{"id":2133443,"date":"2026-09-28T09:56:33","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T07:56:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/"},"modified":"2026-09-28T09:56:33","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T07:56:33","slug":"foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/","title":{"rendered":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"

Your French company closed the year with a profit, the money sits in a French bank account, and you run the business from London, New York, Berlin or Singapore. Moving that profit home is not a bank transfer like any other. Under French law, a profit belongs to the company until the shareholders formally vote to distribute it, and the moment the dividend crosses the border, the French Treasury takes a withholding tax that can reach 25 percent before a single euro lands in your account. Foreign founders discover this chain in the wrong order: they assume the profit is theirs, they ask their accountant to wire it, and months later they learn that the distribution was irregular, the levy was too high, or a treaty reduction they never claimed is now difficult to recover. This guide follows the only safe order. It explains how a dividend is validly voted and paid from abroad, how the French withholding tax is calculated and reduced through treaties or the European parent-subsidiary exemption, and how you challenge an excessive levy without travelling to France. The company formation path, the bank account and the Kbis extract are covered in our general setup guide for foreign founders<\/a>, and the choice between operating through a branch or a subsidiary is analysed in our branch versus subsidiary comparison<\/a>. Every legal reference below is quoted word for word from the official text in force, with a link so you can verify each one. French acronyms are explained the first time they appear: the Kbis is the official company identity extract issued by the greffe, the commercial court registry; the DGFiP, direction g\u00e9n\u00e9rale des finances publiques, is the French tax authority; the CGI, code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts, is the French tax code.<\/p>\n

I. How do you turn your French profit into dividends you can collect from abroad?<\/h2>\n

A. Why does the shareholder vote decide everything, and which papers prove your right to the money?<\/h3>\n

A profit shown in the accounts is not yet your money. French company law requires a formal decision of the shareholders before any distribution, and that decision follows the approval of the annual accounts. Article L. 232-12 of the Commercial Code states that after approval of the annual accounts and confirmation that distributable sums exist, the general meeting determines the share allocated to the shareholders in the form of dividends<\/a>. In practice, this means an annual general meeting, called an assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, must first approve the accounts for the closed financial year, confirm that distributable sums exist after covering prior losses and the mandatory legal reserve, and then vote the dividend expressly. The minutes of that meeting, the proc\u00e8s-verbal, are the founding document of your claim. Without them, no bank, no tax office and no court treats the transfer as a dividend, and a payment made without a vote can be reclassified as an irregular advance with painful tax and criminal consequences for the manager who ordered it.<\/p>\n

The same article allows a faster track when you cannot wait for the year-end meeting. It provides that where interim accounts certified by a statutory auditor show that the company has made a profit since the end of the previous year, interim dividends may be distributed before approval of the accounts for the year<\/a>, adding that the amount of those interim payments may not exceed the amount of the profit so defined<\/a>. These acomptes sur dividendes, interim dividend payments, require a certified interim balance sheet drawn up during or at the end of the financial year, and the cap is strict. Founders who order an interim payment on the basis of an uncertified management report take a personal risk, because the final sentence of the article warns that any dividend distributed in breach of the above rules is a fictitious dividend<\/a>. A fictitious dividend must be paid back, and the managers who arranged it face liability, so the interim route is useful only when the paperwork is complete.<\/p>\n

Once the dividend is validly voted, it becomes a debt the company owes you personally, and that point matters enormously when relationships break down. The Commercial Chamber of the Court of Cassation confirmed it on 12 February 2025 in a case numbered 23-11.410, available at Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 12 February 2025, no. 23-11.410<\/a>. Former shareholders of a simplified joint-stock company, a SAS or soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions simplifi\u00e9e, had voted themselves 60,000 euros of dividends drawn on retained earnings, then sold all their shares a few weeks later. The buyer refused to pay, arguing the distribution should never have happened, and the court of appeal sided with the buyer by simply refusing to give effect to the vote. The Court of Cassation quashed that reasoning, holding that the appeal court had, in its words, violated Article 1102 of the Civil Code together with Article L. 235-1 of the Commercial Code<\/a> by refusing to enforce the resolution without first establishing that its judicial annulment had been pronounced<\/a>. The lesson for a foreign parent company is direct: a regularly voted dividend is an enforceable claim against your French subsidiary, and nobody, not even a new majority shareholder, can erase it without obtaining a court order of annulment first.<\/p>\n

Building the paper file from abroad is therefore the first operational task, before any tax question. Keep the signed annual accounts, the management report, the general meeting minutes recording the approval of the accounts and the exact dividend amount per share and per shareholder, proof that the meeting was properly convened under the articles of association, and the bank statements showing the transfer from the company account to yours. Ask the greffe for a recent Kbis extract proving the company exists and identifying its legal representative, because every administration and every judge starts there. File the approved accounts with the greffe within the statutory period after the meeting, since late filing triggers injunctions and fines that weaken your position in any later dispute. When the file is complete, distance stops being a handicap: your lawyer can produce the minutes, the Kbis and the bank records before any French court or tax office without you boarding a plane.<\/p>\n

B. What happens when the majority blocks the payout or drains the profit before you see it?<\/h3>\n

Many foreign founders hold all or most of the shares, but trouble starts as soon as a French partner, a minority investor or a co-founder controls the meeting. The classic pattern is a majority that votes year after year to carry the profit forward into reserves, the report \u00e0 nouveau, while increasing its own pay as manager, leaving the foreign shareholder with a profitable company and an empty pocket. French courts call this abus de majorit\u00e9, abuse of majority, and they punish it severely when two conditions meet: the decision serves the sole interest of the majority against the interest of the company, and it harms the minority. A systematic policy of hoarding reserves without any genuine investment plan, combined with inflated management remuneration, is the textbook case.<\/p>\n

The Paris Court of Appeal gave a striking illustration on 26 November 2020, in a judgment numbered 19\/10363 concerning a small limited company. The majority shareholder had pushed through his own pay rises while the minority shareholder received nothing. The court upheld the first-instance ruling that the majority shareholder had committed an abuse of majority<\/a>, then went further: it annulled the general meeting resolutions that had set his pay, ordered him to repay the company 160,246 euros for 2009, 169,769 euros for 2010 and 233,120 euros for 2012 with statutory interest, and ordered him to pay the minority shareholder 55,000 euros in damages with statutory interest<\/a>. Two remedies therefore exist side by side. Resolutions taken in abuse of majority can be annulled, and the victim can obtain damages for the personal loss suffered. For a foreign shareholder frozen out of distributions, the action typically asks the commercial court to annul the reserve-hoarding resolutions, to award damages for the lost dividends, and to order a new meeting that respects minority rights.<\/p>\n

Prevention costs less than litigation, and the articles of association are the place to organise it. A shareholders agreement can require a minimum annual distribution ratio once the legal reserve is funded, cap management pay or submit it to a reinforced majority, and give the foreign shareholder a veto over reserve allocations above a threshold. In a SAS, which is the vehicle most foreign founders choose for its contractual flexibility, almost any governance rule can be written into the articles: distribution policy, information rights with quarterly reporting to the foreign parent, and an exit clause if distributions fall below an agreed level for two consecutive years. When the conflict already exists, act quickly and in the right order: send a formal demand by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt, the LRAR or lettre recommand\u00e9e avec accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception, asking for a meeting and a distribution vote; gather the accounts, minutes and pay slips showing the pattern; then have a lawyer file for annulment and damages before the commercial court of the company’s registered office. Courts forgive a shareholder who protested in writing from the start and punish one who slept on his rights for years.<\/p>\n

II. How much tax does France take, and how do you reduce or challenge it?<\/h2>\n

A. How do you bring the 25 percent levy down to 15 percent, 5 percent or zero?<\/h3>\n

Once the dividend is voted, France taxes it at source before it leaves the country. The mechanism is called retenue \u00e0 la source, withholding tax: the French subsidiary itself withholds part of the dividend and pays it to the Treasury, so you receive only the net amount. Article 119 bis, paragraph 2, of the CGI provides that income covered by Articles 108 to 117 bis gives rise to a withholding tax whose rate is set by Article 187 where the effective beneficiaries are persons who have neither their tax domicile nor their registered office in France<\/a>. In plain terms, any dividend paid by your French company to a parent company or shareholder based abroad is caught. The rate for corporate beneficiaries is set by Article 187, paragraph 1, which sends dividends to the standard corporate rate, stating for all other income the rate set in the second paragraph of paragraph I of Article 219<\/a>, while Article 219, paragraph I, confirms that the standard rate of the tax is set at 25 percent<\/a>. Individual shareholders face 12.8 percent, but a foreign parent company starts at 25 percent. A concrete example makes the stakes clear: a subsidiary earns 200,000 euros of profit, pays 50,000 euros of corporate tax at 25 percent, and votes a 150,000 euro dividend. Without any relief, the withholding takes 37,500 euros and only 112,500 euros reaches the foreign parent.<\/p>\n

The first relief comes from tax treaties, the conventions fiscales that France has signed with most countries. These treaties typically cap the French withholding on dividends at 15 percent, sometimes 10 or 5 percent for large direct holdings, provided the foreign parent proves its tax residence with an official certificate and shows it is the effective beneficiary of the income. The Paris Court of Appeal confirmed how this works in practice on 15 September 2026, in a judgment numbered 24\/06926, published at Paris Court of Appeal, division 5, chamber 8, 15 September 2026, no. 24\/06926<\/a>. A shareholder had received dividends on which the distributing company had over-withheld, and the court recalled that Article 119 bis, paragraph 2, of the General Tax Code provides for a withholding tax, at company level, on investment income distributed to non-residents<\/a>, so that it is for the distributing company to determine and apply the correct levy among those listed in section 7 of form no. 2777, depending on whether an international tax treaty applies<\/a>. In that case, the France-Spain treaty allowed the withholding to be limited to 15 percent of the dividends distributed<\/a>, and the court ordered the accounting firm that had missed the treaty to pay the shareholder 50,040 euros in damages. Returning to the example, a 15 percent treaty rate cuts the levy on the 150,000 euro dividend from 37,500 to 22,500 euros, sending 127,500 euros home instead of 112,500. The practical lesson is that the treaty rate is never automatic: the French payer must hold the residence certificate and apply the reduced rate when paying, or the full 25 percent is withheld and must be reclaimed afterwards.<\/p>\n

The second and strongest relief is the European parent-subsidiary exemption, which brings the withholding down to zero. Article 119 ter, paragraph 1, of the CGI states that the withholding tax provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 119 bis does not apply to dividends distributed to a legal person meeting the conditions listed in paragraph 2 of this article by a company subject to corporate tax at the standard rate<\/a>. The conditions, set out in paragraph 2, require the parent to prove to the payer that it is the effective beneficiary and that it has its place of effective management in a European Union member state or in a European Economic Area state that has an administrative assistance treaty with France, that it takes one of the legal forms listed in the European parent-subsidiary directive 2011\/96\/EU, and that it is liable to corporate tax in its home state without the possibility of opting out and without exemption. The holding threshold is demanding but reachable: the parent must directly hold, continuously for two years or more, in full or bare ownership, at least 10 percent of the capital of the company distributing the dividends<\/a>, or commit to keep the holding for at least two years while appointing a French tax representative answerable for the levy if the commitment is broken. Where the parent cannot credit the French withholding at home, the threshold drops, since the holding rate mentioned in the first paragraph of this point c is reduced to 5 percent where the legal person that is the effective beneficiary of the dividends holds interests meeting the conditions of Article 145 and is deprived of any possibility of crediting the withholding tax provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 119 bis<\/a>. The administration explains these rules in its official doctrine at BOFiP, official tax doctrine on withholding exemptions under Article 119 ter<\/a>, which your adviser should check before each distribution.<\/p>\n

Two guardrails surround the exemption and must be respected from the start. First, Article 119 ter, paragraph 3, denies the exemption to dividends paid through an arrangement which, having been put in place to obtain as a main objective a tax advantage contrary to the purpose of the exemption, is not genuine in light of all the relevant facts, treating as non-genuine an arrangement not put in place for valid commercial reasons reflecting economic reality<\/a>. A letterbox company with no staff, no premises and no activity other than collecting French dividends will not survive scrutiny, so the foreign parent needs real substance: directors who actually decide, an office, and documented business reasons for holding the French subsidiary. Second, the domestic parent-subsidiary regime of Articles 145 and 216 matters when the foreign group holds its French operating company through a French holding company: Article 145 requires that participating shares must have been kept for two years where the shares represent at least 5 percent of the capital of the issuing company<\/a>, and Article 216 then allows the parent to deduct the dividend from its taxable profit except for a 5 percent portion for costs, since the portion of costs and expenses set in the first paragraph of this paragraph I is fixed at 5 percent of the total income from the participations, tax credit included<\/a>. On a 150,000 euro dividend received by a French holding company, only 7,500 euros remain taxable, costing 1,875 euros of corporate tax at 25 percent. Structuring the group with a French holding company therefore often beats a direct holding when the ultimate parent sits outside Europe and cannot use the 119 ter exemption itself.<\/p>\n

B. How do you challenge an excessive levy from abroad and recover the money?<\/h3>\n

Errors happen constantly: the treaty rate is forgotten, the exemption paperwork arrives late, the accountant applies 25 percent by default, or the administration reassesses the distribution and claims additional tax. The first step is to identify exactly what went wrong, because the remedy depends on the fault. If the distributing company applied too high a rate while a treaty or the 119 ter exemption was available, the overpaid amount can be reclaimed from the administration through a formal claim, and the company or its adviser may owe you damages for the negligence, as the Paris decision of 15 September 2026 shows with its 50,040 euro award against the accounting firm. If the administration itself issued a reassessment, you must contest the legal basis of that notice. If the distribution paperwork was defective, fix the corporate side first, because no tax claim succeeds on top of an irregular dividend.<\/p>\n

The formal route against the tax authority is the r\u00e9clamation contentieuse, the contentious tax claim. Article L. 190 of the Tax Procedures Book, the Livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales, provides that claims relating to taxes of any kind assessed or collected by the administration fall within contentious jurisdiction where they seek either compensation for errors made in the base or calculation of the tax or the benefit of a right resulting from a legislative or regulatory provision<\/a>. The same article confirms that this covers actions seeking discharge, reduction or refund of a tax. In practice, your French lawyer files a reasoned claim with the tax office that collected the withholding, attaching the general meeting minutes proving the dividend, the bank statements proving the levy, the tax residence certificate, the treaty article or the 119 ter supporting documents, and a precise calculation of the overcharge. The claim must state the legal basis, the amount and the evidence; a vague complaint letter without figures or documents achieves nothing. If the administration rejects the claim expressly or by silence, the dispute moves to the administrative court, the tribunal administratif, where a lawyer admitted in France pleads the file without your presence. Every stage can be handled by correspondence and representation, which is exactly how foreign groups litigate French tax cases.<\/p>\n

The parallel route runs against the professionals who handled the payment, and it is often the faster one. The Paris judgment of 15 September 2026 is built on the principle that accountants and tax advisers owe their clients a duty of information and advice that extends beyond the strict letter of the engagement, including the correct application of withholding rates and treaties. When an adviser withholds 25 percent while the file contained everything needed for 15 percent or zero, the loss equals the excess tax plus the financing cost and the fees of the recovery procedure. Before suing, send the adviser a formal demand setting out the error, the correct rate with its legal basis, and the resulting loss, with a deadline to compensate or to file the refund claim at its own expense. Many firms settle at this stage once the treaty certificate and the calculation are on the table, because their professional insurer prefers a quick refund procedure to a liability judgment. If the adviser refuses, the claim goes to the civil courts, where the Paris award of 50,040 euros shows judges quantify the loss precisely rather than symbolically.<\/p>\n

Organisation decides the outcome more than legal brilliance. Keep a single distribution file for each dividend: convening notices, attendance sheets, minutes, approved accounts, Kbis extract, residence certificates, proof of the holding percentage and its duration, the commitment letter and representative designation where the two-year holding relies on a promise, bank proof of the gross dividend and the withheld amount, and every exchange with the accountant about the rate to apply. Diarise every deadline from the day of payment, because tax claims and court actions are time-barred and late files fail regardless of merit. Never sign a settlement with the administration or a waiver proposed by an adviser without independent legal advice, since a badly worded acceptance can close the door to the refund. Groups that run this discipline recover overpaid withholding in months; groups that discover the error two years later, with no certificate and no minutes, pay twice, once in excess tax and once in fees for a claim that documentation alone would have won.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

Bringing home the profit of your French subsidiary follows a fixed sequence that no shortcut can replace. First, vote the dividend properly: approve the accounts, confirm distributable sums, record the decision in signed minutes, and use certified interim accounts for any advance, because a regularly voted dividend is an enforceable claim that even a new majority cannot erase without a court annulment. Second, pay the right withholding the first time: 25 percent by default for a foreign parent company, reduced by treaty to 15 percent or less with a residence certificate, or eliminated entirely when a European parent meets the 10 percent, two-year and substance conditions of the parent-subsidiary exemption. Third, challenge every overcharge methodically from abroad: a documented contentious claim to the tax office, then the administrative court if needed, plus a liability claim against any adviser whose negligence caused the excess. Keep the minutes, the certificates and the bank records together from day one, and distance becomes irrelevant. The French system rewards the foreign shareholder who documents each step and taxes the one who wires money first and asks questions later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Your French subsidiary is profitable but the cash is stuck in France. How to vote the dividend, cut the 25 percent withholding through treaties or the parent-subsidiary exemption, and challenge any overcharge from abroad.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16580,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2133443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nYour French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Your French subsidiary is profitable but the cash is stuck in France. How to vote the dividend, cut the 25 percent withholding through treaties or the parent-subsidiary exemption, and challenge any overcharge from abroad.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3521,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cryptage\",\"Doing Business in France\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Doing Business in France\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/\",\"name\":\"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6276,\"height\":3525},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/28\\\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge","og_description":"Your French subsidiary is profitable but the cash is stuck in France. How to vote the dividend, cut the 25 percent withholding through treaties or the parent-subsidiary exemption, and challenge any overcharge from abroad.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge","datePublished":"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/"},"wordCount":3521,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cryptage","Doing Business in France"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Doing Business in France"}],"dateModified":"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/","name":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-28T07:56:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp","width":6276,"height":3525},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/28\/foreign-company-france-subsidiary-profits-dividends-withholding-challenge-abroad\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Your French Subsidiary Made a Profit and You Live Abroad: Bring the Money Home Through Dividends, Withholding Tax and Legal Challenge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2133443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2133443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2133443\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2133443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2133443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2133443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}