{"id":2056531,"date":"2026-07-27T13:09:48","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T11:09:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/"},"modified":"2026-07-27T13:11:08","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T11:11:08","slug":"fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/","title":{"rendered":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

When you purchase property in France as an international buyer, the transaction is governed by rules that may differ sharply from those in your home jurisdiction. One of the most powerful protections available to a buyer under French law is the doctrine of dol<\/em> (fraudulent misrepresentation). Unlike many common-law systems where misrepresentation claims are primarily contractual or tortious, French law treats dol<\/em> as a defect in consent (vice du consentement<\/em>) capable of annulling the entire sale and restoring the parties to their pre-contractual position. This article explains what dol<\/em> means in a French property context, how it differs from the better-known vice cach\u00e9<\/em> (hidden defect), the legal tests applied by the Cour de cassation in recent years, and the remedies\u2014and deadlines\u2014available to a buyer who has been deceived.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I. Understanding Dol<\/em> in French Law<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A. The Legal Definition: Article 1137 of the Civil Code<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The French Civil Code defines dol<\/em> at Article 1137<\/a>. The text states that dol<\/em> “is the act, by a contracting party, of obtaining the other party’s consent through manoeuvres or lies. The intentional concealment by one party of information known by that party to be of decisive importance to the other party also constitutes dol<\/em>.” The provision adds an important limitation: “a party’s failure to disclose its own estimate of the value of the performance does not constitute dol<\/em>.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This definition identifies two distinct forms of fraudulent behaviour: active misrepresentation (man\u0153uvres<\/em> or mensonges<\/em>\u2014manoeuvres or lies) and passive misrepresentation (r\u00e9ticence dolosive<\/em>\u2014intentional non-disclosure). Both require that the information withheld or distorted be of a nature that, had the truth been known, the buyer would either not have contracted at all or would have contracted on substantially different terms. This is the test set out at Article 1130<\/a> of the Civil Code: “Error, dol<\/em>, and violence vitiate consent where they are of such a nature that, without them, one of the parties would not have contracted or would have contracted on substantially different terms. Their decisive character is assessed with regard to the persons and the circumstances in which the consent was given.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A further provision, Article 1138<\/a>, extends the scope of dol<\/em> to situations where the fraudulent conduct emanates from the agent, representative, employee, or a collusive third party of the contracting party. For a foreign buyer purchasing through a local agent or property finder, this means that misrepresentations made by an intermediary acting on the seller’s behalf can, in certain circumstances, be imputed to the seller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a property transaction, dol<\/em> takes many practical forms. The most recent<\/a> decision of the third civil chamber of the Cour de cassation on the topic, handed down on 9 April 2026 (no. 24-17.405)<\/strong>, involved a seller who had declared in the notarial deed that no structural work had been undertaken on the property in the preceding ten years\u2014when in fact she had commissioned major foundation works in 2016 to address persistent cracking and humidity. The Court found that “la venderesse ayant sciemment omis de signaler les interventions sur les fondations, le consentement des acqu\u00e9reurs avait \u00e9t\u00e9 vici\u00e9” (the seller having knowingly failed to disclose the foundation interventions, the buyers’ consent had been vitiated). The sale was annulled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The test the courts apply to r\u00e9ticence dolosive<\/em> was crystallised by the third civil chamber in Cass. 3e civ., 9 March 2023, no. 21-18.063<\/a>, where the Court confirmed that “le fait pour le vendeur de dissimuler une information dont il avait connaissance avant la conclusion du contrat peut constituer un dol par r\u00e9ticence” (the seller’s concealment of information of which he had knowledge before the conclusion of the contract may constitute dol by non-disclosure). Three elements must coalesce: the seller knew the information, the seller intentionally withheld it, and the information would have been decisive for the buyer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. How Dol<\/em> Differs from the Vice Cach\u00e9<\/em> Regime<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

International buyers familiar with French property law may know the garantie des vices cach\u00e9s<\/a><\/em> (warranty against hidden defects) codified at Article 1641<\/a> of the Civil Code. The distinction between dol<\/em> and vice cach\u00e9<\/em> is critical because the two remedies serve different purposes, have different procedural requirements, and are subject to different time limits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The vice cach\u00e9<\/em> regime requires that the defect render the property unfit for its intended use, or that it would have caused the buyer to pay a lower price had they known of it. It operates on an objective standard: does the defect exist, was it hidden, and was it present at the time of sale? The seller’s state of mind is irrelevant. The buyer who succeeds under vice cach\u00e9<\/em> may choose between action r\u00e9dhibitoire<\/em> (returning the property and recovering the price) and action estimatoire<\/em> (keeping the property and obtaining a partial refund). But the buyer invoking vice cach\u00e9<\/em> must bring the claim within two years of discovering the defect\u2014a short and strict window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dol<\/em>, by contrast, targets the integrity of the transaction itself. It does not require that the property be physically defective; it requires that the buyer’s consent was obtained through deception. This means a property that is structurally sound can still form the basis of a dol<\/em> claim if the seller misrepresented, for example, its zoning classification, its rental history, or the existence of disputes with neighbours. The Cour de cassation confirmed in Cass. 3e civ., 4 July 2024, no. 23-11.532<\/a> that the omitting of information about the non-constructible classification of land, known to the seller but withheld from the buyer, could in principle constitute dol<\/em>. The Court stated in that judgment: “des restrictions d’usage et de destination inh\u00e9rentes au b\u00e2timent d’origine […] s’appliquent \u00e0 l’extension r\u00e9alis\u00e9e en 1999 et […] l’immeuble est class\u00e9 en zone non constructible, faits connus des vendeurs mais dont ils ont omis d’informer l’acqu\u00e9reur” (restrictions on use and destination inherent to the original building apply to the extension built in 1999 and the property is classified as non-constructible\u2014facts known to the sellers but which they failed to disclose to the buyer).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two remedies are not mutually exclusive. A buyer can plead dol<\/em> as a primary claim and vice cach\u00e9<\/em> as a subsidiary one. However, the strategic choice matters: dol<\/em> offers annulment of the entire contract plus damages, while vice cach\u00e9<\/em> offers a return of the property or a price reduction. The burden of proof is also different. To succeed in dol<\/em>, the buyer must prove not only that the information was withheld, but that the seller did so intentionally\u2014a significantly heavier evidentiary burden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

II. Proving and Pursuing a Dol<\/em> Claim in a Property Transaction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A. The Three Requirements: Intent, Materiality, and Causation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The French courts have developed a rigorous, three-part test for dol<\/em>. Each element must be established by the buyer. The evidentiary standard is high because, as the Cour de cassation has repeatedly affirmed, dol<\/em> “ne se pr\u00e9sume pas, et doit \u00eatre prouv\u00e9” (is not presumed, and must be proven) (Cass. 3e civ., 4 July 2024<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Intentional conduct.<\/strong> The seller must have acted with the intention<\/em> to deceive. This is the element that most frequently causes claims to fail. In Cass. 3e civ., 13 July 2023, no. 22-15.816<\/a>, the Court rejected a dol<\/em> claim brought by a buyer who argued that her apartment had been sold as a “luxury, high-standing, premium-renovated” property when in reality the finishes were substandard. The Court held that the seller had merely “s’\u00e9tait born\u00e9e \u00e0 en vanter les qualit\u00e9s dans une d\u00e9marche commerciale, sans qu’il soit d\u00e9montr\u00e9 qu’elle ait agi avec l’intention de tromper” (had merely praised its qualities in a commercial d\u00e9marche without it being shown that she acted with intent to deceive). Commercial puffery does not constitute dol<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The same principle was applied with equal force in Cass. 3e civ., 21 November 2024, no. 23-10.180<\/a>, where the Cour de cassation overturned a lower court’s finding of dol<\/em> precisely because the appeal court had used “des motifs impropres \u00e0 \u00e9tablir le caract\u00e8re intentionnel du d\u00e9faut d’information” (reasons unsuited to establishing the intentional character of the failure to inform). The lower court had found that the seller could have believed that previous structural repairs were adequate\u2014which meant the seller had no intention<\/em> to mislead. For a foreign buyer, this is a crucial warning: proving that the seller knew something and deliberately concealed it is the hardest part of a dol<\/em> claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Decisive information.<\/strong> The information withheld or distorted must have been of a nature to determine the buyer’s consent. The test is assessed in concreto<\/em>: the court examines the specific buyer, their experience, and the circumstances of the transaction. In Cass. 3e civ., 16 March 2023, no. 21-25.984<\/a>, which concerned a tax-advantaged property investment, the Cour de cassation ruled that a developer who had made representations about the guaranteed profitability of the scheme had a duty to inform the investor\u2014even a sophisticated one\u2014of the associated risks. The Court held: “il incombe au vendeur tenu d’informer l’investisseur m\u00eame averti, des risques li\u00e9s \u00e0 l’achat d’un bien immobilier entrant dans un programme de d\u00e9fiscalisation, de justifier qu’il a ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 cette obligation, sans s’\u00eatre tu sur ceux qui y sont associ\u00e9s” (it falls on the seller, required to inform even the informed investor of the risks associated with the purchase of property forming part of a tax-exemption programme, to justify that it has fulfilled this obligation and has not remained silent about the associated risks).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Causation.<\/strong> The buyer must demonstrate that, but for the dol<\/em>, they would not have entered into the contract or would have done so on materially different terms. This is the “but for” test embedded in Article 1130. The causal link between the deception and the decision to purchase must be established.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is worth noting a critical doctrinal point for international buyers: even if the deed of sale contains a standard clause in which the buyer declares they have “perfect knowledge of the property” and have “obtained all necessary information from the relevant authorities,” this does not automatically shield a seller who has committed dol<\/em>. As the Cour de cassation observed in Cass. 3e civ., 4 July 2024<\/a>: “l’erreur provoqu\u00e9e par la r\u00e9ticence dolosive \u00e9tant toujours excusable” (an error caused by fraudulent non-disclosure is always excusable). However, it is equally true\u2014and the same judgment illustrates\u2014that if the buyer actually possessed the relevant information at the time of contracting despite the seller’s silence, the dol<\/em> claim fails because one cannot be deceived about what one already knows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a non-French-speaking buyer, this doctrinal nuance carries a practical implication: the notarial deed (acte authentique<\/em>) will inevitably contain declarations and clauses in French that the buyer is deemed to have understood. If you do not read French fluently, retaining a bilingual lawyer to review the preliminary sale agreement (compromis de vente<\/a><\/em>) and the final deed before signature is not a luxury; it is a safeguard against signing away rights you do not know you possess. Our firm’s English-language guidance on the French property transaction process<\/a> is available online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B. The Remedies Available and the Statute of Limitations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

When dol<\/em> is established, the principal remedy is annulment of the contract<\/strong> (nullit\u00e9<\/em>) under Article 1178<\/a> of the Civil Code, which provides: “A contract that does not satisfy the conditions required for its validity is null. Nullity must be ordered by a court unless the parties mutually acknowledge it.” The article further states: “The nullified contract is deemed never to have existed. The performances rendered give rise to restitution under the conditions set out in Articles 1352 to 1352-9. Independently of the nullity of the contract, the injured party may seek reparation for the damage suffered under the rules governing extra-contractual liability.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In practice, this means that when a property sale is annulled for dol<\/em>, the buyer must return the property and the seller must return the purchase price. The parties are placed in the position they were in before the contract. In addition, the buyer can claim damages<\/strong> for the losses suffered\u2014notary fees, mortgage arrangement costs, relocation expenses, renovation expenditure, and, in appropriate cases, moral prejudice. The Cass. 3e civ., 8 February 2023, no. 22-11.600<\/a> illustrates a case in which the buyer obtained \u20ac81,176.82 as a reduction of the sale price\u2014a partial remedy where full annulment was not sought\u2014resulting from man\u0153uvres dolosives<\/em> (fraudulent manoeuvres) by the seller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An alternative remedy, affirmed by the Cour de cassation in a decision reported by Dalloz Actualit\u00e9 on 28 June 2026<\/a>, is that a buyer who has been the victim of dol<\/em> but does not wish to have the contract annulled may instead claim damages for the excess price<\/strong> (indemnisation d’un exc\u00e8s de prix<\/em>) they paid as a result of the fraudulent conduct. This is a valuable option where the buyer wishes to keep the property but believes they overpaid due to the seller’s misrepresentations. As Dalloz summarised: “L’acqu\u00e9reur d’un immeuble victime d’un dol qui fait le choix de ne pas demander l’annulation du contrat de vente, peut agir en indemnisation d’un exc\u00e8s de prix. D\u00e8s lors, n’encourt pas la cassation l’arr\u00eat qui \u00e9value souverainement le pr\u00e9judice subi par l’acqu\u00e9reur victime de dol \u00e0 un certain pourcentage du prix d’acquisition.” (A property buyer who is the victim of dol<\/em> and who chooses not to seek annulment of the sale contract may bring an action for compensation for an excessive price. An appellate court that independently assesses the prejudice suffered by the defrauded buyer at a certain percentage of the purchase price does not incur cassation.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The statute of limitations<\/strong> for a dol<\/em> claim is a crucial practical consideration. The Cour de cassation, sitting in a full section formation, confirmed in Cass. 3e civ., 20 March 2025, no. 23-18.735<\/a> that “l’action en nullit\u00e9 d’un contrat fond\u00e9e sur le dol se prescrit par un d\u00e9lai de cinq ans \u00e0 compter du jour o\u00f9 le contractant a d\u00e9couvert le dol qu’il all\u00e8gue” (the action for nullity of a contract based on dol<\/em> is subject to a five-year limitation period running from the day the contracting party discovered the dol<\/em> it alleges). The Court added, in the same judgment, that the five-year period applicable to Article 2224<\/a> of the Civil Code\u2014”Personal and movable actions are time-barred after five years from the day on which the holder of a right knew or ought to have known the facts enabling them to exercise it”\u2014also applies to the associated claim for damages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critically, the limitation period begins to run from the date of actual discovery<\/strong> of the deception, not from the date of the sale. The 2025 judgment is explicit on this point: the court of appeal may not presume that a buyer discovered the dol<\/em> at the date of a public filing that the buyer had no particular reason to consult. The buyer must have actual and effective knowledge. This is a protective rule for foreign owners who may discover the deception years after moving in\u2014but it is not an open-ended invitation. The five-year clock starts the moment the buyer is objectively aware of the concealed information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A buyer who prevails in a dol<\/em> claim may also seek to hold a notary liable if the notary failed in their duty to verify and disclose information relevant to the transaction. The notary’s duty of counsel is broad, though its breach does not, on its own, establish dol<\/em> against the seller. In practice, a comprehensive claim will often deploy multiple legal bases concurrently\u2014dol<\/em> against the seller, vice cach\u00e9<\/em> as a subsidiary claim, and professional liability against the notary where appropriate. Strategic coordination of these actions requires careful judgment about evidence, timing, and cost exposure. For further information on our firm’s French real estate practice, consult our English-language real estate law page<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The French doctrine of dol<\/em> offers a powerful, if demanding, remedy for international buyers who have been deceived in a property transaction. It is not a claim that succeeds on emotion or disappointment. It requires proof of intentional deception about an objectively decisive piece of information. The burden is on the buyer, the timeline is five years from discovery, and the evidentiary standard requires far more than pointing to what a glossy brochure promised. But when the elements align\u2014when a seller has deliberately concealed foundation works, zoning restrictions, structural defects, or the true financial viability of an investment\u2014French law responds with the most radical remedy available in the law of contract: the retroactive annulment of the sale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the international buyer, the most effective protection is pre-contractual diligence. Retain a bilingual legal adviser to review the compromis de vente<\/em> before signature. Commission independent surveys and technical inspections beyond those required by law. Ask direct questions in writing about the property’s history and obtain written answers. Press the seller for disclosure of past disputes, insurance claims, and co-ownership proceedings. A French property transaction is a civil-law commitment underpinned by a notarially recorded deed; anything that should have been disclosed but was not may, one day, ground a claim. The sooner the discovery, the stronger the case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When you purchase property in France as an international buyer, the transaction is governed by rules that may differ sharply from those in your home jurisdiction. One of the most powerful protections available to a buyer under French law is the doctrine of dol (fraudulent misrepresentation). Unlike many common-law systems where misrepresentation claims are primarily […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16412,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"deleted","footnotes":""},"categories":[79307],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2056531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-en-real-estate"],"yoast_head":"\nFraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When you purchase property in France as an international buyer, the transaction is governed by rules that may differ sharply from those in your home jurisdiction. One of the most powerful protections available to a buyer under French law is the doctrine of dol (fraudulent misrepresentation). Unlike many common-law systems where misrepresentation claims are primarily […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3840\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2879,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"French real estate law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"French real estate law\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3840,\"height\":2160},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/27\\\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers","og_description":"When you purchase property in France as an international buyer, the transaction is governed by rules that may differ sharply from those in your home jurisdiction. One of the most powerful protections available to a buyer under French law is the doctrine of dol (fraudulent misrepresentation). Unlike many common-law systems where misrepresentation claims are primarily […]","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3840,"height":2160,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers","datePublished":"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/"},"wordCount":2879,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["French real estate law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"French real estate law"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/","name":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-27T11:09:48+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-27T11:11:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/luke-jones-DaS7IxmJGfw-unsplash.webp","width":3840,"height":2160},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/27\/fraudulent-misrepresentation-dol-french-property-transactions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Dol) in French Property Transactions: A Guide for International Buyers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2056531"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2056537,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2056531\/revisions\/2056537"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2056531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2056531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2056531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}