Your French company calls you at the worst possible moment. The président of your SAS (société par actions simplifiée, the simplified joint-stock company most foreign founders choose) has resigned overnight, or you have just discovered that you must remove them. You live in London, New York, Dubai or Singapore. The company has employees to pay, a bank account that only the président can operate, contracts waiting for a signature, and a French administration that expects every change to be filed on time. No one can wait for your next trip to Paris. This guide gives you the complete procedure, as it stands in September 2026: how the departure and the appointment really work under your articles, how the shareholders decide without travelling, how you file the change on the Guichet unique (the single online portal for company formalities) within the one-month deadline, and how you update the bank, the payroll and the liability position so the new président can run the company from day one. Every decisive rule below is quoted from the statute or the court decision that states it, and every acronym is explained on first use.<\/p>\n
French company law gives the SAS an unusual degree of freedom. Unlike the SARL (société à responsabilité limitée, the limited liability company with rigid statutory offices) or the SA (société anonyme, the public limited company with a board), the SAS leaves the organisation of its management almost entirely to its articles of association. That freedom is your biggest advantage when you must change président from abroad, and your biggest trap if you ignore what your own articles say.<\/p>\n
The starting point is a one-sentence article of the Commercial Code: article L. 227-5<\/a> provides that “Les statuts fixent les conditions dans lesquelles la société est dirigée.” In plain English, your articles decide how the company is managed. They designate who appoints the président, who can remove them, for what reasons, by what majority, and whether reasons are needed at all. Nothing in the statute imposes a default removal procedure, and that silence is deliberate. The Cour de cassation, the highest French court for commercial matters, confirmed the point on 9 March 2022 in a much-cited ruling (Commercial chamber, appeal no. 19-25.795<\/a>): “les conditions dans lesquelles les dirigeants d’une société par actions simplifiée peuvent être révoqués de leurs fonctions sont, dans le silence de la loi, librement fixées par les statuts, qu’il s’agisse des causes de la révocation ou de ses modalités”. In other words, the causes and the mechanics of removal are freely set by the articles, and a président whose articles allow removal at any time can be removed without any stated reason, while a président whose articles require a serious ground (juste motif) cannot be dismissed without one. Before you do anything else, read the exact removal and appointment clauses of your SAS articles, including any clause that gives the appointment power to a specific shareholder, to the board-like body your articles may have created, or to the shareholders collectively.<\/p>\n That reading exercise matters even more since the most recent leading decision. On 9 July 2025 the Commercial chamber of the Cour de cassation (appeal no. 24-10.428<\/a>) held: “Il résulte de ces textes que les statuts de la société par actions simplifiée fixent les conditions dans lesquelles celle-ci est dirigée, notamment les modalités de révocation de ses dirigeants. Si une décision des associés peut compléter les statuts sur ce point, elle ne peut y déroger, quand bien même aurait-elle été prise à l’unanimité.” A shareholders’ resolution may supplement silent articles on removal, but it can never contradict them, even by unanimous vote. The practical lesson for a foreign owner is sharp: if your articles require, for example, a two-thirds majority or a serious ground, a unanimous video-call resolution that ignores that requirement will be struck down, and the removal will be treated as never having happened. Conversely, if your articles are silent, a collective decision of the shareholders can validly fill the gap. Check, then act strictly inside the articles, or amend the articles first through the procedure they prescribe.<\/p>\n Two further statutory anchors complete the picture. First, article L. 227-9<\/a> of the Commercial Code reserves certain fundamental matters to collective decisions of the shareholders, but the appointment and removal of the président are not among the decisions the statute forces into collective hands; they belong to the shareholders collectively only if your articles say so. Most foreign-owned SAS articles do place appointment and removal in the shareholders’ hands, often by simple majority, sometimes with enhanced majorities or veto rights for the investor. Second, if the outgoing président is a legal entity rather than a person, for instance your foreign parent company itself, article L. 227-7<\/a> provides that “les dirigeants de ladite personne morale sont soumis aux mêmes conditions et obligations et encourent les mêmes responsabilités civile et pénale que s’ils étaient président ou dirigeant en leur nom propre”. The human beings behind a corporate président carry the same civil and criminal exposure as a flesh-and-blood président, on top of the joint liability of the legal entity they lead. Foreign groups that installed the parent company as président of the French SAS should weigh that exposure when they redesign the governance.<\/p>\n Finally, remember the framework rule of article L. 227-1<\/a>: within the limits it lists, the rules of the société anonyme apply to the SAS, with the powers of the board or its chairman exercised as the SAS articles provide. Your articles are therefore not a formality. They are the operating manual of the change, and the courts enforce them literally.<\/p>\n Once you know which body decides and by what majority, the good news is that French law does not require anyone to be physically present in France. If you are the sole shareholder (associé unique) of a SASU (société par actions simplifiée unipersonnelle, the one-shareholder SAS), you decide alone, at home, by signing a written record of your decisions. If there are several shareholders, your articles determine how collective decisions are taken: physical meeting, video conference, telephone conference, written consultation, or electronic vote. Most modern SAS articles drafted for international groups expressly allow decisions by any means, including video calls with shareholders dialling in from different countries. If your articles are old and require physical presence, amend that clause before you need it, or hold the meeting where the articles require it and give a proxy to a trusted person in France.<\/p>\n Distance changes nothing about the content of the minutes (procès-verbal, the written record of the decision). The official guidance on the Service Public Entreprendre portal, the French administration’s reference site for businesses (changing a company officer<\/a>), requires the minutes to record both the incoming and the outgoing officer. Your minutes must therefore record both sides of the change in one document or in two coordinated documents: the end of the outgoing président’s mandate, with its effective date and time, and the appointment of the incoming président, with the start date of their mandate, the duration if your articles set one, and any limits on their powers that will apply inside the company. State the dates with precision, because the outgoing président binds the company until the handover moment, and the incoming président cannot sign before theirs. If the departure is a resignation, attach the resignation letter to the minutes. If it is a removal, follow the articles to the letter on convening notices, information sent in advance, and the right of the outgoing président to be heard where the articles or a contractual clause grant it. A removal taken in breach of the articles’ own guarantees is the classic ground for annulment, and the 2025 ruling quoted above shows that courts will not save it even with unanimous shareholder support.<\/p>\n Foreign shareholders should prepare the paper trail for cross-border use from the start. Minutes signed abroad are valid, and electronic signatures are accepted, but every document that will be filed with the French registry should be ready in French or accompanied by a sworn translation (traduction assermentée, a translation certified by a court-approved translator). Identity documents of a non-French incoming président, proof of their address, and any foreign corporate documents if the new président is a company must be prepared for the filing; depending on the issuing country, an apostille under the Hague Convention or full legalisation may be requested by the registry (greffe, the court office that keeps the commercial register). Ask your counsel to assemble this file before the decision date, because the one-month filing clock described below starts running the day the decision is taken, not the day your paperwork is ready. Keep the originals: the bank, the auditors and the registry can each ask to see them.<\/p>\n One appointment scenario deserves special attention from foreign owners: naming a non-resident, non-European président. French company law does not require the président of a SAS to live in France or to hold a French residence permit for the appointment itself to be valid. The difficulty is practical, not corporate: a président who needs a visa to enter France, who cannot open or operate the bank account remotely, or who cannot be reached by the administration creates a company that is legally appointed but operationally paralysed. Many foreign groups solve this by appointing a president who can act in France while keeping strategic control through shareholder rights, or by combining a non-resident président with a délégué (a general manager or deputy) based in France whose powers are carefully set in the articles. Whatever you choose, write the allocation of powers into the articles, because only the président represents the company toward third parties as a matter of law, as explained below.<\/p>\n A perfectly valid shareholder decision is only half the job. Until the change is published and registered, the outgoing président remains the face of the company for banks, customers, suppliers and the administration, and the incoming président cannot prove their authority with a fresh Kbis (the Kbis extract, the official registration certificate issued by the greffe that proves a company’s legal existence and the identity of its officers). The French system concentrates every step after the decision into two moves: a legal notice and an online filing, both within one month.<\/p>\n The first move is publicity in a legal gazette. The Service Public Entreprendre portal states that the newly appointed officer must publish the change, as recorded in the meeting minutes, in an authorised legal-notice outlet within one month. An annonce légale (a legal notice published in an authorised journal or online press service) announcing the departure and the appointment must therefore be published within one month of the decision. The notice identifies the company, its registration number (SIREN, the nine-digit business identifier), the outgoing and incoming présidents, and the effective date. Order it online from abroad through any authorised publisher covering the department (département, the French administrative district) of the company’s registered office; the publisher returns a publication certificate that joins the filing file.<\/p>\n The second move is the filing itself, and it runs entirely online. Since the 2023 reform, all company formalities pass through the Guichet unique des formalités des entreprises (the single portal for business formalities, operated via the INPI, the Institut national de la propriété industrielle, which also handles trademarks and now routes company filings). Article R. 123-1<\/a> of the Commercial Code describes this single body through which businesses complete all the declarations linked to changes in their situation, and article R. 123-66<\/a> sets the deadline in binding terms: “Toute personne morale immatriculée demande […] une inscription modificative dans le mois de tout fait ou acte rendant nécessaire la rectification ou le complément des énonciations prévues aux articles R. 123-53 et suivants”. Every registered company must therefore request an amending entry within one month of any event that changes the registered details, and a change of président is exactly such an event. The official guidance confirms the same deadline in practical language: the change must be declared within one month on the Guichet website, with the file built around the copy of the minutes recording the change and showing the incoming and outgoing officers.<\/p>\n What the registry records is defined by article R. 123-54<\/a>, which requires the company to declare, according to its legal form, the family names, first names, dates and places of birth, home addresses and nationalities of its présidents, general managers and other persons empowered to bind the company on a regular basis, stating for each of them whether they bind the company alone or jointly. Prepare these details for the incoming président with the same care as the minutes: a misspelled name or a wrong birth date produces a defective Kbis and a second corrective filing. The INPI’s own guide for amendments adds three operational points foreign filers often discover too late: the new information must be entered online within one month (INPI, amending a company<\/a>); signing at the end of the process requires either a FranceConnect+ login or an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate, which a non-resident should arrange in advance; and the registry offices review the file after submission, so an incomplete upload means a rejection and a restart (INPI, amending a company<\/a>). File early in the month, not on day thirty.<\/p>\n The last step of publicity happens automatically but matters enormously. Once the greffe validates the filing, it inserts the change in the BODACC (Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales, the official gazette of commercial announcements), and the official guidance draws the legal consequence: after the declaration, automatic insertion in the BODACC by the greffe makes the change of officer effective against third parties (opposable aux tiers, meaning third parties must accept it). Until that publication, the company can find itself bound by the acts of the former président toward a good-faith third party, while the new président struggles to prove their authority. Order a fresh Kbis as soon as the filing is validated and circulate it immediately to the bank, the accountant, customers with framework contracts, and any authority holding a mandate signed by the former président. The Kbis is the document every French counterpart asks for; the BODACC entry is the legal reason they must accept it.<\/p>\n One related filing is frequently mishandled. A change of président alone does not change the company’s beneficial owners, and the portal always asks the question during the process: if nothing changed on ownership, it is enough to tick the box confirming the situation is unchanged. But where the departing président was also a shareholder and their shares move at the same time, a new beneficial-owner declaration (registre des bénéficiaires effectifs, the RBE register of the real human owners behind the company) must be filed through the same Guichet. Treat a combined exit-plus-share-transfer as two filings in one move, not one.<\/p>\n Why all this formalism matters is explained by the representation rule of article L. 227-6<\/a>: “La société est représentée à l’égard des tiers par un président désigné dans les conditions prévues par les statuts.” Only the président appointed under the articles represents the company toward third parties, and the same article adds that the company is bound even by presidential acts outside the corporate purpose unless it proves the third party knew, while the statute adds: “Les dispositions statutaires limitant les pouvoirs du président sont inopposables aux tiers”, meaning internal limits on the président’s powers cannot be invoked against third parties. Two consequences follow for a foreign owner. First, the handover date in your minutes is the moment the power to bind the company passes, so overlapping signatures around that date must be managed deliberately. Second, any internal restriction you place on the new président, such as a spending cap requiring shareholder approval, binds them inside the company and founds a liability claim if breached, but it will not save the company against a third party who contracted in good faith. Draft the restriction, file the appointment, and monitor compliance; do not rely on the restriction to undo a signed deal.<\/p>\n Registration is not the end of the road. Three aftermaths decide whether the change succeeds in practice: the social-security position of the incoming président, the liability left behind by the outgoing one, and the bank mandates that keep the business running.<\/p>\n Start with social security, because it determines monthly cost from the first payslip. A remunerated président of SAS is not self-employed; they belong to the general employee scheme as an assimilated employee (assimilé salarié, a company officer treated like an employee for social security without an employment contract). The legal basis is item 23 of article L. 311-3<\/a> of the Social Security Code, which lists “Les présidents et dirigeants des sociétés par actions simplifiées” among the persons covered by the general scheme. Concretely, from the start date of the mandate, the company must register the new président with URSSAF (Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales, the agency collecting social contributions), run their pay through the DSN (déclaration sociale nominative, the monthly electronic payroll return), and pay employer and employee contributions. If the new président receives no remuneration for the mandate, no contributions are due on it, but the affiliation formalities and the consistency with the pay records still matter, because URSSAF inspectors compare mandates, Kbis details and payroll data. Mirror the operation for the departure: close the outgoing président’s pay record at the exact end date, settle any accrued bonus or severance the articles or a separate agreement provide, and keep the payslips consistent with the minutes. A foreign owner who leaves the former président on the payroll “for one more month” out of convenience creates a mismatch the next URSSAF audit will question.<\/p>\n Next, settle liability on both sides of the handover. For civil liability, article L. 227-8<\/a> provides that “Les règles fixant la responsabilité des membres du conseil d’administration et du directoire des sociétés anonymes sont applicables au président et aux dirigeants de la société par actions simplifiée.” The président answers for management faults, violations of the law or the articles, under the same rules as directors of larger companies. For criminal exposure, article L. 244-1<\/a> extends to the SAS président the penalties written for chairmen, directors and general managers of sociétés anonymes, including the misuse of corporate assets. These are not theoretical texts. On 25 November 2025 the Commercial chamber of the Versailles Court of Appeal (general register no. 24\/06720<\/a>) confirmed a judgment that had “condamné M. [V], pris en sa qualité de président de la société [11], à une interdiction de diriger, gérer, administrer ou contrôler directement ou indirectement toute entreprise commerciale ou artisanale pour une durée de 10 ans”, before reducing the sanction on appeal, where the court stated: “Prononce une interdiction de gérer de cinq ans à l’encontre de M. [V]”. A président can therefore be banned from managing any commercial business for years. For the incoming président, this means taking stock on day one: latest annual accounts, ongoing disputes, tax and URSSAF positions, and any filing delays. For the outgoing président, it means negotiating a clean, documented handover rather than walking away silently, because faults committed during their mandate follow them after departure.<\/p>\n Finally, rebuild the company’s powers in the real world. The bank is the most urgent counterpart: until the signature authorisations (délégations de signature) are updated and the bank’s compliance file holds the new Kbis, the new président cannot move money, and the former président technically still can. Send the bank the new Kbis, the minutes, the legal-notice certificate and the new président’s identity documents the day the Kbis arrives, revoke the old remote-banking tokens in writing, and confirm the revocation. Do the same with the company’s accountant, payroll provider, insurers, landlords holding a personal guarantee of the former président, and key customers whose contracts name an authorised signatory. Where the former président gave personal guarantees (cautions) for company debts, their resignation does not end those guarantees; each creditor must expressly release them, which is negotiated separately and never assumed.<\/p>\n Replacing the président of a French SAS from abroad follows a strict order: read the articles and act inside them, decide remotely with complete minutes showing the outgoing and incoming officers and the exact handover date, publish the legal notice and file on the Guichet unique within one month, circulate the new Kbis and the BODACC entry, align the payroll with the mandate dates, document the liability handover, and rebuild the bank powers. The statutes and the courts leave no shortcut. The articles govern removal and appointment, the shareholders cannot override them even unanimously, and only a published, registered président fully binds the company in the eyes of third parties. Handled in that order, a change that begins with a resignation email ends, a few weeks later, with a new Kbis, a funded bank account and a company that never stopped running. For the full picture of creating and running the vehicle you are now governing, see our pillar guide for foreign founders on setting up a company in France: bank account, Kbis, VAT and first hire<\/a>.<\/p>\n Need a quick opinion on your case<\/strong><\/p>\n A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm helps you remove or appoint your SAS président, file the change on time and secure the handover. Phone consultation: 80 EUR including VAT.<\/p>\nB. Take the Removal and Appointment Decision Without Travelling to France<\/h3>\n
II. File the New President and Make the Change Effective Against Everyone<\/h2>\n
A. Publish the Change and File It on the Guichet Unique Within One Month, Then Collect the New Kbis<\/h3>\n
B. Secure the Aftermath: Payroll Status, Personal Liability and Bank Powers<\/h3>\n
Conclusion<\/h2>\n