Your French company has closed a profitable year and you live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. The cash sits in the French corporate bank account and you would like it in your own. Can you simply transfer it to yourself, even if you own one hundred percent of the shares. No. In France, a shareholder takes company profits only through a formal dividend decision, and when the recipient lives outside France, the French company must withhold French tax at the source before paying a cent. Skip the vote and the payment can be struck down as a fictitious dividend, with the directors personally exposed. Withhold at the wrong rate and you either underpay, which draws penalties, or overpay, which leaves your money waiting months for a refund from the French tax administration.<\/p>\n
This guide covers both halves of the operation in order, for a foreign founder or foreign shareholder who runs a French SARL or SAS from abroad. First, the company-law path: how to check that a dividend exists to distribute, how to vote it without flying to France, and when the money must actually be paid. Second, the tax path: how much France keeps at the source when the shareholder is a non-resident, how tax treaties cap that levy, when a European parent company pays nothing at all, and how to reclaim any excess. A few French acronyms appear throughout and each is explained on first use: the RCS (registre du commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, the trade and companies register where your company is recorded), the greffe (the registry office of the commercial court that keeps the RCS and issues certificates), the Kbis (the official certificate proving your company exists), the CGI (Code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts, the French Tax Code) and the IS (imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, French corporate income tax). If you are still choosing the vehicle itself, our comparison of the SAS, the SARL, the branch and the subsidiary for foreign owners, at SAS, SARL, branch or subsidiary in France: how foreign founders choose the right vehicle<\/a>, explains which structure you are distributing from.<\/p>\n A dividend is not a bank transfer the owner decides alone. It is a legal sequence with three gates, and each gate leaves a paper trail you must be able to show years later. The first gate is the existence of distributable sums. The Commercial Code defines them in precise terms: Article L.232-11 of the Commercial Code<\/a> states that “Le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice distribuable est constitu\u00e9 par le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de l’exercice, diminu\u00e9 des pertes ant\u00e9rieures, ainsi que des sommes \u00e0 porter en r\u00e9serve en application de la loi ou des statuts, et augment\u00e9 du report b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire.” In plain English, you start from the profit of the financial year just closed, subtract prior losses and the sums the law or your articles require you to place in reserve, and add any retained earnings carried forward. The shareholders may also decide to distribute sums taken from reserves at their disposal, but the decision must then expressly name the reserve accounts used, and dividends are taken first from the distributable profit of the year. The same article sets a floor below which nothing may be paid: “Hors le cas de r\u00e9duction du capital, aucune distribution ne peut \u00eatre faite aux actionnaires lorsque les capitaux propres sont ou deviendraient \u00e0 la suite de celle-ci inf\u00e9rieurs au montant du capital augment\u00e9 des r\u00e9serves que la loi ou les statuts ne permettent pas de distribuer.” If the distribution would push equity below share capital plus non-distributable reserves, the dividend is unlawful even if cash is available. Foreign owners sometimes confuse cash with distributable profit. A company can hold cash and still show no distributable profit after losses, and it can show a profit while cash is tied up in receivables. Only the approved accounts decide.<\/p>\n The second gate is the approval of the accounts and the formal dividend vote. Article L.232-12 of the Commercial Code<\/a> provides that “Apr\u00e8s approbation des comptes annuels et constatation de l’existence de sommes distribuables, l’assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale d\u00e9termine la part attribu\u00e9e aux associ\u00e9s sous forme de dividendes.” Approval first, finding of distributable sums second, dividend decision third, all in the same meeting in practice. The meeting itself must be held on time. In a public limited company, Article L.225-100 of the Commercial Code<\/a> requires that “L’assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale ordinaire est r\u00e9unie au moins une fois par an, dans les six mois de la cl\u00f4ture de l’exercice, sous r\u00e9serve de prolongation de ce d\u00e9lai par d\u00e9cision de justice.” In a SARL, the parallel rule in Article L.223-26 of the Commercial Code<\/a> sends the managers report, the inventory and the annual accounts to the shareholders meeting for approval “dans le d\u00e9lai de six mois \u00e0 compter de la cl\u00f4ture de l’exercice”. If the meeting is not convened in time, the public prosecutor or any interested person can ask the court to order the managers to convene it, if necessary under a daily penalty. Living abroad does not extend these six months, so diarize the deadline from the closing date of your financial year, not from the date your accountant finishes the file.<\/p>\n The third gate is the form of the decision, which depends on your vehicle. In a SAS, flexibility is the rule but it is a supervised flexibility: Article L.227-9 of the Commercial Code<\/a> states that “Les statuts d\u00e9terminent les d\u00e9cisions qui doivent \u00eatre prises collectivement par les associ\u00e9s dans les formes et conditions qu’ils pr\u00e9voient.” Your articles of association decide whether shareholders vote in a physical meeting, by videoconference, by written consultation or by signing a unanimous written act, so read them before organizing anything. A videoconference vote held while the articles require physical presence, or a written consultation the articles never authorized, gives a challenger an easy target. If you are the sole shareholder of a SAS, the same article simplifies your life: “L’associ\u00e9 unique approuve les comptes, apr\u00e8s rapport du commissaire aux comptes s’il en existe un, dans le d\u00e9lai de six mois \u00e0 compter de la cl\u00f4ture de l’exercice.” You record your decisions in the company register, and where the sole individual shareholder also chairs the company, filing the signed inventory and annual accounts with the RCS within the same period counts as approval. In a SARL with several shareholders, the default remains a convened meeting with prior notice and communication of the accounts, the proposed resolutions and any auditor report, and remote participation must be organized under the conditions the law and your articles allow. Whatever the vehicle, produce minutes that state the profit shown by the approved accounts, the prior losses and legal reserves deducted, the distributable sum found, the dividend per share, the payment date and the withholding applied. Those minutes are the document the tax administration, a bank and a court will each ask for, in that order.<\/p>\n Practical consequences follow for a founder who never sets foot in France. Keep the company register and the signed minutes where your French counsel or accountant can produce them, because the Kbis alone proves the company exists, not that the dividend was voted. If your registered office is in Paris, the competent greffe for filings is the registry of the Paris commercial court, and filings increasingly pass through the single online business formality window rather than the counter. Calendar discipline matters more than geography: close the year, have the accountant finalize the accounts, circulate them within the notice periods your articles set, hold the vote within six months of closing, and file the approved accounts with the greffe afterwards, since the filing triggers a notice in the BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official gazette where company filings are published) that third parties can check. A dividend voted on time but filed late still pays, yet the late filing advertises disorder to anyone who pulls your record.<\/p>\n Voting the dividend is not the end. The law sets a payment clock, and missing it creates its own liability. Article L.232-13 of the Commercial Code<\/a> provides that “la mise en paiement des dividendes doit avoir lieu dans un d\u00e9lai maximal de neuf mois apr\u00e8s la cl\u00f4ture de l’exercice.” The shareholders set the payment terms, or the board or the managers do if the meeting stays silent, but the money must reach the shareholders within nine months of the year-end, and only a court decision extends that period. A foreign shareholder who votes a dividend in June for a December year-end and only wires the funds the following spring is already outside the limit. If cash is genuinely tight, ask the court for an extension before the deadline expires rather than paying late in silence, because a late payment documented in the bank statements invites questions about which year the distribution belongs to and which withholding rate applied.<\/p>\n The sanction for skipping the gates is severe and has a name: the fictitious dividend. The same Article L.232-12 of the Commercial Code<\/a> closes with the sentence “Tout dividende distribu\u00e9 en violation des r\u00e8gles ci-dessus \u00e9nonc\u00e9es est un dividende fictif.” Dividends paid without approved accounts, without distributable sums, or beyond the equity floor are fictitious, and fictitious dividends can be reclaimed from the shareholders who received them. Advance dividends during the year, before the accounts are approved, are possible only in the narrow case the article describes, where an interim balance sheet certified by a statutory auditor shows a profit after depreciation, provisions, prior losses and required reserves, and even then the advances cannot exceed that profit. A monthly transfer labelled dividend advance without that certified interim statement is not an advance dividend. It is a payment without a legal basis, and in a SARL it can also collide with the prohibition on shareholder borrowing from the company. Founders who pay themselves during the year should therefore label interim transfers as shareholder current-account advances, check the interest rules that apply to them, and convert them into a dividend only at the year-end vote, rather than backdating a justification.<\/p>\n Directors who organize an unlawful distribution answer for it personally. The Paris Court of Appeal recalled the governing text in a 30 January 2025 decision on a disputed 94.5 million euro distribution, RG No. 22\/17478, available at Court of Appeal of Paris, 30 January 2025, RG 22\/17478<\/a>, where the court quotes the statute word for word: “les administrateurs et le directeur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral sont responsables individuellement ou solidairement selon le cas, envers la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ou envers les tiers, soit des infractions aux dispositions l\u00e9gislatives ou r\u00e9glementaires applicables aux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s anonymes, soit des violations des statuts, soit des fautes commises dans leur gestion.” The court then examines, as cumulative conditions of the shareholder action brought on behalf of the company, a fault by the managers, damage suffered by the company and a causal link. Three lessons matter for a foreign owner who is also the chair, president or manager. First, signing an unlawful distribution is a management fault even if you relied on informal advice, because the checks on distributable sums and equity are yours to perform. Second, the damage is the company impoverishment, which the company or a minority shareholder acting for it can pursue. Third, the causal link will rarely be debated, since the signature sits on the minutes. Where the foreign owner employs a French manager, instruct that manager in writing to verify distributable sums and the equity floor before any payment, and keep that instruction with the minutes. It does not immunize anyone, but it proves the control was organized rather than ignored.<\/p>\n Two frequent errors deserve special attention because they trap non-residents more than residents. The first is distributing from reserves without the express designation the law requires. The meeting must name the reserve accounts used, take dividends first from the distributable profit of the year, and respect reserves the law or the articles lock. A blanket resolution distributing an amount without saying where it comes from fails the test. The second is paying the dividend to the wrong person at the wrong time. The dividend belongs to whoever holds the shares on the day the meeting fixes, and paying an outgoing shareholder after a mid-year sale, or a incoming shareholder before registration, creates a double-payment risk the company bears. If you sell your shares during the year, settle in the sale agreement who takes the dividend of the running year, and align the dividend resolution with the share register. Our guide to selling French company shares from abroad, linked in the companion inventory, details the approval and registration mechanics that must match the dividend date.<\/p>\n Once the dividend is lawfully voted, the French company becomes a tax collector. When the beneficial owner of the dividend has neither a French tax domicile nor a French seat, France taxes the dividend at the border through a withholding mechanism, and the company pays the shareholder only the net amount. Article 119 bis, paragraph 2, of the CGI<\/a> states that “Les produits vis\u00e9s aux articles 108 \u00e0 117 bis donnent lieu \u00e0 l’application d’une retenue \u00e0 la source dont le taux est fix\u00e9 par l’article 187 lorsque leurs b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires effectifs sont des personnes qui n’ont pas leur domicile fiscal ou leur si\u00e8ge en France”. The phrase to retain is beneficial owner. The withholding attaches to the person who truly receives and enjoys the dividend, not to an intermediary account, and treaty benefits follow the same person. Structures that route French dividends through an intermediate holder with no substance over the funds gain nothing, because the administration looks through to the beneficial owner before granting any reduced rate.<\/p>\n The domestic rates that apply without a treaty depend on who you are. Article 187 of the CGI<\/a> sends most corporate recipients to the standard corporate rate by providing “Celui pr\u00e9vu au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du I de l’article 219 pour tous les autres revenus.”, and Article 219, paragraph I, of the CGI<\/a> fixes that reference because “Le taux normal de l’imp\u00f4t est fix\u00e9 \u00e0 25 %.” A dividend paid to a foreign company with no applicable treaty therefore bears 25 percent withheld at source by the French distributing company. For individual shareholders, the same Article 187 of the CGI<\/a> sets “12,8 % pour les b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires personnes physiques.” A dividend paid to a foreign individual with no applicable treaty therefore bears 12.8 percent. These are the ceiling rates. Everything that follows explains how to pay less than the ceiling lawfully, and the order matters: the company must apply the correct reduced rate at the time of payment where the paperwork allows it, because recovering an over-withheld amount afterwards takes a separate claim and months of waiting.<\/p>\n Tax treaties are the first reduction mechanism, and most foreign shareholders of French companies have one. France has signed bilateral treaties against double taxation with most countries where founders live, and those treaties typically let France tax the dividend but cap its levy, often at 15 percent of the gross amount for portfolio shareholders, with lower caps in some treaties for a parent company holding a substantial stake. The mechanics were recalled in a Paris decision of 15 September 2026, RG No. 24\/06926, available at Court of Appeal of Paris, 15 September 2026, RG 24\/06926<\/a>, which restates the treaty wording for a French company paying a shareholder resident in Spain: “les dividendes pay\u00e9s par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9sidant en France \u00e0 un r\u00e9sident en Espagne sont imposables dans cet autre Etat (Espagne)”, while “mais si la personne qui re\u00e7oit les dividendes en est le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire effectif, l’imp\u00f4t ainsi \u00e9tabli ne peut exc\u00e9der 15% du montant brut des dividendes.” Both halves of that sentence matter. France keeps a capped tax, here 15 percent, and the residence state, here Spain, taxes the dividend under its own rules with relief for the French levy. Your treaty may set a different cap, and some treaties distinguish individuals from companies or small from substantial holdings, so open your treaty dividend article before the payment, not after. The worldwide tax summaries that practitioners use daily confirm the pattern that exemption or lower rates on dividends apply under treaty conditions such as minimum shareholding and beneficial ownership, as the PwC withholding tables for France record at published practitioner withholding tables for France.<\/p>\n The second reduction mechanism, stronger than any treaty cap, is the European exemption for qualifying parent companies. Article 119 ter of the CGI<\/a> provides that “La retenue \u00e0 la source pr\u00e9vue au 2 de l’article 119 bis n’est pas applicable aux dividendes distribu\u00e9s \u00e0 une personne morale qui remplit les conditions \u00e9num\u00e9r\u00e9es au 2 du pr\u00e9sent article”. The conditions, in substance, are five: the parent has its effective management in the European Union or the European Economic Area under an administrative assistance agreement with France, it takes a company form listed by the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive or an equivalent form, it is subject to corporate income tax in its state without option or exemption, it is the beneficial owner of the dividends, and it holds “directement, de fa\u00e7on ininterrompue depuis deux ans ou plus et en pleine propri\u00e9t\u00e9 ou en nue-propri\u00e9t\u00e9, 10 % au moins du capital de la personne morale qui distribue les dividendes”. The same text allows a parent that has not yet held the stake for two years to commit to keep it for at least two years and to appoint a French tax representative answerable for the withholding if the commitment breaks. An anti-abuse clause denies the exemption to arrangements set up mainly to obtain the tax advantage contrary to its purpose and lacking genuineness. A German, Dutch or Irish holding company that genuinely owns at least 10 percent of your French SAS for the required period, in a qualifying form and subject to its local corporate tax, therefore receives the dividend with zero French withholding, which beats every treaty cap. Document the holding period, the form and the tax status before the payment date, because the French company may only refrain from withholding once the parent proves to the payer that it meets each condition.<\/p>\n Do not confuse that European exemption at the border with the domestic French parent-subsidiary regime inside France. The domestic regime, opened by Article 145 of the CGI<\/a> by reference to Article 216, lets a French parent company receiving dividends from a qualifying participation exclude most of the dividend from its own taxable profit, and the public business guidance at service-public.fr, taxation of dividends received by shareholders<\/a> summarizes the familiar test of holding at least 5 percent of the capital for at least two years for the associated reliefs. That domestic relief concerns the French parent taxation, while Article 119 ter concerns the withholding levied when the dividend leaves France. A foreign group with a French holding company between the operating subsidiary and the ultimate owners uses both in sequence: no or capped withholding mechanics at each border crossing, then the domestic regime at the French parent level. Map the whole chain before voting the first dividend, because the cheapest point to suffer tax is a design choice, not an accident.<\/p>\n The cheapest refund is the one you never have to request. French practice applies the treaty rate directly at payment where the file is complete, and the distributing company carries the responsibility for getting the rate right. In the September 2026 Paris litigation mentioned above, the shareholder argued that Article 119 bis, paragraph 2, of the CGI<\/a> places the withholding at the level of the company, so that it falls to the distributing company to select the correct rate in box 7 of form 2777 depending on whether a tax treaty applies. That description was the claimant position in that dispute, not the holding of the court, but it reflects how the system works in practice: the company files the withholding return, selects the rate in box 7 of the form, and pays the Treasury. The official filing channel is the form 2777-SD return for income from transferable securities, presented by the tax administration at impots.gouv.fr, form 2777-SD for withholding on distributed income<\/a>, which must now be filed and paid online by the distributing company. As the foreign shareholder, your leverage sits upstream of that filing: deliver to your French company, before the payment date, a certificate of tax residence issued by your home administration for the year of payment, proof that you are the beneficial owner of the shares and the dividends, and where relevant the treaty article you rely on with its cap. A residence certificate dated from a prior year, a certificate in a name that does not match the shareholder register, or documents arriving after the wire transfer are the three standard reasons companies apply the full domestic rate by default. None of those is a legal defeat, but each converts an immediate reduced rate into a refund claim that takes months.<\/p>\n When the full domestic rate was withheld although the treaty allowed less, the excess is recoverable through a refund claim filed with the French tax administration from abroad. Assemble four layers of proof before writing. First, the company-law layer: the approved accounts, the shareholders minutes showing the distributable sum and the dividend per share, and the bank advice proving the gross dividend and the tax withheld. Second, the shareholder layer: the share register extract or securities account statement proving you held the shares on the dividend date, with acquisition dates where the treaty requires a minimum holding period. Third, the residence layer: the residence certificate for the payment year and, for companies, evidence of effective management and corporate tax status in the residence state. Fourth, the beneficial ownership layer: bank statements showing the net dividend credited to your own account, loan or usufruct agreements if the shares carry split rights, and a statement that no onward distribution obligation strips you of the economic benefit. File the claim with the office designated for non-resident refunds, reference the exact dividend resolution date, the distributing company registration number and the amount of French tax withheld, and keep the acknowledgment of receipt, because limitation periods run from the withholding date and a second claim after expiry will not save the first incomplete one. Expect the administration to test beneficial ownership and holding periods rather than the arithmetic, which is usually undisputed.<\/p>\n Treaty relief never removes the residence-state taxation, so coordinate both sides before celebrating the French refund. Most treaties give the residence state the primary right to tax the dividend and oblige it to relieve the French tax, either as a credit against local tax or as an exemption with progression. Concretely, an American shareholder reports the French dividend on the United States return and claims the foreign tax credit for the French withholding within the treaty cap, while a British shareholder reports it under United Kingdom rules with the corresponding relief. Amounts withheld in France above the treaty cap are not creditable abroad. They must be reclaimed from France, because the residence state only relieves tax France was entitled to levy. Keep therefore two computations for every distribution: the French withholding at the treaty rate with the reclaimable excess above it, and the residence-state return with the credit limited to the treaty-compliant French tax. Shareholders who present the gross dividend abroad without mentioning the French levy, or who claim a credit for tax France must refund, build the exact mismatch that triggers information requests between administrations.<\/p>\n Three special situations recur with foreign owners and each changes the paperwork. The first is the European parent that qualifies for zero withholding under Article 119 ter but has held the stake for less than two years at the payment date. Use the commitment procedure the article organizes: a written undertaking to keep the 10 percent holding continuously for at least two years, designation of a French tax representative answerable for the withholding if the undertaking breaks, and delivery of both to the distributing company before payment. Diary the two-year anniversary, because a sale one month early revives the full withholding with the representative as payer. The second is the dividend paid into a non-cooperative state or territory. Domestic law raises the withholding to 75 percent for income paid in such a jurisdiction regardless of the beneficiary residence, and treaty benefits do not survive that classification, so check the current list before routing a payment through an offshore account. The third is the shareholder who changed residence during the year. Treaty entitlement follows residence at the payment date in most treaties, with tie-breaker rules for dual residence, so a founder who moved from London to Dubai between the vote and the payment must re-examine which treaty, if any, covers the distribution. None of these situations blocks a dividend. Each simply moves the rate, and the rate moves only on documents delivered before the wire.<\/p>\n A dividend from your French company to yourself abroad is a two-gate operation and the gates open in a fixed order. Company law first: approved accounts, a finding of distributable sums within the equity floor, a vote in the form your articles require within six months of closing, payment within nine months, and minutes that prove every step. Tax second: withholding by the French company at 25 percent for a foreign company or 12.8 percent for a foreign individual without a treaty, reduction to the treaty cap for the beneficial owner on production of a residence certificate before payment, or zero withholding for a qualifying European parent holding at least 10 percent for two years. The refund of any excess follows from the same file, not from a new argument. Foreign founders who treat the dividend as a wire transfer pay twice, once in penalties or requalification risk at the company level and once in unrecovered withholding at the border. Founders who vote properly, deliver residence proof before the payment date and keep the four layers of evidence recover exactly what the treaties promise, no more and no less, and can repeat the operation every profitable year without surprises.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Your French company made a profit and you live abroad. This guide explains how to vote the dividend from outside France, which French withholding applies, how treaties cap it and how to reclaim the excess.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16570,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2142870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nI. How do you lawfully vote a dividend from your French company while living abroad.<\/h2>\n
A. What checks and votes turn a profit into a lawful dividend when you sign from abroad.<\/h3>\n
B. When must the money actually reach you, and what makes a dividend void.<\/h3>\n
II. How much tax does France keep at the source on your dividends and how do you recover the treaty difference.<\/h2>\n
A. Which withholding rate applies to you: 25 percent, 12.8 percent, a treaty cap or zero.<\/h3>\n
B. How do you claim the treaty rate and reclaim the excess from abroad.<\/h3>\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n