{"id":2046409,"date":"2026-07-19T13:11:45","date_gmt":"2026-07-19T11:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/"},"modified":"2026-07-19T13:12:26","modified_gmt":"2026-07-19T11:12:26","slug":"selling-property-france-non-resident-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>I. Preparing the Sale: Mandate and Pre-Contractual Phase<\/h2>\n<h3>A. Engaging an Estate Agent: The <em>Mandat de Vente<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>When you decide to sell your French property as a non-resident, your first practical decision is whether to engage a French estate agent (<em>agent immobilier<\/em>) or to proceed privately. Most non-resident sellers choose to work with an agent, particularly given the logistical challenges of managing viewings, negotiations, and administrative formalities from abroad.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship between a seller and an estate agent is governed by the <em>mandat de vente<\/em> (sale mandate), a written contract regulated by the <em>loi Hoguet<\/em> (Law no. 70-9 of 2 January 1970). A mandate must specify the duration of the agency, the amount of the agent\u2019s commission (typically 4% to 8% of the sale price), and whether it is exclusive (<em>mandat exclusif<\/em>) or non-exclusive (<em>mandat simple<\/em>). Under a <em>mandat exclusif<\/em>, you undertake not to sell through another agent or directly for a specified period; in return the agent commits additional marketing resources.<\/p>\n<p>A non-exclusive mandate allows you to list with multiple agencies, but it also dilutes the interest each agent will invest. For a non-resident seller who cannot easily monitor the local market, a carefully drafted exclusive mandate can be the more effective choice \u2014 provided the contractual duration remains reasonable and the commission structure transparent.<\/p>\n<p>The Cour de cassation has affirmed that the formal validity of the mandate is a matter of strict compliance with the <em>loi Hoguet<\/em>. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68c273c5def1b35fcc39fb25\">Cass. 3e civ., 11 September 2025, no. 23-17.579 (Bull.)<\/a>, the Third Civil Chamber ruled that the agent must hold a valid professional card at the date of signature of the mandate and that, so long as the card was in force \u2014 even if the place of issuance was not mentioned on the mandate \u2014 the mandate remains valid. The Court confirmed that the regulatory objective is to \u201cprotect the mandant\u201d (<em>prot\u00e9ger le mandant<\/em>) by ensuring the agent is licensed, not to create formal nullities for purely administrative omissions.<\/p>\n<p>A critical pitfall for non-resident sellers concerns post-mandate commission claims. The Cour de cassation held, in the same September 2025 decision, that if a mandate provides that the seller may not deal directly with a buyer introduced by the agent for a specified period after the mandate expires (typically 12 months), the seller who transacts after that period without the agent\u2019s involvement does not automatically owe a commission. The Court stated that \u201cla vente conclue, sans l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire de l\u2019agent, \u00e0 une p\u00e9riode o\u00f9 tant le mandat que la clause p\u00e9nale qu\u2019il contient ont \u00e9puis\u00e9 leurs effets, ne saurait donc justifier un droit \u00e0 commission de l\u2019agent\u201d \u2014 a sale concluded without the agent\u2019s intervention, at a time when both the mandate and the penalty clause it contains have exhausted their effects, cannot justify the agent\u2019s right to a commission. Non-resident sellers should therefore scrutinise the expiry and post-expiry restriction clauses of their mandate with particular care.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the agent\u2019s commission more broadly, the Cour de cassation has consistently held that an agent earns a commission only by effective intermediation. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/63fefbfc002ac605de15b296\">Cass. 3e civ., 1 March 2023, no. 21-22.073 (Bull.)<\/a>, the Court explained: \u201cle droit \u00e0 r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration de l\u2019agent immobilier, auquel un mandat de recherche a \u00e9t\u00e9 confi\u00e9, suppose une mise en relation entre le vendeur et l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur\u201d \u2014 the agent\u2019s right to remuneration, where a search mandate has been conferred, requires an actual introduction between seller and buyer. A non-resident seller should understand that a commission is not earned merely because the agent placed a listing online; it is earned when the agent brings a specific buyer who proceeds to purchase.<\/p>\n<h3>B. The Two-Stage Sale: From <em>Compromis<\/em> to <em>Acte Authentique<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>Under French law, the sale of real property is defined by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/id\/LEGITEXT000006070721\" class=\"kohen-legifrance-popup-link\" data-kohen-legifrance-url=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/id\/LEGITEXT000006070721\" data-kohen-legifrance-title=\"Texte officiel Legifrance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Article 1582 of the Civil Code<\/a>: \u201cLa vente est une convention par laquelle l\u2019un s\u2019oblige \u00e0 livrer une chose, et l\u2019autre \u00e0 la payer.\u201d (A sale is an agreement by which one party undertakes to deliver a thing, and the other to pay for it.) It may be concluded by private deed (<em>acte sous seing priv\u00e9<\/em>) or by authentic instrument (<em>acte authentique<\/em>). In practice, every property sale in France proceeds through two distinct stages.<\/p>\n<p>The first stage is the preliminary contract: either a <em>promesse unilat\u00e9rale de vente<\/em> (unilateral promise to sell) or a <em><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/avocats-droit-immobilier-paris\/avocat-compromis-vente-immobilier-paris\/\">compromis de vente<\/a><\/em> (synallagmatic sale agreement). Under a <em>compromis<\/em>, both parties are immediately bound \u2014 the seller to sell and the buyer to buy \u2014 subject only to the fulfilment of any <em>conditions suspensives<\/em> (suspensive conditions), typically the buyer obtaining financing. Under a <em>promesse unilat\u00e9rale<\/em>, the seller grants the buyer an option to purchase within a fixed period; the seller remains bound, but the buyer may decide not to proceed.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>promesse unilat\u00e9rale<\/em> typically requires the buyer to pay an <em>indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019immobilisation<\/em> (immobilisation indemnity), usually 5% to 10% of the sale price, which locks in the seller\u2019s commitment. The legal character of this sum was clarified by the Cour de cassation in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788ba6bc79691c828ecdbf0\">Cass. 3e civ., 16 January 2025, no. 23-23.378<\/a>. The Court held that the immobilisation indemnity \u201cne sanctionnant pas une inex\u00e9cution contractuelle mais repr\u00e9sentant le prix de l\u2019exclusivit\u00e9 accord\u00e9e aux b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires, celle-ci, qui ne constituait pas une clause p\u00e9nale, ne pouvait \u00eatre r\u00e9duite par le juge\u201d \u2014 since it does not sanction a contractual breach but rather represents the price of exclusivity granted to the beneficiaries, it does not constitute a penalty clause and cannot be reduced by the judge. This is an important protection for the non-resident seller: the sum secures genuine commitment from the buyer and cannot be challenged on grounds of disproportionality.<\/p>\n<p>For the seller, the preliminary contract is the moment when all material disclosures must be made. The <em>compromis<\/em> or <em>promesse<\/em> must be accompanied by a comprehensive <em>dossier de diagnostic technique<\/em> (technical diagnostic file), the content of which has been considerably strengthened in recent years. The seller who fails to provide a complete and current diagnostic file risks the annulment of the sale or a claim for damages.<\/p>\n<p>After the signing of the preliminary contract, a statutory 10-day cooling-off period (<em>d\u00e9lai de r\u00e9tractation<\/em>) runs in favour of the buyer (not the seller). During this period the buyer may withdraw without penalty; the seller cannot. Once the cooling-off period expires and suspensive conditions are satisfied, the parties proceed to the second stage: the <em>acte authentique de vente<\/em> (authentic deed of sale), signed before a French <em>notaire<\/em>. The <em>notaire<\/em> is a public officer who verifies title, collects taxes, registers the deed with the land registry (<em>service de la publicit\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re<\/em>), and ensures the transaction is legally watertight. For a non-resident seller, the <em>notaire<\/em> also plays the essential role of tax withholder: the capital gains tax due on the sale is calculated, withheld, and paid to the French tax authority directly by the <em>notaire<\/em> on the day of completion.<\/p>\n<h2>II. The Seller\u2019s Legal Obligations and Continuing Liability<\/h2>\n<h3>A. Pre-Contractual Disclosure and Diagnostic Obligations<\/h3>\n<p>The French Civil Code imposes on every seller a general duty of pre-contractual information. Article 1112-1 of the Civil Code (introduced by the 2016 contract law reform, Ordinance no. 2016-131) provides that a party who knows information of decisive importance for the consent of the other party must disclose it. This duty is reinforced by a growing body of case law addressing the seller\u2019s obligation to inform \u2014 and the consequences of failing to do so.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/64a65e7cbbd03a05db964fd7\">Cass. 3e civ., 6 July 2023, no. 22-12.461<\/a>, the Cour de cassation upheld a finding of liability against a property developer who had \u201cmanqu\u00e9 \u00e0 son obligation pr\u00e9contractuelle d\u2019information en s\u2019abstenant volontairement d\u2019attirer l\u2019attention de l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur sur une information d\u00e9terminante dont elle avait connaissance\u201d \u2014 breached its pre-contractual duty of information by voluntarily refraining from drawing the buyer\u2019s attention to decisive information of which it had knowledge. Although that case concerned a developer selling off-plan, the principle applies equally to private sellers: silence, when it conceals information that would have influenced the buyer\u2019s decision, constitutes a <em>r\u00e9ticence dolosive<\/em> (fraudulent concealment).<\/p>\n<p>The Cour de cassation further refined this doctrine in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/66863b74b1dbbe3bae5fff22\">Cass. 3e civ., 4 July 2024, no. 23-11.532<\/a>. That case involved sellers who had failed to disclose to the buyer that the chalet they were selling had been constructed under illegal conditions and was situated in a non-buildable zone. The Court stated that the sellers\u2019 \u201cdissimulation volontaire constitue une r\u00e9ticence dolosive de la part des vendeurs qui connaissaient le caract\u00e8re d\u00e9terminant pour l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur de cette information portant sur une caract\u00e9ristique essentielle de l\u2019immeuble, quand bien m\u00eame l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 aurait d\u00e9clar\u00e9 dans l\u2019acte de vente conna\u00eetre parfaitement le bien et avoir pris lui-m\u00eame aupr\u00e8s des services comp\u00e9tents tous renseignements concernant les r\u00e8gles d\u2019urbanisme s\u2019y appliquant, l\u2019erreur provoqu\u00e9e par la r\u00e9ticence dolosive \u00e9tant toujours excusable\u201d \u2014 the sellers\u2019 voluntary concealment constituted fraudulent concealment, since the sellers knew that this information, relating to an essential characteristic of the property, was decisive for the buyer, even though the buyer had declared in the deed of sale that he knew the property perfectly and had himself obtained all information concerning applicable urban planning rules from the competent services; an error provoked by fraudulent concealment is always excusable.<\/p>\n<p>The significance of this ruling for a non-resident seller is clear: the standard exculpatory clause found in many French sale deeds \u2014 in which the buyer declares having inspected the property and obtained all relevant information \u2014 does not protect the seller who has deliberately withheld material information. The duty to disclose is proactive, not reactive. A seller who knows of a latent defect, an urban planning restriction, an ongoing neighbour dispute, or a planned public works project affecting the property must disclose it, irrespective of whether the buyer asks.<\/p>\n<p>The technical diagnostic file (<em>dossier de diagnostic technique<\/em>, or DDT) gives concrete form to this disclosure obligation. Since the SRU Law of 2000 and subsequent reforms, the seller must provide the buyer with a series of mandatory surveys before the signing of the preliminary contract: an asbestos survey (<em>diagnostic amiante<\/em>), a lead exposure risk report (<em>constat de risque d\u2019exposition au plomb<\/em>, or CREP), an energy performance certificate (<em>diagnostic de performance \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique<\/em>, or DPE), a natural and technological risks statement (<em>\u00e9tat des risques naturels et technologiques<\/em>, or ERN), a termite survey in affected zones, a gas installation survey, an electrical installation survey, and a sanitation compliance certificate for properties not connected to mains drainage. For properties in a <em><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/droit-de-la-copropriete\/\">copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/a><\/em> (co-ownership), additional documents are required, including the <em>r\u00e8glement de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/em> (co-ownership regulations), the minutes of the last three general assemblies, and the <em>caract\u00e9ristiques de la copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/em> (a summary of the building\u2019s key characteristics).<\/p>\n<p>The seller who fails to provide a complete diagnostic file exposes the sale to serious risk. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6996b63ccdc6046d47eba5f0\">Cass. 3e civ., 19 February 2026, no. 24-10.524 (Bull.)<\/a>, the Cour de cassation addressed the specific obligation to update the natural risks statement. The Court held that if a <em>plan de pr\u00e9vention des risques naturels<\/em> (natural risk prevention plan, or PPRN) is approved between the signing of the preliminary contract and the signing of the authentic deed, the diagnostic file must be updated accordingly before the deed is signed. The Court stated that \u201csi, apr\u00e8s la promesse de vente, le plan de pr\u00e9vention des risques naturels pr\u00e9visibles a \u00e9t\u00e9 approuv\u00e9 avant la signature de l\u2019acte authentique, le dossier de diagnostic technique doit \u00eatre compl\u00e9t\u00e9 par une mise \u00e0 jour de l\u2019\u00e9tat des risques r\u00e9sultant du plan approuv\u00e9 valant <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/avocats-droit-immobilier-paris\/avocat-servitudes-immobilieres-paris\/\">servitude<\/a> d\u2019utilit\u00e9 publique\u201d \u2014 if, after the promesse de vente, the PPRN has been approved before the notarised deed is signed, the DDT must be supplemented by an update of the risk statement. Where the seller fails to do so, the buyer may seek rescission of the sale or a reduction of the price. For a non-resident seller whose transaction may take several months between the preliminary contract and completion \u2014 during which time municipal planning documents can change \u2014 this obligation to keep the diagnostic file current is a practical pitfall of considerable importance.<\/p>\n<p>For non-resident sellers of properties located in a <em>copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/em>, a further specific obligation applies. The seller must provide the <em>notaire<\/em> with the minutes of the last three general assemblies of co-owners and a certificate from the <em>syndic<\/em> (managing agent) confirming that all <em>charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9<\/em> (co-ownership charges) have been paid up to date. The buyer who later discovers undisclosed significant works voted before the sale but not disclosed may seek recourse against the seller on the basis of the pre-contractual information obligation.<\/p>\n<h3>B. Post-Sale Guarantees: Hidden Defects, Undisclosed Servitudes, and Eviction<\/h3>\n<p>Once the sale is completed, the seller does not simply walk away. The French Civil Code imposes several continuing guarantees, some of which can survive for many years after the transfer of ownership. The non-resident seller who imagines that the transaction is definitively closed upon receipt of the sale proceeds may be unpleasantly surprised.<\/p>\n<p>The first and most practically significant is the <em>garantie des <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/avocat-vices-caches-immobilier-paris\/\">vices cach\u00e9s<\/a><\/em> (warranty against hidden defects), governed by Articles 1641 to 1649 of the Civil Code. Article 1641 provides that a seller is liable for latent defects in the thing sold which render it unfit for its intended use, or which impair that use to such an extent that the buyer would not have acquired it, or would only have given a lesser price for it, had the buyer known of them. The defect must have existed before the sale, must be hidden (not apparent on reasonable inspection), and must be sufficiently serious. The buyer must bring an action within two years of discovering the defect (<em>d\u00e9lai de prescription<\/em>), subject to an overall limit of twenty years from the sale. The buyer may elect either to return the property and obtain restitution of the price (<em>action r\u00e9dhibitoire<\/em>) or to keep the property and claim a reduction in the price (<em>action estimatoire<\/em>), in addition to damages where the seller knew of the defect.<\/p>\n<p>Many French sale deeds include a clause purporting to exclude the seller\u2019s liability for hidden defects. However, the case law imposes significant limits on the effectiveness of such clauses. The general rule, reiterated consistently by the Cour de cassation, is that a seller who knows of a defect and fails to disclose it to the buyer cannot rely on a clause excluding the warranty against hidden defects \u2014 the clause is inoperative against a seller of bad faith. It is therefore risky for a seller to sign a deed containing a standard exclusion clause while withholding knowledge of a defect: the clause will fall away if the buyer can prove the seller\u2019s knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>The second continuing guarantee is the <em>garantie d\u2019\u00e9viction<\/em> (warranty against eviction), governed by Articles 1626 to 1640 of the Civil Code. Article 1626 provides that the seller is bound by operation of law to guarantee the buyer against eviction from all or part of the thing sold, or against charges claimed on that thing and not declared at the time of the sale. This guarantee has two aspects: the guarantee against the seller\u2019s own acts (<em>garantie du fait personnel<\/em>) and the guarantee against third-party claims (<em>garantie du fait des tiers<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>Within this framework, Article 1638 addresses the specific situation of undisclosed non-apparent servitudes (easements). The Cour de cassation delivered an important clarification of this provision in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/64a65d23bbd03a05db964e3f\">Cass. 3e civ., 6 July 2023, no. 22-13.179 (Bull.)<\/a>. The case concerned buyers who discovered, after purchasing a house, an underground public sewage pipe running through their property \u2014 a servitude that had never been declared. The Court held: \u201cl\u2019importance de la servitude occulte exig\u00e9e par l\u2019article 1638 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 ne conditionne que la r\u00e9siliation de la vente, et non l\u2019indemnisation du pr\u00e9judice pouvant r\u00e9sulter pour l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur de toute servitude non apparente non d\u00e9clar\u00e9e lors de la vente\u201d \u2014 the importance of the hidden servitude required by Article 1638 conditions only the rescission of the sale, and not the compensation of the loss that may result for the buyer from any non-apparent servitude not declared at the time of the sale. In other words, even a minor undisclosed servitude \u2014 one that would not have prevented the sale \u2014 entitles the buyer to damages proportionate to the diminution in value. Only the more drastic remedy of rescission requires that the servitude be of sufficient importance to presume that the buyer would not have purchased.<\/p>\n<p>The scope of the warranty against hidden servitudes was further clarified in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67adc54dff4fdee7ba5c51fa\">Cass. 3e civ., 13 February 2025, no. 23-17.636 (Bull.)<\/a>. This case involved a sale deed containing a clause stating that the buyer took the property in its condition as of the day of sale and had \u201cno recourse against the seller for any cause whatsoever, including in respect of apparent defects or hidden defects\u201d (<em>aucun recours contre le vendeur pour quelque cause que ce soit, notamment en raison des vices apparents, des vices cach\u00e9s<\/em>). The buyer subsequently discovered an undisclosed underground waste-water network. The Court held that the clause, which concerned the physical state of the property, did not expressly exclude the warranty against hidden servitudes. The Court stated the principle clearly: \u201c\u00e0 d\u00e9faut de clause expresse contraire, le vendeur est tenu de la garantie des servitudes non apparentes non d\u00e9clar\u00e9es lors de la vente\u201d \u2014 in the absence of an express clause to the contrary, the seller is bound by the warranty against non-apparent servitudes not declared at the time of the sale.<\/p>\n<p>This is a critical point for the non-resident seller. The standard exclusion clauses found in many French sale deeds \u2014 clauses excluding liability for \u201cvices apparents\u201d (apparent defects) or \u201cvices cach\u00e9s\u201d (hidden defects) \u2014 do not, in and of themselves, exclude the seller\u2019s warranty against undisclosed easements. That warranty arises from a separate legal regime (the warranty against eviction under Articles 1626 and following), and the Cour de cassation requires that any exclusion of that warranty be express. A non-resident seller who is aware of an informal right of way, an underground pipeline, or a shared access arrangement affecting the property must, at a minimum, ensure that the sale deed formally declares it \u2014 and ideally, that the buyer explicitly acknowledges the declaration. Silence invites a claim for damages, potentially years after the sale.<\/p>\n<p>For the non-resident seller, the practical implications of this legal framework are threefold. First, before listing the property, engage a local professional to review the title deeds and identify any servitudes, both declared and undeclared but known from use. Second, instruct the <em>notaire<\/em> handling the sale to include in the <em>compromis<\/em> and the <em>acte authentique<\/em> a comprehensive declaration of all servitudes affecting the property. Third, consider whether the sale should be accompanied by a specific warranty agreement \u2014 particularly if the buyer is a fellow non-resident who may lack independent means of investigating the property\u2019s legal status.<\/p>\n<p>It is also worth noting that the seller\u2019s disclosure obligations under French law are not limited to the documents listed in the diagnostic file. The seller who has carried out unauthorised works (<em>travaux sans autorisation<\/em>) \u2014 for example, an extension, a pool, or a conversion of a garage \u2014 must disclose this to the buyer, even if no formal diagnostic obligation applies. The buyer who later faces an enforcement notice from the <em>mairie<\/em> (town hall) will have a strong claim against the seller, on the dual grounds of the pre-contractual duty of information and the warranty against eviction. For a non-resident seller who may have purchased the property years earlier without full awareness of the planning history, a review of the <em>certificat d\u2019urbanisme<\/em> (planning certificate) and the building\u2019s planning file at the <em>mairie<\/em> before marketing the property is a prudent precaution.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Selling a property in France as a non-resident is a legally structured transaction, not an informal private arrangement. From the drafting of the estate agent\u2019s mandate through the diagnostic dossier, the preliminary contract, the authentic deed, and the post-sale warranties, French law imposes on the seller a coherent set of obligations that cannot be avoided by silence, by geographical distance, or by standard-form exclusion clauses.<\/p>\n<p>The Cour de cassation\u2019s rulings in recent years have consistently reinforced the seller\u2019s duty of proactive disclosure \u2014 particularly concerning hidden defects, undisclosed servitudes, and urban planning restrictions \u2014 and have narrowed the effectiveness of boilerplate exemption clauses. A non-resident seller who understands the architecture of these obligations, prepares the diagnostic file rigorously, and engages a <em>notaire<\/em> with experience in cross-border transactions will be well placed to complete the sale efficiently and with minimal exposure to post-completion claims. Those who treat the transaction as a merely administrative formality, by contrast, run a real risk of finding themselves before a French court years after they believed the matter was closed.<\/p>\n<p>For foreign owners seeking assistance with the sale of their French property \u2014 from the initial mandate to the authentic deed and the management of post-sale warranties \u2014 the real estate team at <a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/real-estate-law-attorneys-paris-75017\/\">Kohen Avocats<\/a> provides English-language legal support throughout the process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. Preparing the Sale: Mandate and Pre-Contractual Phase A. Engaging an Estate Agent: The Mandat de Vente When you decide to sell your French property as a non-resident, your first practical decision is whether to engage a French estate agent (agent immobilier) or to proceed privately. Most non-resident sellers choose to work with an agent, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":251031309,"featured_media":16426,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kj_source_type":"","_kj_official_id":"","_kj_official_url":"","_kj_judilibre_id":"","_kj_jur":"","_kj_lieu":"","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"","_kj_date":"","activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":4,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"federated","footnotes":""},"categories":[79307],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2046409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-en-real-estate"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.2 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I. Preparing the Sale: Mandate and Pre-Contractual Phase A. Engaging an Estate Agent: The Mandat de Vente When you decide to sell your French property as a non-resident, your first practical decision is whether to engage a French estate agent (agent immobilier) or to proceed privately. Most non-resident sellers choose to work with an agent, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"7000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"5000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\"},\"headline\":\"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3530,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"French real estate law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"citation\":\"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"French real estate law\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/\",\"name\":\"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":7000,\"height\":5000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/19\\\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners","og_description":"I. Preparing the Sale: Mandate and Pre-Contractual Phase A. Engaging an Estate Agent: The Mandat de Vente When you decide to sell your French property as a non-resident, your first practical decision is whether to engage a French estate agent (agent immobilier) or to proceed privately. Most non-resident sellers choose to work with an agent, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":7000,"height":5000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd"},"headline":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners","datePublished":"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/"},"wordCount":3530,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["French real estate law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","citation":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"French real estate law"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/","name":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners - Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, Real Estate and Business Law Attorney in Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-19T11:11:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-19T11:12:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp","width":7000,"height":5000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/19\/selling-property-france-non-resident-guide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Selling Property in France as a Non-Resident: A Legal Guide for Foreign Owners"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Reda Kohen, attorney specialized in real estate and business law in Paris, advises and assists companies and individuals in their real estate, commercial and contractual transactions. He also handles real estate litigation and the resolution of complex commercial disputes.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6254a643e6239d803134a01c800381bd","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/251031309"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2046409"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2046411,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2046409\/revisions\/2046411"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2046409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2046409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2046409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}