{"id":2147034,"date":"2026-10-13T15:09:38","date_gmt":"2026-10-13T13:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/"},"modified":"2026-10-13T15:09:38","modified_gmt":"2026-10-13T13:09:38","slug":"british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/","title":{"rendered":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"

You have held the same French house for twenty years, you fly in for Easter, summer and Christmas, and you have never needed a visa. Then one Friday evening at the Gare du Nord or at Nice airport, the border officer frowns at the screen, counts on fingers, and tells you that you have exhausted your 90 days. Or worse: months later a letter orders you to leave France within thirty days and warns of a multi-year ban from returning. Since Brexit, British citizens are third-country nationals in the Schengen area: every short stay in France, Spain, Italy or Greece draws from a single shared allowance of 90 days in any 180-day period, and overstaying can end in a refusal of entry (refus d’entr\u00e9e<\/em>), a stay in the border holding area (zone d’attente<\/em>), or a formal order to leave French territory (obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais<\/em>, universally shortened to OQTF). This article explains, for a British reader, how the count works, what officers can do when it goes wrong, and how to challenge each decision within the short time limits the law sets. French terms are translated at first use.<\/p>\n

Read this before your next trip, not after a refusal. The 90-day count is rolling and backward-looking: the officer counts your presence over the 180 days before each entry, including trips you have half forgotten. The British government’s own travel advice for France confirms the headline rule and warns that visits to other Schengen countries in the previous 180 days count toward the same 90 days, and that overstaying can bring a ban from Schengen countries of up to three years \u2014 see the official gov.uk France entry-requirements page<\/a>. What follows is the French-law machinery behind that warning.<\/p>\n

I. How the 90\/180-day count traps British visitors \u2014 and what happens when the border says no<\/h2>\n

Two moments decide everything: the arithmetic of your past trips, and the few hours at the border desk when an officer disputes it. British second-home owners are the classic casualties, because four long visits a year easily breach the ceiling while each visit feels short on its own. If you own the house itself, our companion guide on French property tax for British second-home owners<\/a> covers the tax side; this article covers the border side. The two halves of this section take the count first, then the refusal.<\/p>\n

A. Counting your 90 days across the whole Schengen area<\/h3>\n

The rule is one shared pot, not 90 days per country. Days spent anywhere in the Schengen area \u2014 France plus, among your likely destinations, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, the Netherlands and Germany \u2014 all draw from the same allowance of 90 days within any rolling 180-day window. Days in Ireland do not count, because Ireland is outside Schengen; days in Britain obviously do not count either. Both the day you arrive and the day you leave count as full days of presence. A typical trap looks like this: 21 days at Easter in the Dordogne, 45 days in summer split between France and Spain, 30 days across autumn half-term and Christmas \u2014 96 days inside a 180-day window, six days over, and an overstay recorded against your name even though no single trip looked excessive.<\/p>\n

Work one concrete example through to the end, because the border officer will. You spend 16 December to 6 January in the French house (22 days counting both end days), 6 to 27 April around Bergerac (22 days), 13 July to 10 August split between the house and a week in San Sebasti\u00e1n (29 days), and 19 to 31 October for half-term (13 days). Enter France again on 20 December and the officer looks back to late June: the April trip has only just dropped out, the summer and autumn trips are inside, and the Christmas trip itself keeps adding days as it runs. Totals in the high eighties leave no margin for a delayed Eurotunnel crossing or an extra weekend \u2014 and crossing into the nineties turns a routine arrival into a refusal file. Recalculate before every single trip, against the planned return date, and treat anything above 80 days as a red light.<\/p>\n

Three counting subtleties catch Britons out. First, the window rolls: on any given entry date, the officer looks back 180 days, so a long-ago trip drops out of the count only once it is more than 180 days behind you. Second, entries through other Schengen states still count: flying London\u2013Malaga, driving up through Spain into France, and flying home from Bergerac is one continuous Schengen stay, and French territory rules then apply to the whole of it. The statute says so directly for people arriving overland from inside Schengen: \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger en provenance directe du territoire d’un des \u00c9tats parties \u00e0 la convention sign\u00e9e \u00e0 Schengen le 19 juin 1990 peut se voir appliquer les 1\u00b0 et 2\u00b0 de l’article L. 611-1 lorsqu’il ne peut justifier \u00eatre entr\u00e9 ou s’\u00eatre maintenu sur le territoire m\u00e9tropolitain en se conformant aux stipulations des paragraphes 1 et 2 de l’article 19, du paragraphe 1 de l’article 20 et des paragraphes 1 et 2 de l’article 21 de cette m\u00eame convention. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 611-2<\/a>). In plain terms, slipping into France by road from Spain does not reset anything. Third, a foreign alert follows you: France can enforce another Schengen state’s removal decision against a person flagged for non-admission who is unlawfully on French soil, since \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger a fait l’objet d’un signalement aux fins de non-admission en vertu d’une d\u00e9cision de refus d’entr\u00e9e ou d’\u00e9loignement ex\u00e9cutoire prise par l’un des autres \u00c9tats parties \u00e0 la convention sign\u00e9e \u00e0 Schengen le 19 juin 1990 et se trouve irr\u00e9guli\u00e8rement sur le territoire m\u00e9tropolitain \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 615-1<\/a>). A Spanish refusal can therefore bite on your next arrival in France.<\/p>\n

Practical discipline beats cleverness. Keep every boarding pass, Eurostar ticket, motorway toll receipt and hotel invoice: since systematic passport stamping is being replaced by electronic recording, your own paper trail is your evidence if the count is disputed. Count before each trip using the 180 days behind your planned return date, not your departure date, and leave a margin of several days. If your life genuinely requires more than 90 days \u2014 retirement in the French house, extended family care \u2014 do not gamble on the border officer’s arithmetic: apply from Britain for a French long-stay visa before travelling, as explained in our British newcomer’s guide to French visas and residence cards<\/a>. A visa-holder is outside the 90-day pot entirely.<\/p>\n

B. Refused entry: the written decision, your rights, and the holding area<\/h3>\n

When the officer says no, the refusal is not a shrug and a turned back: it is a formal administrative decision with mandatory contents and immediate rights. The statute authorises it bluntly: \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger qui ne satisfait pas aux conditions d’admission pr\u00e9vues au titre I peut faire l’objet d’une d\u00e9cision de refus d’entr\u00e9e, sans pr\u00e9judice des dispositions particuli\u00e8res relatives au droit d’asile et \u00e0 la protection internationale ou \u00e0 la d\u00e9livrance de visas de long s\u00e9jour. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 332-1<\/a>). Exhausted 90-day allowance, missing proof of accommodation or means, or an alert in the shared systems are the standard grounds for a Briton \u2014 not criminality, just arithmetic and paperwork.<\/p>\n

Insist on the paper and read it before signing anything. The law requires that \u00ab La d\u00e9cision de refus d’entr\u00e9e, qui est \u00e9crite et motiv\u00e9e, est prise par un agent relevant d’une cat\u00e9gorie fix\u00e9e par voie r\u00e9glementaire. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 332-2<\/a>). The notification must tell you of your right to warn, or have warned, the person you were to visit, your consulate, or a lawyer of your choice \u2014 and it must tell you of a right many travellers never learn they have: \u00ab Elle mentionne le droit de l’\u00e9tranger de refuser d’\u00eatre rapatri\u00e9 avant l’expiration du d\u00e9lai d’un jour franc dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l’article L. 333-2 . \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 332-2<\/a>). That jour franc<\/em>, one full clear day, is breathing space: you cannot be put on the next plane home the same evening if you invoke it, which gives your family time to send the missing booking confirmations or instruct a lawyer. The same article adds that \u00ab La d\u00e9cision et la notification des droits qui l’accompagne lui sont communiqu\u00e9es dans une langue qu’il comprend. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 332-2<\/a>). If you were handed a French-only form you could not read, that defect matters for everything that follows.<\/p>\n

Use the clear day actively. Call your consulate and a lawyer immediately \u2014 the notification itself tells you that you may warn them \u2014 and get relatives to email the missing evidence straight to you: the return booking, the hotel confirmations for the nights in question, the travel insurance, the proof of funds. Ask for every further document in writing and in English, note the names and numbers of the officers, and never sign a statement you cannot read. If you are travelling with children, say so at once and keep the family together: the statute singles out vulnerable people, especially accompanied and unaccompanied minors, for particular attention, and separation in the holding area is challengeable on that ground alone.<\/p>\n

If return cannot happen at once, you may be held in the border holding area, the zone d’attente<\/em>: a closed transit facility at the airport, port or station, not a police cell and not French soil in legal fiction \u2014 you are deemed not yet to have entered France. The first 96 hours rest on the administration’s decision, but beyond that a judge must authorise continued holding: \u00ab Le maintien en zone d’attente au-del\u00e0 de quatre-vingt-seize heures \u00e0 compter de la d\u00e9cision de placement initiale peut \u00eatre autoris\u00e9, par le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire statuant sur l’exercice effectif des droits reconnus \u00e0 l’\u00e9tranger, pour une dur\u00e9e qui ne peut \u00eatre sup\u00e9rieure \u00e0 huit jours. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 342-1<\/a>). Note what the judge examines: the effective exercise of your rights \u2014 interpreter, lawyer, doctor, contact with family \u2014 not whether the refusal was well founded. Owning a house in France, holding a return ticket and having family waiting do not, by themselves, spring the lock: \u00ab L’existence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation de l’\u00e9tranger n’est pas \u00e0 elle seule susceptible de justifier le refus de prolongation de son maintien en zone d’attente. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 342-10<\/a>).<\/p>\n

A very recent Paris ruling shows the machinery in motion. On 9 May 2026 the Paris Court of Appeal overturned a first judge who had refused to extend a traveller’s holding, precisely because the first judge had reviewed the merits of the refusal itself (Paris Court of Appeal, 9 May 2026, docket no. 26\/02575<\/a>). The court recalled that the challenge to a refusal belongs to a different judge entirely, since the refusal is an administrative act \u00ab dont le contentieux \u00e9chappe au juge judiciaire pour relever de la seule comp\u00e9tence du juge administratif \u00bb<\/em> (Paris Court of Appeal, 9 May 2026, docket no. 26\/02575<\/a>). Finding the procedure regular as to the effective exercise of rights, it concluded: \u00ab Il convient donc d’infirmer l’ordonnance du premier juge et d’ordonner, en l’absence d’autres moyens et au regard de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure quant \u00e0 l’exercice effectif des droits reconnus \u00e0 l’\u00e9tranger, la prolongation du maintien en zone d’attente. \u00bb<\/em> (Paris Court of Appeal, 9 May 2026, docket no. 26\/02575<\/a>). The lesson for a Briton held at Roissy or Coquelles: argue rights and procedure before the judicial judge, and attack the refusal itself before the administrative court \u2014 and note that cassation review of the holding order remains open, since \u00ab Le d\u00e9lai de pourvoi en cassation est de deux mois \u00e0 compter de la notification. \u00bb<\/em> (Paris Court of Appeal, 9 May 2026, docket no. 26\/02575<\/a>).<\/p>\n

II. Overstaying inside France: the removal order, the return ban, and how to fight them<\/h2>\n

Getting past the border does not end the risk: prefectures, police checks and even a routine traffic stop can surface an expired allowance months later. Inside the territory, the instrument is no longer refusal of entry but the OQTF, usually paired with a voluntary-departure period and potentially followed by a ban on returning (interdiction de retour sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais<\/em>, shortened to IRTF). This section separates the order itself from the remedies, because the remedies die in days while the order lasts for years.<\/p>\n

A. The removal order, the thirty-day clock, and the return ban<\/h3>\n

The OQTF is the standard tool against overstayers, and its legal definition names your situation almost word for word. The administration may order a foreigner to leave where \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger, entr\u00e9 sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais sous couvert d’un visa d\u00e9sormais expir\u00e9 ou, n’\u00e9tant pas soumis \u00e0 l’obligation du visa, entr\u00e9 en France plus de trois mois auparavant, s’est maintenu sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais sans \u00eatre titulaire d’un titre de s\u00e9jour ou, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, sans demander le renouvellement du titre de s\u00e9jour temporaire ou pluriannuel qui lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9livr\u00e9 \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 611-1<\/a>). A visa-exempt Briton who entered more than three months ago and holds no residence permit fits the second branch exactly. The same article covers clandestine entry, refused or withdrawn permits, rejected asylum claims, threats to public order and unauthorised work \u2014 but ordinary British overstay lives in that second clause.<\/p>\n

An OQTF normally comes with time to leave on your own: \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger faisant l’objet d’une d\u00e9cision portant obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais dispose d’un d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9part volontaire de trente jours \u00e0 compter de la notification de cette d\u00e9cision. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 612-1<\/a>). Thirty days from notification \u2014 use them to organise departure, not to hope the letter goes away, because ignoring the clock triggers the harshest consequence. If you are still in France after the voluntary period expires, the administration moves from invitation to prohibition: \u00ab Lorsque l’\u00e9tranger s’est maintenu irr\u00e9guli\u00e8rement sur le territoire au-del\u00e0 du d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9part volontaire, l’autorit\u00e9 administrative \u00e9dicte une interdiction de retour. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 612-7<\/a>). Humanitarian circumstances can excuse the ban, but the default is automatic, and its reach is long: \u00ab Les effets de cette interdiction cessent \u00e0 l’expiration d’une dur\u00e9e, fix\u00e9e par l’autorit\u00e9 administrative, qui ne peut exc\u00e9der cinq ans \u00e0 compter de l’ex\u00e9cution de l’obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 612-7<\/a>). Up to five years barred from France \u2014 and, through the shared alert systems, effectively from the Schengen area \u2014 for the sake of a miscounted summer. Serve the thirty days, keep proof of departure, and the ban normally never arises.<\/p>\n

Two common British situations deserve a special warning. First, the pending-application trap: filing a carte de s\u00e9jour request after the allowance has already expired does not neutralise an OQTF already notified, and prefectures routinely refuse late applications and order departure in the same envelope. File renewals and first applications months before expiry, never after a control. Second, the departure trap: leaving France quietly without keeping proof \u2014 no boarding pass, no stamped exit record, no dated receipt \u2014 can leave the file showing you still inside, with the voluntary period expiring on paper while you are already home in Kent. Depart through a controlled point, keep everything, and have your lawyer confirm the file records your exit.<\/p>\n

B. Challenging the order before the administrative court \u2014 in days, not months<\/h3>\n

Every element of the package can be challenged \u2014 the OQTF, the residence decision behind it, the voluntary-departure period, and any accompanying return ban \u2014 but the challenge goes to the administrative court (tribunal administratif<\/em>), never to the criminal or civil courts, and the clock is brutally short. The statute opens the door in one sentence: \u00ab La d\u00e9cision portant obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais ainsi que la d\u00e9cision relative au s\u00e9jour, la d\u00e9cision relative au d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9part volontaire et l’interdiction de retour sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais qui l’accompagnent, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, peuvent \u00eatre contest\u00e9es devant le tribunal administratif selon la proc\u00e9dure pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l’article L. 911-1. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 614-1<\/a>). A later return ban imposed after expiry of the departure period has its own route: it \u00ab peut \u00eatre contest\u00e9e devant le tribunal administratif selon la proc\u00e9dure pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l’article L. 921-1 ou, lorsque l’\u00e9tranger est plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention administrative, selon la proc\u00e9dure pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l’article L. 921-2. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 614-4<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Under the fast-track procedure, the numbers leave no room for delay: \u00ab Lorsqu’une disposition du pr\u00e9sent code pr\u00e9voit qu’une d\u00e9cision peut \u00eatre contest\u00e9e selon la proc\u00e9dure pr\u00e9vue au pr\u00e9sent article, le tribunal administratif peut \u00eatre saisi dans le d\u00e9lai de sept jours \u00e0 compter de la notification de la d\u00e9cision. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 921-1<\/a>), and \u00ab Sous r\u00e9serve de l’article L. 921-4, il statue dans un d\u00e9lai de quinze jours \u00e0 compter de l’introduction du recours. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 921-1<\/a>). Seven days to file, fifteen for the court to rule. Money must not be the reason you miss those seven days: \u00ab L’\u00e9tranger peut demander le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l’aide juridictionnelle, au plus tard lors de l’introduction de son recours. \u00bb<\/em> (CESEDA, Article L. 911-1<\/a>), meaning state-funded legal aid can be requested when the appeal is lodged.<\/p>\n

Prepare the legal-aid request at the same time as the appeal, not afterwards. Bring the OQTF and all its annexes, your passport, proof of the date you received the letter, and evidence of your means \u2014 or lack of them \u2014 to the first meeting with the lawyer, because aid must be requested no later than when the case is filed and a late request cannot be repaired. If removal is imminent, your lawyer can also ask the court for interim protection freezing enforcement until the judgment: these emergency requests live or die on proof of urgency and serious doubt, so the day-by-day trip reconstruction and the procedural defects are their fuel as well.<\/p>\n

What wins these appeals in practice is arithmetic and paperwork, not indignation. Rebuild the 180-day window day by day with tickets and receipts; show the miscount, the stamped visa that restarted the position, or the pending long-stay application that should have suspended removal. Attack the form as well as the substance: an unmotivated decision, notification in a language you do not understand, or a file that never mentions your British spouse, your French property, or your children’s schooling are all reviewable faults. And if the prefecture never gave voluntary departure at all \u2014 immediate-enforcement OQTFs exist for public-order cases \u2014 the deadlines compress further still, which is why the letter must go to a lawyer the day it arrives, not the week after.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The border and the prefecture both count; you should count first. Track every Schengen day against the rolling 180-day window, keep the tickets that prove it, and convert long French stays into long-stay visas applied for from Britain before you travel. If you are stopped, demand the written reasoned decision, invoke the clear day, and split your defence correctly: rights and procedure before the judicial judge in the holding area, the refusal itself before the administrative court. If an OQTF arrives, treat the seven-day appeal window as the emergency it is, prove departure within the thirty days, and never let a missed deadline harden into a five-year return ban.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

British passport, French border: how the 90-days-in-180 count works after Brexit, what a refusal of entry and the holding area mean, and how to challenge an OQTF or return ban.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16396,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80312,80314],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2147034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-british-desk","category-decryptage"],"yoast_head":"\nStopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"British passport, French border: how the 90-days-in-180 count works after Brexit, what a refusal of entry and the holding area mean, and how to challenge an OQTF or return ban.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\\\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3268,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"British Desk\",\"D\u00e9cryptage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\\\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"British Desk\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/\",\"name\":\"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\\\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"width\":7086,\"height\":4724},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/13\\\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\\\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge","og_description":"British passport, French border: how the 90-days-in-180 count works after Brexit, what a refusal of entry and the holding area mean, and how to challenge an OQTF or return ban.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge","datePublished":"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/"},"wordCount":3268,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp","articleSection":["British Desk","D\u00e9cryptage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"British Desk"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"}],"dateModified":"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/","name":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton's 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-13T13:09:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-hNQAWN4t99A-unsplash-scaled.webp","width":7086,"height":4724},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/13\/british-schengen-90-180-overstay-refusal-entry-oqtf-challenge-brexit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Stopped at the French Border After Brexit: the Briton’s 90\/180-Day Count, Refusal of Entry, the Holding Area and How to Challenge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2147034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2147034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2147034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2147034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2147034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2147034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}