{"id":2103882,"date":"2026-08-21T20:06:46","date_gmt":"2026-08-21T18:06:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/"},"modified":"2026-08-21T20:13:48","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T18:13:48","slug":"challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Receiving a French <em>proposition de rectification<\/em> (formal proposed tax adjustment) about a UK pension after Brexit is not the same as receiving a final tax bill. It is the point at which the French tax authority explains the correction it is considering and gives you a short opportunity to answer. For a British person who has moved to France, the difficult question is usually not whether the pension came from the United Kingdom. It is how the pension is classified, where you were resident under the France\u2013UK tax treaty, which French return lines were required, and whether the authority has applied the correct exchange rate, tax credit or exemption.<\/p>\n<p>The treaty did not disappear when the United Kingdom left the European Union. The current 2008 UK\u2013France Double Taxation Convention remains in force and contains separate rules for ordinary pensions, government-service pensions and the elimination of double taxation. A UK tax deduction is not, by itself, proof that France must remove the assessment; nor does a French adjustment automatically mean that UK tax was lawful. Your response must deal with both systems and preserve each remedy. This guide sets out the evidence, deadlines and arguments to organise before you accept, reject or partly accept the proposed adjustment.<\/p>\n<p>The practical starting point is to compare the letter with the official <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/18\/uk-pensions-france-after-brexit-tax-treaty-declaration\/\">guide to declaring UK pensions in France after Brexit<\/a>. The present article addresses the narrower crisis that follows: the French authority has already challenged your declaration, your pension classification or your treaty relief.<\/p>\n<h2>I. Why has France reassessed my UK pension after Brexit?<\/h2>\n<h3>A. When does the French tax office treat a UK pension as taxable in France?<\/h3>\n<p>The first question is residence. French domestic law uses several alternative tests. Article 4 B of the <em>Code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts<\/em> (French General Tax Code, or CGI) describes a person whose tax home is in France as someone who has \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">son foyer ou le lieu de son s\u00e9jour principal<\/q>\u201d, carries on a main professional activity there or has the centre of his or her economic interests there. The same provision adds that an international tax treaty can prevent a person who meets a domestic test from being treated as a French treaty resident. Read the current text of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051202565\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051202565\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CGI Article 4 B<\/a> before relying on a single fact such as a French property, a French bank account or a British passport.<\/p>\n<p>For the return itself, CGI Article 170 requires an income-tax declaration and expressly covers income received from abroad. It says that a person with a French tax home who receives abroad, directly or through an intermediary, products referred to in Article 120 must include them in the return. It also requires certain treaty-exempt income to be reported where it is relevant to the calculation of tax on other income. The exact words are \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">toute personne imposable audit imp\u00f4t est tenue de souscrire et de faire parvenir \u00e0 l&#8217;administration une d\u00e9claration d\u00e9taill\u00e9e<\/q>\u201d. The official text is available at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000053543803\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000053543803\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CGI Article 170<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>That obligation to report is separate from the treaty question of who may tax the payment. HM Revenue and Customs describes the 2008 convention as the treaty in force between the two countries. Article 18 states that pensions and similar remuneration paid for past employment to a resident of a contracting state are taxable only in that state. In practical terms, an ordinary UK State Pension or private occupational pension received by a person who is treaty-resident in France will normally be dealt with in France, subject to the precise category of payment and any special provision. The treaty wording is: \u201cPensions and other similar remuneration paid in consideration of past employment to a resident of a Contracting State shall be taxable only in that State.\u201d Read the complete <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/france-tax-treaties\/2008-uk-and-france-double-taxation-convention-in-force\">UK\u2013France Double Taxation Convention<\/a>, especially Articles 4, 18, 19 and 23.<\/p>\n<p>Do not apply Article 18 without checking whether the payment is a government-service pension. Article 19 has a different allocation rule for pensions paid by, or out of funds created by, a contracting state, a local authority or a French statutory body for services rendered to that state or body. Nationality can matter under the exception. A civil-service pension, armed-forces pension, injury payment, lump sum, annuity, drawdown payment or death benefit may therefore need a separate classification. HMRC\u2019s treaty summary distinguishes ordinary pensions from government pensions, and the convention itself contains a special exemption for certain pensions that are exempt in the source state.<\/p>\n<p>The French tax return may also have been completed on the wrong line. The official French tax guidance says that foreign pensions for a French tax resident must be reported on the main return and on form 2047, with the line depending on whether the payment produces a French-tax credit or is otherwise taxable in France. The guidance refers to lines 1AL to 1DL and 1AM to 1DM. Keep a copy of the filed form, the online confirmation, the calculation notice and any message sent through the secure tax mailbox. A dispute about a line or a credit is different from a dispute about the existence of the pension.<\/p>\n<p>French authorities may also challenge the evidence of UK treaty residence. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007615996\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000007615996\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat, 14 February 1979, no. 06961<\/a>, the court held in the summary that \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">ne suffit pas \u00e0 \u00e9tablir qu&#8217;il soit r\u00e9sident du Royaume Uni<\/q>\u201d. The decision concerned the earlier France\u2013UK convention, not the current 2008 text, but its evidential warning remains useful: nationality and the source of a pension do not replace proof of residence. Supply the relevant HMRC residence material, day-count evidence, permanent-home information and treaty analysis rather than arguing from nationality alone.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, Brexit is often used as a label for a problem that is actually a domestic filing or classification issue. The withdrawal from the European Union changed immigration and social-security routes, but it did not abolish the bilateral tax treaty. The letter should therefore be tested against the treaty in force for the relevant tax year, the French legislation in force for that year and the category of pension actually paid. A correction based only on \u201cUK income is foreign\u201d is not enough; a correction based on an omitted report, an incorrect credit or a misclassified government pension may be legally different.<\/p>\n<h3>B. What does a proposition de rectification mean and what evidence matters?<\/h3>\n<p>A <em>proposition de rectification<\/em> is the formal notice through which the French authority proposes to increase the tax base, remove a credit, add interest or apply a penalty. Under Article L. 55 of the <em>Livre des proc\u00e9dures fiscales<\/em> (Book of Tax Procedures, or LPF), the contradictory correction procedure applies when the administration finds an insufficiency, inaccuracy, omission or concealment in the elements used to calculate tax. The official wording describes \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">la proc\u00e9dure de rectification contradictoire d\u00e9finie aux articles L. 57 \u00e0 L. 61 A<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000020898650\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000020898650\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 55<\/a>. The article is currently applicable, with a scheduled change in 2027, so the date of the tax year matters.<\/p>\n<p>The notice must be sufficiently reasoned. LPF Article L. 57 says that the administration sends a proposed adjustment \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">qui doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re \u00e0 lui permettre de formuler ses observations ou de faire conna\u00eetre son acceptation<\/q>\u201d. It also requires the response of the administration to be reasoned when it rejects your observations. The current text is at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000022177777\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000022177777\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 57<\/a>. LPF Article R*57-1 adds that the notice must state the nature and reasons for the proposed adjustment and invites the taxpayer to send acceptance or observations within thirty days. The official wording begins: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">La proposition de rectification pr\u00e9vue par l&#8217;article L. 57 fait conna\u00eetre au contribuable la nature et les motifs de la rectification envisag\u00e9e<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000019271343\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000019271343\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article R*57-1<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Read the notice in this order:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify the tax year or years, the tax concerned and the amount proposed for each year.<\/li>\n<li>Identify whether the authority says that the pension was omitted, declared in the wrong category, converted at the wrong rate, wrongly treated as treaty-exempt or wrongly credited for UK tax.<\/li>\n<li>Check the treaty article cited by the officer. Ordinary pensions, government-service pensions, annuities and lump sums are not interchangeable.<\/li>\n<li>Check the method used to convert sterling to euros, the payment dates, the gross amount, the tax deducted in the UK and the French credit claimed.<\/li>\n<li>Check whether interest and penalties are calculated separately from the principal tax and whether the notice explains the factual basis for any deliberate-failure allegation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Address is part of the procedure. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000047464409\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000047464409\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat, 14 April 2023, no. 467129<\/a>, the court explained that the administration must in principle notify the proposed adjustment at the address supplied by the taxpayer, unless it proves that that address was fictitious and establishes the taxpayer\u2019s effective residence elsewhere. The official summary states: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">\u00e0 l\u2019adresse indiqu\u00e9e par le contribuable<\/q>\u201d. If you live in France but spend periods in the UK, preserve the envelope, delivery record, online notification timestamp and every address previously communicated to the tax authority. A missed letter can become a procedural argument, but it is not safe to assume that non-collection stops the response period.<\/p>\n<p>Another useful decision is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000030192198\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/ceta\/id\/CETATEXT000030192198\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat, 4 February 2015, no. 364708<\/a>. The court described the contents required for a regular notice: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">la d\u00e9signation de l&#8217;imp\u00f4t concern\u00e9, de l&#8217;ann\u00e9e d&#8217;imposition et de la base d&#8217;imposition<\/q>\u201d, together with the reasons enabling useful observations. The decision does not mean that every drafting error cancels an assessment. It means that your reply should compare the letter with those requirements and explain precisely why a missing year, unexplained calculation, absent treaty analysis or unsupported classification prevented a useful answer.<\/p>\n<p>Your evidence should be organised as a short indexed bundle. Include the pension provider\u2019s annual statement, P60 or equivalent, award notice, payment ledger, bank statements showing receipt, HMRC correspondence, any UK tax computation, French tax returns and notices, form 2047, proof of French residence, proof of any UK residence position, and the document that identifies whether the pension is private, occupational, State Pension, government-service or a lump sum. Add a one-page chronology. Where an English document is central to the legal argument, obtain a reliable French translation or explain the relevant passages in the response; do not send a pile of documents without identifying what each one proves.<\/p>\n<p>For a treaty argument, separate three questions in the bundle: first, where you were resident under the treaty; second, what kind of pension was paid; third, which country the treaty assigns the taxing right to. A UK tax deduction may support the facts, but it may also be the result of an incorrect PAYE code. Conversely, a French assessment may be based on a correct domestic reporting obligation but an incorrect treaty credit. Ask HMRC for the relevant tax calculation and, where appropriate, use the official <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/double-taxation-united-kingdomfrance-si-2009-number-226-form-france-individual\">France\u2013Individual form<\/a> for relief at source or repayment of UK income tax. That UK remedy is not a substitute for answering the French notice.<\/p>\n<p>There is also a question of time. LPF Article L. 169 states that, for income tax and corporation tax, the ordinary right of recovery runs to the end of the third year following the year for which tax is due, with longer periods in listed cases. Its current wording includes a ten-year period where specified foreign-account or foreign-asset reporting obligations have not been met. Read <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000054358875\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000054358875\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 169<\/a> against the tax year and the precise omission alleged. Do not accept a ten-year period merely because a payment came from Britain: the extension must correspond to a statutory reporting failure and the relevant category of income.<\/p>\n<p>If you previously relied in good faith on published French tax guidance or on a formal position taken by the administration, LPF Article L. 80 A may be relevant. It says \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">Il ne sera proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 aucun rehaussement d&#8217;impositions ant\u00e9rieures<\/q>\u201d in the circumstances it defines, including a taxpayer\u2019s good-faith reliance on an interpretation formally admitted or published by the administration. The protection is technical: identify the exact guidance, its date, the transaction or filing to which it applied and why your facts fall within it. The official text is at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037312533\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037312533\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 80 A<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>II. How do I challenge the reassessment and protect my position?<\/h2>\n<h3>A. How do I reply within the French deadlines and claim treaty relief?<\/h3>\n<p>Start by calculating the response deadline from the date of receipt or valid electronic notification shown in the notice. LPF Article R*57-1 provides thirty days for observations. LPF Article L. 11 states that, unless another period is provided, the period for responding to an administrative notification is thirty days from receipt: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">\u00e0 compter de la r\u00e9ception de cette notification<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815185\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815185\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 11<\/a>. If the notice or the circumstances allow a formal extension, request it before the original period ends and keep proof of sending. A request for more time is not a substitute for a substantive answer.<\/p>\n<p>Write \u201cI reject the proposed adjustment\u201d or \u201cI accept only the following uncontested part\u201d in clear terms. Then answer each numbered paragraph of the notice. A useful structure is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Residence:<\/strong> state the dates of arrival, departure, habitual home, family location, work or pensioner status and the treaty residence position. Attach evidence rather than relying on an assertion.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Classification:<\/strong> identify the pension provider, legal nature, employment history and any government-service connection. Explain why Article 18 or Article 19 of the treaty applies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>French reporting:<\/strong> show the main return and form 2047 entries, the amounts in sterling and euros, the exchange-rate source and any credit or exemption claimed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Double taxation:<\/strong> identify the UK tax withheld or paid and explain whether the remedy is relief at source, repayment from HMRC, a French credit or exclusive taxation in France.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Procedure:<\/strong> identify missing reasons, an unexplained calculation, a wrong address, a wrong tax year or a period that appears out of time.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sanctions:<\/strong> state why any omission was a genuine classification or translation error, disclose the documents that were available, and dispute any allegation of deliberate conduct unless the administration proves it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Do not describe the tax treaty as a general exemption. A treaty allocates taxing rights; it does not normally remove the French obligation to report a foreign payment. If Article 18 gives France exclusive taxing rights over an ordinary UK pension of a French treaty resident, say that expressly and show the payment category. If the pension is government-service income, address Article 19 separately. If the amount is a tax-free UK lump sum, a pension commencement lump sum, a drawdown, an annuity or an unauthorised payment, obtain advice on the legal category before applying an article designed for a regular pension.<\/p>\n<p>For the French side, the official tax page confirms that foreign pensions can require both the ordinary income-tax return and form 2047, with different lines depending on the French-tax-credit treatment. Link your explanation to the exact boxes completed. If the authority has simply copied the gross sterling amount into euros, show the correct calculation and explain whether the relevant date is the payment date or the administration\u2019s accepted annual rate. If a UK tax payment was later refunded, disclose that fact; a credit cannot be retained for tax that was not ultimately borne.<\/p>\n<p>For the UK side, a French resident receiving a UK pension may need to request relief at source or repayment from HMRC. The official France\u2013Individual form is specifically described as being for residents of France receiving UK pensions, purchased annuities, interest or royalties. Keep the certificate of French residence and every HMRC response. If HMRC refuses or only partly repays, do not silently alter the French answer. Explain the position to the French authority and preserve the possibility of a corresponding claim once the UK amount is final.<\/p>\n<p>If the reassessment creates a genuine treaty conflict, consider the <em>proc\u00e9dure amiable<\/em> (mutual agreement procedure) as a parallel treaty route. The French tax authority\u2019s guidance lists the proposed adjustment, tax notices, administrative appeals and relevant court decisions among the documents to provide. It also warns that the treaty may prescribe a time limit, and that the competent authorities do not replace the taxpayer\u2019s domestic remedies. The official page records: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">La proc\u00e9dure amiable doit \u00eatre demand\u00e9e aupr\u00e8s de l&#8217;Autorit\u00e9 comp\u00e9tente de l\u2019\u00c9tat de r\u00e9sidence du contribuable dans un d\u00e9lai de 3 mois \u00e0 3 ans selon les conventions<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.impots.gouv.fr\/international-professionnel\/la-procedure-amiable\">impots.gouv.fr\u2019s mutual agreement procedure guidance<\/a>. Check the current treaty text for the applicable period before relying on it.<\/p>\n<p>The mutual agreement route is not a reason to let the French thirty-day response or later tax-claim deadline expire. Send a protective domestic response, identify the treaty conflict, ask the tax office to correct the assessment and then consider the competent-authority route. If the two administrations eventually propose a solution, read its conditions carefully: the French guidance explains that acceptance can require withdrawal of domestic administrative or court proceedings relating to the same tax.<\/p>\n<p>Interest and penalties must be challenged separately. CGI Article 1727 provides that an unpaid tax debt can produce late-payment interest and states a monthly rate in its current text. It also includes situations in which interest is not due, including certain good-faith interpretive difficulties or an express explanation attached to a timely declaration. The official wording starts: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">qui n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 acquitt\u00e9e dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal donne lieu au versement d&#8217;un int\u00e9r\u00eat de retard<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051213330\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051213330\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CGI Article 1727<\/a>. CGI Article 1729 provides 40% for deliberate failure and 80% for abuse of law or fraudulent manoeuvres in the circumstances it describes. Its text begins: \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">entra\u00eenent l&#8217;application d&#8217;une majoration<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000020051904\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000020051904\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CGI Article 1729<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>A well-supported answer can ask for withdrawal of the penalties even where some principal tax remains due. Explain the chronology, the information supplied at the time, the language or form difficulty, the absence of concealment and the steps taken to correct the position. Do not admit \u201cdeliberate failure\u201d merely because the payment was not placed on the correct form. The administration must identify the facts supporting the sanction, and the legal and factual response should remain distinct.<\/p>\n<p>Keep the transmission evidence. Send through the secure tax mailbox when available, attach one searchable PDF plus an index, and save the confirmation. If using registered post, keep the receipt and delivery record. Do not send original pension certificates unless specifically requested. If the authority asks for further documents, answer within the new deadline and repeat the treaty point rather than assuming that the first letter is still the whole dispute.<\/p>\n<h3>B. When should I file a claim or go to the tribunal administratif?<\/h3>\n<p>If the administration maintains the adjustment after your observations, the next step is usually a <em>r\u00e9clamation contentieuse<\/em> (formal tax claim) against the assessment. This is different from the observations sent in response to the proposed adjustment. The claim should identify the tax notice, years, amounts, treaty articles, statutory grounds, requested relief and supporting documents. It should ask for full discharge or, if appropriate, a stated reduction. Do not rely on an informal telephone call to preserve the deadline.<\/p>\n<p>LPF Article R*196-1 sets the usual time limit for claims concerning taxes other than local direct taxes and related taxes. It says they must be filed no later than 31 December of the second year following the relevant assessment, payment or event, depending on the case. The exact official wording and exceptions are at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000054553358\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000054553358\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article R*196-1<\/a>. The date on the tax notice, the date the tax was paid and the type of correction can change the calculation. Calculate the deadline conservatively and file before the earliest plausible date.<\/p>\n<p>When the claim concerns income tax, you can ask for a <em>sursis de paiement<\/em> (deferment of payment) for the disputed amount, subject to the applicable conditions. Service Public explains that a tax claim does not automatically suspend payment, but the taxpayer can request deferment and must identify the disputed tax and provide reasons and documents. Its current guidance also explains that the tax authority has six months to process a claim and that a court can be approached when the answer is unsatisfactory or no answer arrives after that period. Read the current <a href=\"https:\/\/www.service-public.fr\/particuliers\/vosdroits\/F110?quest0=1&#038;quest1=3&#038;quest2=0\">Service Public guidance on tax claims and court appeals<\/a> and state the suspension request expressly in the claim.<\/p>\n<p>LPF Article L. 199 identifies the court route for direct taxes: decisions on claims that do not fully satisfy the taxpayer can be brought before the <em>tribunal administratif<\/em> (administrative court). The official text says \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">peuvent \u00eatre port\u00e9es devant le tribunal administratif<\/q>\u201d. See <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051200782\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051200782\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 199<\/a>. The court does not decide a claim that was never properly put to the tax administration, and court time limits run from the relevant decision or implied rejection. Keep the rejection letter, the date it was made available, and the notice of appeal rights.<\/p>\n<p>A court file should be built around a clean proposition. Do not send the judge the entire history without a map. Prepare a chronology, a table comparing the authority\u2019s calculation with yours, a treaty classification table, and a numbered exhibit list. For each disputed amount, show the sterling source document, conversion into euros, French declaration line, treaty article, UK tax treatment and requested correction. If residence is disputed, show the treaty tie-breaker facts separately from the pension facts. If procedure is disputed, show the notice, envelope, address, delivery proof, response, extension request and administrative reply in order.<\/p>\n<p>Potential procedural grounds include an insufficiently reasoned notice, failure to identify the tax year or legal basis, a calculation that cannot be reconstructed, a notification sent to the wrong address, an incorrect response deadline, failure to answer material observations or a recovery period that does not apply to the alleged omission. These arguments are fact-sensitive. In the 2015 decision cited above, the Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat accepted that a notice can be regular where it identifies the tax, year, amount and reasons, even though additional information may later corroborate the same reasons. That is why the response should explain concrete prejudice and not merely list formal defects.<\/p>\n<p>LPF Article L. 47 protects a taxpayer undergoing an examination of personal tax status by requiring an advance notice and expressly stating that the taxpayer may be assisted by a chosen adviser, \u201c<q lang=\"fr\">sous peine de nullit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/q>\u201d if the required information is omitted. The full text is at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815149\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000033815149\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LPF Article L. 47<\/a>. A simple desk review of a return and a full examination are not identical procedures, so do not assume every guarantee applies in the same way. Identify the document you actually received and the procedure named by the authority.<\/p>\n<p>If the authority alleges that the tax was not declared at all, compare the allegation with the forms submitted and the dates. Article L. 169\u2019s extended periods can matter where specified foreign-account obligations were not met, but a foreign pension payment and a foreign bank account are not the same legal fact. If your UK account was declared on form 3916 or the relevant online annex but the pension was placed on the wrong line, say so. If the pension was omitted, explain why and provide the corrected calculation; do not let the authority treat a repairable category error as concealed income without addressing the evidence.<\/p>\n<p>There may also be a separate issue with UK withholding. Under the treaty, the country entitled to tax the pension and the country that withheld PAYE may not be the same. HMRC\u2019s public guidance says that a person taxed twice may seek relief under the relevant agreement and that the agreement determines where relief is claimed. The French authority\u2019s procedure-amiable page also asks for proof of the double taxation and copies of domestic appeals. This creates a practical rule: make the French claim, the HMRC claim and any mutual-agreement request consistent with one factual chronology. Contradictory statements about residence or the nature of the pension can damage all three routes.<\/p>\n<p>Before filing in court, ask whether the amount in dispute justifies a technical expert review. A cross-border pension file can combine tax residence, treaty interpretation, exchange rates, form mechanics and sanctions. A short review of the notice and documents can identify whether the strongest argument is full treaty allocation, a calculation correction, a limitation defence, removal of penalties or a payment arrangement. If the tax assessment is already enforced, address collection measures and the payment suspension request immediately; a later court action does not automatically undo enforcement already begun.<\/p>\n<p>The following checklist is suitable for a first review:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>date and method of receipt of the proposed adjustment;<\/li>\n<li>tax years, tax type and amount proposed for each year;<\/li>\n<li>ordinary pension, State Pension, government-service pension, annuity, lump sum or drawdown classification;<\/li>\n<li>French treaty residence evidence and any UK residence certificate;<\/li>\n<li>award statements, P60s, bank statements, PAYE evidence and payment dates;<\/li>\n<li>French returns, form 2047, tax notices and secure-mail correspondence;<\/li>\n<li>exchange-rate source and a calculation that can be reproduced;<\/li>\n<li>UK\u2013France treaty article relied on and the country in which relief is claimed;<\/li>\n<li>response deadline, extension request, domestic claim deadline and any mutual-agreement time limit;<\/li>\n<li>separate challenge to principal tax, interest and penalties; and<\/li>\n<li>proof of transmission for every response and claim.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The goal is not to deny every French tax adjustment. It is to force the dispute into the correct legal categories and to prevent a short letter from turning a correctable reporting problem into an accepted assessment. A British reader should be able to see from the file whether the French authority has applied domestic law, the treaty, the evidence and the procedure consistently.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>A French reassessment of UK pension income after Brexit should be answered as a cross-border tax procedure, not as a general complaint about Brexit. Confirm treaty residence, classify the pension, reconcile the French forms with the actual payment, test the reasoning and calculation in the <em>proposition de rectification<\/em>, and respond within thirty days with an indexed evidence bundle. Preserve the domestic claim and payment-suspension routes even if you also seek HMRC relief or a mutual agreement between the two tax authorities.<\/p>\n<p>The strongest file usually combines the exact treaty article, the correct French return line, proof of the payment\u2019s nature, a transparent sterling-to-euro calculation and a precise procedural objection. If the authority has misunderstood the pension or the residence facts, the response should correct the record before the assessment becomes final. If part of the tax is due, isolate that part and challenge the balance, interest or penalties on their own legal grounds.<\/p>\n<h2>Need a quick opinion on your case?<\/h2>\n<p>Arrange a telephone consultation within 48 hours with a lawyer from the firm to review the French tax notice, the UK pension documents and the treaty issue.<\/p>\n<p>Send the deadline, the proposed calculation and your supporting documents before the consultation so that the response strategy can be assessed efficiently.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"tel:+33646605822\">+33 6 46 60 58 22<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/formulaire-de-contact\/\">Contact the firm<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Received a French proposition de rectification about a UK pension? Learn how to test residence, treaty classification, evidence, deadlines and relief.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16546,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[80312,80314],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2103882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-british-desk","category-decryptage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.2 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Received a French proposition de rectification about a UK pension? Learn how to test residence, treaty classification, evidence, deadlines and relief.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4385\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3026\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4459,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"British Desk\",\"D\u00e9cryptage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"British Desk\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cryptage\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/\",\"name\":\"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4385,\"height\":3026},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/21\\\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit","og_description":"Received a French proposition de rectification about a UK pension? Learn how to test residence, treaty classification, evidence, deadlines and relief.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4385,"height":3026,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit","datePublished":"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/"},"wordCount":4459,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["British Desk","D\u00e9cryptage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"British Desk"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cryptage"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/","name":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-21T18:06:46+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-21T18:13:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-tKKyX0mbpQs-unsplash.webp","width":4385,"height":3026},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/challenge-french-tax-reassessment-uk-pension-france-brexit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to Challenge a French Tax Reassessment on UK Pension Income After Brexit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2103882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2103882"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2103882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2103893,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2103882\/revisions\/2103893"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16546"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2103882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2103882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2103882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}