You wired 40,000 euros from London, New York or Dubai to keep your French company alive. The rent in Paris was due, the first employee had to be paid, the bank refused an overdraft, and your French partner told you that a quick shareholder advance was the simplest fix. You transferred the money, sometimes with a one-line email as the only paperwork, and you told yourself you would take it back once the cash flow recovered. Months later, the company is still trading, invoices are being paid to other suppliers, yet every time you ask for your money back the answer is the same: there is no cash, the funds must stay in the company, or a vote you never attended supposedly froze your advance. Living abroad, you wonder whether French law leaves you powerless.<\/p>\n
It does not. In France, the money a shareholder leaves at the disposal of the company sits in a compte courant d’associ\u00e9<\/em>, literally a shareholder current account. The official business portal entreprendre.service-public.gouv.fr<\/em> describes it plainly: the current account of a shareholder is analysed as a loan which gives the lending shareholder the status of creditor of the company. Because it is a loan with no fixed term, you can in principle demand your money back at any time, and the company cannot simply refuse, even when it claims to be short of cash. The Cour de cassation, France’s highest civil court, confirmed this on 12 February 2025: apart from an agreement to the contrary, every shareholder is entitled to demand repayment of a current-account balance at any moment. That single rule decides most disputes \u2014 but three traps can still cost you everything: a lock-up agreement you signed without reading it, an insolvency filing that blocks all repayments, and your own position as director of the company. This guide walks you through each of them, with the exact procedure to recover your funds from abroad.<\/p>\n The starting point is simple: your shareholder advance is a loan for an indefinite term, and a loan with no maturity date becomes repayable as soon as you ask for it. The service-public business portal states the rule in one sentence: in the absence of specific terms, the shareholder’s claim against the company is refundable at any time. When you request repayment, the company then has a five-year period from that request to pay you back \u2014 but that period describes the outside legal limit, not a permission to make you wait five years. In practice, once you send a formal demand, the debt is due, and the company must pay within a reasonable time or face court enforcement.<\/p>\n Your first move from abroad is a formal demand letter, the mise en demeure<\/em>. Send it by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt (lettre recommand\u00e9e avec accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception<\/em>) to the company’s registered office (si\u00e8ge social<\/em>), addressed to its legal representative. If you have no trusted person in France, instruct a French lawyer to send it: the letterhead of a barreau<\/em> (bar association) lawyer concentrates minds wonderfully. The letter must state the exact amount of your credit balance, refer to the bank transfer slips and the company’s own annual accounts where your advance appears as a liability (passif<\/em>), and set a clear deadline \u2014 typically fifteen days. Keep every proof: wire transfer confirmations, the current-account agreement if one exists, email exchanges acknowledging the advance, and the balance sheet line showing the debt. French judges love paperwork, and a shareholder who can show the money arriving from his personal foreign account wins the evidential battle before it starts.<\/p>\n If the deadline expires without payment, the fastest weapon is the injonction de payer<\/em>, the European-style order-for-payment procedure. Article 1405 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a> provides that: “Le recouvrement d’une cr\u00e9ance peut \u00eatre demand\u00e9 suivant la proc\u00e9dure d’injonction de payer lorsque : 1\u00b0 La cr\u00e9ance a une cause contractuelle ou r\u00e9sulte d’une obligation de caract\u00e8re statutaire et s’\u00e9l\u00e8ve \u00e0 un montant d\u00e9termin\u00e9”. A shareholder advance has a contractual cause and a determined amount, so it fits perfectly. Your lawyer files a one-sided petition (requ\u00eate<\/em>) with the president of the commercial court (tribunal de commerce<\/em>) of the company’s registered office, attaching your evidence. The judge issues a payment order without hearing the company first. A bailiff (commissaire de justice<\/em>, formerly huissier de justice<\/em>) serves it, and the company has one month to pay or to file an objection (opposition<\/em>). With no serious defence \u2014 and “we prefer to keep the cash” is not a serious defence \u2014 most companies pay at this stage rather than fund litigation they will lose.<\/p>\n If the company files an objection, the case simply continues as an ordinary lawsuit before the commercial court, and your position remains strong. The court will order repayment with legal interest running from your formal demand, and possibly a higher court-ordered rate. One procedural shield the company may raise is the request for time to pay. Article 1343-5 of the Civil Code<\/a> states: “Le juge peut, compte tenu de la situation du d\u00e9biteur et en consid\u00e9ration des besoins du cr\u00e9ancier, reporter ou \u00e9chelonner, dans la limite de deux ann\u00e9es, le paiement des sommes dues.” Note the ceiling: the judge may defer or spread payment over a maximum of two years, weighing your needs as creditor against the company’s situation \u2014 but during that court-granted period, the penalty interest and late surcharges provided for delay do not accrue, and any clause to the contrary is deemed unwritten. A payment schedule is therefore the worst realistic outcome when your claim is sound: you still get paid, with a judge-controlled timetable.<\/p>\n Watch the limitation clock, but do not panic about it. Article 2224 of the Civil Code<\/a> provides: “Les actions personnelles ou mobili\u00e8res se prescrivent par cinq ans \u00e0 compter du jour o\u00f9 le titulaire d’un droit a connu ou aurait d\u00fb conna\u00eetre les faits lui permettant de l’exercer.” For a current-account advance repayable on demand, the five-year period runs from your demand for repayment, which is precisely why sending the mise en demeure<\/em> early matters twice: it makes the debt due and it fixes the starting point of your rights. A shareholder who waits six or seven years after a clear refusal before suing may discover the claim is time-barred, while one who acts within months has no limitation problem at all. From abroad, the practical lesson is to send the formal demand as soon as the first refusal arrives, not after a year of polite transatlantic phone calls.<\/p>\n Finally, interest can substantially increase what the company owes you. If your current-account agreement provides for interest, that rate applies; if the company is late after your demand, legal interest (int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gal<\/em>) accrues automatically. For a foreign founder, there is a second financial lever: the tax-deductible reference rate published monthly by the tax administration caps what the company may deduct, but it does not cap what it must pay you if your agreement says more. Check your agreement before suing, because claiming the contractual rate rather than the legal rate can add thousands of euros to the judgment. Your lawyer will compute both and claim the higher lawful amount.<\/p>\n Company managers confronted with a repayment demand recycle the same three excuses: the cash position does not allow it, the shareholders supposedly agreed to leave the money in, and your advance will be set against something you allegedly owe. French law rejects the first excuse outright. The service-public portal is categorical: when the shareholder claims reimbursement of his current account, the company cannot refuse it, even on grounds of financial difficulty, nor can it limit repayment to whatever its cash flow can bear. The company may ask a judge for payment time under Article 1343-5, as explained above, but it cannot grant itself that favour. A refusal letter invoking cash-flow problems is therefore not a defence \u2014 it is written evidence of an unjustified refusal that will support your claim for interest and costs.<\/p>\n The leading court decision says exactly this. On 12 February 2025 the Commercial Chamber of the Cour de cassation, appeal no. D 23-17.483, published in the Court’s Bulletin, approved the following statement of law: “sauf stipulation contraire, tout associ\u00e9 \u00e9tait en droit d’exiger \u00e0 tout moment et peu important les motifs de sa demande le remboursement du solde de son compte courant, d\u00e8s lors que l’avance ainsi consentie constituait un pr\u00eat \u00e0 dur\u00e9e ind\u00e9termin\u00e9e”. Read the full ruling on the official Cour de cassation website here<\/a>. Three elements matter for you. First, the right belongs to every shareholder regardless of the size of his holding \u2014 a 10 percent minority holder enjoys it exactly like a majority holder. Second, you never have to justify your reasons: wanting to buy a flat in London or simply distrusting the management is legally sufficient. Third, the only escape for the company is a “stipulation contraire”, an agreement to the contrary \u2014 which brings us to the one excuse that can actually work.<\/p>\n A lock-up (convention de blocage<\/em>) is a written agreement under which you accept that your advance stays in the company for a defined period or until a defined event, such as full repayment of a bank loan. Banks lending to small French companies routinely demand such lock-ups from shareholders as a guarantee, and the service-public portal confirms the mechanism: blocking a shareholder current account means the company is no longer obliged to repay the contributed funds, and the business then holds genuine permanent capital. But a lock-up is a contract, and contracts bind only those who agreed to them. Article 1103 of the Civil Code<\/a> lays down the foundation: “Les contrats l\u00e9galement form\u00e9s tiennent lieu de loi \u00e0 ceux qui les ont faits.” Conversely, a document you never signed cannot bind you: minutes of a shareholders’ meeting you did not attend, a bank covenant signed only by the manager, or an oral remark at a dinner do not constitute your personal agreement to block your money. Before conceding anything, ask the company to produce the lock-up bearing your signature, check its exact duration and release conditions, and verify whether the triggering event \u2014 for example, the bank loan’s full repayment \u2014 has already occurred. In our files, roughly half of alleged lock-ups collapse at this verification stage because the document is missing, unsigned, expired, or signed by someone without authority.<\/p>\n The set-off excuse (compensation<\/em>) deserves the same sceptical treatment. French law does allow mutual debts to cancel each other out: Article 1347 of the Civil Code<\/a> defines that “La compensation est l’extinction simultan\u00e9e d’obligations r\u00e9ciproques entre deux personnes. Elle s’op\u00e8re, sous r\u00e9serve d’\u00eatre invoqu\u00e9e, \u00e0 due concurrence, \u00e0 la date o\u00f9 ses conditions se trouvent r\u00e9unies.” And Article 1348<\/a> adds that compensation may even be ordered by a court where one obligation is certain but not yet quantified or due. In practice, the company may claim you owe it damages for your management, unpaid capital contributions (apports<\/em>), or personal expenses charged to the company. Each of those counterclaims must be certain, liquid and due before it can cancel your advance \u2014 a disputed allegation of mismanagement argued for the first time in a defence brief meets none of those conditions. Challenge every counterclaim line by line: is the capital fully paid up, were the expenses approved, has any court ever fixed the alleged damages? If the company owes you 40,000 euros of documented advance and vaguely alleges 40,000 euros of harm with no judgment, the judge will order the company to pay you now and invite it to prove its alleged counterclaim in separate proceedings.<\/p>\n One final variation: the company links your advance to an unrelated deal, typically the buyback of your shares. The February 2025 ruling answers that too \u2014 the Court held that the company’s obligation to pay the price of repurchased shares and its obligation to repay the current account are independent of each other, so failure to repay the account cannot justify unwinding the share deal, and symmetrically a share dispute cannot block your advance. Article 1224 of the Civil Code<\/a> reserves termination of contracts to cases of sufficiently serious non-performance decided by a court, which a standalone advance never triggers. Keep each dispute in its own lane, and do not let the company hold your cash hostage to an unrelated negotiation.<\/p>\n Everything above assumes a solvent company that simply does not want to pay. The moment a French court opens formal insolvency proceedings \u2014 sauvegarde<\/em> (safeguard), redressement judiciaire<\/em> (reorganisation) or liquidation judiciaire<\/em> (liquidation) \u2014 the rules flip completely. From the opening judgment (jugement d’ouverture<\/em>), the company is legally forbidden from repaying any pre-existing debt, including your shareholder advance. Paying you after that date would expose the manager to personal sanctions and the payment to cancellation. The service-public portal warns shareholders expressly: after insolvency proceedings open, the company is no longer entitled to repay a shareholder current account, and the shareholder must declare his claim like any other creditor. If your French partner mentions cash problems serious enough to involve a court, your race is no longer against the company’s goodwill \u2014 it is against the publication of the opening judgment.<\/p>\n Your lifeline is the declaration of claims (d\u00e9claration de cr\u00e9ances<\/em>). Article L. 622-24 of the Commercial Code<\/a> commands: “A partir de la publication du jugement, tous les cr\u00e9anciers dont la cr\u00e9ance est n\u00e9e ant\u00e9rieurement au jugement d’ouverture, \u00e0 l’exception des salari\u00e9s, adressent la d\u00e9claration de leurs cr\u00e9ances au mandataire judiciaire dans des d\u00e9lais fix\u00e9s par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d’Etat.” In plain terms: within two months of the judgment’s publication in the BODACC \u2014 the Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales<\/em>, France’s official gazette for insolvency and company notices \u2014 you must send your claim to the court-appointed receiver (mandataire judiciaire<\/em>), or to the liquidator (liquidateur<\/em>) in a liquidation. Miss that deadline and you are forclos<\/em>, shut out, with only a narrow and uncertain late-relief procedure (relev\u00e9 de forclusion<\/em>) requiring proof that your failure was not your fault \u2014 a hard argument when the judgment was duly published. As a foreign creditor, appoint a French lawyer the day you learn of the proceedings; postal delays between continents have never excused a missed declaration.<\/p>\n Be realistic about ranking. Shareholder advances are unsecured (chirographaire<\/em>) claims: you stand behind employees, the tax authorities, social-security bodies and secured lenders, and in many liquidations unsecured creditors recover only a fraction of their claims, sometimes nothing. That harsh arithmetic is precisely why speed matters before insolvency: a repayment obtained and collected while the company was still solvent is yours to keep, subject only to narrow claw-back rules for the suspect period (p\u00e9riode suspecte<\/em>), whereas the same sum trapped inside at the opening date becomes a lottery ticket. Monitor the warning signs from abroad: repeated refusals to repay despite visible trading, directors resigning, the registered office moving, or rumours of unpaid suppliers. Anyone can check a French company’s health for a few euros: order a recent Kbis<\/em> \u2014 the official identity card of a French company issued by the greffe<\/em>, the registry office of the commercial court \u2014 and search the BODACC for insolvency notices in the company’s name. If you already hold our guide on companies that cannot pay, read our analysis of cessation of payments, sauvegarde and redressement from abroad<\/a> before deciding whether to sue immediately or negotiate security.<\/p>\n Negotiating security while there is still time is often smarter than suing blindly. A company that cannot repay cash today may grant you a pledge on its business assets (nantissement du fonds de commerce<\/em>), a joint guarantee from a solvent group company, or a notarised acknowledgement of debt with an agreed repayment schedule \u2014 each improving your ranking or your enforcement options if insolvency later strikes. Conversely, never accept repayment in kind, such as equipment or stock, without a written valuation: insolvency receivers love challenging undervalued transfers to insiders. And if the company proposes a partial repayment plan, have your lawyer draft it as a binding settlement (protocole d’accord transactionnel<\/em>) with an acceleration clause making the whole balance due on the first missed instalment. Foreign shareholders who paper their deals this way sleep better than those relying on handshake promises across the Channel or the Atlantic.<\/p>\n One procedural trap specific to shareholder-creditors: courts scrutinise late-declared insider claims for abuse. If you controlled the company and kept lending while knowing it was already insolvent, the receiver may seek to subordinate or challenge your claim, and your fellow directors’ conduct will be examined. Keep contemporaneous evidence that each advance responded to a genuine business need \u2014 board minutes, cash-flow forecasts, emails with the accountant (expert-comptable<\/em>) \u2014 rather than a desperate attempt to prop up a corpse. Clean documentation drawn up before the crisis is worth more than the most brilliant pleading drafted after it.<\/p>\n Many foreign founders are both shareholder and director \u2014 g\u00e9rant<\/em> of a SARL (limited liability company) or pr\u00e9sident<\/em> of a SAS (simplified joint-stock company, the favourite vehicle of foreign investors). That dual role changes the analysis in two directions. First, the prohibitions on borrowing run the other way: French law forbids individual directors and shareholders from borrowing from their own company. Article L. 223-21 of the Commercial Code<\/a> thunders: “A peine de nullit\u00e9 du contrat, il est interdit aux g\u00e9rants ou associ\u00e9s autres que les personnes morales de contracter, sous quelque forme que ce soit, des emprunts aupr\u00e8s de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9, de se faire consentir par elle un d\u00e9couvert, en compte courant ou autrement, ainsi que de faire cautionner ou avaliser par elle leurs engagements envers les tiers.” The parallel ban for public limited companies sits in Article L. 225-43 of the Commercial Code<\/a>, and Article L. 227-12<\/a> extends those bans to the president and senior officers of a SAS: “Les interdictions pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l’article L. 225-43 s’appliquent, dans les conditions d\u00e9termin\u00e9es par cet article, au pr\u00e9sident et aux dirigeants de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9.” In short, your account as shareholder-lender must always show a credit balance in your favour; the day it tips into debit \u2014 you owe the company money \u2014 the arrangement is void and, for a de facto manager, potentially a criminal matter (abus de biens sociaux<\/em>, misuse of company assets). Before claiming repayment, reconcile the account with the company’s accountant and make sure no personal expense, dividend advance or travel reimbursement muddies the balance the other way.<\/p>\n Second, the tax administration watches shareholder advances closely, and a tax reassessment can shrink the company’s ability to pay you. Interest the company pays you is deductible from its taxable profit only if two conditions are met: the share capital must be fully paid up (capital lib\u00e9r\u00e9<\/em>), and the rate must not exceed the monthly reference rate (taux de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence<\/em>) published by the tax authorities \u2014 around 4.4 to 5.3 percent depending on the financial year-end. Any excess interest is added back to taxable profit, and for a corporate shareholder, a zero-interest advance can be reclassified as an abnormal management decision (acte anormal de gestion<\/em>) with the foregone interest taxed as a hidden profit distribution. If you lent through your foreign holding company rather than in your own name, charge arm’s-length interest from day one and document it: zero-interest loans between related companies are the tax auditor’s favourite adjustment, and an adjustment can push a fragile company toward the very insolvency that would trap your principal. Our breakdown of French corporate tax bills and how to challenge them from abroad<\/a> explains the audit procedure in detail.<\/p>\n Third, directors answer personally for company debts in ways common-law founders rarely expect. The manager of a SARL is liable to the company and to third parties for breaches of company law, violations of the articles and management faults, and in liquidation the court may order directors who contributed by fault to an asset shortfall to bear all or part of it. Paradoxically, this exposure can help a shareholder-director: a co-director who blocked your repayment to favour himself may have committed a management fault engaging his personal liability, giving you a second debtor beyond the company. But the sword cuts both ways \u2014 if you ran the company while refusing transparency to your co-shareholders, expect a counterclaim for fault the moment you sue for your advance. Keep board decisions, bank statements and management reports clean, because the repayment lawsuit and the liability lawsuit often become one.<\/p>\n Practical hygiene prevents most of these traps. Always sign a written current-account agreement before wiring funds, stating the amount, an interest rate at or near the deductible reference rate, repayment on demand, and \u2014 crucially \u2014 no lock-up clause unless a bank genuinely requires one, in which case cap its duration and define the release event precisely. Never mix the advance with unpaid capital subscriptions or with your director’s pay: each has its own legal regime, and confusion lets the company argue set-off. Each year, have the shareholders’ meeting (assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/em>) approve the accounts showing your credit balance, so the debt is acknowledged in a public filing at the greffe<\/em>. And if you are a foreign tax resident, declare the interest in your country of residence while checking the applicable tax treaty to avoid double taxation. These five habits cost little and decide cases: judges repay documented lenders and punish informal ones. Our founding guide for newcomers, setting up a company in France as a foreign founder<\/a>, shows how to structure the company correctly from day one so that today’s advance does not become tomorrow’s lawsuit.<\/p>\n Your shareholder advance is a loan repayable on demand, and a French company that is still trading cannot lawfully refuse to return it \u2014 financial difficulty at most earns it a court-supervised payment schedule of up to two years, never a refusal. Send a documented formal demand from abroad, follow it with an injonction de payer<\/em> before the commercial court, challenge any alleged lock-up or set-off by demanding the signed paperwork, and act within the five-year limitation period running from your demand. The two situations that genuinely change the game are a lock-up you validly signed and insolvency proceedings that block all repayments and force you to declare your claim within two months of publication. Check the BODACC, order a fresh Kbis from the greffe, verify your account balance with the accountant, and move before the opening judgment \u2014 because a shareholder who sues a solvent company recovers in full with interest, while one who sleeps into liquidation shares the leftovers with every other unsecured creditor. If you are also the director, keep the account in credit, charge proper interest and paper every decision, so that your claim survives tax and liability scrutiny. Money lent cleanly is money recovered quickly.<\/p>\n Phone consultation: 80 EUR including VAT, within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a> \u2014 Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen. Send your documents through our contact page<\/a> for a first analysis of your shareholder advance and the fastest recovery route.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Your French company refuses to repay your shareholder advance (compte courant d’associ\u00e9)? French law makes it repayable on demand. Procedure, lock-ups, insolvency and director traps explained.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16470,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2131054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nI. Can Your French Company Legally Refuse to Repay Your Shareholder Advance?<\/h2>\n
A. How to Demand Repayment From Abroad and Force Payment Within Weeks<\/h3>\n
B. Why “We Have No Cash” Is Never a Legal Defence in France<\/h3>\n
II. What Happens to Your Advance When the Company Is Insolvent or You Are Also Its Director?<\/h2>\n
A. If Insolvency Proceedings Open: Declare Your Claim or Lose Your Money<\/h3>\n
B. The Director and Tax Traps That Can Wipe Out Your Claim<\/h3>\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n
Need a quick opinion on your case<\/h2>\n