{"id":2113537,"date":"2026-08-30T00:06:15","date_gmt":"2026-08-29T22:06:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/"},"modified":"2026-08-30T00:06:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-29T22:06:15","slug":"french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/","title":{"rendered":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder"},"content":{"rendered":"

A French company can lose practical access to its bank account immediately after a change of president, even though the company itself has not disappeared and the account remains open. The usual trigger is a gap between the corporate decision, the public filing, the updated Kbis, and the bank\u2019s own mandate and compliance records. A foreign shareholder is then confronted with a difficult distinction: owning shares does not, by itself, give that shareholder the right to operate the company\u2019s account, while a newly appointed president may have the company\u2019s corporate authority but still be unable to log in, sign a payment, or remove the former president\u2019s access.<\/p>\n

This article addresses that specific crisis for founders, parent companies, and investors located outside France. It focuses on a French SAS, or soci\u00e9t\u00e9 par actions simplifi\u00e9e<\/em>, while identifying the points that must be adapted for an SARL, branch, or subsidiary. The practical objective is to restore lawful continuity: establish who represents the company, give the bank a coherent evidence file, protect payroll and tax payments, and seek urgent relief when a prolonged freeze threatens the business. The legal analysis is based on official French sources and the wording of the relevant provisions and decisions available on the date of publication.<\/p>\n

I. Why a French company bank account can be blocked after a change of president<\/h2>\n

A. Who has authority after the decision?<\/h3>\n

The first question is not whether the foreign shareholder is economically important. It is whether the change of president was adopted and documented in the manner required by the company\u2019s constitutional documents. For a French SAS, Article L227-5 of the French Commercial Code<\/a> states: \u201cLes statuts fixent les conditions dans lesquelles la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 est dirig\u00e9e.\u201d In English, the company\u2019s articles of association determine how it is managed. That short rule has significant practical consequences. The articles may give the power to appoint or remove the president to the shareholders, to a specially defined body, or to another mechanism created by the articles. The minutes must therefore identify the correct decision-maker, the quorum or majority rule, the form of the vote, and the effective date.<\/p>\n

Article L227-6 of the French Commercial Code<\/a> then provides that the company is represented towards third parties by a president appointed under the articles. The official text begins: \u201cLa soci\u00e9t\u00e9 est repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard des tiers par un pr\u00e9sident d\u00e9sign\u00e9 dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues par les statuts.\u201d The same provision gives the president extensive powers to act in the company\u2019s name, subject to the corporate purpose, and makes statutory limits on those powers unenforceable against third parties. For a bank, that means a properly evidenced new president is not merely an internal employee. The bank must identify the person who now represents the account holder, while still completing its own security and compliance steps.<\/p>\n

That external representation rule does not eliminate the need to prove the internal decision. Article L227-9<\/a> states that the articles determine which decisions must be taken collectively by the shareholders and the forms and conditions of those decisions. The article also reserves certain major operations, including changes affecting capital, merger, dissolution, transformation, statutory auditors, annual accounts, and profits, to collective action under the conditions set by the articles. A bank reviewing a replacement president will therefore look for the signed minutes, but it may also ask for the relevant pages of the articles to confirm who had authority to sign those minutes.<\/p>\n

A foreign shareholder should separate four dates in its file:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. the date on which the shareholders or competent body adopted the resolution;<\/li>\n
  2. the effective date of the outgoing president\u2019s end of office and the incoming president\u2019s appointment;<\/li>\n
  3. the date on which the change was filed through the Guichet unique, the online one-stop portal for French business formalities operated through the National Institute of Industrial Property, known as INPI; and<\/li>\n
  4. the date on which the bank accepted the new mandate, online administrator, payment signatories, and contact details.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    These dates can be close but are not identical. The filing through the Guichet unique updates the public business information. The greffe<\/em>, meaning the clerk\u2019s office of the competent commercial court, may review the filing. The RNE, or Registre national des entreprises<\/em>, is the national business register, while the RCS, or Registre du commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s<\/em>, remains the commercial registration reference used for commercial companies. A Kbis is the official extract traditionally used to evidence a company\u2019s registration and registered officers in the commercial register. A SIREN is the nine-digit identifier of the legal entity; a SIRET identifies an establishment. None of those documents is a substitute for the bank\u2019s own mandate record, but they help the bank reconcile the corporate file.<\/p>\n

    Article L123-9 of the French Commercial Code<\/a> explains why publicity matters. It states that a person subject to registration cannot rely against third parties or public administrations on facts and acts subject to mention unless they have been published in the register. The provision does not mean that the corporate decision has no existence before the updated extract is issued. It means that the company must plan for the evidential effect of publication when dealing with a bank, a payment provider, a landlord, a major customer, or a public body. If the Kbis still shows the former president, the new president should send the bank the decision and the filing receipt at once, then provide the updated extract as soon as it is available.<\/p>\n

    The shareholder\u2019s position is also narrower than many foreign founders expect. Article 1844 of the French Civil Code<\/a> states: \u201cTout associ\u00e9 a le droit de participer aux d\u00e9cisions collectives.\u201d A shareholder has a right to participate in collective decisions, subject to the applicable corporate structure and rules. That right does not automatically make the shareholder a bank signatory, an online banking administrator, or the company\u2019s representative. The shareholder can cause the company to act through the proper corporate decision, can authorise a representative where the articles permit it, and can seek judicial relief when governance has become impossible. The company\u2019s account remains an account of the legal entity, not of the shareholder personally.<\/p>\n

    The distinction becomes critical when the former president is also a shareholder. The end of the corporate office should lead to a review of every separate banking authorisation: paper signature rights, online credentials, payment approval limits, cards, direct-debit administration, cash-management access, and authority to communicate with the bank. A former president may no longer represent the company while still appearing in the bank\u2019s operational system. Conversely, a bank may disable a former user but leave the company without a functioning replacement mandate until it has completed its verification. The outgoing office and the bank\u2019s technical permissions must be closed and rebuilt as two linked but separate workstreams.<\/p>\n

    For a corporate foreign shareholder, the evidence may need one additional layer. The bank may request a recent extract for the foreign parent, proof of the signatory\u2019s authority under the parent\u2019s law, the chain of ownership up to the ultimate beneficial owner, and a certified translation or legalisation where its compliance policy requires it. The bank may use the expression \u201cbeneficial owner\u201d for the natural person who ultimately owns or controls the French company. A foreign board resolution authorising a representative to instruct the French subsidiary should not be confused with the French subsidiary\u2019s own appointment of its president. The file must show both links: who controls the shareholder and who represents the French account holder.<\/p>\n

    The minimum corporate authority pack should normally contain the following documents, with the exact list adapted to the bank and the company\u2019s form:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Document<\/th>\nPurpose in the bank file<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Signed minutes of the appointment or removal<\/td>\nShows the decision, vote, effective date, and signatories.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Current articles and relevant governance clause<\/td>\nShows who could take the decision and how the vote had to be organised.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Acceptance statement and identity document of the new president<\/td>\nConnects the office, the person, and the bank\u2019s customer-identification file.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Guichet unique filing receipt and updated Kbis or RNE evidence<\/td>\nShows the formalisation and public registration of the change.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Beneficial-owner information and foreign parent documents<\/td>\nAnswers the bank\u2019s anti-money-laundering and ownership questions.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Written banking mandate and access instructions<\/td>\nIdentifies signatories, payment limits, online administrators, and contact channels.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    A foreign founder who wants a broader overview of the account-opening stage can consult the guide to opening a French business bank account as a foreign company<\/a>. The present problem is different: it concerns the continuity of an existing account after a governance change, not simply the first request to open an account.<\/p>\n

    This question belongs to the wider French company formation and corporate-law hub<\/a>, which provides the broader framework for creating and managing a company in France. The present article addresses the narrower banking-access crisis that can follow a change of president.<\/p>\n

    B. What the bank needs to react to a foreign shareholder\u2019s file<\/h3>\n

    A bank can treat a sudden change of president as a compliance event even where the shareholders acted regularly. A new signatory, a new telephone number, a change of email address, a non-resident officer, a foreign parent, an unusual transfer request, or a simultaneous change in beneficial-owner information may trigger enhanced review. In France, banks perform customer-identification and anti-money-laundering checks. The bank\u2019s concern may be legitimate, but a broad operational freeze can still endanger the company if it prevents payment of employees, tax liabilities, suppliers, rent, insurance, or social contributions.<\/p>\n

    The first practical question is whether the bank has blocked the whole account or only a function. A company may still receive incoming transfers while outgoing payments, cards, online access, or international transfers are disabled. It may have access through a branch but not through its online platform. It may have lost the old president\u2019s credentials but not yet received a new authentication device. Each situation requires a different request. A letter that simply says \u201cplease unblock the account\u201d may produce a generic compliance response. A precise request should list the account number, the blocked functions, the date and time of the block, the urgent payments, the new authorised person, and the documents attached.<\/p>\n

    The bank should receive one coherent, indexed PDF rather than a sequence of unexplained attachments from multiple countries. The first page should identify the French company, its SIREN, registered office, account numbers, outgoing president, incoming president, foreign shareholder, and urgent operational risk. The next pages should follow the authority chain. Every identity document should be legible and current. Every translation should be labelled. If a document is not yet available, the file should say what it is, why it is pending, and when it will be supplied. This reduces the risk that a compliance analyst sees contradictory versions of the same corporate history.<\/p>\n

    The bank may ask for a Kbis even when the new president has already been validly appointed. That request is understandable as an operational verification, but it should not lead the company to wait silently if salary or tax deadlines are approaching. Send the signed minutes and filing receipt immediately, ask whether those documents allow a temporary mandate or a limited payment channel, and obtain a written answer. The new president can also request that the bank preserve statements and transaction history while access is reconstructed. A request for historic statements is important when the former president or a departing adviser controlled the online account.<\/p>\n

    French banking case law illustrates why the bank\u2019s knowledge of a change in corporate leadership matters, although each case turns on its own contract and facts. In Cass. com., 13 February 2019, no. 17-28.530<\/a>, the Court of cassation discussed payment orders carrying signatures connected with a company whose direction had changed. The decision records that \u201cle Cr\u00e9dit mutuel \u00e9tait avis\u00e9 du changement de direction de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Historia prestige et en possession d’un exemplaire de la signature de son nouveau g\u00e9rant\u201d. That passage should not be read as an automatic rule that every bank must accept every instruction after receiving a resolution. It does show the evidential importance of notifying the bank and giving it a usable specimen of the new authorised person\u2019s signature or authentication details.<\/p>\n

    The bank\u2019s review of a governance change should also be distinguished from a decision to terminate the account relationship. Article L312-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code<\/a> gives a person domiciled in France, including a legal person, a right to request the opening of a deposit account if that person has no deposit account in France. The provision states in its first paragraph: \u201cA droit \u00e0 l’ouverture d’un compte de d\u00e9p\u00f4t dans l’\u00e9tablissement de cr\u00e9dit de son choix, sous r\u00e9serve d’\u00eatre d\u00e9pourvu d’un tel compte en France\u201d. The right-to-account procedure can be useful if the existing bank ends the relationship and the company genuinely has no other French deposit account. It is not an automatic right to restore online access to an account that is temporarily restricted, nor does it make the foreign shareholder personally entitled to operate the company\u2019s account.<\/p>\n

    Termination has its own rules. Article L312-1-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code<\/a> provides, for an open-ended deposit-account agreement, that the credit institution terminates it with at least two months\u2019 notice on paper or another durable medium. The specific statutory regime and exceptions must be checked against the account contract, the reason for termination, and whether the account was opened through the right-to-account procedure. A bank\u2019s silence or temporary access freeze should not be described as a formal closure without a written notice confirming the bank\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n

    Do not respond to a freeze by circulating the former president\u2019s credentials, asking staff to share a token, or instructing an employee to impersonate the new president. That can create evidence of poor internal control and make the bank\u2019s compliance concern worse. The correct request is for a new user profile, new authentication, new payment limits, and written confirmation that the former user\u2019s access has been removed or suspended. The company should also change its own internal password-management, email-forwarding, accounting, and payment-approval arrangements.<\/p>\n

    There is a further distinction between an office and a mandate. The Civil Code provisions on mandate are not a complete substitute for the bank\u2019s contract, but they provide a useful legal framework for the company\u2019s instruction. Article 2003 of the Civil Code<\/a> says: \u201cLe mandat finit : Par la r\u00e9vocation du mandataire\u201d. Article 2004<\/a> adds: \u201cLe mandant peut r\u00e9voquer sa procuration quand bon lui semble\u201d. In a company context, the new president should ask the bank to record the revocation of any separate bank mandate and the appointment of new authorised users. Article 2005<\/a> is also relevant to the practical risk: notification to the former agent alone may not protect the company against a third party who acted without knowledge of the revocation. That is why the bank, not only the former president, must receive a provable notice.<\/p>\n

    The operational impact should be calculated rather than described in general terms. Make a table of every payment at risk: net salaries, payroll taxes, URSSAF contributions, income-tax withholding, corporate tax, VAT, rent, insurance, loan instalments, supplier invoices, and customer refunds. URSSAF means the network that collects French social-security contributions and related employment charges. If the company employs staff, a bank freeze can quickly become a labour and social-compliance crisis. The new president should ask the bank for a controlled payment solution while the full review continues, such as branch-initiated payments or a temporary dual-signature process, provided the bank agrees in writing.<\/p>\n

    Finally, do not assume that the foreign shareholder can solve the issue by opening a personal French account and paying company liabilities without documentation. A shareholder\u2019s advance may be possible, but it should be recorded correctly as a shareholder loan, capital contribution, or other lawful funding operation, with accounting and tax treatment reviewed. A payment from the wrong person can create confusion about the debtor, deductibility, VAT evidence, and the company\u2019s books. The safer course is to preserve the company\u2019s account and create a documented contingency only when needed.<\/p>\n

    II. What a foreign shareholder should do when access remains frozen<\/h2>\n

    A. Build the evidence, notify, and restore operations<\/h3>\n

    The response should run on three tracks at the same time: corporate proof, bank dialogue, and business continuity. Waiting for one track to finish before starting the next is a common source of avoidable loss. A foreign shareholder may be several time zones away, the new president may not yet have a French banking relationship, and the account manager may be unable to give a substantive answer because the file has moved to a compliance department. The company should nominate one contact, one deputy, and one lawyer or adviser authorised to transmit documents and receive procedural answers.<\/p>\n

    The corporate proof track begins with the articles and the decision. Check the exact clause governing appointment and removal. Verify who chaired and signed the meeting, whether a conflict rule applied, whether a written consultation was permitted, whether notice was properly given, and whether the minutes record the result and effective date. If the outgoing president was removed for misconduct, keep the evidence separate from the bank\u2019s first request. The bank initially needs a clear authority file, not a complete shareholder dispute. If the validity of the decision is itself contested, obtain a legal assessment before making an assertion that could later be used against the company.<\/p>\n

    The filing track should then be documented. Use the Guichet unique receipt, the INPI reference, any request for correction, the greffe message, and the updated Kbis or RNE extract when delivered. The official public guidance on changes to a company\u2019s manager should be checked for the company\u2019s form and the applicable filing. The company should preserve screenshots or PDFs of the submission, not merely the reference number in an email. If the filing is rejected or pending regularisation, answer the precise request and tell the bank exactly what has happened. A pending registry update is a reason to explain the sequence, not a reason to conceal it.<\/p>\n

    The bank track should start with a written notice sent through every contractual channel that can produce proof: secure messaging, the account manager, the bank\u2019s registered office or customer service address, and, where appropriate, a formal letter. The notice should request confirmation of receipt and answer five questions:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Is the account open, restricted, suspended, or formally terminated?<\/li>\n
    2. Which payment, card, transfer, direct-debit, statement, and online functions are blocked?<\/li>\n
    3. What documents or explanations are still required, and which department is reviewing them?<\/li>\n
    4. Can the bank activate the new president under a temporary or limited mandate while the review continues?<\/li>\n
    5. How can the company make time-critical payroll, tax, social-security, rent, and insurance payments?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Ask for a reason, but recognise that anti-money-laundering rules may restrict what the bank can disclose about a suspicious-transaction review. A refusal to explain confidential compliance intelligence is not necessarily a refusal to identify the practical documents needed to restore an authorised user. The letter should therefore give the bank a constructive alternative: provide the requested corporate records, confirm the beneficial-owner chain, identify the new signatory, and ask what operational arrangement can be used pending completion.<\/p>\n

      The evidence pack should also address the former president. The new president should sign an explicit instruction revoking access and bank mandates, identifying the outgoing user by name, role, email address, telephone number, card number if known, and date of removal. If the bank requires its own form, complete it even if the corporate minutes already contain a revocation. If the former president still holds a card, token, cheque book, or company telephone, record the demand for return and the date on which it was made. If there is a risk of unauthorised transfers, request transaction alerts, a temporary payment ceiling, and confirmation of the bank\u2019s fraud-reporting channel.<\/p>\n

      Continuity planning must be concrete. Rank payments by legal and business urgency, contact employees and key suppliers before a missed deadline, and keep proof of every attempted payment. The company should not send duplicate transfers when the bank has not confirmed whether the first instruction is pending. For tax and social obligations, consult the accountant about lawful alternative payment methods and document any request for a payment arrangement. For employees, the new president should protect payslips, payroll records, and evidence that the employer attempted to pay. A bank freeze does not automatically excuse every unpaid obligation.<\/p>\n

      A second bank account may be a prudent contingency for a company with no workable access, but it should be opened in the company\u2019s name and disclosed accurately in the compliance file. The right-to-account mechanism under Article L312-1 of the Monetary and Financial Code<\/a> should not be presented as a shortcut around an anti-money-laundering review. The bank designated through that procedure will also require identification, corporate documents, and information about the persons controlling or representing the company. The objective is lawful continuity, not concealment of the original account.<\/p>\n

      Internal governance may also require attention. If the foreign shareholder removed the president but failed to appoint an authorised replacement, the bank may have a legitimate reason to refuse instructions. If the new president was appointed but the resolution is defective, a court application aimed only at the bank may not solve the underlying problem. A foreign shareholder can review the procedure through the existing article on removing the president of a French SAS<\/a>, then correct the corporate decision if necessary.<\/p>\n

      Keep the bank case separate from a wider shareholder dispute wherever possible. If the bank receives an aggressive bundle alleging fraud, oppression, or wrongful removal without a clear request for restored access, the compliance team may treat the whole file as higher risk. Send a concise authority memorandum, then reserve contested allegations for the appropriate corporate or judicial proceeding. The memorandum can state that the company disputes the former president\u2019s continued authority, without asking the bank to decide the merits of every shareholder claim.<\/p>\n

      Escalation within the bank should be planned. Start with the relationship manager, then the professional customer service department, then the complaints department identified in the account documentation. A consumer banking mediator is not automatically competent for every professional company account, so check the contract and the bank\u2019s eligibility rules before relying on that path. A written complaint still has value because it fixes the chronology, identifies the documents supplied, and shows that the company sought a proportionate operational solution.<\/p>\n

      The foreign shareholder should also protect access to information. Request current and historic statements, pending transactions, rejected payments, direct-debit mandates, card activity, and the identity of current online users. Preserve copies outside the former president\u2019s email system. If the bank will communicate only with the new president, the shareholder should act through the company rather than sending repeated personal demands. If the shareholder is a director of the foreign parent, attach the parent\u2019s authorisation to the French company\u2019s request only where it clarifies the chain of authority.<\/p>\n

      B. Seek emergency judicial relief and protect the company<\/h3>\n

      If the bank does not restore a usable channel promptly, the company should consider urgent legal relief. The correct forum depends on the bank contract, the company\u2019s status, the registered office, the nature of the claim, and any jurisdiction clause. A dispute between a commercial company and its bank will often be examined through the president of the competent tribunal de commerce<\/a>, the French commercial court, but the procedural route must be checked against the facts. Article 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a>, which concerns the president of the commercial court, states: \u201cLe pr\u00e9sident peut, dans les m\u00eames limites, et m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d’une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, prescrire en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 les mesures conservatoires ou de remise en \u00e9tat qui s’imposent\u201d. It also allows a provision or performance of an obligation where that obligation is not seriously contestable.<\/p>\n

      Depending on the legal relationship and court jurisdiction, the general interim-relief provisions may also matter. Article 834 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a> permits the president of the tribunal judiciaire, the judicial court, to order interim measures in an emergency when there is no serious dispute or when a dispute justifies the measure. Article 835<\/a> addresses protective or restorative measures where there is an imminent harm or a manifestly unlawful disturbance, even in the presence of a serious dispute. The articles are tools for analysing the relief sought; they do not guarantee that a judge will order a bank to react in the exact form requested.<\/p>\n

      The application should ask for a narrow and operational order. Depending on the evidence, the company may request that the bank recognise the new president as the company\u2019s representative, activate a specified account user, process identified categories of urgent payments, provide access to statements, record the revocation of the former mandate, or refrain from rejecting instructions solely because the public extract has not yet been updated when the corporate decision and filing receipt have been produced. A judge is more likely to understand a request that identifies the exact access problem and the exact corrective action than a general request to \u201cunfreeze everything\u201d.<\/p>\n

      The exhibits should show both authority and urgency. Attach the articles, minutes, attendance or voting records where relevant, acceptance of office, identity documents, filing receipt, Kbis or RNE information, bank correspondence, screenshots of the error message, rejected payment notices, payroll schedule, tax or URSSAF deadlines, supplier warnings, and a chronological statement signed by the new president. If the company claims that the former president may still move funds, include the revocation notice and proof of transmission to the bank. If the bank has cited missing beneficial-owner evidence, attach the full ownership chart and the documents that resolve that issue.<\/p>\n

      An emergency application is not a substitute for a claim on the merits. The company may later need to address damages, breach of contract, the validity of the corporate decision, an alleged wrongful removal, or the former president\u2019s conduct. The interim judge focuses on the immediate measure and the evidence available at that stage. The requested order should therefore be proportionate and reversible where possible. A court may prefer a limited payment channel, dual approval, or supervised access rather than an unrestricted release if the bank identifies a real security concern.<\/p>\n

      A request for an administrateur provisoire, meaning a court-appointed provisional administrator, is more exceptional. In Cass. com., 6 February 2007, no. 05-19.008, published in the Bulletin<\/a>, the Court of cassation stated: \u201cla d\u00e9signation judiciaire d’un administrateur provisoire est une mesure exceptionnelle qui suppose rapport\u00e9e la preuve de circonstances rendant impossible le fonctionnement normal de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 et la mena\u00e7ant d’un p\u00e9ril imminent\u201d. The Court refused the measure where serious disagreements did not prevent the company and its organs from functioning normally.<\/p>\n

      The same caution<\/a> appears in Cass. com., 18 June 2013, no. 12-13.255<\/a>. The decision reproduces the argument that the appointment is exceptional and requires circumstances making normal operation impossible and threatening imminent peril. It also shows that a lasting disagreement among shareholders, without proof of the necessary danger and paralysis, is not enough. A bank-access freeze can contribute to that threshold when the company cannot pay employees, taxes, suppliers, or essential creditors, but the applicant must prove the concrete operational consequences. A court will not appoint an administrator simply because a foreign shareholder is dissatisfied with the outgoing president.<\/p>\n

      The company should consider a mandataire ad hoc, a court-appointed special representative with a defined mission, only after analysing whether the requested task is temporary negotiation, preservation of evidence, a corporate meeting, or full administration. A narrowly defined mission may be more proportionate than asking for a replacement management structure. The order should identify whether the representative can contact the bank, sign limited payment instructions, convene shareholders, receive statements, or preserve company records. The legal remedy must match the problem rather than become a second dispute about control.<\/p>\n

      Foreign shareholders face procedural issues that should be anticipated. The court may require a French-language application and exhibits. A corporate foreign shareholder may need to demonstrate the authority of the person instructing counsel. Powers of attorney, foreign registry extracts, apostilles, legalisations, and certified translations can affect timing and admissibility. The registered office of the French company, the bank\u2019s location, and any contractual jurisdiction provision may affect where the application is issued. The fact that the shareholder lives in London, New York, Dubai, or Singapore does not by itself determine the French court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

      The application should avoid asking the court to decide matters it does not need to decide urgently. If the bank only needs a clear identification of the new president and a temporary payment route, do not make the emergency request depend on a full ruling about every allegation of misconduct. If the corporate appointment is challenged, explain the challenge and ask for the interim measure that protects the company while the merits case proceeds. A precise chronology is particularly important where the foreign shareholder was not present in France and relied on remote signing or electronic notices.<\/p>\n

      Bank liability requires the same discipline. A bank is not automatically liable merely because it asked questions after a change of president, and the company should not promise a damages claim before reviewing the contract and the bank\u2019s reasons. At the same time, a bank that has received a clear, coherent authority file and leaves a company without any proportionate payment route may face a different analysis from a bank that is responding to an unresolved identity or fraud alert. The court will examine the information known to the bank, the contractual rules, the nature of the block, the urgency, the company\u2019s responses, and the actual loss.<\/p>\n

      The 2019 decision cited above also demonstrates why the company should preserve records of the bank\u2019s knowledge and the new signatory\u2019s specimen. Where instructions, signatures, or payment authorisations are later disputed, the chronology may determine whether an anomaly was apparent, whether the bank had been informed, and whether an instruction was processed under the correct mandate. Maintain a secure evidence folder containing every letter, portal message, bank call note, attachment, delivery receipt, and rejected payment. A foreign shareholder who can produce a dated and indexed record is in a stronger position than one who relies on a chain of informal messages.<\/p>\n

      The legal and operational end point should be written into the settlement or court order. It should specify the new president\u2019s name, the accounts concerned, the online roles, the permitted payment limits, the removal of the former user, the process for a new token or card, the bank contact, the time for implementation, and the method for resolving any remaining compliance request. After access is restored, test one low-value payment, one incoming transfer, one direct debit, the statement download, and the alert system. Then confirm that the former president cannot log in or approve a payment. Restoration is not complete merely because one password works.<\/p>\n

      The shareholder should also update the company\u2019s governance calendar. A change of president may require updates to the bank, accountant, payroll provider, insurer, commercial partners, tax portal, URSSAF account, electronic invoicing platform, and any public procurement profile. The BODACC, or Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales<\/em>, is the official bulletin publishing certain civil and commercial notices; it should not be confused with the Kbis or the RNE. The company should record which change was filed, which notice was published, and which private counterparty still needs direct notification. This checklist prevents the bank incident from being followed by a second incident with payroll or tax administration.<\/p>\n

      Where a bank has formally terminated the account, begin the search for a replacement immediately while preserving the right to challenge an unlawful or defective termination. Where the bank has only restricted access, ask for a written status and a temporary solution before treating the relationship as ended. Where the former president retains company funds or records, consider separate corporate, civil, or criminal advice. Where shareholders are locked in a wider deadlock, a targeted review of the remedies for a 50\/50 French company deadlock<\/a> may be relevant, but it should not replace the immediate account-continuity plan.<\/p>\n

      A practical decision tree is therefore:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. If the appointment is valid and the bank needs documents, send one complete authority and compliance pack with a precise request.<\/li>\n
      2. If the Kbis is pending, send the resolution and filing receipt, ask for a limited interim mandate, and monitor the registry update.<\/li>\n
      3. If the bank has not explained the restriction, request the account status, blocked functions, missing documents, and urgent payment route in writing.<\/li>\n
      4. If the account is formally terminated, analyse notice and exceptions, then pursue a replacement account and any challenge without delay.<\/li>\n
      5. If payroll, tax, supplier, or fraud risks are immediate, prepare a focused r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 application before the competent court with proof of the threatened harm.<\/li>\n
      6. If normal corporate operation is genuinely impossible and the company faces imminent peril, assess a mandataire ad hoc or administrateur provisoire request under the demanding case-law standard.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Conclusion<\/h2>\n

        A French company bank account blocked after a change of president is usually a coordination crisis before it becomes a merits dispute. The new president may have the legal power to represent the company under the articles and the Commercial Code, while the bank still needs to verify the decision, the identity of the signatory, the beneficial-owner chain, the public filing, and the replacement mandate. The foreign shareholder has an important role in assembling that evidence and preserving the company\u2019s interests, but share ownership alone does not confer account-operating authority.<\/p>\n

        The immediate response should identify whether the account is restricted or closed, separate the corporate appointment from the banking mandate, notify the bank with proof, ask for a proportionate payment route, and protect salaries, taxes, social contributions, and essential suppliers. If dialogue fails and the company faces a real operational threat, a focused application for interim relief can seek a workable order. An administrateur provisoire remains an exceptional remedy: the evidence must show that normal functioning is impossible and that the company faces imminent peril. The strongest file is chronological, document-led, and directed at a precise operational solution.<\/p>\n

        Need a quick opinion on your case<\/h2>\n

        Telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm.<\/p>\n

        Receive a practical first review of your French company\u2019s banking and governance situation within 48 hours.<\/p>\n

        Call Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen: +33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a><\/p>\n

        Contact the firm about your French company<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        A practical legal guide for foreign shareholders when a French company bank account is blocked after a president changes: authority, Kbis, evidence, emergency relief and business continuity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16428,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80314,80313],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2113537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decryptage","category-doing-business-in-france"],"yoast_head":"\nFrench Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A practical legal guide for foreign shareholders when a French company bank account is blocked after a president changes: authority, Kbis, evidence, emergency relief and business continuity.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"29 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5804,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cryptage\",\"Doing Business in France\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Doing Business in France\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/\",\"name\":\"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4000,\"height\":3000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30\\\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder","og_description":"A practical legal guide for foreign shareholders when a French company bank account is blocked after a president changes: authority, Kbis, evidence, emergency relief and business continuity.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00","author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"29 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder","datePublished":"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/"},"wordCount":5804,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cryptage","Doing Business in France"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Doing Business in France"}],"dateModified":"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/","name":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-29T22:06:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-cjyN6d8hqio-unsplash.webp","width":4000,"height":3000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/30\/french-company-bank-account-blocked-after-change-president-foreign-shareholder-remedies\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"French Company Bank Account Blocked After a Change of President: Remedies for a Foreign Shareholder"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2113537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2113537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2113537\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2113537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2113537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2113537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}