{"id":2113947,"date":"2026-08-30T17:06:44","date_gmt":"2026-08-30T15:06:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/"},"modified":"2026-08-30T17:06:44","modified_gmt":"2026-08-30T15:06:44","slug":"french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/","title":{"rendered":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"chapeau\">A letter from the French tax office asking for UK bank statements is not something to answer with a bare bundle of PDFs or to leave unanswered because the account is in Britain. For a British person living in France, the request may relate to an <em>examen contradictoire de la situation fiscale personnelle<\/em> (ESFP, a French examination of an individual\u2019s overall tax position), a statutory request for explanations and evidence, the review of undeclared foreign accounts, or an early information-gathering step. Each route has a different legal effect and a different response timetable. The United Kingdom\u2019s post-Brexit relationship with France does not make a UK account invisible: the two administrations exchange tax information, while French law can require a French tax resident to declare certain foreign accounts. The exchange itself does not prove that every credit is taxable income. The practical task is to identify the exact procedure, preserve the deadline, reconcile every material credit with its real origin, and challenge a demand that is too vague to answer usefully. This guide sets out a document-led response for a British resident, including the distinction between salary, pension, savings, property proceeds, gifts, loans and transfers between the person\u2019s own accounts. It also explains what to do if the administration threatens an assessment, relies on third-party information, or sends a proposed adjustment.<\/p>\n<p>For the wider residence and reporting context, see our <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/19\/challenge-french-tax-residence-assessment-uk-resident-brexit-appeal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">guide to challenging a French tax-residence assessment for a UK resident<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>I. What does a French tax audit request for UK bank statements mean?<\/h2>\n<h3>A. Can the French tax office ask a British resident for UK statements?<\/h3>\n<p>The first question is not whether the request feels justified. It is which legal power the letter identifies and what the officer is asking you to establish. A French request may be sent by the <em>service des imp\u00f4ts des particuliers<\/em> (SIP, the local individual taxpayers\u2019 office), the non-residents\u2019 tax office, or an officer conducting an ESFP. It may ask for statements from a named UK current account, every account held during particular years, or only the documents supporting credits already identified by the administration. Those are materially different demands. The heading of the letter, the cited articles, the tax years, the name of the officer and the stated deadline should be copied into a case chronology on the day the letter arrives.<\/p>\n<p>French income tax is called <em>imp\u00f4t sur le revenu<\/em>. A person who is tax resident in France is generally taxed under French rules on worldwide income, subject to the United Kingdom\u2013France tax treaty and the domestic rules for particular categories. A person who is not tax resident in France may still have French-source income or another French tax obligation. Residence therefore matters, but a British passport, a UK bank address or a non-resident label on a UK account does not answer the residence question by itself. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/france-tax-treaties\/2008-uk-and-france-double-taxation-convention-in-force\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2008 UK\u2013France Double Taxation Convention<\/a>, as modified by the Multilateral Instrument, contains residence, income-allocation, double-tax relief and information-exchange provisions. It does not turn a request for evidence into an automatic finding that a credit is income.<\/p>\n<p>The administration\u2019s ordinary tools should be separated.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A general request for information may ask you to explain a discrepancy or to supply documents. It is not necessarily the opening of a formal audit.<\/li>\n<li>Article L. 16 of the <em>Livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales<\/em> (LPF, the French Tax Procedures Book) allows requests for explanations and justifications concerning the taxpayer\u2019s situation, including foreign assets or income. The official text refers to \u201c<em>ainsi que des avoirs ou revenus d\u2019avoirs \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger<\/em>\u201d \u2014 foreign assets or income from foreign assets \u2014 in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000041471956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000041471956\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">current Article L. 16 LPF<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>An ESFP examines the consistency between declared income, personal expenditure, assets and bank movements. The bank statements are evidence within that examination; they are not, by themselves, a tax calculation.<\/li>\n<li>A review based on undeclared foreign-account information can use a separate power. Article L. 10-0 A LPF concerns the examination of statements in circumstances where the foreign-account reporting obligations have not been met, before a formal ESFP or accounting audit. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051215888\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051215888\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official text of Article L. 10-0 A LPF<\/a> must be read with the exact years and accounts named in the letter.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>That distinction matters after Brexit because a British resident may have several overlapping explanations for a UK credit. A transfer from a UK current account to a French account may be a movement of existing savings, not a new receipt. A UK pension payment may be governed by treaty provisions, but the gross amount, tax withheld and date of receipt still need to be identified. A completion payment on a UK property sale may contain capital, repayment of a mortgage and sale costs. A family transfer may be a gift or a loan, with different evidence and tax consequences. The tax officer is entitled to ask for the trail; the response should not concede the legal classification merely because a statement shows money entering the account.<\/p>\n<p>Foreign-account reporting is a related but separate issue. Article 1649 A of the French <em>Code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts<\/em> (CGI, the General Tax Code) requires individuals who are domiciled in France to report references for accounts opened, held, used or closed abroad with their income tax return. The same article states that transfers through undeclared accounts are presumed, subject to proof to the contrary, to be taxable income. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045764822\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045764822\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official Article 1649 A CGI<\/a> is the starting point. The administrative guidance on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.impots.gouv.fr\/formulaire\/3916\/declaration-par-un-resident-dun-compte-letranger-ou-dun-contrat-de-capitalisation-o\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Form 3916 and 3916-bis<\/a> explains the declaration mechanism and the current forms. A British person who became French tax resident should check each relevant tax year rather than assume that the account\u2019s age or the fact that it was used only for pension payments removes the obligation.<\/p>\n<p>The declaration obligation does not mean that every credit on a declared account is taxable, and failure to tick the right box does not make every historic balance income. It does mean that the taxpayer should deal expressly with the reporting history. If a UK account was omitted, say which years are affected, explain whether the omission was corrected, and obtain advice on the possible penalties and presumed-income rules. Do not conceal the omission while arguing about the origin of the credit. A carefully limited admission about a reporting error can be more useful than an unexplained denial supported by statements that show the account existed.<\/p>\n<p>Automatic exchange of information is another source of the question. UK financial institutions and French institutions operate within international exchange frameworks that identify tax residence and report financial-account data. Article 27 of the UK\u2013France Convention also provides for the exchange of information foreseeably relevant to the administration or enforcement of the taxes covered by the Convention. The information may alert the French administration to an account, a balance, interest or a change of residence. It does not supply the whole factual history of a credit. The account holder\u2019s written explanation remains important because an automated report will not normally say whether a \u00a340,000 transfer was an inheritance, a loan repayment, a house-sale balance or a pension lump sum.<\/p>\n<p>A statement request can also concern a British resident who has no French bank account. The administration may compare declared French income with assets, expenditure and information obtained from another state. A person who receives a request while living in the UK but retaining a French property, rental income or other French connection should not rely on the absence of French residence. The letter must be analysed under the relevant French-source rules and the treaty article for the income concerned. The response should state the residence position and provide the evidence supporting it, without treating a residence argument as a reason to ignore a document request.<\/p>\n<p>Before answering, make four copies of the letter: the original file, a working copy with annotations, a copy for a French tax lawyer or accountant, and a clean copy for the final response. Record the delivery date, the method of delivery, the tax years and the deadline. Preserve the envelope or electronic message where it proves receipt. Download original statements directly from the UK bank if possible and keep the download metadata. Screenshots from a banking app are useful for an urgent first explanation but should not replace complete statements where the administration asks for the account history.<\/p>\n<p>The response should also identify whether the request asks for all pages, opening and closing balances, account-holder details, incoming transfers, outgoing transfers, linked accounts or only selected transactions. If the letter refers to \u201call bank statements\u201d, do not decide unilaterally that only pages showing credits matter. If the scope is genuinely unclear, ask a focused written question while preparing the broadest reasonable response. A clarification request does not automatically suspend the deadline. The safe approach is to request clarification, provide what can already be supplied, and explain the missing items and the date on which they will follow.<\/p>\n<h3>B. What must a request identify, and which deadline applies?<\/h3>\n<p>The date printed on the letter is not enough. You need to determine which statutory clock it starts. Article L. 16 requires a demand of that kind to state explicitly the points covered and the response period under the applicable rules. Its final sentence is a useful control: the demand must \u201c<em>indiquer explicitement les points sur lesquels elles portent<\/em>\u201d, identify expressly the points to which it relates. In practice, compare the letter with the account list and the years actually requested. A demand that names 2021 and 2022 does not automatically authorise a response limited to 2024, and a request about foreign assets is not necessarily a request for every private transaction over a decade.<\/p>\n<p>For a statutory request for explanations or justifications under Article L. 16, Article L. 16 A LPF provides a minimum period. The official text states that the response time \u201c<em>ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieur \u00e0 deux mois<\/em>\u201d, cannot be shorter than two months. Read the full <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315926\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315926\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">Article L. 16 A LPF<\/a> before calculating the date. If the initial response is insufficient, the administration can issue a formal <em>mise en demeure<\/em> (formal notice) giving a further period of thirty days. The first two-month period and the later thirty-day period are not interchangeable. A request for extra time sent before expiry is sensible, but it should explain precisely why statements or official certificates cannot be obtained in time and propose a date for completion.<\/p>\n<p>A different period may apply to a formal audit notice or to a procedural request governed by another provision. Article L. 11 LPF generally provides a thirty-day period where no special period is fixed. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815185\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815185\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official Article L. 11 LPF<\/a> should be checked against the actual letter and its cited text. Never replace a two-month period with a thirty-day assumption, and never assume that a letter carrying the words \u201ccontr\u00f4le fiscal\u201d automatically gives the L. 16 A period.<\/p>\n<p>For an ESFP, the notice of verification has its own protections. Article L. 47 LPF states that an ESFP or accounting audit cannot begin without prior notice. The notice must identify the years under examination and expressly mention the right to be assisted by a chosen adviser. The statute uses the words \u201c<em>la facult\u00e9 de se faire assister par un conseil de son choix<\/em>\u201d. See the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815149\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815149\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">current Article L. 47 LPF<\/a>. A request for bank statements can accompany that notice. A statement request issued before a full audit notice is not automatically the same thing as an ESFP, so the document\u2019s legal heading and cited provisions must be preserved.<\/p>\n<p>In the bank-statement context, the sixty-day period appearing in Article L. 12 and Article L. 47 jurisprudence requires particular care. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000022330291\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000022330291\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 26 May 2010, no. 304299<\/a>, the court examined an ESFP notice that asked for account statements. It held that a taxpayer who has not used the opportunity to produce the statements within \u201c<em>un d\u00e9lai de soixante jours<\/em>\u201d can expose the control period to an extension while the administration obtains the statements, subject to the precise statutory setting. This is not a universal replacement for the deadline printed on every letter. It is a reason to supply complete account coordinates and available statements promptly, and to avoid assuming that an officer\u2019s ability to request documents from a bank means the taxpayer can wait.<\/p>\n<p>Calculate the deadline from the legally relevant receipt date, not from the day you first open a document several days later. If the letter arrives through the secure tax mailbox, save the message and its date. If it arrives by registered post, keep the envelope and delivery record. Ask whether the deadline runs in calendar days and whether a public holiday changes the last day only after checking the applicable rule. A French tax office may accept a late explanatory package, but acceptance is not a procedural right. If the response is sent electronically, save the message, attachments, transmission receipt and a PDF of the complete submission.<\/p>\n<p>A response should be signed by the taxpayer or by a properly authorised representative. It should identify the taxpayer, tax number, address, tax years, letter reference and the accounts covered. Start with a short scope statement: \u201cI respond to the request dated [date] concerning [years\/accounts].\u201d Then provide a table matching each material credit to an explanation and supporting documents. If a document is unavailable, say what was requested from the bank or HM Revenue &amp; Customs, when it was requested, why it is unavailable and when it is expected. Do not write \u201cthe statements speak for themselves\u201d. A statement shows movement; it does not prove the legal nature of the movement.<\/p>\n<p>For documents in English, the tax office can ask for a French translation or an explanation that allows the officer to understand the relevant entries. A translation prepared for the response should preserve the account number\u2019s last four digits, dates, sterling amounts, exchange-rate method and document title. Avoid changing a British tax term into an apparently equivalent French category without explaining the original. For example, a P60 confirms annual pay and tax details for employment; it does not automatically determine the French treatment of that employment income. A UK State Pension statement, a private-pension payslip and a bank credit should be linked but not treated as three independent receipts.<\/p>\n<p>If the letter requests information that would disclose another person\u2019s private data, do not redact the document so aggressively that the transaction cannot be traced. A safe approach is to supply the complete relevant page under a confidentiality explanation, mask only information that is legally irrelevant and dangerous to disclose, and ask the lawyer handling the file how to protect third-party data. Do not redact the sender, date, amount, reference or account trail. An unexplained black rectangle can look like an attempt to prevent verification.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, do not confuse a request to explain credits with an invitation to amend every French return immediately. The right correction depends on the classification, tax year, statute of limitations, treaty article and whether the account was correctly declared. A voluntary correction can be appropriate, but filing a new return without a parallel procedural analysis may create admissions or miss a claim for treaty relief. The first response should protect the deadline and establish the evidence. The tax treatment can then be addressed with a quantified calculation.<\/p>\n<h2>II. How should a British resident answer and challenge the request?<\/h2>\n<h3>A. Which UK documents prove the origin of each bank credit?<\/h3>\n<p>The most effective response is a reconciliation, not a narrative. Create one line for each significant credit and assign it a category before writing the covering letter. Use a consistent reference such as UK-2021-001. The table should contain the date shown by the bank, the amount and currency, the payer, the receiving account, the proposed legal or factual category, the French return line if relevant, and the documents attached. Where two accounts are involved, give both references so the administration can see that the same money was not counted twice.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Credit on the UK statement<\/th>\n<th>Evidence to collect<\/th>\n<th>Point to explain<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Employment salary or bonus<\/td>\n<td>Payslips, P60, P45 if employment ended, employment contract, UK tax calculation and French declarations<\/td>\n<td>Gross pay, deductions, payment date, employer and the year in which the work was performed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>UK State Pension or private pension<\/td>\n<td>DWP or pension-provider annual statement, payslips, P60, bank entries and treaty analysis<\/td>\n<td>Type of pension, payer, gross amount, UK tax withheld and the residence\/treaty position<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Transfer between your own accounts<\/td>\n<td>Outgoing statement, incoming statement, matching reference and account-ownership evidence<\/td>\n<td>The money already existed and the two credits are not separate income<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>UK property sale<\/td>\n<td>Completion statement, conveyancer\u2019s ledger, sale contract, mortgage redemption, agent\u2019s invoice and bank trail<\/td>\n<td>Sale proceeds, repayment of debt, costs and any capital gain must be separated<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gift or inheritance<\/td>\n<td>Gift letter, probate documents, will, estate accounts, executor letter, transfer proof and tax certificate<\/td>\n<td>Identity of the donor or estate, date, legal basis and whether tax was paid in the UK or elsewhere<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Loan or repayment<\/td>\n<td>Signed loan agreement, repayment schedule, lender\u2019s statement and matching outgoing payment<\/td>\n<td>Principal is not automatically income; interest and any forgiveness have a different analysis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Investment redemption or dividend<\/td>\n<td>Broker statement, contract note, dividend voucher, portfolio history and cost basis<\/td>\n<td>Capital returned, gain, dividend, interest and withholding tax are different amounts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>For employment credits, do not send a P60 alone when the request concerns individual monthly entries. A P60 can establish annual pay and UK tax withheld, while payslips link particular payments to the bank. If the employer paid a bonus, reimbursement or termination sum, obtain the payroll description and the settlement or redundancy document. Reimbursements may be indistinguishable from salary on the bank line. Identify the amount paid for work, the amount repaid for expenses and the evidence for each.<\/p>\n<p>Pension credits need the same discipline. A British resident may receive the UK State Pension, a workplace pension, a SIPP distribution, an annuity or a lump sum. Each label matters. The treaty may allocate different kinds of pension or government-service pension differently, and the French domestic treatment can depend on the category and the taxpayer\u2019s residence. Attach the payer\u2019s annual statement and state whether the bank credit is gross or net of UK withholding. If the payment is a lump sum, explain whether it is a pension commencement lump sum, a drawdown, a refund of contributions or another payment. Never call every pension-related credit \u201ca pension\u201d and leave the officer to infer the rest.<\/p>\n<p>Property-sale proceeds are a frequent source of large apparent income. The bank may show one credit for the completion balance, but the taxpayer\u2019s economic position includes the sale price, mortgage redemption, estate-agent fees, solicitor\u2019s fees, taxes and any funds transferred to another account. Use the completion statement as the primary document and match the net amount to the bank credit. If the property was jointly owned, identify each owner\u2019s share. If the sale relates to a property held before the move to France, state the acquisition date, ownership percentage and residence position relevant to the capital-gains analysis. Do not claim that every sale receipt is non-taxable merely because it is capital; prove the calculation.<\/p>\n<p>Transfers between your own accounts should be shown as a closed loop. The outgoing UK account statement, incoming French or second UK account statement, transfer reference and account-holder names should appear together. If currency conversion intervened, add the conversion confirmation. A transfer from a joint account may require evidence of the joint holders\u2019 shares. A payment from a spouse\u2019s account to the taxpayer\u2019s account may be a household transfer, a gift, reimbursement or a loan. Describe the facts accurately instead of using \u201cown funds\u201d where the legal ownership is shared.<\/p>\n<p>Gifts, inheritance distributions and family support need an evidence trail. A bank reference reading \u201cfamily\u201d proves almost nothing on its own. For an inheritance, attach the grant of probate or equivalent estate document, the estate accounts, the executor\u2019s distribution schedule and proof of the beneficiary\u2019s entitlement. For a gift, identify the donor, the relationship, the date and whether a declaration was made. For a loan, include the signed agreement, repayment terms and evidence that the principal was actually advanced. A later repayment should be matched to the original loan. If the arrangement was informal, say so and assemble contemporaneous evidence rather than creating a document now that falsely appears to have been signed years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Investment entries should be separated into deposits, withdrawals, dividends, interest and sales. A withdrawal from a stocks-and-shares account may combine invested capital and a gain. A transfer from a UK ISA is not analysed by looking at the word \u201cISA\u201d alone; the French treatment of the underlying income and the treaty position must be checked. A broker\u2019s annual statement is useful, but the tax office may need contract notes and a portfolio history to determine the acquisition cost. If a credit is a refund of an overpayment or a returned deposit, attach the original payment and the refund notice.<\/p>\n<p>Use a currency rule consistently. The UK statement should remain in pounds sterling. Add the euro equivalent only in a separate column and state the exchange-rate source and date used. Do not convert each item with a different rate chosen to produce a favourable result. If the French return used a published annual rate, reconcile the annual figure to the bank movements and explain material differences caused by payment dates. The officer should be able to reproduce the arithmetic without guessing whether \u00a310,000 was treated as \u20ac10,000 or converted at a particular rate.<\/p>\n<p>Set out taxation already paid in the UK without assuming that it creates a French credit automatically. The treaty may provide an exemption, a credit or another method for a particular category of income, subject to conditions. The UK\u2013France Convention\u2019s double-taxation article and the article allocating the relevant income should be cited together. The HMRC certificate, P60, self-assessment calculation or pension document should show the amount and year of UK tax. A bank statement alone cannot prove final tax paid. Likewise, a French return entry alone does not prove that the income was correctly classified under the treaty.<\/p>\n<p>Organise the documents in the order the officer will need them: cover letter, account map, transaction reconciliation, full statements, supporting evidence by reference number, treaty and legal analysis, and a list of missing documents. Put a short index at the front. Use identical reference numbers in the table, filenames and paragraphs. If the package is too large for the secure mailbox, ask how to transmit it and preserve the proof of delivery. Do not send confidential bank records to an unverified email address copied from an old letter.<\/p>\n<p>Keep a separate working schedule for facts that are not yet proved. Mark each item \u201cdocumented\u201d, \u201cpartially documented\u201d, \u201crequested\u201d or \u201cunexplained\u201d. An unexplained line is not necessarily taxable income, but it is a risk that needs action. Prioritise large credits, repeated credits, round-number transfers, cash deposits, payments from investment platforms and credits matching information that the administration has expressly mentioned. Small recurring bank charges do not deserve the same first-day attention as a \u00a375,000 property-sale credit.<\/p>\n<p>The response should be honest about uncertainty. If you cannot prove a credit\u2019s origin, say what you know and what you are still obtaining. Do not label a payment a gift because that is the most convenient category. The administration may ask the alleged donor or compare the credit with another taxpayer\u2019s file. A credible explanation of uncertainty preserves the possibility of correction; a false certainty can damage the entire response.<\/p>\n<h3>B. What if the demand is vague, the tax office relies on third-party data or sends a rectification?<\/h3>\n<p>A demand for statements is not immune from procedural control. Article L. 16 requires the points and response period to be stated, and the request must give the taxpayer a meaningful opportunity to identify the sums concerned. The Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat\u2019s decision in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007632622\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007632622\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">30 September 1992, no. 73894<\/a>, is particularly useful where the administration has aggregated credits without dates, amounts and account references. The court held that the lack of that detail made it \u201c<em>impossible au contribuable de r\u00e9pondre utilement<\/em>\u201d, impossible for the taxpayer to answer usefully. The decision does not excuse a taxpayer from explaining clearly identified credits. It does support a focused request for a transaction-by-transaction schedule where a global figure cannot be reconciled.<\/p>\n<p>The same principle appears in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007629728\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007629728\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 10 December 1990, no. 73489<\/a>, whose official classification identifies an insufficiently precise request based on globalisation. By contrast, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007625109\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007625109\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 18 June 1990, no. 53601<\/a>, the court accepted a request that specified, for each year, the amount and nature of the sums credited. These decisions produce a practical test: can you tell, without reconstructing the administration\u2019s entire investigation, which account, year, date, amount and type of credit you must explain? If yes, answer it. If no, ask for the missing detail while supplying the information that is already identifiable.<\/p>\n<p>Do not use a vague-request objection as a reason to send nothing. State the objection in the first paragraph, then provide the reconciliation for every credit you can identify. For the balance, ask the officer to confirm whether the request concerns gross credits, net unexplained credits, all accounts or only the account reported through foreign-information exchange. This demonstrates cooperation and preserves the procedural point. It also reduces the risk that the administration will treat the answer as a refusal.<\/p>\n<p>If the administration says it obtained the information from a bank, another authority or a foreign administration, Article L. 76 B LPF can matter at the later assessment stage. The provision requires the administration to inform the taxpayer of the content and origin of information and documents obtained from third parties and used to establish the assessment, and to provide copies if requested before collection. The statutory wording refers to \u201c<em>la teneur et l\u2019origine des renseignements et documents obtenus de tiers<\/em>\u201d. See the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315750\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315750\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official Article L. 76 B LPF<\/a>. Ask for the precise data relied on, but continue building your own evidence; a request for disclosure is not a substitute for proving the account history.<\/p>\n<p>Article L. 10-0 A must also be read narrowly. In its recent decision in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000053776582\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000053776582\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">CAA Paris, 2 April 2026, no. 24PA02766<\/a>, the court held that the provision can allow the administration to obtain statements from third parties before a formal ESFP or accounting audit where foreign-account reporting obligations were not met. It also held, on the facts before it, that examining statements for one account did not necessarily require a formal ESFP or accounting audit before the statements could be used. The court described the conclusion as one that \u201c<em>n&#8217;impliquent pas que l&#8217;administration fiscale proc\u00e8de \u00e0 une v\u00e9rification de comptabilit\u00e9<\/em>\u201d. That decision is a warning against assuming that every use of a UK statement must have been preceded by a full audit notice. It is not a licence to disregard the scope, years or legal basis of the request.<\/p>\n<p>During an ESFP, Article L. 47 B LPF allows the administration to examine mixed private and professional financial accounts and request explanations without thereby beginning an accounting audit. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815171\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815171\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official Article L. 47 B LPF<\/a> should be checked if the letter says the account contains both personal and business movements. If the administration treats a private credit as business income or treats business receipts as personal income, identify the account\u2019s use and keep the two analyses separate. A British sole trader or director should not let a cross-border personal bank statement become an unexamined substitute for company records.<\/p>\n<p>The administration cannot always move directly from an unanswered request to a final assessment without the statutory consequence being identified. Article L. 69 LPF provides that taxpayers who have not answered the Article L. 16 request may be assessed ex officio for income tax. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315055\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006315055\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">current Article L. 69 LPF<\/a> uses the expression \u201c<em>sont tax\u00e9s d\u2019office \u00e0 l\u2019imp\u00f4t sur le revenu<\/em>\u201d. A response that arrives before the deadline, or a documented explanation of why part of the evidence is pending, is therefore more important than a perfect stylistic letter. If a formal <em>mise en demeure<\/em> has arrived, treat the thirty-day period as urgent and obtain advice immediately.<\/p>\n<p>If a proposed adjustment arrives, the procedure changes again. The <em>proposition de rectification<\/em> (proposed tax adjustment) should identify the years, legal basis, facts, calculation and penalties. Article L. 57 LPF requires the proposal to be reasoned so that the taxpayer can make observations or accept it. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000022177777\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000022177777\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">official Article L. 57 LPF<\/a> states that it \u201c<em>doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 lui permettre de formuler ses observations<\/em>\u201d. Compare the adjustment with your transaction schedule. Check whether the officer has counted transfers between your own accounts twice, treated gross property proceeds as income, ignored UK tax already paid, applied the wrong treaty article, or used the foreign-account presumption without considering your evidence.<\/p>\n<p>The observations should be structured by disputed credit, not by general indignation. For each item, state the administration\u2019s proposed treatment, your factual correction, the document proving it, the relevant French rule or treaty article, and the amount that should remain in the assessment. If the administration\u2019s calculation is partly correct, accept the supported part and dispute the rest. A blanket denial of a credit that the bank and HMRC documents plainly support can undermine an otherwise strong challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Where the administration relies on an account statement obtained from a third party, compare the copy with the statement supplied by the bank. Check whether pages are missing, whether opening and closing balances reconcile, whether an account is joint, whether a currency conversion has been altered, and whether a credit appears twice after a transfer. Ask for the source and content under Article L. 76 B when the proposed adjustment relies on material not supplied to you. If the administration refuses access or gives only a conclusion, record that refusal and address it in the observations and any later claim.<\/p>\n<p>Article 147419 of the Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat also protects the ability to answer. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007959055\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007959055\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\">Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 3 September 1997, no. 147419<\/a>, the court held that, after an ESFP, the administration could not impose the sanction attached to an insufficient response without first returning documents useful for answering the request. The decision refers to the need to have \u201c<em>au pr\u00e9alable, restitu\u00e9 les documents<\/em>\u201d supplied during the examination. If the tax office still holds original statements, notebooks, contracts or explanations needed to answer, request their return or a copy before the deadline and preserve the request in writing.<\/p>\n<p>The 2010 decision, no. 304299, has a second practical lesson. If the administration asks for all account coordinates and statements, give the complete list, including accounts that were closed during the period, and explain any account that was never used for income. Supplying only the account that appears in the letter can create a further question about undisclosed accounts. The court\u2019s reasoning about the sixty-day period and the last statement received makes it unsafe to assume that one partial delivery ends the issue.<\/p>\n<p>If you receive a notice of verification, use the right-to-advice wording in Article L. 47 and ask a French tax lawyer to attend or to help draft the response. A lawyer can distinguish an information request from an ESFP, calculate the period, analyse the UK\u2013France treaty, and preserve an objection without sacrificing a complete factual explanation. The lawyer may also request a meeting with the officer. A meeting is not a substitute for written observations; send a written summary afterwards so the file records what was said and which documents were accepted or disputed.<\/p>\n<p>After an assessment is issued, the ordinary administrative route is a <em>r\u00e9clamation contentieuse<\/em> (formal tax claim asking the administration to cancel or reduce the assessment), followed where necessary by proceedings before the competent court. The claim must identify the tax, years, notice or collection reference, disputed amount, legal grounds and supporting documents. Keep the proof of filing and monitor the deadline applicable to the particular tax. A treaty claim, a procedural challenge and a calculation correction should be stated together where they concern the same assessment. Waiting for an informal email exchange can allow a formal claim period to expire.<\/p>\n<p>Do not send a second, inconsistent explanation merely because the officer asks the same question in a different form. Maintain one master chronology. If new documents change the explanation, say what changed and why: a bank has corrected a statement, an executor has supplied a missing page, or a tax certificate has clarified the gross amount. Consistency does not mean refusing to correct an error. It means making the correction traceable.<\/p>\n<p>A good challenge therefore has two layers. The factual layer proves where each pound came from and where it went. The procedural layer checks whether the administration identified the transactions, gave the correct deadline, disclosed third-party information when required, returned documents needed for the answer, and reasoned any proposed adjustment. A British resident can have a strong response even where the UK account was not declared or a French return contains an error, but the response must confront the weakness directly and separate it from credits that are demonstrably not income.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>A request for UK bank statements from the French tax office is an urgent evidence exercise, not an automatic finding that every credit is taxable. First identify the procedure: a general request, Article L. 16 justifications, an ESFP, a foreign-account review under Article L. 10-0 A, or a proposed adjustment. Then calculate the correct period, preserve proof of receipt, obtain complete statements and reconcile each material credit with documents showing its true origin. Salary, pension, property proceeds, investment withdrawals, gifts, inheritances, loans and transfers between your own accounts must not be placed in one undifferentiated \u201csavings\u201d category. If the demand aggregates credits without enough detail, raise the precision issue while answering all identifiable points. If the administration relies on third-party material, request its content and origin. If it sends a proposed adjustment, respond by transaction and amount under Article L. 57, while protecting any later formal claim. The UK\u2013France treaty and information exchange explain why the question may have arisen; they do not remove the need for a careful, evidence-based classification.<\/p>\n<h2>Need a quick opinion on your case<\/h2>\n<p>A telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm can help you secure the response deadline and organise the UK bank evidence.<\/p>\n<p>We can review the French tax letter, the account reconciliation, the UK pension or property documents and the proposed challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Call <a href=\"tel:+33646605822\">+33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a> or use the <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/formulaire-de-contact\/\">contact page for kohenavocats.fr<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A practical guide for a British resident in France who receives a request for UK bank statements: identify the procedure, protect the deadline, reconcile each credit and challenge an unexplained assessment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16411,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80312,80314],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2113947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-british-desk","category-decryptage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.2 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A practical guide for a British resident in France who receives a request for UK bank statements: identify the procedure, protect the deadline, reconcile each credit and challenge an unexplained assessment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"29 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5748,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"British Desk\",\"D\u00e9cryptage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"British Desk\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/\",\"name\":\"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":7086,\"height\":4724},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements","og_description":"A practical guide for a British resident in France who receives a request for UK bank statements: identify the procedure, protect the deadline, reconcile each credit and challenge an unexplained assessment.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"29 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements","datePublished":"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/"},"wordCount":5748,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["British Desk","D\u00e9cryptage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"British Desk"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"}],"dateModified":"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/","name":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-30T15:06:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7irj5rVew44-unsplash.webp","width":7086,"height":4724},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-tax-audit-british-resident-uk-bank-statements-response\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"French Tax Audit: How a British Resident Should Answer a Request for UK Bank Statements"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2113947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2113947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2113947\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2113947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2113947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2113947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}