{"id":2144268,"date":"2026-10-10T12:52:59","date_gmt":"2026-10-10T10:52:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/"},"modified":"2026-10-10T12:52:59","modified_gmt":"2026-10-10T10:52:59","slug":"foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/","title":{"rendered":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"

You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, and a letter from the French tax administration has just landed on your desk \u2014 or, more likely, in the inbox of your Paris accountant, who forwards it with a worried message. Your French company, the soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions simplifi\u00e9e<\/em> (SAS, the flexible joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) or soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e<\/em> (SARL, the limited liability company with stricter operating rules) that you set up to invoice French clients, will be audited. The letter has a formal name \u2014 an avis de v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9<\/em> (audit notice, the document that opens a verification of your company’s accounts) \u2014 and it names the financial years under review, the auditor who will come, and the date of his first visit to your French premises. Your first reflex is to panic about the distance: how do you defend a tax audit in a country where you do not live, in a language you may not read fluently, against an administration whose powers you have never tested? The reassuring answer is that the French tax audit is one of the most strictly choreographed procedures in French law. Every step \u2014 the notice, the on-site checks, the reasoned reassessment proposal, the hierarchical appeals, the independent commission, the formal claim and the administrative judge \u2014 follows written rules, carries deadlines that protect you as much as they bind you, and produces documents you can answer from abroad through a representative. This guide follows that choreography in order: first the verification phase that starts with the notice, then the rectification phase where the administration prices its claims and where you challenge them, with the Paris specifics where they change the practice for a company registered in the capital.<\/p>\n

I. What does the audit notice trigger, and how do you run the verification from abroad?<\/h2>\n

The audit notice is not a sanction and not a bill. It is the starting signal of a verification of your accounts (v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9<\/em>, the on-site audit during which tax inspectors examine the company’s books, supporting documents and computer systems at its premises), and French law treats that starting signal so seriously that forgetting it annuls everything that follows. Understanding what the notice must contain, what the auditors may and may not do on site, and how long they may stay gives you the three levers that matter most at this stage: appointing the right representative, preparing the exact documents, and watching the clock. If you chose your company form with our guide to choosing between an SAS, a SARL, a branch and a subsidiary in France<\/a>, and if you already follow the rhythm of French corporate taxation described in our guide to French corporate tax rates, instalments and filing for companies run from abroad<\/a>, this audit is the moment where those filings are tested line by line \u2014 and where procedure is your strongest defence.<\/p>\n

A. The notice, your right to counsel and the charter: the three lines that decide whether the whole audit survives<\/h3>\n

The rule that opens every audit fits in one sentence of the tax procedure code (Livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales<\/em>, abbreviated LPF, the statute that governs how the French tax administration checks, reassesses and collects tax): Les agents de l’administration des imp\u00f4ts v\u00e9rifient sur place, en suivant les r\u00e8gles pr\u00e9vues par le pr\u00e9sent livre, la comptabilit\u00e9 des contribuables astreints \u00e0 tenir et \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter des documents comptables.<\/a> Auditors verify on site, following the rules of that same book \u2014 which means every guarantee written in the book applies to your company, including when its shareholder lives on another continent. The most important guarantee arrives before the auditors do. The statute provides that Cet avis doit pr\u00e9ciser les ann\u00e9es soumises \u00e0 v\u00e9rification et mentionner express\u00e9ment, sous peine de nullit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, que le contribuable a la facult\u00e9 de se faire assister par un conseil de son choix.<\/a> Read that twice: the notice must name the audited years and must expressly state that you may be assisted by an adviser of your choice \u2014 an accountant (expert-comptable<\/em>), a tax lawyer (avocat fiscaliste<\/em>), or both \u2014 and forgetting either mention annuls the entire procedure (nullit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/em>, the sanction that wipes out the audit and the reassessments built on it). The notice must also tell you that the taxpayers’ charter (charte des droits et obligations du contribuable v\u00e9rifi\u00e9<\/em>, the official booklet listing your rights during a tax audit) is available on the tax administration’s website or on request. From abroad, your first three actions in the first 48 hours are therefore simple: check that the notice names the years and mentions your right to counsel, download or request the charter, and appoint your representative in writing. A short engagement letter giving your Paris accountant or lawyer authority to receive documents, attend meetings and sign correspondence in your company’s name removes the distance problem at a stroke \u2014 the administration then deals with a professional in Paris while you decide by email and videoconference.<\/p>\n

The scope of what the auditors may examine is wider than many foreign founders expect, and a 2020 decision of the highest administrative court (Conseil d’\u00c9tat<\/em>, the supreme court for tax disputes) confirmed it. The court held that everyday checkout and accounting software counts as a computerised accounting system subject to inspection: doivent \u00eatre regard\u00e9s comme des syst\u00e8mes informatis\u00e9s de tenue de comptabilit\u00e9, au sens des articles L. 13 et L. 47 A du livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales<\/a> \u2014 including cash registers and comparable equipment running software that feeds, even indirectly, into the daily takings centralised in the accounts. For your company this has a concrete consequence: the auditors may ask for the fichier des \u00e9critures comptables<\/em> (FEC, the standardised electronic file of all accounting entries that every French company using computerised accounts must be able to produce), run their own computer checks on it, and compare the software’s raw data with the declared turnover. If your bookkeeping is kept in English-language cloud software by a provider outside France, tell your accountant now: the file must be producible in the French standard format, and gaps or unreadable exports are treated as irregularities, not as technical excuses. The same decision recalls the notice requirements word for word, which is why Paris auditors now send highly standardised letters \u2014 check yours against the two mandatory mentions rather than assuming any official-looking letter qualifies. When the company is registered in Paris, the file is handled by the Paris corporate tax offices of the national tax authority (Direction g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des finances publiques<\/em>, abbreviated DGFIP, the French tax administration, acting locally through the Service des imp\u00f4ts des entreprises<\/em>, abbreviated SIE, the office that manages each company’s corporate tax, VAT and audit files), and the auditor named in your notice belongs to the brigade covering your arrondissement: all correspondence, document deliveries and meeting requests go through that office, so your representative’s first letter should confirm his mandate there and ask for a single point of contact for scheduling.<\/p>\n

Two practical points complete the opening phase. First, the look-back period is limited: for corporate tax (imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s<\/em>, abbreviated IS, the tax on company profits, which applies to profits made by businesses operated in France since les b\u00e9n\u00e9fices passibles de l’imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sont d\u00e9termin\u00e9s d’apr\u00e8s les r\u00e8gles fix\u00e9es par les articles 34 \u00e0 45<\/a>), Pour l’imp\u00f4t sur le revenu et l’imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, le droit de reprise de l’administration des imp\u00f4ts s’exerce jusqu’\u00e0 la fin de la troisi\u00e8me ann\u00e9e qui suit celle au titre de laquelle l’imposition est due.<\/a> In practice, an audit opened in 2026 normally reaches back to 2023, 2024 and 2025 \u2014 three years, extended to ten only in cases of hidden activity or fraud, which a regularly filing foreign-owned company should never trigger. Check the years named in your notice against that three-year window: anything older needs a justification you should ask your counsel to demand in writing. Second, never ignore the notice because you live far away. An unanswered audit continues without you, the reassessment that follows becomes enforceable, and every later challenge starts from a weaker position. Distance is not a defence in French tax procedure \u2014 but representation cures distance entirely, and the administration is used to dealing with mandated professionals for companies whose directors live abroad.<\/p>\n

B. The on-site verification run from abroad: duration, documents, behaviour and the closing interview<\/h3>\n

Once the notice period has run, the auditors come to your French premises \u2014 your office, your accountant’s office if the books are kept there by agreement, or occasionally their own offices if you agree. For a small or medium-sized company, which covers almost every foreign-founded SAS or SARL in its first years, the statute caps the intrusion: la v\u00e9rification sur place des livres ou documents comptables ne peut s’\u00e9tendre sur une dur\u00e9e sup\u00e9rieure \u00e0 trois mois<\/a>. Three months on site, on pain of annulment of the resulting tax \u2014 a hard ceiling your counsel should diary from the first visit. The cap concerns the on-site presence, not the whole procedure: the administration may still study your written observations afterwards and examine private bank accounts used for business under separate provisions, but auditors camping in your office for four months build their reassessment on sand. From abroad, ask your representative to keep a dated log of every visit, every document handed over with a receipt (d\u00e9charge<\/em>), and every request left pending: that log is the evidence that turns a duration overrun or a missing step into an annulment later.<\/p>\n

What the auditors actually do during those weeks follows a predictable pattern, and knowing it removes most of the anxiety. They start with coherence checks \u2014 turnover against bank credits, margins against the sector, salaries against declarations, VAT returns against accounting revenue \u2014 then drill into the points that look unusual: large expense items without invoices, shareholder current-account movements (comptes courants d’associ\u00e9s<\/em>, the advances you as a foreign shareholder may have made to your company), management fees paid to your foreign holding, transfer prices with related entities abroad, and cash movements. Every document they take must be listed; every copy they make must be traceable. Your instructions to the local team should be short and strict: be courteous and available, answer factual questions, never volunteer interpretations of tax law, never argue, and refer every legal question to the appointed counsel. If the auditors want to interview staff, those interviews happen with the representative present. If they ask for documents held abroad \u2014 contracts with your foreign parent, foreign bank statements \u2014 they are entitled to ask, and refusing produces an adverse inference, so organise transmission through your counsel with translations of the key passages. One common trap for foreign founders is the private use of company funds: school fees, family travel or a Paris flat paid by the company and booked as expenses are reclassified as distributed income and taxed in your hands as well as the company’s. If such items exist, tell your counsel privately before the auditors find them \u2014 a disclosed and corrected error costs far less than a detected concealment, because the penalty rate jumps with intent.<\/p>\n

The verification ends with a closing discussion \u2014 the end-of-audit interview (d\u00e9bat oral et contradictoire<\/em>, the oral exchange in which the auditors present their envisaged adjustments before writing them up) \u2014 which your representative attends, increasingly by arrangement, and reports to you the same day with the auditors’ list of envisaged points. Treat that debrief as the most valuable meeting of the audit: it tells you, weeks before the formal proposal, which years, which taxes (corporate tax, VAT, withholding taxes) and which amounts are at stake, and it lets your counsel prepare the written reply with evidence rather than in a rush. If no adjustment is envisaged, the administration sends a no-reassessment notice and the file closes \u2014 an outcome worth confirming in writing and keeping with the company’s permanent records, because a later audit of the same years for the same taxes is then barred. If adjustments are envisaged, everything moves to the second phase: the written rectification procedure, where the real battle over reasons, figures and penalties is fought \u2014 and where a foreign shareholder who answers precisely and on time wins far more often than the statistics suggest.<\/p>\n

II. How do you answer the reassessment and challenge the bill without flying to France?<\/h2>\n

The verification produces facts; the rectification produces law. Once the auditors leave, the administration must put its claims in a reasoned written proposal, give you time to answer, examine your observations, and only then collect. Each of those steps is a door you can walk through from abroad: a reasoned reply within the deadline, a request for the superior’s review, a referral to the independent commission, then the formal claim and the administrative court. The order matters \u2014 skipping a step usually weakens the next \u2014 and the deadlines are short, so this part of the guide is organised as a chain: proposal, reply, internal appeals, commission, collection, claim, judge. The statute frames the whole chain in one line: when the administration finds an insufficiency or error in the tax base, les rectifications correspondantes sont effectu\u00e9es suivant la proc\u00e9dure de rectification contradictoire d\u00e9finie aux articles L. 57 \u00e0 L. 61 A.<\/a> Contradictory means exactly what it says: nothing is definitively charged before you have been given the reasons and the opportunity to contradict them.<\/p>\n

A. The reasoned proposal, your 30-day reply, and the internal appeals that cost nothing and win often<\/h3>\n

The central document of the entire procedure is the proposal of rectification (proposition de rectification<\/em>, the registered letter setting out, tax by tax and year by year, the legal basis, the figures and the penalties the administration intends to apply). The statute demands reasoning, not formulas: L’administration adresse au contribuable une proposition de rectification qui doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 lui permettre de formuler ses observations ou de faire conna\u00eetre son acceptation.<\/a> Reasoned so that you can actually reply \u2014 and the courts give that requirement teeth. The Paris administrative court of appeal annulled personal assessments built on a proposal that merely reproduced pages of the company’s own reassessment without explaining the reconstruction method, holding that l’administration doit indiquer au contribuable, dans la proposition de rectification, les motifs et le montant des rehaussements envisag\u00e9s, leur fondement l\u00e9gal et la cat\u00e9gorie de revenus dans laquelle ils sont op\u00e9r\u00e9s, ainsi que les ann\u00e9es d’imposition concern\u00e9es.<\/a> Because the taxpayer had never received the company’s own proposal and could not usefully discuss figures computed by an undisclosed method, the court concluded that est d\u00e9charg\u00e9, en droits et p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s, des cotisations suppl\u00e9mentaires d’imp\u00f4t sur le revenu<\/a> \u2014 full discharge of the additional tax and penalties. For your company the lesson is operational: when the proposal arrives, your counsel’s first reading is not about the numbers but about the reasoning. Does each adjustment state its legal basis, its computation method and the documents it relies on? Are referenced annexes actually attached? Is the method of any turnover reconstruction explained step by step? A proposal that asserts without demonstrating is vulnerable, and saying so precisely in your observations preserves the annulment argument for the judge later.<\/p>\n

Your reply deadline is thirty days from receipt, with a thirty-day extension available on written request made before expiry: the general rule sets the period at est fix\u00e9 \u00e0 trente jours \u00e0 compter de la r\u00e9ception de cette notification<\/a>, and the rectification article adds that ce d\u00e9lai est prorog\u00e9 de trente jours<\/a> when you ask in time. From abroad, the discipline is therefore: acknowledge receipt the day the proposal reaches your representative, diary day 25 as the internal deadline for instructing counsel, and systematically request the extension in writing \u2014 it is routinely granted and it doubles your preparation time. The reply itself should be built like a court brief, not like a complaint letter: take each adjustment in the administration’s order, concede what is indefensible with corrected figures (goodwill concessions cost little and buy credibility), contest the rest with documents and computations, attach every exhibit with a numbered list, and close by expressly requesting, in the alternative, the hierarchical appeal and the departmental interlocutor interview described below. Send it by tracked means and keep proof of dispatch and receipt: a late or unprovable reply is the single most common self-inflicted wound in the whole procedure. Watch the penalties section of the proposal with equal care. The tax code scales surcharges by behaviour \u2014 a. 40 % en cas de manquement d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9<\/a> for deliberate failure, rising to c. 80 % en cas de man\u0153uvres frauduleuses<\/a> for fraudulent manoeuvres \u2014 plus late-payment interest. Your observations should therefore always address the penalty qualification separately: even where the principal adjustment stands, showing good faith, disclosed positions and reliance on professional advice can move the file from 40 percent back to interest only, which on a large reassessment saves more than the argument on the principal.<\/p>\n

If the administration maintains its position in its formal response to your observations, two internal appeals remain before any judge \u2014 both available on simple written request, both handled in Paris for a Paris-registered company, both usable from abroad through your representative. First, the hierarchical appeal (recours hi\u00e9rarchique<\/em>, the review of the file by the auditor’s superior) and then the departmental interlocutor (interlocuteur d\u00e9partemental<\/em>, a senior official designated to hear the taxpayer after the hierarchical stage). These are not favours; they are enforceable guarantees. The highest administrative court confirmed that les dispositions contenues dans la charte sont opposables \u00e0 l’administration<\/a> \u2014 the charter binds the administration \u2014 and that it secures le respect de la m\u00eame garantie substantielle, qui tient \u00e0 ce qu’il puisse obtenir, avant la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure de redressement, un d\u00e9bat avec le sup\u00e9rieur hi\u00e9rarchique du v\u00e9rificateur<\/a>, followed if needed by a debate with a higher-ranking official. Being refused these interviews, or being received by someone without the required hierarchical standing, is a procedural irregularity your counsel must record in writing at the time. In practice, these interviews settle or visibly reduce a large share of files: the superior sees the file with fresh eyes, tests whether the adjustments would survive before a judge, and often abandons the weakest points or downgrades penalties. Prepare them like hearings \u2014 a short speaking note, a paginated exhibit bundle, three messages maximum \u2014 and attend by videoconference where the office allows it, with your representative physically present. Second, where disagreement persists on technical matters such as valuations, accounting methods or turnover reconstructions, you may ask the administration to refer the file to the departmental commission for direct taxes and VAT: Lorsque le d\u00e9saccord persiste sur les rectifications notifi\u00e9es, l’administration, si le contribuable le demande, soumet le litige \u00e0 l’avis<\/a> of the competent independent body. The commission hears both sides and gives a reasoned opinion that the administration follows in most cases; requesting it also structures the file for the judge if litigation follows. Your counsel will tell you when referral helps \u2014 typically where an independent expert eye on figures beats a legal argument \u2014 and when it merely delays, because the request must be weighed against the interest clock that keeps running.<\/p>\n

B. From collection to the administrative judge: claims, courts and paying wisely while you live abroad<\/h3>\n

After the contradictory phase closes, the administration issues collection notices (avis de mise en recouvrement<\/em>, the documents that make the additional tax, penalties and interest legally payable) and the file moves from debate to payment \u2014 but payment is not the end of your rights. The next step is the formal claim (r\u00e9clamation contentieuse<\/em>, the written claim to the tax administration asking for discharge or reduction of the tax, which must precede any court action). The deadline is generous but strict: claims must reach the administration doivent \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es \u00e0 l’administration au plus tard le 31 d\u00e9cembre de la deuxi\u00e8me ann\u00e9e suivant celle<\/a> of the collection, payment or triggering event, depending on the case. Diary that date the day the collection notice arrives, and file the claim well before it with the full reasoning and exhibits \u2014 the claim defines the perimeter of the later court case, so arguments omitted there are harder to raise before the judge. The administration has six months to answer; silence for six months counts as an implicit rejection that you may take to court. The court action itself goes to the administrative court (tribunal administratif<\/em>, the first-instance court for tax disputes), within dans les deux mois \u00e0 partir de la notification ou de la publication de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.<\/a> Two months from the express or implicit rejection \u2014 the shortest fuse in the whole chain, and the one foreign shareholders most often miss because the rejection letter sits unread in a Paris mailbox. Give your representative standing instructions: every administrative letter is scanned to you within 48 hours, and any rejection triggers an immediate litigation assessment.<\/p>\n

The most delicate decision at this stage is whether to pay first and litigate after, or to seek suspension. French tax litigation does not automatically suspend collection: the sums on the collection notice are due even while your claim or court case is pending, and unpaid amounts accrue enforced-recovery measures. Three attitudes are available, and your counsel will price each. Paying the full amount stops interest from running and simplifies recovery with interest if you win \u2014 the administration repays overpaid tax with default interest \u2014 but it immobilises cash a young company may need. Requesting a payment plan (d\u00e9lai de paiement<\/em>) from the local collection office spreads the outflow while the dispute runs, and Paris offices grant them routinely on documented cash-flow evidence, provided each instalment is honoured. Offering guarantees in exchange for suspension of enforced recovery protects the company’s bank accounts from seizure while preserving the dispute. What you must never do is simply stop paying without any request: forced recovery \u2014 bank seizures (saisies<\/em>), notices to clients holding your receivables (avis \u00e0 tiers d\u00e9tenteur<\/em>) \u2014 can paralyse a small company within weeks, and lifting them costs more than negotiating terms upfront. Keep every payment receipt and every plan confirmation: they enter the litigation file as proof of compliance and good faith, which judges notice when assessing penalties.<\/p>\n

When the company sits in Paris or the \u00cele-de-France, the litigation geography is an advantage for a well-organised foreign shareholder. The competent first-instance court is the administrative court of Paris for taxes assessed in the capital, and appeals go to the Paris administrative court of appeal (cour administrative d’appel de Paris<\/em>, the court that decided the discharge for an unreasoned proposal cited above) \u2014 the two courts that handle the largest volume of corporate tax cases in France, with specialised tax chambers and predictable case management. Your representative files, exchanges briefs and attends hearings locally; you follow through copies and attend only if a hearing makes it worthwhile, which is rare at first instance since tax cases are decided on the papers. Paris specifics also shape the earlier phases: the departmental interlocutor for a Paris company sits within the Paris tax directorate, the commissions meet regularly with experienced members, and the collection offices process payment plans for foreign-owned companies daily \u2014 none of which requires your presence, provided the mandate, the exhibits and the translations are in order. One Paris trap deserves a warning: errands multiply across offices \u2014 audit brigade, collection office, claims department, court registry \u2014 and letters from each look alike. Centralise everything with one representative who logs every sender, date and deadline in a single table shared with you; most missed deadlines in Paris files come not from legal difficulty but from a letter opened too late. Run this way, a tax audit of a Paris company from a home abroad is entirely manageable: the procedure is written, the deadlines are knowable, the appeals are real, and the judge \u2014 as the discharge cases show \u2014 annuls reassessments that are unreasoned, unproven or procedurally flawed, wherever the shareholder happens to live.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

A tax audit notice received for your French company while you live abroad opens a procedure, not a verdict: the notice must name the years and your right to counsel \u2014 Cet avis doit pr\u00e9ciser les ann\u00e9es soumises \u00e0 v\u00e9rification et mentionner express\u00e9ment, sous peine de nullit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, que le contribuable a la facult\u00e9 de se faire assister par un conseil de son choix.<\/a> \u2014 the on-site checks are capped in time, the proposal must reason its figures so you can answer them \u2014 L’administration adresse au contribuable une proposition de rectification qui doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 lui permettre de formuler ses observations ou de faire conna\u00eetre son acceptation.<\/a> \u2014 and the charter’s guarantees of hierarchical review bind the administration before the file closes. Answer within the thirty days, doubled on request; attack reasoning before numbers; demand the superior’s review, the interlocutor and, where useful, the commission; claim before the 31 December of the second year and appeal within two months; and organise payment so the dispute never paralyses the business. Handled in that order through a mandated professional in France, an audit becomes what French law intends it to be \u2014 a contradictory examination where a prepared taxpayer, even one living thousands of kilometres away, holds every card the procedure deals.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Your French company received an avis de verification while you live abroad. This guide walks you through the audit notice, the on-site verification, the reasoned reassessment proposal and every appeal up to the administrative judge.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16421,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2144268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nYour French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Your French company received an avis de verification while you live abroad. This guide walks you through the audit notice, the on-site verification, the reasoned reassessment proposal and every appeal up to the administrative judge.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4295,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cryptage\",\"Doing Business in France\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Doing Business in France\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/\",\"name\":\"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp\",\"width\":3927,\"height\":6291},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/10\\\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill","og_description":"Your French company received an avis de verification while you live abroad. This guide walks you through the audit notice, the on-site verification, the reasoned reassessment proposal and every appeal up to the administrative judge.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill","datePublished":"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/"},"wordCount":4295,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cryptage","Doing Business in France"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Doing Business in France"}],"dateModified":"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/","name":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-10T10:52:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-clKiaVaiROM-unsplash-scaled.webp","width":3927,"height":6291},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/10\/foreign-company-france-tax-audit-notice-verification-challenge-abroad\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Your French Company Just Got a Tax Audit Notice While You Live Abroad: Verification, Rectification and How to Challenge the Bill"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2144268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2144268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2144268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16421"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2144268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2144268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2144268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}