Une offre d’indemnit\u00e9 doit \u00eatre faite \u00e0 la victime qui a subi une atteinte \u00e0 sa personne dans le d\u00e9lai maximum de huit mois \u00e0 compter de l’accident.<\/a>” The same article organises the details: an offer must be presented within three months of the claim where liability is not disputed and the loss is fully quantified, and where liability is rejected or unclear, or the loss is not yet quantified, the insurer must give a reasoned reply within the same period. Crucially, the offer may be provisional (provisionnelle<\/em>) while your condition has not stabilised: “Cette offre peut avoir un caract\u00e8re provisionnel lorsque l’assureur n’a pas, dans les trois mois de l’accident, \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de la consolidation de l’\u00e9tat de la victime. L’offre d\u00e9finitive d’indemnisation doit alors \u00eatre faite dans un d\u00e9lai de cinq mois suivant la date \u00e0 laquelle l’assureur a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de cette consolidation. En tout \u00e9tat de cause, le d\u00e9lai le plus favorable \u00e0 la victime s’applique.<\/a>” Consolidation<\/em> is the medical moment when your condition stabilises and any remaining after-effects (s\u00e9quelles<\/em>) are considered permanent; only after consolidation can permanent disability, future care needs and lasting effects on work and private life be priced. The final sentence is the key: wherever two deadlines could apply, the one most favourable to the victim applies.<\/p>\n

Two further protections surround your acceptance. First, the offer must cover every compensable head of loss, including property damage not already settled, and for a deceased victim it is addressed to the heirs and where relevant the spouse. Second, even after you accept, you keep a cooling-off right: the service-public.fr page confirms that a 15-calendar-day right of retraction runs from the date of acceptance, and that the victim who refuses the offer may either enter further discussion or bring the matter before the judge to obtain fairer compensation (Accident de la route: indemnisation des victimes de dommages corporels<\/a>). Never treat the first cheque as the end of the story if your condition is still evolving. And time, for once, is generous: Article 2226 of the Civil Code provides that “L’action en responsabilit\u00e9 n\u00e9e \u00e0 raison d’un \u00e9v\u00e9nement ayant entra\u00een\u00e9 un dommage corporel, engag\u00e9e par la victime directe ou indirecte des pr\u00e9judices qui en r\u00e9sultent, se prescrit par dix ans \u00e0 compter de la date de la consolidation du dommage initial ou aggrav\u00e9.<\/a>” You have ten years from consolidation of the initial injury, or of its aggravation, to bring the liability action, which matters greatly for injuries that worsen years later. As for where to sue, Article 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure lets the claimant choose, in non-contractual matters, “en mati\u00e8re d\u00e9lictuelle, la juridiction du lieu du fait dommageable ou celle dans le ressort de laquelle le dommage a \u00e9t\u00e9 subi<\/a>“, so a British victim can seise the tribunal judiciaire<\/em> (the ordinary civil court) of the place where the crash happened, practical when the evidence, the experts and the witnesses are in France, even after returning to Britain.<\/p>\n

B. Refusing a low offer, forcing penalty interest, and asking the judge for a full reassessment<\/h3>\n

Insurer offers are frequently too low, not necessarily from bad faith but because the file is incomplete or a head of loss is missing: future care costs underestimated, loss of promotion prospects ignored, the spouse’s own moral suffering omitted, English medical bills left out because they were never translated. Your first response should be methodical rather than angry. Ask for the detailed breakdown behind the offer and compare it, line by line, with the medical consolidation report and your receipts. French bodily-injury practice itemises losses under standard headings, medical expenses, assistance by a third person (tierce personne<\/em>), lost earnings, permanent functional deficit, suffering endured (souffrances endur\u00e9es<\/em>), aesthetic damage, loss of enjoyment of life (pr\u00e9judice d’agr\u00e9ment<\/em>), and the moral and economic losses of close relatives. Any heading that is absent or priced at zero without reasons is a ground for challenge. You may obtain your own medical opinion from a doctor who advises victims (m\u00e9decin-conseil de victimes<\/em>), distinct from the insurer’s expert, and send the insurer a reasoned counter-valuation with supporting documents. Many files settle at this stage for a significantly higher figure once the missing evidence arrives.<\/p>\n

If the insurer misses the statutory deadlines or serves an offer that is manifestly derisory, the statute punishes the delay automatically. Article L211-13 of the Insurance Code provides: “Lorsque l’offre n’a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 faite dans les d\u00e9lais impartis \u00e0 l’article L. 211-9 , le montant de l’indemnit\u00e9 offerte par l’assureur ou allou\u00e9e par le juge \u00e0 la victime produit int\u00e9r\u00eat de plein droit au double du taux de l’int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gal \u00e0 compter de l’expiration du d\u00e9lai et jusqu’au jour de l’offre ou du jugement devenu d\u00e9finitif. Cette p\u00e9nalit\u00e9 peut \u00eatre r\u00e9duite par le juge en raison de circonstances non imputables \u00e0 l’assureur.<\/a>” Interest at twice the legal rate runs automatically from expiry of the deadline until the offer or the final judgment, and only circumstances beyond the insurer’s control allow the judge to reduce it. This is a powerful lever in negotiation, but a second Cour de cassation decision shows it must be used explicitly. On 24 May 2018 the Second Civil Chamber rejected a victim’s claim for double interest with this reasoning: “Mais attendu que M. X… n’ayant soutenu dans ses conclusions d’appel ni qu’aucune offre provisionnelle n’avait \u00e9t\u00e9 faite dans les huit mois de l’accident, ni que l’offre d\u00e9finitive du 17 novembre 2011 \u00e9tait manifestement insuffisante et incompl\u00e8te, la cour d’appel, qui n’avait pas \u00e0 proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une recherche qui ne lui \u00e9tait pas demand\u00e9e, a l\u00e9galement justifi\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision ;<\/a>” (Cour de cassation, Second Civil Chamber, 24 May 2018, appeal No 17-12.470, published in the Bulletin, rejection). The court will not investigate of its own motion; your written submissions must state precisely that no provisional offer was made within eight months of the accident, or that the final offer was manifestly insufficient and incomplete. Plead the penalty in clear terms, with dates, or lose it.<\/p>\n

When negotiation fails, the judge takes over the valuation entirely. Before the tribunal judiciaire<\/em> of the place of the accident, you can request a court-ordered medical assessment (expertise judiciaire<\/em>) by an independent expert, interim payments (provisions<\/em>) while the case continues, and a full reassessment of every head of loss, where the judge is not bound by the insurer’s figures. If your condition worsens after a settlement or a judgment, Article 2226 quoted above gives you a fresh starting point: the ten-year period for aggravated damage runs from consolidation of the aggravation, so a knee that deteriorates five years after the crash can reopen the file. Where the crash also led to a prosecution, for example for drink-driving or dangerous driving causing injury, you may join the criminal proceedings as a civil party (partie civile<\/em>) and have the criminal court rule on your compensation at the same time as guilt; the mechanism is explained step by step in our guide for British victims of crime in France who file a complaint, join the trial and claim compensation<\/a>, and the same logic applies when a road accident becomes a criminal case. Finally, if the liable driver was uninsured or fled, address the guarantee fund directly with the police report, the medical evidence and proof that no insurer can pay; the official English-language page on compensation by the guarantee fund<\/a> lists the path, and the fund then pursues the wrongdoer itself.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

A road crash in France does not leave a British victim at the mercy of an insurer’s first figure. French law applies because the damage occurred in France; the loi Badinter compensates pedestrians, passengers and cyclists for bodily injury unless an inexcusable fault was the exclusive cause of the accident, and it measures drivers by their own faults; the insurer must present a reasoned offer within three months of the claim and in any event within eight months of the accident, with a definitive offer five months after consolidation; late or derisory offers attract interest at double the legal rate when expressly pleaded; and you keep ten years from consolidation to bring your action before the court of the place of the accident. Keep the accident report, photograph everything, have every English medical document translated, never accept an incomplete offer during the cooling-off period without advice, and plead each deadline breach in writing. The statute was written so that the victim, including the British visitor who has long since driven home, is paid fully and quickly, and the judge remains available whenever the insurer forgets that purpose.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Injured on a French road after Brexit? French Badinter law decides your compensation. Who pays, the deadlines the insurer must meet, and how to challenge a low offer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16577,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80312,80314],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2154880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-british-desk","category-decryptage"],"yoast_head":"\nHurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Injured on a French road after Brexit? French Badinter law decides your compensation. Who pays, the deadlines the insurer must meet, and how to challenge a low offer.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2322,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"British Desk\",\"D\u00e9cryptage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"British Desk\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"name\":\"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":5883,\"height\":3914},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/22\\\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer","og_description":"Injured on a French road after Brexit? French Badinter law decides your compensation. Who pays, the deadlines the insurer must meet, and how to challenge a low offer.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer","datePublished":"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/"},"wordCount":2322,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp","articleSection":["British Desk","D\u00e9cryptage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"British Desk"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"}],"dateModified":"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/","name":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-22T16:09:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash-1-scaled.webp","width":5883,"height":3914},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/22\/british-road-crash-france-badinter-compensation-insurer-offer-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hurt in a Road Crash in France After Brexit: How a British Victim Gets Badinter Compensation and Challenges a Low Insurer Offer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2154880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2154880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2154880\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2154880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2154880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2154880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}