{"id":2119137,"date":"2026-09-11T03:13:04","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T01:13:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/"},"modified":"2026-09-11T03:13:04","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T01:13:04","slug":"foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/","title":{"rendered":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call"},"content":{"rendered":"

The PDF from the French bank is rarely labelled as a guarantee. It arrives after the Kbis (the official extract from the RCS, the registre du commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s<\/em>, France\u2019s companies register) has been issued, or while the credit committee still holds the IBAN. The title is lettre de patronage<\/em>, lettre de confort<\/em> or \u201ccomfort letter\u201d. The addressee is the foreign parent, not the pr\u00e9sident<\/em> or g\u00e9rant<\/em> personally. Sign this, the bank says, and the account can proceed.<\/p>\n

Article 2287-1 of the Civil Code<\/a> lists the personal securities governed by Title I: \u201cLes s\u00fbret\u00e9s personnelles r\u00e9gies par le pr\u00e9sent titre sont le cautionnement, la garantie autonome et la lettre d’intention.\u201d The label does not decide whether the parent must pay if the French SAS (soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions simplifi\u00e9e<\/em>) or SARL (soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e<\/em>) defaults. The wording does. That is a different risk from the director\u2019s personal cautionnement<\/a> and from a parent loan<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Cour de cassation treated \u201cfaire en sorte qu’aucun cr\u00e9ancier n’encoure de perte\u201d as an obligation of result in 2019. The Court of Appeal of Versailles dismissed a \u20ac145,940.54 claim in 2025 where the parent had only undertaken to \u201cwatch over\u201d the subsidiary. A foreign owner who treats the letter as a formality discovers the difference when the bank calls. This article sits next to the path for setting up a French company as a foreign founder<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I. When a French bank asks the foreign parent for a letter of patronage, is it a comfort letter or a hidden guarantee?<\/h2>\n

A. What French banks mean by a lettre de patronage, a lettre d’intention and a lettre de confort<\/h3>\n

French relationship managers use three labels for the same family of documents. Lettre de patronage<\/em> is the banking phrase. Lettre de confort<\/em> is the older commercial phrase. Lettre d’intention<\/em> is the statutory phrase. Article 2322 of the Civil Code<\/a> defines it in one sentence: \u201cLa lettre d’intention est l’engagement de faire ou de ne pas faire ayant pour objet le soutien apport\u00e9 \u00e0 un d\u00e9biteur dans l’ex\u00e9cution de son obligation envers son cr\u00e9ancier.\u201d The parent undertakes to do something, or to refrain from doing something, in order to support the subsidiary in performing its obligation to the bank. The parent does not, by that definition alone, undertake to pay the debt.<\/p>\n

That statutory object is why the letter exists in the onboarding file. The French company is a separate legal person. Its share capital may be \u20ac1,000 or \u20ac10,000. Its Kbis shows a foreign pr\u00e9sident living abroad. The bank\u2019s credit committee wants a group signal: the parent knows the facility, the parent will keep the subsidiary in a position to pay, the parent will not walk away on the first difficult quarter. English-speaking treasurers know the same document as a letter of comfort. In London or New York the letter is often intended to be morally binding and legally thin. In France it is a named personal security. Treating it as a non-binding group policy note is the first mistake.<\/p>\n

The second mistake is to confuse this letter with the M&A \u201cletter of intent\u201d that records a plan to buy shares. That document belongs to pre-contractual negotiations. Article 2322 belongs to the law of securities. The same French words cover two different acts. A parent that already signed a term sheet for an acquisition has not, by that term sheet, supported the target\u2019s overdraft. A parent that signs the bank\u2019s patronage template has not bought anything. It has given a security.<\/p>\n

The bank asks for the letter at predictable moments. The first is account opening, when compliance has the Kbis but still wants a group undertaking before it releases payments. The second is the first overdraft, the first equipment lease, or the first facility that exceeds the cash on the blocked capital account. The third is a later review, including after an AML review that has already frozen or closed the account<\/a>, when the bank will only restore the relationship against a parent letter. The fourth is a landlord or a supplier who copies the bank\u2019s method and asks the parent to \u201cconfirm its support\u201d. Each of those addressees will later argue that it relied on the letter. The parent should assume that the letter will be produced in court.<\/p>\n

The legal starting point remains the separation of patrimony. The subsidiary\u2019s debts are the subsidiary\u2019s debts. The parent is not a surety merely because it owns 100% of the shares, appoints the pr\u00e9sident, and consolidates the accounts. Captain Contrat\u2019s public guidance on parent and subsidiary restates that principle and then adds the letter of intent as the instrument through which a parent may choose to stand beside the subsidiary. Service-public\u2019s business page on cautionnement, \u201cGarantir une dette avec un cautionnement\u201d<\/a>, describes the neighbouring instrument: a promise to pay the debt if the debtor does not. The patronage letter sits between those two ideas. It can stay on the support side of article 2322. It can slide onto the payment side of article 2288 of the Civil Code<\/a>, which defines suretyship: \u201cLe cautionnement est le contrat par lequel une caution<\/a> s’oblige envers le cr\u00e9ancier \u00e0 payer la dette du d\u00e9biteur en cas de d\u00e9faillance de celui-ci.\u201d<\/p>\n

Qualification is a matter of interpretation, not of the heading. Article 1188 of the Civil Code<\/a> states: \u201cLe contrat s’interpr\u00e8te d’apr\u00e8s la commune intention des parties plut\u00f4t qu’en s’arr\u00eatant au sens litt\u00e9ral de ses termes.\u201d Article 1192<\/a> then stops the court from rewriting a clear clause: \u201cOn ne peut interpr\u00e9ter les clauses claires et pr\u00e9cises \u00e0 peine de d\u00e9naturation.\u201d If the letter clearly says the parent will pay on first demand, the parent will not be heard to say that it only meant to be helpful. If the letter only says the parent will watch over the subsidiary\u2019s finances, the bank will not turn that sentence into a cheque by calling the document a guarantee in later correspondence. The Cour de cassation and the courts of appeal have spent twenty years drawing that line, one formula at a time.<\/p>\n

A foreign parent should therefore read the French template as a security document, have it translated by someone who understands securities rather than marketing, and compare it with the three statutory boxes in article 2287-1. Comfort, patronage and letter of intent are banking vocabulary. Cautionnement, autonomous guarantee and letter of intent are the legal vocabulary. Only the second list decides the claim.<\/p>\n

B. When the wording turns the letter into a cautionnement or a first-demand guarantee<\/h3>\n

The commercial chamber of the Cour de cassation has already shown how little the title protects the parent. In Cass. com., 18 December 2019, no. 18-12.287<\/a>, the company Ban rouge, which held the entire capital of its subsidiary TLU, had signed a letter of intent in favour of Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 G\u00e9n\u00e9rale. TLU went into liquidation. The bank sued the parent for the unpaid credit. The Court of Appeal of Chamb\u00e9ry held that the parent\u2019s obligation to act was only an obligation of means. The Cour de cassation quashed that holding. After recording that Ban rouge had undertaken \u201c\u00e0 faire en sorte qu’aucun cr\u00e9ancier n’encoure de perte du fait des engagements avec ses filiales\u201d and had assured the bank that it would do \u201cde toute mani\u00e8re, le n\u00e9cessaire afin que sa filiale respecte ses engagements et dispose d’une tr\u00e9sorerie suffisante \u00e0 cet effet\u201d, the Court held that \u201cl’obligation contract\u00e9e s’analysait en une obligation de r\u00e9sultat\u201d. The appeal court had not drawn the legal consequences of its own findings. The parent\u2019s words, not the label \u201cletter of intent\u201d, produced an obligation of result.<\/p>\n

The opposite wording produced the opposite result in CA Versailles, 24 June 2025, no. 23\/08513<\/a>. Design Vision had signed, on 1 October 2020, a letter of intent for a \u20ac150,000 loan granted by CIC to its subsidiary N\u00e9cessaire. After the subsidiary\u2019s liquidation the bank claimed \u20ac145,940.54 from the parent, arguing that the letter was an obligation of result and a guarantee. The court quoted article 2322 and then the letter: the parent confirmed that its policy had always been to see that subsidiaries were financially sound, and that \u201cnous veillerons \u00e0 ce que notre filiale soit en mesure de respecter ses engagements financiers\u201d. The court held: \u201cL’obligation souscrite par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Design Vision est ainsi de \u00ab veiller \u00bb \u00e0 la solidit\u00e9 de la situation financi\u00e8re de ses filiales, et de \u00ab veiller \u00bb \u00e0 ce que sa filiale soit en mesure de respecter ses engagements financiers.\u201d There was no assurance of a result, no promise to be substituted for the subsidiary, no guarantee. Emails from the bank itself had described the template as a \u201cmod\u00e8le obligation de moyens\u201d. The court of appeal reversed the commercial court, dismissed the payment claim, and ordered the bank to pay costs. It added, in terms that matter for every later demand: \u201cIl a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que la lettre d’intention souscrite par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Design Vision exprimait seulement son intention de mettre en \u0153uvre certains moyens pour permettre au b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de faire face \u00e0 ses obligations, sans que cela ne constitue une quelconque obligation de garantie \u00e9quivalente \u00e0 un cautionnement.\u201d The bank had pleaded a guarantee. It had not even alleged a breach of the obligation of means. The claim failed.<\/p>\n

Those two decisions give the foreign parent a working test. Language of result \u2014 \u201cfaire en sorte qu’aucun cr\u00e9ancier n’encoure de perte\u201d, \u201cde toute mani\u00e8re, le n\u00e9cessaire\u201d, \u201cnous nous substituons\u201d, \u201cnous r\u00e9glons \u00e0 premi\u00e8re demande\u201d, \u201cnous garantissons le paiement\u201d \u2014 pulls the letter toward an obligation of result, toward suretyship, or toward an autonomous guarantee. Language of means \u2014 \u201cnous veillerons\u201d, \u201cnous nous efforcerons\u201d, \u201cnous maintiendrons une politique de soutien\u201d, without a promise that no creditor will lose money \u2014 can stay inside article 2322 as a duty to support. The bank\u2019s own covering email is part of the file. If the bank sold the document as a means template and later sues as if it were a guarantee, Versailles shows that the mismatch is usable.<\/p>\n

Two neighbouring statutes complete the map. If the letter obliges the parent to pay the subsidiary\u2019s debt in the event of default, the court may treat it as a cautionnement under article 2288, even if the heading still says patronage. A corporate surety does not benefit from the handwritten-mention rules that protect a natural person under article 2297 of the Civil Code<\/a>: \u201cA peine de nullit\u00e9 de son engagement, la caution personne physique appose elle-m\u00eame la mention qu’elle s’engage en qualit\u00e9 de caution \u00e0 payer au cr\u00e9ancier ce que lui doit le d\u00e9biteur en cas de d\u00e9faillance de celui-ci, dans la limite d’un montant en principal et accessoires exprim\u00e9 en toutes lettres et en chiffres.\u201d That sentence is why the director\u2019s personal guarantee is a separate negotiation, with its own nullities. It does not rescue a parent company that signed a payment undertaking. If the letter obliges the parent to pay a sum on first demand, without raising defences drawn from the underlying loan, article 2321 of the Civil Code<\/a> describes an autonomous guarantee: \u201cLa garantie autonome est l’engagement par lequel le garant s’oblige, en consid\u00e9ration d’une obligation souscrite par un tiers, \u00e0 verser une somme soit \u00e0 premi\u00e8re demande, soit suivant des modalit\u00e9s convenues.\u201d The parent then pays first and argues later, and only abuse, fraud or collusion stops the call.<\/p>\n

A parent that wanted a comfort letter and finds, on a second reading, a first-demand clause or a substitution clause is not looking at a drafting inconvenience. It is looking at a different security. The right response is to refuse that template, or to strike the payment language, before anyone signs. After signature, the fight is qualification and performance, not vocabulary.<\/p>\n

II. How should a foreign parent draft, authorize and contest a letter of patronage from abroad?<\/h2>\n

A. How to draft and authorize the letter so the parent is not over-committed<\/h3>\n

The safest letter is the one the parent can perform without writing a cheque on day one of a default. That usually means an obligation of means, limited in amount, limited in time, limited to a named facility, and silent on first demand. The parent confirms that it owns the subsidiary, that it intends to keep that ownership for the stated period, that it will not take steps to strip the subsidiary of the means needed to perform the named facility, and that it will consider, in good faith, recapitalisation or a current-account advance if the subsidiary is short. It does not undertake that \u201cno creditor will incur a loss\u201d. It does not undertake to pay \u201cin any event\u201d. It does not undertake to be substituted for the subsidiary. It does not give the bank a right to call a sum \u201con first demand, without the parent being entitled to raise any defence\u201d. Those four refusals are the difference between article 2322 and articles 2288 or 2321.<\/p>\n

The letter should identify the French company by its name, RCS number and registered office, identify the bank and the facility, and state the cap in figures and in words. An unlimited letter that also covers \u201call present and future credits in any form whatsoever\u201d, which is the formula Versailles had to read, is how a \u20ac150,000 loan becomes an open-ended group exposure. If the parent is willing to cover one overdraft of \u20ac200,000 until 31 December 2027, the letter should say so. If the bank wants a wider net, that is a pricing discussion, not a recitals discussion. Governing law and jurisdiction should be written, not left to later argument. A French bank will push for French law and the commercial court of the French company\u2019s registered office. A foreign parent that accepts French law should still keep the obligation inside article 2322.<\/p>\n

Language must be consistent across the pack. The covering email, the term sheet, the board minutes and the letter should tell the same story. Versailles used the bank\u2019s own \u201cmod\u00e8le obligation de moyens\u201d email against the later claim. A parent can use the same method in reverse: its board minutes should record that the directors authorised a letter of intent under article 2322, an obligation of means, and not a cautionnement or an autonomous guarantee. If the bank later recharacterises the document, those minutes are not decisive, but they are part of the common intention under article 1188.<\/p>\n

Authorisation is a second, separate question. If the parent is a French soci\u00e9t\u00e9 anonyme<\/em> (SA, a public limited company), article L. 225-35 of the Commercial Code<\/a> is explicit: \u201cLes cautions, avals et garanties donn\u00e9s par des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s autres que celles exploitant des \u00e9tablissements bancaires ou financiers font l’objet d’une autorisation du conseil, qui en limite le montant, dans les conditions d\u00e9termin\u00e9es par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d’Etat.\u201d The board authorises a ceiling. Article R. 225-28 of the Commercial Code<\/a> adds that the authorisation given to the managing director cannot run for more than one year, \u201cquelle que soit la dur\u00e9e des engagements cautionn\u00e9s, avalis\u00e9s ou garantis\u201d. A patronage letter that a court treats as a \u201cgarantie\u201d falls inside that corporate filter. A letter that stays a pure obligation of means is more debatable. The practical answer for an SA parent is to obtain a board authorisation anyway, with a ceiling and a one-year review, rather than argue the characterisation after a call.<\/p>\n

If the parent is a French SAS, article L. 225-35 does not apply as such. Article L. 227-6 of the Commercial Code<\/a> gives the pr\u00e9sident the widest powers to act in the company\u2019s name within the corporate purpose, and then states: \u201cLes dispositions statutaires limitant les pouvoirs du pr\u00e9sident sont inopposables aux tiers.\u201d A statutory clause that required a shareholder vote before any \u201cguarantee\u201d will not, by itself, defeat a bank that received a letter signed by the pr\u00e9sident, unless the bank knew of the excess. The same logic appears for a SARL in article L. 223-18 of the Commercial Code<\/a>: in relations with third parties the g\u00e9rant has the widest powers, and clauses that limit those powers cannot be set up against third parties. Internally, the parent should still follow its own articles. Externally, the bank will argue apparent authority.<\/p>\n

If the parent is not French \u2014 a Delaware corporation, a GmbH, a Ltd, a Luxembourg company \u2014 French articles L. 225-35 and L. 227-6 do not govern its internal power. The law of the parent does. The French court that later hears the bank\u2019s claim will still characterise the instrument under the law chosen in the letter, often French law. The parent therefore needs both things: a valid corporate authorisation under its own law (board resolution, secretary\u2019s certificate, whatever its articles require), and a French-law text that does not overspill into payment. Banks that already ran an AML file on the foreign shareholder will ask for that corporate paper. Sending it is cheaper than arguing, three years later, that the signatory had no power.<\/p>\n

A bilingual execution is useful when the parent\u2019s board reads English and the bank\u2019s template is French. The French version will usually prevail in a French court. The English version is for the board, not for a later claim that the parent \u201cdid not understand\u201d. Do not sign a scanned signature block on which the bank has already typed \u201ccaution solidaire\u201d in small print under a patronage heading. Read the last line. If the bank also wants the director\u2019s personal suretyship, that is the other article, the other statute, and the other negotiation.<\/p>\n

B. What to do when the bank calls the letter, freezes the account or sues the parent<\/h3>\n

The call does not always look like a writ. It may be a formal notice (mise en demeure<\/em>) sent to the parent\u2019s registered office abroad, a hold on the French company\u2019s account, a refusal to renew the facility unless the parent \u201chonours its patronage\u201d, or an assignment before the commercial court of the French company\u2019s registered office. The first task is to recover the entire file: the signed letter, every draft, the covering emails, the board minutes, the facility agreement, the Kbis, and any later correspondence in which the bank described the letter as a means undertaking or as a guarantee. Qualification will be fought on that bundle, not on a single paragraph isolated by the bank\u2019s counsel.<\/p>\n

The second task is to state, in writing, what the parent accepted. If the letter is a means undertaking in the Versailles sense, the parent does not pay the subsidiary\u2019s unpaid balance merely because the subsidiary has defaulted. Default is the moment at which the bank must show that the parent failed to implement the support it promised: a recapitalisation that was announced and then withheld, a current-account drain, a decision to let the subsidiary fail while the parent extracted cash. Article 1231-1 of the Civil Code<\/a> then supplies the remedy for a proven breach of that obligation: \u201cLe d\u00e9biteur est condamn\u00e9, s’il y a lieu, au paiement de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats soit \u00e0 raison de l’inex\u00e9cution de l’obligation, soit \u00e0 raison du retard dans l’ex\u00e9cution, s’il ne justifie pas que l’ex\u00e9cution a \u00e9t\u00e9 emp\u00each\u00e9e par la force majeure.\u201d Damages are not automatically equal to the unpaid loan. They depend on the breach. A bank that, like CIC in the Versailles case, pleads a guarantee and says nothing about a failure of means, invites the same dismissal.<\/p>\n

If the letter used Ban rouge language \u2014 no creditor will incur a loss; the parent will in any event do what is necessary \u2014 the parent should expect an obligation of result and a claim for the unpaid facility. The defence then moves to other grounds: the facility was amended without the parent, the cap was exceeded, the letter expired, the signatory had no power and the bank knew it, the bank sold a means template and cannot now denature a clear \u201cveiller\u201d clause under article 1192. None of those defences should be invented. They have to sit in the documents.<\/p>\n

If the letter is in substance a cautionnement, the parent-company surety does not have the natural-person protections of article 2297 or of article 2300 of the Civil Code<\/a> on disproportionate suretyships. It may still raise the debtor\u2019s exceptions under article 2298<\/a>: \u201cLa caution peut opposer au cr\u00e9ancier toutes les exceptions, personnelles ou inh\u00e9rentes \u00e0 la dette, qui appartiennent au d\u00e9biteur, sous r\u00e9serve des dispositions du deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a de l’article 2293.\u201d A corporate surety can argue that the underlying obligation is not due, or that it has been extinguished, in a way that a first-demand guarantor under article 2321 generally cannot. That is one reason to resist first-demand wording at the drafting stage. After a call, it is a reason to identify which of the three boxes in article 2287-1 actually fits.<\/p>\n

Account freezes sit in a different register. The bank may freeze the French company\u2019s account because of a default, an AML hold, or a third-party attachment. A patronage letter does not give the bank a right to freeze the parent\u2019s foreign accounts by itself. It may give the bank a contractual claim against the parent. Mixing the two, and treating a freeze as self-help enforcement of the letter, should be challenged in correspondence and, where the French account is concerned, before the court that has jurisdiction over the bank-customer relationship. If the French company\u2019s registered office is in Paris or elsewhere in \u00cele-de-France, that fight is usually in the Paris commercial court specified by the account agreement, with the Kbis, the general terms and the letter in the same bundle. A foreign parent served abroad should not ignore the summons on the ground that it never set foot in France. Article 1103 of the Civil Code<\/a> is blunt: \u201cLes contrats l\u00e9galement form\u00e9s tiennent lieu de loi \u00e0 ceux qui les ont faits.\u201d A letter validly formed under French law binds the parent that signed it.<\/p>\n

Evidence of actual support is the parent\u2019s friend when the obligation is one of means. Current-account advances, documented capital increases, delayed intra-group charges, and a refusal to upstream cash while the facility was alive are the facts Versailles recorded when it described the parent\u2019s conduct. A parent that emptied the subsidiary through management fees and then pleaded a comfort letter will look like a parent that did not even perform a duty of means. Keep the intra-group cash trail. It is the same trail a tax inspector reads; it is also the trail a commercial court reads when the bank says the parent did nothing.<\/p>\n

Settlement is often available before judgment. A bank that overplayed a means letter may accept a capped contribution, a new limited letter, or a timetable for recapitalisation. A parent that signed result language may still negotiate a discount against a prompt payment and a release. Do not sign a new \u201cacknowledgement of guarantee\u201d in the heat of a freeze; that document will be exhibit 1 in the next hearing. Any new instrument should be as carefully limited as the first one should have been.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

A letter of patronage is not a polite group email. In French law it is a lettre d’intention, a personal security listed next to suretyship and the autonomous guarantee. The bank asks for it because the Kbis of a thinly capitalised foreign-owned SAS or SARL does not, by itself, comfort a credit committee. The parent can give that comfort without promising to pay. It can also, by a handful of English or French verbs, promise exactly that.<\/p>\n

The working distinction is in the wording. \u201cNous veillerons\u201d was an obligation of means in Versailles in 2025, and the bank that sued as if it held a guarantee lost. \u201cFaire en sorte qu’aucun cr\u00e9ancier n’encoure de perte\u201d and \u201cde toute mani\u00e8re, le n\u00e9cessaire\u201d were an obligation of result for the Cour de cassation in 2019. First-demand language is an autonomous guarantee. A promise to pay on default is a cautionnement. The heading will not save the parent from the sentence it signed.<\/p>\n

From abroad, the practical sequence is narrow. Recover the template before anyone signs. Strip payment, substitution and first-demand clauses. Cap the amount and the duration. Authorise the letter under the parent\u2019s own law, and, if the parent is a French SA, under article L. 225-35. Keep the emails that describe the letter as a means undertaking. If a call comes, answer the qualification first, then the performance, and do not treat a freeze as a substitute for a judgment. The director\u2019s personal cautionnement, if the bank wants that as well, is another document and another risk. The patronage letter is the parent\u2019s document. It should be written as if a commercial court will read it, because one will.<\/p>\n

\n

Need a quick opinion on your case<\/h2>\n

Our firm offers a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.<\/p>\n

Call +33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a> or use our contact form<\/a> to review the bank\u2019s template, the parent\u2019s authority to sign, and the defences if a letter of patronage has already been called.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A French bank that asks your foreign parent for a letter of patronage is not asking for a courtesy. Under article 2322 of the Civil Code the letter is a personal security. The wording decides whether the parent only supports the subsidiary or must pay if it defaults.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16292,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2119137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A French bank that asks your foreign parent for a letter of patronage is not asking for a courtesy. Under article 2322 of the Civil Code the letter is a personal security. The wording decides whether the parent only supports the subsidiary or must pay if it defaults.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4280,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cryptage\",\"Doing Business in France\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Doing Business in France\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6528,\"height\":3780},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/11\\\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call","og_description":"A French bank that asks your foreign parent for a letter of patronage is not asking for a courtesy. Under article 2322 of the Civil Code the letter is a personal security. The wording decides whether the parent only supports the subsidiary or must pay if it defaults.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call","datePublished":"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/"},"wordCount":4280,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cryptage","Doing Business in France"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Doing Business in France"}],"dateModified":"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/","name":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-11T01:13:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp","width":6528,"height":3780},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/09\/11\/foreign-parent-france-letter-of-patronage-bank-hidden-guarantee\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Bank Wants a Letter of Patronage From Your Foreign Parent: How to Draft It, Keep It From Becoming a Hidden Guarantee, and Contest a Call"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2119137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2119137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2119137\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16292"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2119137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2119137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2119137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}