{"id":2153426,"date":"2026-10-21T01:58:28","date_gmt":"2026-10-20T23:58:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/"},"modified":"2026-10-21T01:58:28","modified_gmt":"2026-10-20T23:58:28","slug":"british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/","title":{"rendered":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"

You own a holiday home in the Dordogne, the Luberon or the Cotentin with your spouse. Both of you live in Britain, the children are grown up, and the question keeps coming back at every family gathering: how do we pass the French house on without handing the tax office a fortune, without losing control of the place while we still use it, and without the children falling out afterwards? For a growing number of British families the answer runs through three French letters: SCI, the société civile immobilière<\/em>, a family property company. The parents put the house into the company, give the children the shares in stages, and keep the usufruit<\/em>, the legal right to use the property and take its income, while the children receive only the nue-propriété<\/em>, the bare ownership that becomes full ownership later. Done properly, the structure keeps one coherent owner on the land register, freezes the value used to police the children’s forced shares, and turns a single large taxable gift into a series of smaller ones sheltered by personal allowances. Done badly, it produces blocked votes at family meetings, a five-figure registration bill on the first resale, and a file the French tax office loves to reopen. This guide explains, for a British reader, how the SCI gift works from formation to challenge, where the tax savings really sit, and which recent court decisions redraw the balance of power between parents and children.<\/p>\n

I. How British parents use an SCI to hold the French house and pass on its shares<\/h2>\n

A. Setting up the SCI and keeping control after giving the shares away<\/h3>\n

An SCI is a French civil company whose purpose is to own and manage property. In the words of the Civil Code, “La société est instituée par deux ou plusieurs personnes qui conviennent par un contrat d’affecter à une entreprise commune des biens ou leur industrie en vue de partager le bénéfice ou de profiter de l’économie qui pourra en résulter.”<\/a> Two people are enough, so a married couple can form one on their own, and the company, not the individuals, becomes the registered owner of the house. Each parent receives parts sociales<\/em>, company shares, in proportion to what they put in, and the statuts<\/em>, the articles of association, name a gérant<\/em>, a manager, who signs the insurance, the letting agreements and the repair contracts. For British owners this is the first attraction: instead of two or three individuals scattered between Kent and the Charente appearing on every deed, there is one legal person with one representative, which simplifies conveyancing, borrowing and everyday administration.<\/p>\n

The second attraction is control after the gift. Parents rarely want to hand over the keys outright; they want the children to own the value while they keep the use. French law allows exactly that split. The parents give away the nue-propriété<\/em> of their shares and keep the usufruit<\/em>, so they continue to occupy the house, receive any rent and vote on the distribution of profits, while the children hold shares that will blossom into full ownership when the usufruct ends. The voting rules for this split are written into the Civil Code: “Si une part est grevée d’un usufruit, le nu-propriétaire et l’usufruitier ont le droit de participer aux décisions collectives.”<\/a> And on the substance of the vote: “Le droit de vote appartient au nu-propriétaire, sauf pour les décisions concernant l’affectation des bénéfices, où il est réservé à l’usufruitier.”<\/a> In plain terms, the children vote on sales, borrowings and changes to the articles, while the parents decide what happens to the rental income. The articles can adjust this balance, which is why the drafting of the statuts<\/em> matters more than the choice of the vehicle itself: quorum rules, reinforced majorities for selling the house, and an agrément<\/em> clause requiring the existing shareholders to approve any new entrant decide who really governs the family company for the next twenty years.<\/p>\n

A recent decision of the Court of Cassation shows what happens when parents try to keep power without respecting the paperwork. In a family SCI where parents held only the usufruct of shares and demanded the dismissal of the daughter-manager, the Third Civil Chamber held that “l’usufruitier de parts sociales ne peut se voir reconnaître la qualité d’associé, qui n’appartient qu’au nu-propriétaire, mais qu’il doit pouvoir provoquer une délibération des associés sur une question susceptible d’avoir une incidence directe sur son droit de jouissance”<\/a> (Court of Cassation, Third Civil Chamber, 16 February 2022, appeal no. 20-15.164). The usufruct holder is therefore not a shareholder and cannot force a meeting for just any grievance, but must be able to act when the question directly affects the enjoyment of the property. For British parents this is a practical warning: keeping the usufruct protects your holidays and your rental income, but it does not make you the boss of the company. If you want to remain manager, write it into the articles and have the shareholders vote you in; do not assume the usufruct alone carries that right.<\/p>\n

Paperwork matters a second time when shares move. French law requires that “La cession de parts sociales doit être constatée par écrit.”<\/a> and that “Elle n’est opposable aux tiers qu’après accomplissement de ces formalités et après publication au registre du commerce et des sociétés ; ce dépôt peut être effectué par voie électronique.”<\/a> A transfer that is valid between the parties can therefore still be invisible to outsiders until it is registered. In May 2025 the First Civil Chamber drew the boundary of that invisibility inside families: “les héritiers du cédant des parts sociales, n’étant pas des tiers, ne pouvaient se prévaloir du défaut de publication de l’acte de cession afin de le voir déclaré inopposable à leur égard”<\/a> (Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 21 May 2025, appeal no. 23-10.119). The heirs of the person who transferred SCI shares could not demand that thirty-three shares return to the estate merely because the transfer had never been published. The lesson for British families is symmetrical. Your children will generally be bound by a gift of shares you made in proper form even if a registration step was missed, but a bank, a buyer or the tax office are outsiders who can and will rely on the missing publication. Every gift of shares should end with the transfer recorded in the company’s share register and filed with the company register, and the file kept with the notarial deed.<\/p>\n

One companion question should be settled at the same time: which national law governs your succession. Many British owners combine the SCI with an English-law will electing English law for the whole estate, a route described in our guide to choosing English law for a French house and keeping the children protected<\/a>. The SCI does not replace that will; it organises the ownership while the will organises the devolution. Where no will and no valid choice exists, French intestacy rules apply to the French property, as explained in our guide for families where a British owner dies in France without a will<\/a>. The gift of SCI shares examined below works under either route, but its interaction with the forced share differs, which is the subject of the next section.<\/p>\n

B. Valuing the gift, cutting the tax bill and surviving the forced share<\/h3>\n

French children are héritiers réservataires<\/em>, reserved heirs: the statute books guarantee them a minimum slice of the estate. The Code states that “La réserve héréditaire est la part des biens et droits successoraux dont la loi assure la dévolution libre de charges à certains héritiers dits réservataires, s’ils sont appelés à la succession et s’ils l’acceptent.”<\/a> The disposable portion, the quotité disponible<\/em>, is whatever remains.eacute; disponible<\/em>, is whatever remains. The fractions are fixed by statute: “Les libéralités, soit par actes entre vifs, soit par testament, ne pourront excéder la moitié des biens du disposant, s’il ne laisse à son décès qu’un enfant ; le tiers, s’il laisse deux enfants ; le quart, s’il en laisse trois ou un plus grand nombre.”<\/a> A British couple with two children therefore cannot give away more than one-third of their combined estates by gifts and will combined without exposing the excess to a court action for reduction, the action en réduction<\/em>, brought by the short-changed child. Gifts of SCI shares count towards that ceiling on the same basis as a gift of the house itself, which surprises families who assumed that interposing a company would hide the value. It does not; it only changes the form of what is given.<\/p>\n

The instrument that tames this risk is the donation-partage<\/em>, the parent-to-children partition gift made in a single notarial deed. The Code provides that “Toute personne peut faire, entre ses héritiers présomptifs, la distribution et le partage de ses biens et de ses droits.”<\/a> The official Service Public guidance confirms the practice in plain terms: a donation-partage is a notarial act that transmits and divides all or part of your property among your heirs before your death (Service Public, Faire une donation-partage<\/a>). Its decisive legal advantage is the freezing of values: “les biens donnés seront, sauf convention contraire, évalués au jour de la donation-partage pour l’imputation et le calcul de la réserve”<\/a>, provided every living reserved heir receives a lot, expressly accepts it, and no usufruct over a sum of money was reserved. Concretely, if the Provençal farmhouse placed in the SCI is worth 600,000 euros when the parents give the shares and worth 900,000 euros when the second parent dies fifteen years later, the forced-share calculation still uses the 600,000-euro figure. For British families watching French prices from across the Channel, that freeze is often worth more than any tax allowance: it is what allows the parents to give early, while the property is valuable but not yet at its peak, and to deprive later price rises of any power to reopen the partition.<\/p>\n

The tax arithmetic then runs on three numbers. First, each gift benefits from a personal allowance: “Pour la perception des droits de mutation à titre gratuit, il est effectué un abattement de 100 000 € sur la part de chacun des ascendants et sur la part de chacun des enfants vivants ou représentés par suite de prédécès ou de renonciation.”<\/a> Each parent can therefore give each child up to 100,000 euros with no gift tax payable, so a couple with two children can transmit 400,000 euros of share value with no duty at all. Second, the taxable surplus follows the direct-line scale, since “Les droits de mutation à titre gratuit sont fixés aux taux indiqués dans les tableaux ci-après, pour la part nette revenant à chaque ayant droit”<\/a>, starting at 5 per cent on the first 8,072 euros and climbing to 45 per cent above 1,805,677 euros. Third, giving only the bare ownership shrinks the taxable base, because the gift is valued on the nue-propriété<\/em> alone. The scale is laid down by statute according to the age of the usufruct holder, and the Code adds an important precision: “Pour déterminer la valeur de la nue-propriété, il n’est tenu compte que des usufruits ouverts au jour de la mutation de cette nue-propriété.”<\/a> Take a worked example. A house worth 500,000 euros is held by an SCI with 100 shares. The father, aged 63, gives his 50 shares to the couple’s only child keeping the usufruct; at that age the usufruct is worth half, so the bare ownership given is worth 125,000 euros. The 100,000-euro allowance absorbs most of it, leaving 25,000 euros taxable at the bottom rates, a bill of roughly 3,900 euros. Had the father given full ownership of the same half, the taxable amount after allowance would have been 150,000 euros and the bill around 23,000 euros. The usufruct split does not abolish the tax, but it divides it by a factor the family can plan around, and the same arithmetic repeats for the mother’s shares and, where the family is larger, for each child.<\/p>\n

Two cautions complete the picture. First, the heirs are seised of the estate by operation of law, since “Les héritiers désignés par la loi sont saisis de plein droit des biens, droits et actions du défunt.”<\/a> A gift of shares therefore never removes the property from the succession calculations; it advances the child’s portion and will be brought back into account, the rapport<\/em>, when the estate is divided, unless the gift was made as an extra share with the agreement of all. Families who give shares to one child and cash to another should say so expressly in the deed and keep the valuations consistent. Second, where the parents hold the house directly rather than through a company, the economics differ: our companion guide to gifting a French house to the children by notarial deed<\/a> compares the direct route, with its own allowance and valuation logic. The SCI route earns its extra formation cost only when the family wants staged gifts, retained control through usufruct, and a single owner of record; for a one-off outright gift to a single child, the direct deed is usually cheaper and simpler.<\/p>\n

II. What the SCI changes when the family sells, lets or falls out<\/h2>\n

A. Selling the shares or the house, and the furnished-letting question<\/h3>\n

Sooner or later the family sells: the parents downsize, the children disagree about keeping the house, or a buyer appears with an offer nobody wants to refuse. An SCI offers two doors, and their costs differ sharply. Door one is the sale of the house by the company, followed by distribution of the cash; each shareholder is then taxed on the gain according to their own position, because a family SCI paying tax under the income-tax regime is transparent. The Code states the principle plainly: “les associés ou actionnaires sont personnellement soumis à l’impôt sur le revenu ou à l’impôt sur les sociétés, suivant le cas, pour la part des revenus sociaux correspondant à leurs droits dans la société”<\/a>. Door two is the sale of the shares themselves, where the buyer steps into the company and the house never changes registered owner. That second door carries its own registration duty: “pour les cessions de participations dans des personnes morales à prépondérance immobilière”<\/a> the duty is set at 5 per cent of the price, while “pour les cessions, autres que celles soumises au taux mentionné au 2°, de parts sociales dans les sociétés dont le capital n’est pas divisé en actions”<\/a> the rate is 3 per cent with “un abattement égal au rapport entre la somme de 23 000 € et le nombre total de parts sociales de la société”<\/a> applied to each share. A family SCI owning a single French house is the textbook example of a company with a preponderance of real estate, so buyers of its shares generally face the 5 per cent charge on the full price, with no allowance comparable to the notarial scale on direct property sales. British sellers should therefore price the two doors honestly: selling shares saves the buyer no duty and obliges a discount for the latent capital-gains tax sleeping inside the company, while selling the house outright gives the buyer a clean asset at the standard conveyancing cost.<\/p>\n

The letting question deserves the same honesty. Many British owners want the house to pay its way through holiday lets when the family is not using it, and an SCI at income tax can receive that rent transparently, each shareholder declaring their slice. But furnished holiday letting is treated in France as a commercial activity, and a civil company that carries on a commercial activity on a regular basis can be pushed into corporation tax, losing the personal capital-gains allowances that made the transparent SCI attractive in the first place. The boundary between occasional letting that stays civil and a genuine furnished-letting business is fact-sensitive: number of properties, services supplied, registration steps and accounting presentation all count. Before signing any management contract with a rental agency, the family should ask its notaire and accountant to confirm in writing which side of the line the planned letting falls on, and have the articles reviewed so that the company’s stated object covers what it will actually do. A short written clearance at the outset costs a fraction of a reassessment later, and it is the document a buyer will ask for when the shares are eventually sold.<\/p>\n

British buyers arriving now sometimes reverse the sequence: they form the SCI first and buy through it. That purchase route, with its own conveyancing logic, belongs to the buying guides rather than to this article, but one coordination point matters here. If the plan is for the parents to buy through a new SCI and start giving shares within months, the formation and the first gift should be designed together, so that the articles already contain the usufruct voting rules, the approval clause and the manager provisions the later gifts will rely on. Retrofitting protective clauses after the children already hold shares requires their consent, which is exactly when consent becomes hardest to obtain.<\/p>\n

B. Falling out, splitting up and answering the tax office<\/h3>\n

Family companies survive only as long as the family agrees, and the statute books provide an exit when agreement ends. The Code lists the ways a company comes to an end, including “Par la dissolution anticipée prononcée par le tribunal à la demande d’un associé pour justes motifs, notamment en cas d’inexécution de ses obligations par un associé, ou de mésentente entre associés paralysant le fonctionnement de la société”<\/a>. Mésentente<\/em>, a deadlock between shareholders that paralyses the company, is therefore a statutory ground for asking the tribunal judiciaire<\/em>, the ordinary civil court, to wind the company up early. British siblings who inherited equal shareholdings and now disagree about everything, from the colour of the shutters to the choice of letting agent, should understand both edges of this remedy. It guarantees that nobody can be locked inside a paralysed company for ever, but it ends with the sale of the house and the division of the cash, which is usually the outcome everyone was trying to avoid. Cheaper protections belong earlier in the story: a buy-out formula in the articles, an independent manager while tempers cool, and a mediation clause that forces a pause before any court filing.<\/p>\n

Divorce adds a second fault line. Where British spouses formed the SCI together, the shares follow the couple’s matrimonial property regime: shares bought with joint funds during a community regime are joint property to be divided, while shares owned before the marriage or received by gift or inheritance generally stay personal. The French-English interaction of those regimes, including what happens to the house on divorce or death and how a couple can change regime after moving to France, is examined in our guide for couples married in England and living in France<\/a>. Within the SCI itself, the spouse who keeps the shares usually buys out the other, and that buy-out is a transfer of shares carrying the registration duties described above. Valuing the shares for the buy-out is the recurring battleground: the company’s accounts show a historic cost, the house has a market value, and the latent capital-gains tax plus the 5 per cent duty on any later share sale sit between the two. An independent valuation that states all three figures, commissioned jointly before negotiations harden, settles more cases than any exchange of solicitors’ letters.<\/p>\n

Then there is the tax office. The French administration reads SCI returns with experienced eyes, and British-owned structures attract attention on familiar points: rental income omitted because it landed in a UK account, a gift of shares declared at an optimistic valuation, administrative penalties added to the duty, and the usufruct valued at the wrong age band. When the administration disagrees, it sends its reasoned adjustments and the taxpayer replies with evidence: the notarial deeds, the share register, the bank statements showing where the rent actually went, the valuer’s report supporting the price, and the calculation sheets for the allowances claimed. Our walkthrough of answering a French tax audit letter as a British resident<\/a> sets out that exchange step by step, including how penalties can be contained and how the bill itself can be challenged. Three habits decide most files. Keep the company’s paperwork where the notaire can find it, especially the registered transfers that the 2025 decision above shows families neglect. Have valuations done by an independent professional before the gift, not after the challenge. And never let a family member sign a transfer or a company account they have not read: the signature binds the company even when the signatory did not understand the French text, and unwinding it requires the very court proceedings the structure was meant to avoid. Where the adjustment stands, the remedy runs through the administrative courts, and the UK-France double tax treaty remains available to prevent the same income being taxed twice, a mechanism the treaty guides on this site explain in detail.<\/p>\n

A final word on residence status for the parents who run the company from Britain. Managing a French SCI from a Kent kitchen does not by itself make anyone French tax resident, but receiving French rental income, spending long periods in the house and holding French directorships all feed the residence tests both countries apply, and the UK’s own guidance for citizens settled abroad, including the official Living in France<\/a> pages, reminds readers to check registration, healthcare and tax position in both states. Keep a simple annual file: days spent in each country, rental statements, company minutes and tax returns on both sides of the Channel. If residence is ever questioned, that file, not memory, decides the outcome.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The SCI earns its place in a British family’s French planning when three conditions meet: the parents want to give the house’s value to the children in stages rather than all at once, they want to keep the use and the rental income while they are alive to enjoy them, and they accept the discipline of company paperwork in exchange. The staged gift of bare ownership, sheltered by the 100,000-euro allowance per parent per child and valued with the usufruct stripped out, usually beats any single outright transfer on tax. The donation-partage in a single notarial deed then freezes the values that count towards the children’s forced shares, so that later price rises enrich the children instead of endangering the partition. Against those gains stand real costs: formation and annual accounting fees, a 5 per cent duty when the shares change hands for money, the loss of simplicity if the company starts trading furnished lets, and the deadlock remedies that end, when agreement fails, with the sale of the house itself. None of those costs is a reason to reject the structure, and none of the gains is a reason to adopt it blindly. The families who prosper with an SCI are the ones who draft the articles as carefully as the gift, register every transfer, value honestly, and keep the file that answers the tax office before the question is asked.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How British parents use a French SCI to gift holiday-home shares to the children, keep control through usufruct, cut gift tax and survive the forced share.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16309,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80312,80314],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2153426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-british-desk","category-decryptage"],"yoast_head":"\nBritish Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"How British parents use a French SCI to gift holiday-home shares to the children, keep control through usufruct, cut gift tax and survive the forced share.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"20 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4097,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"British Desk\",\"D\u00e9cryptage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"British Desk\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"name\":\"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"width\":5472,\"height\":3648},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/21\\\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill","og_description":"How British parents use a French SCI to gift holiday-home shares to the children, keep control through usufruct, cut gift tax and survive the forced share.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"20 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill","datePublished":"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/"},"wordCount":4097,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp","articleSection":["British Desk","D\u00e9cryptage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"British Desk"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"}],"dateModified":"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/","name":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-20T23:58:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alesia-kazantceva-RTiVDW3h5s8-unsplash-scaled.webp","width":5472,"height":3648},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/21\/british-sci-shares-gift-children-usufruct-control-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"British Parents, French Holiday Home in an SCI After Brexit: Gifting the Shares to the Children, Keeping Control, and Challenging the Tax Bill"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2153426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153426\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2153426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2153426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2153426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}