{"id":2120634,"date":"2026-09-13T08:53:32","date_gmt":"2026-09-13T06:53:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/"},"modified":"2026-09-13T08:53:32","modified_gmt":"2026-09-13T06:53:32","slug":"foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/","title":{"rendered":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad"},"content":{"rendered":"

Your French subsidiary has just received an avis de v\u00e9rification<\/em>, the formal notice that the French tax office is opening a tax audit of its accounts. If you run the group from London, New York, Dubai or Singapore, the letter feels doubly alarming: it is written in French, it refers to procedures you have never met, and it sets clocks running that you cannot see. The financial stakes are immediate. French corporate tax, called IS for imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s<\/em>, applies at a standard rate of 25 percent, and every euro of profit the auditor adds back to the taxable result is taxed, charged late-payment interest and very often hit with a surcharge for deliberate fault. This guide explains exactly how a foreign parent prepares the audit, protects the contradictory debate with the auditor from abroad, answers the proposition de rectification<\/em>, the formal reassessment notice, within the 30-day deadline, and contests the bill through the hierarchical appeal, the departmental commission and the administrative courts. SAS means soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions simplifi\u00e9e<\/em>, the flexible French joint-stock company most foreign founders choose. CGI means Code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts<\/em>, the French Tax Code. LPF means Livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales<\/em>, the Tax Procedure Code that governs every audit step. BOFiP means Bulletin officiel des finances publiques<\/em>, the administration’s published doctrine. The auditor is the v\u00e9rificateur<\/em>; the audit of accounts is the v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9<\/em>; the reassessment is the redressement<\/em>. Read this way, the French procedure is not a maze but a sequence of dated moves, and a group abroad can play every one of them.<\/p>\n

I. Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received an Avis de V\u00e9rification: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Tax Audit<\/h2>\n

A. What the Audit Notice Must Contain and Which Papers a Foreign Group Gathers Within Days<\/h3>\n

The audit starts with a letter, and that letter is not a courtesy: it is a procedural act whose defects can annul everything that follows. Under article L. 47 of the LPF<\/a>, an audit of accounts cannot begin until the taxpayer has been informed by the sending or delivery of an audit notice, and the guarantees go further: “Cet avis doit pr\u00e9ciser les ann\u00e9es soumises \u00e0 v\u00e9rification et mentionner express\u00e9ment, sous peine de nullit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, que le contribuable a la facult\u00e9 de se faire assister par un conseil de son choix.” In plain English, the notice must state which years are audited and must expressly remind the company, on pain of nullity of the whole procedure, that it may be assisted by counsel of its choice. The same article adds: “L’avis informe le contribuable que la charte des droits et obligations du contribuable v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 peut \u00eatre consult\u00e9e sur le site internet de l’administration fiscale ou lui \u00eatre remise sur simple demande.” The charter of the audited taxpayer’s rights and obligations can be read on the tax administration’s website or obtained on simple request, and a foreign parent should ask the subsidiary’s accountant for it on day one, because it sets out the timetable of the audit in the administration’s own words. The first practical move is therefore a three-point check the day the letter arrives: which financial years are listed, whether the right to counsel is expressly mentioned, and who inside the group is appointed to answer the auditor. If the notice covers years you believed closed, remember the time limit in article L. 169 of the LPF<\/a>: “Pour l’imp\u00f4t sur le revenu et l’imp\u00f4t sur les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s, le droit de reprise de l’administration des imp\u00f4ts s’exerce jusqu’\u00e0 la fin de la troisi\u00e8me ann\u00e9e qui suit celle au titre de laquelle l’imposition est due.” For corporate tax the administration’s right to reassess runs until the end of the third year following the year for which the tax is due, so an audit opened in 2026 routinely covers 2023, 2024 and 2025. Years beyond that limit can only be reopened in narrow cases such as hidden activity, which is why the opening letter’s list of years deserves a careful comparison with the limitation clock before any document is handed over.<\/p>\n

The second move is assembling the file the auditor will ask for, because the law puts the company’s books at the centre of the control. Article L. 13 of the LPF<\/a> provides: “Les agents de l’administration des imp\u00f4ts v\u00e9rifient sur place, en suivant les r\u00e8gles pr\u00e9vues par le pr\u00e9sent livre, la comptabilit\u00e9 des contribuables astreints \u00e0 tenir et \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter des documents comptables.” Tax officers verify on the premises, following the rules of the procedure code, the accounts of taxpayers required to keep and present accounting records. Concretely, the French subsidiary must be ready to present its general ledger, journals, invoices issued and received, bank statements, payroll records, fixed-asset register and the filed corporate tax returns with their appendices for each audited year. A foreign group should add three layers that auditors of subsidiaries systematically request. First, the intra-group paperwork: service agreements with the foreign parent, transfer-pricing documentation where the group falls within the documentation duties, management-fee invoices with proof the services were actually rendered, loan agreements and interest calculations for any shareholder loan, and dividend resolutions. Groups that recharge head-office costs should already recognise the danger zone described in our guide on management fees challenged by the French auditor<\/a>, because undocumented monthly fees are the single most reassessed item in audits of foreign-held companies. Second, the corporate documents: Kbis, the official company identity extract issued by the commercial court registry (greffe<\/em>), articles of association, minutes of the meetings that approved the audited accounts, and the beneficial-owner register entry. Third, anything in a foreign language should be lined up for translation, because the auditor works in French and an English-only contract file slows the debate and invites misunderstanding; having key agreements translated or at least summarised in French by counsel keeps the discussion on substance rather than language. Day-one organisation also means freezing routine destruction: no archiving purge, no mailbox clean-up, no midst-audit change of accounting software without preserving the old data, since a missing or unusable file can turn a routine audit into a reconstruction of turnover from bank movements, which almost always ends higher than the declared figures.<\/p>\n

The third move is appointing the team and the channel. The subsidiary’s French accountant (expert-comptable<\/em>) will carry the technical discussion, but a foreign parent needs its own eyes: a French tax lawyer who receives copies of every auditor letter the day it arrives, a single group contact authorised to approve answers, and, where the amounts justify it, a short scoping call with counsel to rank the risks by size, typically transfer pricing and fees first, then VAT positions, then payroll and withholding items. Our pillar guide on setting up a company in France as a foreign founder, from bank account to Kbis to VAT<\/a> gives the formation-to-operation background, and our companion piece on French corporate tax for foreign owners, IS at 25 percent, branch versus subsidiary, and paying on time<\/a> gives the rate and calendar background the whole audit will refer back to, since the reassessment is computed by adding profit back and taxing it at the standard rate stated in article 219 of the CGI<\/a>: “Le taux normal de l’imp\u00f4t est fix\u00e9 \u00e0 25 %.” That rate is why preparation pays: each line of defence that survives saves a quarter of the disputed amount plus interest and surcharges, and each concession should be priced at that same quarter before it is granted.<\/p>\n

B. How the On-Site Audit Runs and How a Group Abroad Keeps the Debate Genuinely Contradictory<\/h3>\n

The audit itself takes place at the company’s premises, which for a small subsidiary often means the accountant’s office, and it unfolds as a series of visits during which the auditor examines the books, asks written and oral questions, and closes with a synthesis meeting. The defining legal feature of the French audit is that it must be contradictory: the auditor has to hold a genuine oral and contradictory debate with the taxpayer before notifying any reassessment, and the absence of that debate is one of the few defects that can wipe out the whole reassessment. The Conseil d’\u00c9tat, France’s supreme administrative court, framed the rule in its decision of 20 February 2023, ninth chamber, no. 461286 (JB3C), published on Legifrance<\/a>, concerning a bar-brasserie whose accounts had been rejected as non-probative: “Il appartient en cons\u00e9quence \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante d’apporter la preuve qu’elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9e d’un d\u00e9bat oral et contradictoire avec le v\u00e9rificateur.” Where the audit takes place at the accountant’s office at the company’s own request, it is for the company to prove it was deprived of an oral and contradictory debate with the auditor, and in that case the proof failed because the file showed questions put in writing, a formal record of missing stock inventories, sixteen on-site interventions and a synthesis meeting held with the company’s lawyer present. The lesson for a foreign group is practical rather than theoretical. Do not let the audit become a silent correspondence between the auditor and the accountant while the parent learns of it months later. Insist that counsel attends the key meetings, if necessary by video link with a colleague on site, that every oral answer of substance is confirmed in writing the same week, and that the closing synthesis meeting is prepared like a hearing: a short memo per open point, the exhibits numbered, the concessions and refusals minuted. A debate documented this way not only protects a future nullity argument, it very often reduces the reassessment itself, because an auditor who receives a reasoned, exhibit-backed answer during the audit regularly drops the weakest adjustments before writing the formal notice.<\/p>\n

Distance imposes four disciplines that Paris-based groups take for granted. First, speed of circulation: auditor letters must reach the foreign decision-maker within days, not at month-end, because the general time limit of article L. 11 of the LPF<\/a> runs from receipt: “le d\u00e9lai accord\u00e9 aux contribuables pour r\u00e9pondre aux demandes de renseignements, de justifications ou d’\u00e9claircissements et, d’une mani\u00e8re g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, \u00e0 toute notification \u00e9manant d’un agent de l’administration des imp\u00f4ts est fix\u00e9 \u00e0 trente jours \u00e0 compter de la r\u00e9ception de cette notification.” Thirty days from receipt is the default deadline for answering any request for information or clarification, so a letter that sleeps two weeks in a Paris mailbox before being scanned to the parent has already consumed half the defence time. Second, consistency between entities: the auditor will compare the subsidiary’s story with the parent’s invoices, the group’s transfer-pricing master file and sometimes information obtained from foreign administrations, so the parent’s finance team must align its documents with the subsidiary’s answers before they go out, never after. Third, language: the director who does not speak French should never meet the auditor alone; every meeting goes through counsel or a mandated representative, and every commitment is validated in writing in French. Fourth, knowledge of the local office: audits of Paris subsidiaries are handled by the Paris tax directorate (DRFiP de Paris, the regional public-finance directorate), whose auditors process large numbers of foreign-held companies and know exactly where the weak files sit. A group that presents, from the first visits, an organised file with translated key contracts, reconciled intra-group flows and a named contact who answers within days signals that the reassessment, if any, will be fought line by line, and that signal changes the auditor’s cost-benefit analysis on marginal adjustments.<\/p>\n

Two guardrails close the audit phase. The first is the protection against a second audit of the same years and taxes. Article L. 51 of the LPF<\/a> states: “Lorsque la v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9 ou l’examen de comptabilit\u00e9, pour une p\u00e9riode d\u00e9termin\u00e9e, au regard d’un imp\u00f4t ou d’une taxe ou d’un groupe d’imp\u00f4ts ou de taxes, est achev\u00e9, l’administration ne peut proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9 ou \u00e0 un examen de comptabilit\u00e9 de ces m\u00eames \u00e9critures au regard des m\u00eames imp\u00f4ts ou taxes et pour la m\u00eame p\u00e9riode.” Once an audit of accounts for a given period and given taxes is completed, the administration cannot audit the same records again for the same taxes and period, subject to narrow exceptions such as fraud or a follow-up on facts revealed later. A foreign parent should therefore treat the closing of the audit as a legal event: keep the closing documents, note exactly which taxes and periods were covered, and invoke the rule if a new team returns on the same ground. The second guardrail is knowing when the audit phase ends and the written reassessment phase begins. An audit with no adjustment ends with a notice that no reassessment is envisaged; an audit with adjustments continues with the proposition de rectification<\/em>, and from that moment the timetable hardens and the centre of gravity moves from the auditor’s desk to written observations, appeals and, where needed, the courts. Understanding that switch is what turns Part II of this guide from theory into a checklist.<\/p>\n

II. You Have Received a Proposition de Rectification: How to Reply Within 30 Days and Contest From Abroad<\/h2>\n

A. How to Answer the Reassessment Notice and Trigger the Hierarchical Appeal and the Departmental Commission<\/h3>\n

The proposition de rectification<\/em> is the document that turns audit discussions into a quantified threat: for each adjustment it states the legal basis, the facts, the computation and the resulting tax, interest and penalties. Its legal regime is strict, and the strictness protects the taxpayer. Article L. 57 of the LPF<\/a> requires: “L’administration adresse au contribuable une proposition de rectification qui doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 lui permettre de formuler ses observations ou de faire conna\u00eetre son acceptation.” The notice must be reasoned so that the taxpayer can submit observations or accept, which means a motivation so thin that no serious answer is possible is itself a ground for discharge. Before the company answers or accepts, article L. 48 of the LPF<\/a> adds a second lock: “l’administration doit indiquer, avant que le contribuable pr\u00e9sente ses observations ou accepte les rehaussements propos\u00e9s”, in the article L. 57 proposal or the article L. 76 notification, “le montant des droits, taxes et p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s r\u00e9sultant de ces rectifications.” The administration must state, before the taxpayer responds, the amount of duties, taxes and penalties resulting from the adjustments. A foreign parent reading the notice should therefore verify three things before drafting a single argument: that every adjustment carries its legal basis and computation, that the totals of tax, interest and each penalty are stated, and that the penalties are individually justified rather than applied as an automatic accessory. Where motivation is missing on a head of adjustment, counsel says so expressly in the observations, because courts do discharge adjustments whose statement of reasons does not allow the taxpayer to understand and discuss them, and the point, once made in time, cannot be cured afterwards by explanations served at a later stage of the procedure.<\/p>\n

The observations themselves must be filed within the 30-day period of article L. 11, and a group abroad should treat that deadline as absolute. The same article offers one breathing space: on the taxpayer’s request received before the deadline expires, article L. 57 of the LPF<\/a> provides that “ce d\u00e9lai est prorog\u00e9 de trente jours.” In practice counsel requests the extension systematically and immediately upon receipt, which buys the time to collect foreign evidence, obtain translations and have the parent’s finance team validate the figures, while keeping the initiative. The content of the observations follows a fixed architecture that French tax litigators use in every case. Each adjustment gets its own section: reminder of the auditor’s reasoning, statement of the facts with exhibit references, legal discussion tied to the exact article invoked, a quantified alternative computation where the principle is conceded but the amount is disputed, and an express request, typically maintained as a fallback, for referral to the departmental commission where the item falls within its remit. Exhibits are numbered, bank-paid and dated; intra-group services are proved by contracts, work product, time records and payment flows rather than by affirmations; and the letter closes with a global summary table so the superior reading it sees the financial effect of each concession at a glance. The tone stays professional and factual throughout: the observations are the first exhibit of the future court file, and a judge reading them two years later should find a reasonable company explaining its business, not a group lecturing the administration.<\/p>\n

Two administrative appeals then open without going to court, and both are free, quick and fully available to a company whose owners live abroad. The first is the hierarchical appeal (recours hi\u00e9rarchique<\/em>): the taxpayer asks for the file to be reviewed by the auditor’s superior, then, if the disagreement persists, by the departmental interlocutor, an independent senior official who hears both sides. The official service-public guide on tax disputes describes this route as the way to bring the case before the auditor’s superior, and its page on amicable disputes with the tax administration<\/a> is the starting point every foreign group should bookmark. The hierarchical meeting is often the most cost-effective moment of the whole dispute: a well-prepared one-hour discussion, with counsel presenting the exhibit file and the parent’s finance director available by video to explain the business, settles or halves a surprising share of adjustments, because the superior has the authority to abandon fragile points that the auditor felt obliged to notify. The second route is the departmental commission for direct taxes and turnover taxes, which article L. 59 of the LPF<\/a> opens in these terms: “Lorsque le d\u00e9saccord persiste sur les rectifications notifi\u00e9es, l’administration, si le contribuable le demande, soumet le litige \u00e0 l’avis soit de la commission des imp\u00f4ts directs et des taxes sur le chiffre d’affaires pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l’article 1651 du code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts”. Where disagreement persists, the administration, if the taxpayer so requests, submits the dispute for an opinion to the commission for direct taxes and turnover taxes, a joint body of administration and taxpayer representatives. The request must be made in the observations, it covers questions of fact such as valuations, pricing and the reality of services rather than pure questions of law, and the commission’s opinion, though advisory, carries real weight: the administration follows it in most cases, and where it does not, its opinion becomes a useful exhibit before the court. A foreign group should therefore never waive these two stages by silence or delay; they cost nothing, they suspend nothing but they frequently reduce the bill, and they build the reasoned record on which the court case will later rest.<\/p>\n

B. How to Suspend Collection, File the Claim and Take the Case to the Administrative Court<\/h3>\n

Once the administration confirms the adjustments, in whole or in part, the reassessed tax is placed in collection, and a foreign parent discovers the second shock of French procedure: the tax must in principle be paid even while it is contested. The escape route is the suspension of payment attached to the formal claim (r\u00e9clamation<\/em>). Article L. 277 of the LPF<\/a> provides: “Le contribuable qui conteste le bien-fond\u00e9 ou le montant des impositions mises \u00e0 sa charge est autoris\u00e9, s’il en a express\u00e9ment formul\u00e9 la demande dans sa r\u00e9clamation et pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 le montant ou les bases du d\u00e9gr\u00e8vement auquel il estime avoir droit, \u00e0 diff\u00e9rer le paiement de la partie contest\u00e9e de ces impositions et des p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s y aff\u00e9rentes.” A taxpayer disputing the basis or amount of the assessment may, if it expressly so requests in its claim and states the amount or basis of the relief sought, defer payment of the contested part of the tax and related penalties. Two conditions are therefore non-negotiable: the claim must expressly request suspension, and it must quantify the relief claimed. Above the amount fixed by decree, the debtor must provide guarantees, typically a bank guarantee, which a foreign group should negotiate with its French bank as soon as the claim is filed rather than after the first enforcement notice. The claim itself must be filed on time: article R*196-1 of the LPF<\/a> requires that “Pour \u00eatre recevables, les r\u00e9clamations relatives aux imp\u00f4ts autres que les imp\u00f4ts directs locaux et les taxes annexes \u00e0 ces imp\u00f4ts, doivent \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es \u00e0 l’administration au plus tard le 31 d\u00e9cembre de la deuxi\u00e8me ann\u00e9e suivant celle, selon le cas”. Claims on taxes other than local direct taxes must reach the administration no later than 31 December of the second year following the relevant event, usually the collection notice. Missing that date kills the entire dispute regardless of its merits, which is why counsel diaries it the day the assessment arrives and why a parent abroad should demand written confirmation that the claim, with its express suspension request, has been filed.<\/p>\n

If the administration rejects the claim expressly or stays silent, the dispute moves to the administrative court (tribunal administratif<\/em>), on appeal the administrative court of appeal (cour administrative d’appel<\/em>, CAA), and on points of law the Conseil d’\u00c9tat. The gateway deadline is stated in article R. 421-1 of the Code of administrative justice<\/a>: “La juridiction ne peut \u00eatre saisie que par voie de recours form\u00e9 contre une d\u00e9cision, et ce, dans les deux mois \u00e0 partir de la notification ou de la publication de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e.” The court can only be seised by an action against a decision, within two months of notification or publication of the contested decision. The whole case then runs on written pleadings, which is good news for a group abroad: no one needs to fly to Paris for a hearing, representation runs through a French lawyer, and the parent’s role is to supply evidence and approve strategy. Before the court, the standard of reasoning illustrated by the Conseil d’\u00c9tat’s decision of 4 April 2025, third and eighth chambers combined, no. 461220 (Conversant, formerly Valueclick), published on Legifrance<\/a>, deserves attention. The court upheld a court of appeal that had found a reassessment sufficiently reasoned where the notice set out the reconstruction method and the 80 percent expense ratio applied to reconstructed receipts: “c’est sans erreur de droit que la cour administrative d’appel en a d\u00e9duit que cette proposition de rectification \u00e9tait suffisamment motiv\u00e9e au regard des exigences de l’article L. 76 du livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales”. The message cuts both ways: courts do not demand that the notice disclose every internal working, but they do require a method the taxpayer can actually discuss, so challenges should target missing methods and figures, not the mere brevity of the notice. On substance, the corporate-tax dispute of a subsidiary almost always turns on the territoriality rule of article 209 of the CGI<\/a>, under which taxable profits are computed “en tenant compte uniquement des b\u00e9n\u00e9fices r\u00e9alis\u00e9s dans les entreprises exploit\u00e9es en France”, taking into account only profits made in businesses operated in France. Deductions for payments to the foreign parent survive only if the expense was incurred in the interest of the French business and priced at arm’s length, which sends the litigator straight back to the contracts, deliverables and pricing file assembled during the audit. Penalties must be fought on their own ground: article 1729 of the CGI<\/a> attaches to inaccuracies and omissions a surcharge of “40 % en cas de manquement d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9”, 40 percent for deliberate fault, rising to 80 percent for abuse of law or fraud, and each level has its own legal conditions the administration must prove. A court file that contests the principle, the computation, each penalty and the interest, head by head, with the audit observations as its backbone, gives the foreign shareholder the fullest possible recovery, and the suspension obtained with the claim holds collection at bay while the case runs, provided the guarantees stay in place. Groups whose audit reveals deeper trouble, such as a subsidiary that can no longer pay its debts, should read in parallel our guide for directors of French companies that cannot pay their debts and face a management ban<\/a>, because a tax dispute must never be allowed to drift into an insolvency fault with its own 45-day filing logic.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

A tax audit of a French subsidiary is a procedure with dated moves, and a foreign parent that learns the sequence keeps every remedy. Check the audit notice against article L. 47 the day it arrives, because a missing statement of the audited years or of the right to counsel can annul the procedure. Build the file before the auditor asks: complete accounts, intra-group agreements with proof of real services, translated key contracts, and a single group contact who answers within days, since the default 30-day clock of article L. 11 runs from receipt. Live the contradictory debate through counsel, attend the synthesis meeting prepared, and close the audit knowing exactly which years and taxes are covered so the article L. 51 shield against a second audit can be invoked. When the reassessment notice arrives, test its reasoning against articles L. 57 and L. 48, answer within 30 days with a systematic extension request, and trigger the hierarchical appeal and the departmental commission, the two free stages that most often reduce the bill. Then claim with an express suspension request under article L. 277, diary the 31 December bar of article R*196-1, and take a well-documented file to the administrative court within the two months of article R. 421-1, contesting the tax, the computation and each penalty head by head. The Conseil d’\u00c9tat’s JB3C and Conversant rulings show courts that enforce both sides of the bargain: the taxpayer must prove any denial of debate, and the administration must serve a notice whose method can actually be discussed. Played this way, from London or Singapore as surely as from Paris, the French audit becomes what it should be: a dispute about figures, fought on paper, with the law setting the rules for both sides.<\/p>\n

Need a quick opinion on your case<\/h2>\n

Send us the audit notice or the reassessment proposal today: a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer of the firm to check your deadlines, price each adjustment at the 25 percent rate, and freeze collection while you contest. Our firm is based in Paris and assists foreign groups across France. Call +33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a> or write via the contact page<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A French tax audit notice (avis de verification) has landed on your subsidiary’s desk. How a foreign parent prepares the audit, replies to the proposition de rectification within 30 days and contests the reassessment from abroad.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16568,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2120634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nYour French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A French tax audit notice (avis de verification) has landed on your subsidiary's desk. How a foreign parent prepares the audit, replies to the proposition de rectification within 30 days and contests the reassessment from abroad.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4502,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cryptage\",\"Doing Business in France\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Doing Business in France\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/\",\"name\":\"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4950,\"height\":3300},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/13\\\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad","og_description":"A French tax audit notice (avis de verification) has landed on your subsidiary's desk. How a foreign parent prepares the audit, replies to the proposition de rectification within 30 days and contests the reassessment from abroad.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad","datePublished":"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/"},"wordCount":4502,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cryptage","Doing Business in France"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Doing Business in France"}],"dateModified":"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/","name":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-13T06:53:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-J7MPbX1-XzA-unsplash.webp","width":4950,"height":3300},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/13\/foreign-subsidiary-france-tax-audit-avis-verification-proposition-rectification-contest\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Your French Subsidiary Has Just Received a Tax Audit Notice: How a Foreign Parent Prepares the Audit, Answers the Reassessment and Contests From Abroad"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2120634"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120634\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2120634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2120634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2120634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}